UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State of incorporation or organization)

33-11491

(Commission File No.)

34-1755769

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

225 West Washington Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

(Address of principal executive offices)

(317) 636-1600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes   x       No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer:

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer x

 

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   o       No   x

Registrant has no common stock outstanding.

 




Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Form 10-Q

INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

Page

Part I — Financial Information

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005

 

3

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

 

4

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

 

5

 

 

 

 

Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

6

 

 

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

15

 

 

Item 3.

 

Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk

 

28

 

 

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

29

Part II — Other Information

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

29

 

 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

29

 

 

Item 5.

 

Other Information

 

29

 

 

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

30

Signatures

 

31

 

2




Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except unit amounts)

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment properties, at cost

 

 

$

22,227,899

 

 

$

21,745,309

 

Less—accumulated depreciation

 

 

4,348,676

 

 

3,809,293

 

 

 

 

17,879,223

 

 

17,936,016

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

322,952

 

 

337,048

 

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

 

 

312,948

 

 

357,079

 

Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity

 

 

1,492,522

 

 

1,562,595

 

Deferred costs and other assets

 

 

995,973

 

 

938,301

 

Total assets

 

 

$

21,003,618

 

 

$

21,131,039

 

LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgages and other indebtedness

 

 

$

14,241,941

 

 

$

14,106,117

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue

 

 

1,036,219

 

 

1,092,334

 

Cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity

 

 

233,902

 

 

194,476

 

Other liabilities, minority interest, and accrued distributions

 

 

179,731

 

 

163,524

 

Total liabilities

 

 

15,691,793

 

 

15,556,451

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.75%/8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 850,698 units issued
and outstanding, respectively, at liquidation value

 

 

85,070

 

 

85,070

 

PARTNERS’ EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred units, 32,610,345 and 32,900,856 units outstanding, respectively. Liquidation values $1,384,654,064 and $1,398,263, respectively

 

 

1,383,025

 

 

1,396,679

 

General Partner, 221,290,143 and 220,361,581 units outstanding, respectively

 

 

3,031,740

 

 

3,227,274

 

Limited Partners, 58,316,657 and 58,522,624 units outstanding, respectively

 

 

811,990

 

 

865,565

 

Total partners’ equity

 

 

5,226,755

 

 

5,489,518

 

Total liabilities and partners’ equity

 

 

$

21,003,618

 

 

$

21,131,039

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3




Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

 

 

For the Three
Months Ended
September 30,

 

For the Nine 
Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

REVENUE:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum rent

 

$

500,589

 

$

475,912

 

$

1,474,503

 

$

1,406,461

 

Overage rent

 

21,931

 

18,484

 

53,287

 

46,276

 

Tenant reimbursements

 

233,278

 

225,973

 

681,090

 

648,926

 

Management fees and other revenues

 

20,780

 

19,746

 

60,348

 

56,931

 

Other income

 

42,158

 

42,894

 

135,895

 

118,469

 

Total revenue

 

818,736

 

783,009

 

2,405,123

 

2,277,063

 

EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating

 

118,185

 

115,742

 

331,389

 

315,827

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

211,390

 

203,022

 

632,200

 

617,814

 

Real estate taxes

 

73,427

 

74,558

 

225,636

 

217,175

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

23,910

 

22,637

 

74,704

 

75,250

 

Advertising and promotion

 

17,718

 

20,974

 

55,661

 

57,736

 

Provision for credit losses

 

393

 

2,727

 

4,853

 

3,331

 

Home and regional office costs

 

32,703

 

27,068

 

95,691

 

85,060

 

General and administrative

 

4,422

 

4,988

 

13,920

 

13,239

 

Other

 

15,264

 

12,455

 

40,492

 

34,375

 

Total operating expenses

 

497,412

 

484,171

 

1,474,546

 

1,419,807

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

321,324

 

298,838

 

930,577

 

857,256

 

Interest expense

 

206,195

 

201,150

 

611,010

 

594,136

 

Income before minority interest

 

115,129

 

97,688

 

319,567

 

263,120

 

Minority interest

 

(3,154

)

(3,174

)

(7,512

)

(8,734

)

Income tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries

 

(2,536

)

(3,796

)

(7,395

)

(11,216

)

Income before unconsolidated entities

 

109,439

 

90,718

 

304,660

 

243,170

 

Income from unconsolidated entities and beneficial interests, net

 

25,898

 

18,662

 

75,703

 

51,045

 

Gain (loss) on sales of assets and interests in other unconsolidated entities, net

 

9,457

 

(55

)

51,406

 

12,552

 

Income from continuing operations

 

144,794

 

109,325

 

431,769

 

306,767

 

Results of operations from discontinued operations

 

56

 

4,695

 

112

 

8,110

 

Gain on disposal or sale of discontinued operations, net

 

 

5,605

 

84

 

125,385

 

NET INCOME

 

144,850

 

119,625

 

431,965

 

440,262

 

Preferred unit requirement

 

(25,296

)

(25,407

)

(76,018

)

(76,485

)

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO UNITHOLDERS

 

$

119,554

 

$

94,218

 

$

355,947

 

$

363,777

 

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO UNITHOLDERS ATTRIBUTABLE TO:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

$

94,592

 

$

74,358

 

$

281,477

 

$

286,236

 

Limited Partners

 

24,962

 

19,860

 

74,470

 

77,541

 

Net income

 

$

119,554

 

$

94,218

 

$

355,947

 

$

363,777

 

BASIC EARNINGS PER UNIT:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.30

 

$

1.27

 

$

0.82

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.04

 

 

0.48

 

Net income

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.34

 

$

1.27

 

$

1.30

 

DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.30

 

$

1.27

 

$

0.82

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.04

 

 

0.48

 

Net income

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.34

 

$

1.27

 

$

1.30

 

Net Income

 

$

144,850

 

$

119,625

 

$

431,965

 

$

440,262

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedge agreements

 

(4,030

)

(1,385

)

7,354

 

(10,212

)

Net income on derivative instruments reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense

 

504

 

152

 

1,718

 

(1,139

)

Currency translation adjustments

 

962

 

(2,277

)

(262

)

(3,923

)

Other income (loss)

 

1,196

 

(104

)

721

 

(421

)

Comprehensive Income

 

$

143,482

 

$

116,011

 

$

441,496

 

$

424,567

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4




Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

For the Nine Months
Ended September 30,

 

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

431,965

 

$

440,262

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided

 

 

 

 

 

 

by operating activities —

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

599,985

 

602,209

 

 

Gain on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities

 

(51,406

)

(12,552

)

 

Gain on disposal or sale of discontinued operations, net

 

(84

)

(125,385

)

 

Straight-line rent

 

(12,334

)

(15,317

)

 

Minority interest

 

7,512

 

8,734

 

 

Minority interest distributions

 

(24,563

)

(16,135

)

 

Equity in income of unconsolidated entities

 

(75,703

)

(51,045

)

 

Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities

 

60,724

 

62,367

 

 

Changes in assets and liabilities —

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

 

56,064

 

68,229

 

 

Deferred costs and other assets

 

(119,943

)

(132,476

)

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, deferred revenues and other liabilities

 

23,882

 

(101,724

)

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

896,099

 

727,167

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures, net

 

(533,696

)

(420,400

)

 

Cash impact from the consolidation and de-consolidation of properties

 

 

(8,951

)

 

Net proceeds from sale of partnership interest, other assets and discontinued operations

 

103,158

 

330,187

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

(134,398

)

(17,426

)

 

Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities and other

 

245,796

 

228,098

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(319,140

)

111,508

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership contributions and issuance of units

 

13,172

 

2,667

 

 

Purchase of preferred units, partnership units, and treasury units

 

(13,625

)

(176,939

)

 

Preferred Unit redemptions

 

(494

)

(579

)

 

Partnership distributions

 

(712,926

)

(664,772

)

 

Mortgage and other indebtedness proceeds, net of transaction costs

 

3,431,483

 

2,941,901

 

 

Mortgage and other indebtedness principal payments

 

(3,308,665

)

(3,037,718

)

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(591,055

)

(935,440

)

 

DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

(14,096

)

(96,765

)

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year

 

337,048

 

519,556

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period

 

$

322,952

 

$

422,791

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5




Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

1.   Organization

Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), is a majority owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Simon Property”). Simon Property is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In these condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.

We are engaged primarily in the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate, primarily regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers and community/lifestyle centers. As of September 30, 2006, we owned or held an interest in 284 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 170 regional malls, 69 community/lifestyle centers, 35 Premium Outlet centers and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 38 states and Puerto Rico (collectively, the “Properties”, and individually, a “Property”). We also own interests in eight parcels of land held in the United States for future development (together with the Properties, the “Portfolio”). Finally, we have ownership interests in 52 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland); five Premium Outlet centers in Japan; and one Premium Outlet center in Mexico.

2.   Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries, and all significant inter-company amounts have been eliminated. Due to the seasonal nature of certain operational activities, the results for the interim period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be obtained for the full fiscal year.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of September 30, 2006, of our 342 properties we consolidated 197 wholly-owned properties and 19 additional properties that are less than wholly-owned, but which we control or for which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for the remaining 126 properties using the equity method of accounting (joint venture properties). We manage the day-to-day operations of 58 of the 126 joint venture properties but have determined that our partner or partners have substantive participating rights in regards to the assets and operations of these joint venture properties.

We allocate our net operating results after preferred distributions based on our partners’ respective weighted average ownership interest in the Operating Partnership. In addition, Simon Property owns certain of our preferred units. Simon Property’s weighted average ownership interest in the Operating Partnership was 79.1% and 78.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Simon Property’s ownership interest in us was 79.1% and 79.0%, respectively. We adjust the limited partners’ interest at the end of each period to reflect their respective ownership interest in the Operating Partnership.

6




We made certain reclassifications of prior period amounts in the financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on net income previously reported. Also, the statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods ended September 30, 2005 have been reclassified to reflect significant dispositions of properties sold.

3.   Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We collect funds at the point of sale and then remit those funds to the banks that issue our co-branded gift cards for further processing. As a result, cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2006 includes $26.8 million related to these gift card programs, which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes.

Accounting for Beneficial Interests in Mall of America

As previously disclosed, in January 2006, an entity controlled by the Simon family assigned to us its right to receive cash flow, capital distributions, and related profits and losses with respect to a portion of its ownership interest in the Mall of America through Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”). The beneficial interest was transferred subject to a credit facility repayable from MOAA’s distributions from the property. As a result of this assignment, we began recognizing our share of MOAA’s income during the first quarter of 2006, including the proportionate share of earnings of MOAA since August 2004 through the first quarter of 2006 of $10.2 million. This income is included with “income from unconsolidated entities and beneficial interests, net” in our consolidated results of operations. We have accounted for our beneficial interests in MOAA under the equity method of accounting. On November 2, 2006, the Simon family entity transferred its partnership interest to an affiliate of another partner in MOAA as part of a settlement of pending litigation disclosed in Note 8, terminating our beneficial interests. We will cease recording income from this property’s operations as a result of this transaction. We also expect to record a gain during the fourth quarter of 2006 of approximately $85 million.

4.   Per Unit Data

We determine basic earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period. We determine diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common units were converted into units at the earliest date possible. The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per unit.

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

 

For the Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

Income from continuing operations, after preferred unit requirements

 

$

119,498

 

$

83,918

 

$

355,751

 

$

230,282

 

Discontinued operations

 

56

 

10,300

 

196

 

133,495

 

Net Income available to Unitholders - Basic & Dilutive

 

$

119,554

 

$

94,218

 

$

355,947

 

$

363,777

 

Weighted Average Units Outstanding - Basic

 

279,573,123

 

279,728,163

 

279,375,365

 

280,095,303

 

Effect of stock options of Simon Property

 

871,604

 

932,289

 

910,977

 

906,661

 

Weighted Average Units Outstanding - Diluted

 

280,444,727

 

280,660,452

 

280,286,342

 

281,001,964

 

 

For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2006, potentially dilutive securities include stock options of Simon Property and certain preferred units which are exchangeable for units. The only potentially dilutive securities that had a dilutive effect for the three and nine months ended September 30,

7




2006 and 2005 were stock options of Simon Property. When stock options are exercised we issue an equal number of units to Simon Property. Common units may be exchanged for shares of Simon Property common stock, on a one-for one basis, in certain circumstances. We accrue distributions when they are declared.

5.   Investment in Unconsolidated Entities

Real Estate Joint Ventures

Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties, and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio. We held joint venture ownership interests in 68 Properties in the United States as of September 30, 2006 and 69 at December 31, 2005. We held interests in two joint ventures which owned 52 European shopping centers as of September 30, 2006 and  December 31, 2005. We also held an interest in five joint venture properties in Japan and one joint venture property in Mexico. We account for these Properties using the equity method of accounting.

Substantially all of our joint venture Properties are subject to rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, or other sale rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which results in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the joint venture interest.

On November 1, 2006, we acquired our partner’s 50% ownership interest in Mall of Georgia, a regional mall Property, for $252.6 million, including the assumption of our $96.0 million share of debt. As a result, we now own 100% of Mall of Georgia and will consolidate this Property beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006.

International Joint Venture Investments

We conduct our international operations in Europe through our two European joint venture investment entities; Simon Ivanhoe B.V./S.à.r.l. (“Simon Ivanhoe”), which was formerly known as European Retail Enterprises B.V./S.à.r.l (“ERE”), and Gallerie Commerciali Italia (“GCI”). The carrying amount of our total combined investment in these two joint venture investments is $337.8 million and $287.4 million as of  September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, net of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The Operating Partnership has a 50% ownership in Simon Ivanhoe and a 49% ownership in GCI as of September 30, 2006.

On October 20, 2005, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, effectively acquired our former partner’s 39.5% ownership interest in ERE. On February 13, 2006, pursuant to the terms of our October 20, 2005 transaction with Ivanhoe, we sold a 10.5% interest in this joint venture to Ivanhoe for 45.2 million, or $53.9 million, and recorded a gain on the disposition of $34.4 million. This gain is reported in “gain on sales of assets and interests in other unconsolidated entities, net” in the consolidated statements of operations. We then settled all remaining share purchase commitments from the founders of ERE, including the early settlement of some commitments, by purchasing an additional 25.8% interest in Simon Ivanhoe for 55.1 million, or $65.5 million. The result of these transactions equalized our and Ivanhoe’s ownership in Simon Ivanhoe to 50% each.

We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in Japan through joint venture partnerships with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. and Sojitz Corporation (formerly known as Nissho Iwai Corporation). The carrying amount of our investment in these Premium Outlet joint ventures in Japan is $282.9 million and $287.7 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, net of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The Operating Partnership has a 40% ownership in the Japan Premium Outlet joint ventures.

8




During the period ended September 30, 2006, we finalized the formation of joint venture arrangements to develop and operate retail centers in China with Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund (MSREF) and SZITIC Commercial Property Co., Ltd. (SZITIC CP), retail property subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned trust and investment firm Shenzen International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. (SZITIC), as our partners. The centers will be anchored by Wal-Mart stores and our and MSREF’s ownership will each be 32.5% with SZITIC CP owning 35%. We are planning on initially developing five centers, four of which are currently under construction, with a total equity commitment of approximately $50 million. We account for these investments in China under the equity method of accounting.

Summary Financial Information

Summary financial information of all of our joint ventures and a summary of our investment in and share of income from such joint ventures follow. We condensed into separate line items major captions of the statements of operations for joint venture interests sold or consolidated. Consolidation occurs when we acquire an additional interest in the joint venture and, as a result, gain unilateral control of the Property or are determined to be the primary beneficiary. We reclassify these line items into “discontinued joint venture interests” on the balance sheets and statements of operations, if material, so that we may present comparative results of operations for those joint venture interests held as of September 30, 2006.

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

BALANCE SHEETS

 

2006

 

2005

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment properties, at cost

 

$

10,565,734

 

 

$

9,915,521

 

 

Less - accumulated depreciation

 

2,191,105

 

 

1,951,749

 

 

 

 

8,374,629

 

 

7,963,772

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

379,053

 

 

334,714

 

 

Tenant receivables

 

235,336

 

 

207,153

 

 

Investment in unconsolidated entities

 

184,570

 

 

135,914

 

 

Deferred costs and other assets

 

325,337

 

 

304,825

 

 

Total assets

 

$

9,498,925

 

 

$

8,946,378

 

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgages and other indebtedness

 

$

8,166,550

 

 

$

7,479,359

 

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and deferred revenue

 

495,539

 

 

403,390

 

 

Other liabilities

 

227,673

 

 

189,722

 

 

Total liabilities

 

8,889,762

 

 

8,072,471

 

 

Preferred units

 

67,450

 

 

67,450

 

 

Partners’ equity

 

541,713

 

 

806,457

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ equity

 

$

9,498,925

 

 

$

8,946,378

 

 

Our Share of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

4,090,724

 

 

$

3,765,258

 

 

Partners’ equity

 

$

360,992

 

 

$

429,942

 

 

Add: Excess investment

 

897,628

 

 

938,177

 

 

Our net investment in joint ventures

 

$

1,258,620

 

 

$

1,368,119

 

 

Mortgages and other indebtedness

 

$

3,526,859

 

 

$

3,169,662

 

 

 

“Excess Investment” represents the unamortized difference of our investment over our share of the equity in the underlying net assets of the joint ventures acquired. We amortize excess investment over the life of the related Properties, typically no greater than 40 years, and the amortization is included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

9




 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

 

For the Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum rent

 

$

276,572

 

$

262,663

 

$

813,217

 

$

774,671

 

Overage rent

 

19,621

 

17,074

 

52,312

 

48,677

 

Tenant reimbursements

 

143,194

 

134,384

 

405,910

 

390,522

 

Other income

 

41,071

 

38,843

 

110,842

 

96,188

 

Total revenue

 

480,458

 

452,964

 

1,382,281

 

1,310,058

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating

 

103,044

 

100,477

 

280,263

 

271,796

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

82,840

 

81,546

 

241,959

 

241,036

 

Real estate taxes

 

35,265

 

33,186

 

102,654

 

98,477

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

20,678

 

19,088

 

62,402

 

58,559

 

Advertising and promotion

 

11,594

 

7,956

 

26,309

 

23,780

 

Provision for credit losses

 

2,425

 

2,679

 

4,087

 

7,769

 

Other

 

26,414

 

29,136

 

86,884

 

82,818

 

Total operating expenses

 

282,260

 

274,068

 

804,558

 

784,235

 

Operating Income

 

198,198

 

178,896

 

577,723

 

525,823

 

Interest expense

 

113,400

 

103,438

 

331,028

 

298,162

 

Income Before Gain on Sale of Asset

 

84,798

 

75,458

 

246,695

 

227,661

 

Gain on sale of asset

 

 

 

94

 

 

Income Before Unconsolidated Entities

 

84,798

 

75,458

 

246,789

 

227,661

 

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities

 

480

 

 

719

 

(1,892

)

Income from Continuing Operations

 

85,278

 

75,458

 

247,508

 

225,769

 

Income (loss) from discontinued joint venture interests

 

129

 

(1,025

)

631

 

(887

)

Gain (loss) on disposal or sale of discontinued operations, net

 

(329

)

 

20,375

 

98,359

 

Net Income

 

$

85,078

 

$

74,433

 

$

268,514

 

$

323,241

 

Third-Party Investors’ Share of Net Income

 

$

51,049

 

$

45,578

 

$

160,488

 

$

186,617

 

Our Share of Net Income

 

34,029

 

28,855

 

108,026

 

136,624

 

Amortization of Excess Investment

 

(12,164

)

(10,221

)

(37,056

)

(36,400

)

Income from Beneficial Interests and Other, net

 

4,033

 

 

15,309

 

 

Write-off of Investment Related to Properties Sold

 

135

 

14

 

(2,842

)

(37,764

)

Our Share of Net Gain Related to Properties Sold

 

(135

)

14

 

(7,734

)

(11,415

)

Income from Unconsolidated Entities and Beneficial Interests, net

 

$

25,898

 

$

18,662

 

$

75,703

 

$

51,045

 

 

On January 11, 2005, Metrocenter, a joint venture regional mall property was sold. We recognized our share of the gain of $11.8 million, net of the write-off of the related investment and received $62.6 million representing our share of the proceeds from this disposition.

On April 25, 2006, Great Northeast Plaza, a joint venture community center was sold. We recognized our share of the gain of $7.7 million, net of the write-off of the related investment and received $8.8 million representing our share of the proceeds from this disposition.

Our share of the gain resulting from the sale of Metrocenter and Great Northeast Plaza are shown separately in “gain (loss) on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, net” in the consolidated statement of operations.

10




6.   Debt

Unsecured Debt

On March 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services raised its corporate credit rating for us to ‘A-’ from ‘BBB+’ which resulted in a decrease in the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our unsecured revolving $3 billion credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to 37.5 basis points over LIBOR from 42.5 basis points over LIBOR. The revision to our rating also decreased the facility fee on the Credit Facility to 12.5 basis points from 15 basis points.

On May 15, 2006, we sold two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $800 million at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.93%. The first tranche is $400.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.75% due May 1, 2012 and the second tranche is $400.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 6.10% due May 1, 2016. We used the proceeds of the offering and the termination of forward-starting swap arrangements to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.

On August 29, 2006, we sold two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $1.1 billion at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.73%. The first tranche is $600.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.60% due September 1, 2011 and the second tranche is $500.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.875% due March 1, 2017. We used proceeds from the offering to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.

Credit Facility.   Other significant draws on the Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were as follows:

Draw
Date

 

Draw
Amount

 

Use of Credit Line Proceeds

01/03/06

 

$ 59,075

 

Repayment of a Term Loan (CPG Partners, L.P.), which had a rate of 7.26%.

01/06/06

 

140,000

 

Repayment of a mortgage, which had a rate of LIBOR plus 138 basis points.

01/20/06

 

300,000

 

Repayment of unsecured notes, which had a fixed rate of 7.375%.

03/27/06

 

600,000

 

Early repayment of the $1.8 billion facility we used to finance our acquisition of
   Chelsea Property Group, Inc. (Chelsea) in 2004.

04/03/06

 

58,000

 

Repayment of two secured mortgages which each bore interest at 8.25%.

 

Other amounts drawn on the Credit Facility were primarily for general working capital purposes. We repaid a total of $2.0 billion on the Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The total outstanding balance on the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2006 was $291.4 million, and the maximum amount outstanding during the quarter was approximately $1.3 billion. During the first nine months of 2006, the weighted average outstanding balance on the Credit Facility was approximately $1.3 billion.

Acquisition Facility.   We borrowed $1.8 billion in 2004 to finance the cash portion of our acquisition of Chelsea. As disclosed above, this facility has been fully repaid.

Secured Debt

Total secured indebtedness was $4.3 billion and $4.6 billion at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we repaid $217.7 million in mortgage loans, unencumbering four properties.

7.   Partners’ Equity

Under The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, on February 21, 2006, the Compensation Committee of Simon Property’s Board of Directors awarded 426,750 restricted shares of Simon Property common stock to employees under this Plan at a fair value of $83.48 per share. On May 11,

11




2006, our non-employee Directors were awarded 9,660 shares of restricted stock under this Plan at a fair value of $81.26 per share. The fair market value of the restricted stock awarded on February 21, 2006 has been deferred and is being amortized over a four-year vesting service period. The fair market value of the restricted stock awarded on May 11, 2006 has been deferred and is being amortized over a one-year vesting service period. As a result of the awards of restricted stock, we issued a like number of units to Simon Property in accordance with our partnership agreement.

During the first nine months of 2006, five limited partners exchanged 86,800 units for a like number of shares of common stock of Simon Property, increasing Simon Property’s interest in us.

On May 12, 2006, the Simon Property Board of Directors authorized a common stock repurchase program under which Simon Property may purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of its common stock subject to a maximum aggregate purchase price of $250 million over the next twelve months as market conditions warrant. Simon Property may purchase the shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. There have been no purchases under this program since May, 2006.

As previously disclosed, for the quarter ending on March 31, 2006, holders of Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units (“Series I Preferred Units”) and Simon Property’s Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series I Preferred Stock”) could elect to convert their securities during the quarter beginning on April 3, 2006 into units in the Operating Partnership and shares of Simon Property common stock, respectively. The optional conversion is as a result of the closing sale price of Simon Property’s common stock exceeding the applicable trigger price per share for a period of 20 trading days in the last 30 trading days of the quarter. The conversion trigger price was also met during the second quarter of 2006. At the current conversion price of $79.48, each Series I Preferred Unit was convertible into 0.78637 of a common unit and each share of Series I Preferred Stock was convertible into 0.78637 of a share of Simon Property common stock. If holders of a Series I Preferred Unit convert into common units, then the holder may also elect to convert those units into common stock on a one-for-one basis in accordance with our partnership agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, 238,982 shares of Series I Preferred Stock were converted into 187,593 shares of Simon Property common stock and Simon Property converted a like number of its Series I Preferred Units into common units. As of September 30, 2006, the conversion trigger price of $79.37 had been met and the Series I Preferred Unit is convertible into 0.78745 of a common unit and the Series I Preferred Stock is convertible into 0.78745 of a share of Simon Property common stock beginning October 2, 2006 through December 29, 2006.

Subsequent to September 30, 2006, Simon Property redeemed all 8,000,000 outstanding shares of its 8¾% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share plus accrued unpaid dividends. Concurrently with that redemption, we redeemed the 8¾% preferred units held by Simon Property at that same price. We will record a $7 million charge to net income during the fourth quarter of 2006 related to these transactions.

Preferred units whose redemption is outside of our control have been classified as temporary equity in the accompanying balance sheets.

8.   Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

There have been no material developments since July 1, 2006 with respect to the pending litigation disclosed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except that on November 2, all parties agreed to settle the lawsuit brought by Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. on November 9, 1999 in the Federal District Court for the State of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial District (Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. vs. Melvin Simon et al.). As disclosed in note 3 to these consolidated financial statements, the settlement terminated our beneficial

12




interest in Mall of America. This action was dismissed, with prejudice, and mutual releases were delivered by all parties to the proceeding.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such routine litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Guarantees of Indebtedness

Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture, and is typically secured by the joint venture Property, which is non-recourse to us. As of September 30, 2006, we have loan guarantees and other guarantee obligations of $68.8 million and $99.6 million, respectively, to support our total $3.5 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness in the event that the joint venture partnership defaults under the terms of the underlying arrangement. Mortgages which are guaranteed by us are secured by the property of the joint venture and that property could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation.

9.   Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, we disposed of certain non-significant properties summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

Properties

 

 

 

Previous
Ownership %

 

Date of Disposal

 

Sales Price

 

Gain

 

Wabash Village

 

 

100

%

 

July 27, 2006

 

 

$

2.6

 

 

$

2.0

 

Trolley Square

 

 

90

%

 

August 3, 2006

 

 

$

38.6

 

 

$

7.3

 

 

We had no consolidated property acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

10.   Recent Financial Accounting Standards

In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ratified its consensus in EITF Issue 04-05, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (Issue 04-05). The effective date for Issue 04-05 is June 29, 2005 for all new or modified partnerships and January 1, 2006 for all other partnerships for the applicable provisions. The adoption of the provisions of EITF 04-05 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—an amendment of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29.”  This Statement requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless: (a) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits; or (b) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” This FSP amends SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and SFAS No. 124, “Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations,” and APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” This FSP provides guidance on the determination of when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss. This FSP also requires disclosure about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments.

13




The guidance in this FSP is effective in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 is a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” This Statement requires voluntary changes in accounting to be accounted for retrospectively and all prior periods to be restated as if the newly adopted policy had always been used, unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required most voluntary changes in accounting to be recognized by including the cumulative effect of the change in accounting in net income in the period of change. This Statement also requires a change in method of depreciation, amortization or depletion for a long-lived asset be accounted for as a change in estimate that is affected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” This Statement requires that a public entity measure the cost of equity-based service awards based on the grant date fair value of the award. All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are required to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair value. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period after June 15, 2005. Other than the reclassification of the unamortized portion of our restricted stock awards to capital in excess of par in the consolidated balance sheets, the adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We began expensing the vested portion of restricted stock awards to the recipients in the consolidated statements of operations in 2002.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation also provides guidance on description, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 becomes effective on January 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this Interpretation.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 is definitional and disclosure oriented and addresses how companies should approach measuring fair value when required by GAAP; it does not create or modify any current GAAP requirements to apply fair value accounting. The Standard provides a single definition for fair value that is to be applied consistently for all accounting applications, and also generally describes and prioritizes according to reliability the methods and inputs used in valuations. FAS 157 prescribes various disclosures about financial statement categories and amounts which are measured at fair value, if such disclosures are not already specified elsewhere in GAAP. The new measurement and disclosure requirements of FAS 157 are effective for us in the first quarter of 2008. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 157 to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.

 

14




Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this report. Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: our ability to meet debt service requirements, the availability of financing, changes in our credit rating, changes in market rates of interest and foreign exchange rates for foreign currencies, the ability to hedge our interest rate risk, risks associated with the acquisition, development and expansion of properties, general risks related to retail real estate, the liquidity of real estate investments, environmental liabilities, international, national, regional and local economic climates, changes in market rental rates, trends in the retail industry, relationships with anchor tenants, the inability to collect rent due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise, risks relating to our joint venture properties, costs of common area maintenance, competitive market forces, risks related to international activities, insurance costs and coverage, impact of terrorist activities, inflation and maintenance of REIT status. We discussed these and other risks and uncertainties under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. We may update that discussion in this or subsequent quarterly reports, but otherwise we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Overview

Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), is a majority owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Simon Property”). Simon Property is our general partner and a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In this discussion, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.

We are engaged in the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate properties, primarily regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers and community/lifestyle centers. As of September 30, 2006, we owned or held an interest in 284 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 170 regional malls, 69 community/lifestyle centers, 35 Premium Outlet centers and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 38 states plus Puerto Rico (collectively, the “Properties”, and individually, a “Property”). We also own interests in eight parcels of land held in the United States for future development (together with the Properties, the “Portfolio”). Finally, we have ownership interests in 52 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland); five Premium Outlet centers in Japan; and one Premium Outlet center in Mexico.

Operating Fundamentals

We generate the majority of revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

·       Base minimum rents and cart and kiosk rentals,

·       Overage and percentage rents based on tenants’ sales volume, and

·       Recoveries of a significant amount of our recoverable expenditures, which consist of property operating, real estate tax, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotional expenditures.

Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

15




We seek growth in our earnings and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our properties and investments. We seek to accomplish this growth through the following:

·       Focusing on leasing to increase revenues and utilization of economies of scale to reduce operating expenses,

·       Expanding and re-tenanting existing franchise locations at competitive market rates,

·       Adding mixed-use elements to our Portfolio through our land intensification initiatives. This may include adding elements such as multifamily, condominiums, hotel and self-storage at selected locations, and

We also grow by generating supplemental revenues in our existing real estate portfolio, from outlot parcel sales and, due to our size and tenant relationships, from the following:

·       Simon Brand Ventures (“Simon Brand”) mall marketing initiatives, including fees derived from the marketing, promotion, and sale of bank-issued co-branded gift cards. Simon Brand revenues also include payment services, national media contracts, a national beverage contract and other contracts with national companies.

·       Simon Business Network (“Simon Business”) offers property operating services to our tenants and others resulting from its relationships with vendors.

We focus on high quality real estate across the retail real estate spectrum. We expand or renovate to enhance existing assets’ profitability and market share when we believe the investment of our capital meets our risk-reward criteria. We develop new properties in major metropolitan areas that exhibit strong population and economic growth.

We routinely review and evaluate a number of acquisition opportunities based on their complement to our Portfolio. Lastly, we are selectively expanding our international presence. Our international strategy includes partnering with established real estate companies and financing international investments with local currency to minimize foreign exchange risk.

To support our overall growth goals, we employ a three-fold capital strategy:

·       Provide the capital necessary to fund growth.

·       Maintain sufficient flexibility to access capital in many forms, both public and private.

·       Manage our overall financial structure in a fashion that preserves our investment grade ratings.

Results Overview

Diluted earnings per unit decreased  $0.03 during the first nine months of 2006, or 2.3%, to $1.27 from $1.30 for the same period last year. The 2006 results include a $34.4 million gain (or $0.12 per diluted unit) from the sale of partnership interests in one of our European joint ventures to our new partner, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, and recognition of $15.3 million in income (or $0.05 per diluted unit) from contributed beneficial interests, representing the right to receive cash flow, capital distributions, and related profits and losses of Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”). Included in 2005 results is a gain upon the disposition of the Riverway and O’Hare International Center office building properties that resulted in a gain of $125.4 million (or $0.45 per diluted unit).

Our core business fundamentals remained strong during the first nine months of 2006. Regional mall comparable sales per square foot (“psf”) strengthened during the first nine months of 2006, increasing 6.8% to $474 psf from $444 psf for the same period in 2005 reflecting robust retail demand and the disposition of non-core properties. Our regional mall average base rents increased 2.7% to $35.23 psf as of September 30, 2006 from $34.30 psf as of September 30, 2005.  In addition, our regional mall leasing spreads were $6.06 psf as of September 30, 2006 compared to $7.26 psf as of September 30, 2005 principally as a result of leasing mix. The operating fundamentals of the Premium Outlet centers and

16




community/lifestyle centers also contributed to the increase in our operating results for the nine month period as seen in the following section entitled Portfolio Data. Finally, regional mall occupancy was 92.5% as of September 30, 2006 as compared to 92.6% as of September 30, 2005. The slight decline results from an increase in square footage lost to bankruptcy proceedings and store closures.

During the first nine months of 2006 we disposed of three properties as follows:

·       On April 25, 2006, Great Northeast Plaza, a community center located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was sold for $8.8 million, and we recorded a gain on disposition of $7.7 million. We held a 50% interest in this property.

·       On July 27, 2006, Wabash Village, a community center located in West Lafayette, Indiana was sold for $2.6 million, and we recorded a gain on disposition of $2.0 million. We held a 100% interest in this property.

·       On August 3, 2006, Trolley Square, a regional mall located in Salt Lake City, Utah was sold for $38.6 million, and we recorded a gain on disposition of $7.3 million. We held a 90% interest in this property.

Regarding financing activities, despite the increasing interest rate environment resulting in an approximate 150 basis point increase in LIBOR (5.32% at September 30, 2006 versus 3.86% at September 30, 2005), our effective overall borrowing rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased only 23 basis points as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Our financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are highlighted by the following:

·       We repaid $300 million in unsecured notes that bore interest at 7.38%, and a $59.1 million term loan that bore interest at 7.26%.

·       We paid off one mortgage totaling $140.0 million that bore interest at LIBOR plus 138 basis points.

·       We made the final $600 million payment on the facility we used to fund the cash portion of our 2004 acquisition of  Chelsea Property Group, Inc. (“Chelsea”).

·       We repaid two mortgages totaling $58.0 million that each bore interest at 8.25%.

·       On March 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services raised its corporate credit rating for us to ‘A-’ from ‘BBB+’ which resulted in a decrease in the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our unsecured revolving $3 billion credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to 37.5 basis points over LIBOR from 42.5 basis points over LIBOR. The revision to our rating also decreased the facility fee on the Credit Facility to 12.5 basis points from 15 basis points.

·       We issued two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $800 million at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.93%. We used the net proceeds of $803.9 million, which includes $10.1 million proceeds from terminated forward-starting swap arrangements, to reduce the borrowings on our Credit Facility.

·       We paid off one mortgage totaling $19.8 million that bore interest at 8.12%.

·       We issued two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $1.1 billion at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.73%. We used the proceeds of the offering to reduce borrowings on our Credit Facility.

·       Borrowings on the Credit Facility decreased to approximately $291.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, principally as a result of the above repayments. The September 30, 2006 outstanding balance encompassed only Euro and Yen denominated borrowings.

 

17




Portfolio Data

The Portfolio data discussed in this overview includes the following key operating statistics: occupancy, average base rent per square foot and comparable sales per square foot for our three domestic platforms. We include acquired Properties in this data beginning in the year of acquisition. The following table sets forth these key operating statistics for:

·       Properties that we consolidate in our consolidated financial statements,

·       Properties that we account for under the equity method as unconsolidated joint ventures, and

·       the foregoing two categories of Properties on a total Portfolio basis.

Domestic Property Data:

 

 

September 30,
2006

 

%/basis
point
Change(1)

 

September 30,
2005

 

%/basis
point
Change(1)

 

Regional Malls:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

92.4%

 

 

-20 bps

 

 

92.6%

 

 

 

+90 bps

 

 

Unconsolidated

 

 

92.8%

 

 

+20 bps

 

 

92.6%

 

 

 

+60 bps

 

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

92.5%

 

 

-10 bps

 

 

92.6%

 

 

 

+80 bps

 

 

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

$

34.74

 

 

2.8%

 

 

$

33.79

 

 

 

4.6%

 

 

Unconsolidated

 

 

$

36.11

 

 

2.4%

 

 

$

35.26

 

 

 

2.5%

 

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

$

35.23

 

 

2.7%

 

 

$

34.30

 

 

 

3.7%

 

 

Comparable Sales Per Square Foot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

$

460

 

 

7.5%

 

 

$

428

 

 

 

5.2%

 

 

Unconsolidated

 

 

$

500

 

 

5.0%

 

 

$

476

 

 

 

6.3%

 

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

$

474

 

 

6.5%

 

 

$

445

 

 

 

5.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premium Outlet Centers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

 

99.3%

 

 

-30 bps

 

 

99.6%

 

 

 

 

 

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

 

 

$

24.05

 

 

4.6%

 

 

$

22.99

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Sales Per Square Foot

 

 

$

462

 

 

6.0%

 

 

$

436

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Community/Lifestyle Centers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

88.1%

 

 

-140 bps

 

 

89.5%

 

 

 

-80 bps

 

 

Unconsolidated

 

 

96.6%

 

 

+110 bps

 

 

95.5%

 

 

 

-70 bps

 

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

90.7%

 

 

-60 bps

 

 

91.3%

 

 

 

-90 bps

 

 

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

$

11.96

 

 

3.3%

 

 

$

11.58

 

 

 

4.2%

 

 

Unconsolidated

 

 

$

11.12

 

 

6.0%

 

 

$

10.49

 

 

 

4.1%

 

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

$

11.69

 

 

4.1%

 

 

$

11.23

 

 

 

4.1%

 

 

Comparable Sales Per Square Foot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

$

227

 

 

0.4%

 

 

$

226

 

 

 

3.2%

 

 

Unconsolidated

 

 

$

205

 

 

0.5%

 

 

$

204

 

 

 

1.0%

 

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

$

220

 

 

(0.4%)

 

 

$

221

 

 

 

3.3%

 

 


(1)          Percentages may not recalculate due to rounding.

18




Occupancy Levels and Average Base Rent Per Square Foot.   Occupancy and average base rent are based on mall and freestanding Gross Leaseable Area (“GLA”) owned by us (“Owned GLA”) in the regional malls, all tenants at the Premium Outlet centers, and all tenants at community/lifestyle centers. Our Portfolio has maintained stable occupancy and increased average base rents despite the uncertain economic climate.

Comparable Sales Per Square Foot.   Comparable sales include total reported retail tenant sales at Owned GLA (for mall and freestanding stores with less than 10,000 square feet) in the regional malls and all reporting tenants at the Premium Outlet centers and community/lifestyle centers. Retail sales at Owned GLA affect revenue and profitability levels because sales determine the amount of minimum rent that can be charged, the percentage rent realized, and the recoverable expenses (common area maintenance, real estate taxes, etc.) that tenants can afford to pay.

International Property Data

The following key operating statistics are provided for our international properties, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

 

 

September 30,
2006

 

%/basis
point
Change

 

September 30,
2005

 

%/basis
point
Change

 

European Shopping Centers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

 

96.9%

 

 

 

-80 bps

 

 

 

97.7%

 

 

-150 bps

 

Comparable sales per square foot

 

 

386

 

 

 

-0.4%

 

 

 

387

 

 

 

Average base rent per square foot (2)

 

 

26.26

 

 

 

1.0%

 

 

 

25.99

 

 

1.2%

 

International Premium Outlets (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occupancy

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

Comparable sales per square foot

 

 

¥

89,746

 

 

 

5.6%

 

 

 

¥

85,008

 

 

 

Average base rent per square foot (2)

 

 

¥

4,686

 

 

 

3.9%

 

 

 

¥

4,509

 

 

 


(1)          Does not include our center in Mexico (Premium Outlets Punta Norte), which opened December 2004.

(2)          Amounts recorded for our international investment entities transactions utilize conversion factors, as appropriate, of:  USD:Euro of 0.788 and 0.830, and USD:Yen of 117.91 and 107.20, both for 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Results of Operations

In addition to the activity discussed in the Results Overview, the following acquisitions and openings affected our consolidated results from continuing operations in the comparative periods:

·       On August 4, 2006, we opened Round Rock Premium Outlets, a 432,000 square foot Premium Outlet center located within 20 minutes North of Austin, Texas in Round Rock, Texas.

·       In November 2005, we opened Rockaway Plaza, a 450,000 square foot community center located in Rockaway, New Jersey, adjacent to our Rockaway Townsquare.

·       On October 7, 2005, we opened Firewheel Town Center, a 785,000 square foot open-air regional mall located 15 miles northeast of downtown Dallas in Garland, Texas.

·       On July 15, 2005, we opened Wolf Ranch, a 600,000 square foot open-air community center located in Georgetown, Texas.

·       On May 6, 2005, we opened Seattle Premium Outlets.

19




·       On March 15, 2005, we and our joint venture partner completed the construction of, obtained permanent financing for, and opened St. Johns Town Center (St. Johns), a 1.5 million square foot open-air retail project in Jacksonville, Florida. Prior to the completion, we consolidated St. Johns as we were responsible for 85% of the development cost. At permanent financing, the ownership percentages were each adjusted to 50%, and we began to account for St. Johns using the equity method of accounting.

In addition to the activity discussed in the Results Overview, the following acquisitions, dispositions, and openings affected our income from unconsolidated entities in the comparative periods:

·       On May 31, 2006, we opened Giugliano, an 800,000 square foot center anchored by a hypermarket, in Italy.

·       On April 25, 2006, we sold our 50% interest in Great Northeast Plaza community center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for $8.8 million and recognized a gain on the disposition of $7.7 million.

·       On November 18, 2005, we purchased a 37.99% interest in Springfield Mall in Springfield, Pennsylvania for approximately $39.3 million, including the issuance of our share of debt of $29.1 million.

·       On November 21, 2005, we purchased a 50% interest in Coddingtown Mall in Santa Rosa, California for approximately $37.1 million, including the assumption of our share of debt of $10.5 million.

·       In March 2005, we opened Toki Premium Outlets in Japan.

·       On January 11, 2005, Metrocenter, a regional mall located in Phoenix, Arizona, was sold. We held a 50% interest in Metrocenter.

For the purposes of the following comparison between the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the above transactions are referred to as the Property Transactions. In the following discussions of our results of operations, “comparable” refers to Properties open and operating throughout the periods in both 2006 and 2005.

Our consolidated discontinued operations reflect results of the following significant property dispositions:

Property

 

Date of Disposition

Riverway (office)

 

June 1, 2005

O’Hare International Center (office)

 

June 1, 2005

Grove at Lakeland Square

 

July 1, 2005

Cheltenham Square

 

November 17, 2005

Southgate Mall

 

November 28, 2005

Eastland Mall (Tulsa, OK)

 

December 16, 2005

Biltmore Square

 

December 28, 2005

 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006  vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2005

Minimum rents, excluding rents from our consolidated Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives, increased $21.8 million during the period, of which the Property Transactions accounted for $4.2 million of the increase. Total amortization of the fair market value of in-place leases increased minimum rents by $3.1 million over that of the third quarter of 2005. Comparable rents, excluding rents from Simon Brand and Simon Business, increased $17.6 million, or 3.8%. This was primarily due to the leasing of space at higher rents that resulted in an increase in minimum rents of $11.7 million. In addition, rents from carts, kiosks, and other temporary tenants increased comparable rents by $1.8 million.

20




Tenant reimbursements, excluding Simon Business initiatives, increased $7.0 million, of which the Property Transactions accounted for $2.5 million. The remainder of the increase of $4.5 million, or 2.0%, was in comparable Properties and was due to inflationary increases in property operating costs.

Total other income, excluding Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives, increased $6.5 million, and was principally the result of the following:

·       $6.1 million increased land sale activity:

·       $3.7 million related to the sale of a holding in a technology venture by Chelsea ;

·       $1.8 million in increased interest income driven by increasing investment rates;

·       $1.3 million in gain on the sale of air rights at Las Vegas Outlet Center;

·       partially offset by decreases of $6.4 million in other net activity during the comparable period of 2005 on comparable Properties related primarily to the 2005 sale of securities and net recovery of a note receivable which had previously been reserved for.

Revenues from Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives decreased $4.1 million to $35.9 million from $40.0 million. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to:

·       decreased revenue in the period as a result of structural changes to the co-branded gift card programs;

·       offset partially by increased event and sponsorship income.

Simon Brand and Simon Business expenses decreased $3.0 million, primarily as a result of decreases in operating expenses of the co-branded gift card programs, which are included in total property operating expenses.

Property operating expenses increased $2.4 million, $1.5 million from comparable properties (representing an increase of 1.3%) principally as a result of inflationary increases for energy, utilities, and salaries, and the remainder from new openings.

Provision for credit losses decreased $2.3 million from the prior period due principally to the recovery of receivables that were previously fully reserved.

Home office and regional costs increased $5.6 million due to increased personnel costs, which is due to the effect of the increase in our stock price on our stock-based compensation programs.

Other expenses increased $2.8 million primarily due to increased professional fees.

Interest expense increased $5.0 million due principally to the following:

·       the impact of increases in our average borrowing rates for our variable rate debt; and

·       the impact of increased fixed rate debt of $1.3 billion, which are generally at higher rates than our variable rate debt, due to the issuances of unsecured notes in May and August of 2006 and June and November of 2005.

Gain on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities increased $9.5 million over the prior period. In 2006, we recorded a $7.3 million gain on the sale of Trolley Square, and $2.0 million for Wabash Village.

The results of operations from discontinued operations and the gain on disposal of discontinued operations related to the sale of Riverway and O’Hare International Center properties recorded in 2005. The decrease in gain on disposal of discontinued operations is due to the resolution of a $5.6 million contingency related to the sale of these properties.

 

21




Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006  vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005

Minimum rents, excluding rents from our consolidated Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives, increased $63.1 million during the period, of which the Property Transactions accounted for $11.3 million of the increase. Total amortization of the fair market value of in-place leases increased minimum rents by $10.5 million over that of the first nine months of 2005. Comparable rents, excluding rents from Simon Brand and Simon Business, increased $51.7 million, or 3.8%. This was primarily due to the leasing of space at higher rents that resulted in an increase in base minimum rents of $41.4 million. In addition, rents from carts, kiosks, and other temporary tenants increased comparable rents by $3.6 million.

Total overage rents increased $7.0 million, or 15.1%, reflecting the increases in tenants’ sales.

Tenant reimbursements, excluding Simon Business initiatives, increased $30.9 million, of which the Property Transactions accounted for $7.3 million. The remainder of the increase of $23.6 million, or 3.7%, was in comparable Properties and was due to inflationary increases in property operating costs.

Total other income, excluding Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives, increased $24.2 million, and was the result of:

·       $6.9 million in increased lease settlement activity;

·       $5.0 million in increased interest income driven by increasing investment rates;

·       $3.7 million related to the sale of a holding in a technology venture by Chelsea ;

·       $1.5 million in collections on a note receivable which had been previously fully reserved;

·       $1.3 million in gain on the sale of air rights at Las Vegas Outlet Center;

·       $1.2 million in gains on the sale of air rights at a property in Texas to a residential joint venture;

·       $9.5 million increase in land sale activity;

·       partially offset by decreases of $4.9 million in other net activity from the comparable period of 2005 on comparable Properties related primarily to the 2005 sale of securities and net recovery of a note receivable that had been reserved for.

Revenues from Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives decreased $0.5 million to $105.3 million from $105.8 million. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to:

·       decreased revenue from the co-branded gift card program;

·       offset by increased event and sponsorship income.

Simon Brand and Simon Business expenses decreased $8.4 million, primarily as a result of decreases in operating expenses of the co-branded gift card programs, which are included in total property operating expenses.

Property operating expenses increased $15.6 million, $12.5 million from comparable properties (representing an increase of 4.0%) principally as a result of inflationary increases, and the remainder from new openings.

Real estate taxes increased $8.5 million due principally to a $6.5 million multi-year reassessment settlement at a Property and increases in expenses at the our other comparable properties driven by reassessments and rate increases.

Provision for credit losses increased $1.5 million from the prior period related to significantly lower bad debt expense in 2005 due to recoveries of amounts previously written off or provided for in prior periods.

Home office and regional costs increased $10.6 million due to increased personnel costs, which is due to the effect of the increase in our stock price on our stock-based compensation programs.

22




Other expenses increased $6.1 million primarily due to ground rent expenses of $2.3 million and increased professional fees.

Interest expense increased $16.9 million due principally to the following:

·       the impact of increases in our average borrowing rates for our variable rate debt offset by a decrease in variable rate debt of approximately  $2.4 billion due to repayment activity;  and

·       the impact of increased fixed rate debt of $2.3 billion, which are generally at higher rates than our variable rate debt, due to the issuances of unsecured notes in May and August of 2006 and June and November of 2005.

The minority interest decrease resulted from our allocating to our minority interest partner their share of the multi-year real estate tax assessment settlement discussed above offset by increased net income in Properties in which outside partners hold a minority ownership interest.

During the first quarter of 2006, we recognized the receipt of a beneficial interest in Mall of America Associates (MOAA), which represents the majority of the increase in our income from unconsolidated entities and beneficial interests, net in the consolidated financial statements. The transaction and related accounting are more fully described in the condensed footnotes to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.

Gain on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities increased $38.9 million over the prior period. In 2006, we recorded a $34.4 million gain on the sale of 10.5% of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe B.V./S.à.r.l. (“Simon Ivanhoe”), a $7.7 million gain on the sale of Great Northeast Plaza, a $7.3 million gain on the sale of Trolley Square, and a $2.0 million gain on the sale of Wabash Village. The gain on sale of assets in 2005 of $12.6 million primarily relates to the sale of our joint venture interest in Metrocenter in January 2005 and the sale of a property management entity in which we acquired an interest as part of the Rodamco acquisition in 2002.

The decrease in gain on disposal of discontinued operations is due to a $125.4 million net recognized gain upon disposition of our Riverway and O’Hare International Center properties in June of 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Because we generate revenues primarily from long-term leases, our financing strategy relies primarily on long-term fixed rate debt. We manage our floating rate debt to be at or below 15 –25% of total outstanding indebtedness by setting interest rates for each financing or refinancing based on current market conditions. We also enter into interest rate protection agreements as appropriate to assist in managing our interest rate risk. We derive most of our liquidity from leases that generate positive net cash flow from operations and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities that totaled $1.1 billion during the first nine months of 2006. In addition, our Credit Facility provides an alternative source of liquidity as our cash needs vary from time to time.

Our balance of cash and cash equivalents decreased $14.1 million during 2006 to $323.0 million as of September 30, 2006. The September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 balances include $26.8 million and $42.3, respectively, related to our co-branded gift card programs, which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes.

On September 30, 2006, the Credit Facility had available borrowing capacity of approximately $2.7 billion net of outstanding borrowings of $291.4 million and letters of credit of $22.5 million. During the first nine months of 2006, the maximum amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $2.0 billion and the weighted average amount outstanding was $1.3 billion. The weighted average interest rate was 4.83% for the period ended September 30, 2006.

23




Simon Property and the Operating Partnership also have access to public equity and long term unsecured debt markets and access to private equity from institutional investors at the Property level. Our current senior unsecured debt ratings are A- by Standard & Poor’s and A3 by Moody’s Investors Service.

Cash Flows

Our net cash flow from operating activities and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 totaled $1.1 billion. We also received proceeds of $103.2 million from the sale of partnership interests and sales of assets during the first nine months of 2006. In addition, we had net proceeds from all of our debt financing and repayment activities in this period of $122.8 million. These activities are further discussed below in Financing and Debt. We also:

·       repurchased units and preferred units amounting to $13.6 million,

·       paid unitholder distributions of $636.9 million,

·       paid preferred unit distributions totaling $76.0 million,

·       funded consolidated capital expenditures of $533.7 million. These capital expenditures include development costs of $232.1 million, renovation and expansion costs of $216.7 million, and tenant costs and other operational capital expenditures of $84.9 million, and

·       funded investments in unconsolidated entities of $134.4 million.

In general, we anticipate that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet operating expenses, monthly debt service, recurring capital expenditures, and distributions necessary to maintain Simon Property’s REIT qualification for 2006 and on a long-term basis. In addition, we expect to be able to obtain capital for nonrecurring capital expenditures, such as acquisitions, major building renovations and expansions, as well as for scheduled principal maturities on outstanding indebtedness, from:

·       excess cash generated from operating performance and working capital reserves,

·       borrowings on our Credit Facility,

·       additional secured or unsecured debt financing, or

·       additional equity raised in the public or private markets.

Financing and Debt

Unsecured Debt

On March 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services raised our corporate credit rating to ‘A-’ from ‘BBB+’ which resulted in a decrease in the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our Credit Facility to 37.5 basis points over LIBOR from 42.5 basis points over LIBOR. The revision to our rating also decreased the facility fee on the Credit Facility to 12.5 basis points from 15 basis points.

On May 15, 2006, we sold two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $800 million at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.93%. The first tranche is $400.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.75% due May 1, 2012 and the second tranche is $400.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 6.10% due May 1, 2016. We used the proceeds of the offering and the termination of forward-starting swap arrangements to reduce borrowings on our Credit Facility.

On August 29, 2006, we sold two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $1.1 billion at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.73%. The first tranche is $600.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.60% due September 1, 2011 and the second tranche is $500.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.875% due March 1, 2017. We used the proceeds of the offering to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.

24




Credit Facility.   Other significant draws on the Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were as follows:

Draw
Date

 

Draw
Amount

 

Use of Credit Line Proceeds

01/03/06

 

$ 59,075

 

Repayment of a Term Loan (CPG Partners, L.P.), which had a rate of 7.26%.

01/06/06

 

140,000

 

Repayment of a mortgage, which had a rate of LIBOR plus 138 basis points.

01/20/06

 

300,000

 

Repayment of unsecured notes, which had a fixed rate of 7.375%.

03/27/06

 

600,000

 

Early repayment of the $1.8 billion facility we used to finance our acquisition
   of Chelsea in 2004.

04/03/06

 

58,000

 

Repayment of two secured mortgages that each bore interest at 8.25%.

 

Other amounts drawn on the Credit Facility were primarily for general working capital purposes. We repaid a total of $2.0 billion on the Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The total outstanding balance on the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2006 was $291.4 million, and the maximum amount outstanding during the quarter, was approximately $1.3 billion. During the first nine months of 2006, the weighted average outstanding balance on the Credit Facility was approximately $1.3 billion.

Acquisition Facility.   We borrowed $1.8 billion in 2004 to finance the cash portion of our acquisition of Chelsea. As disclosed above, this facility has been fully repaid.

Secured Debt

Total secured indebtedness was $4.3 billion and $4.6 billion at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we repaid $217.7 million in mortgage loans, unencumbering four properties.

Summary of Financing

Our consolidated debt, adjusted to reflect outstanding derivative instruments, and the effective weighted average interest rates as of September 30 and December 31 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

Debt Subject to

 

Adjusted
Balance
as of
September 30,
2006

 

Effective
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 

Adjusted Balance
as of
December 31, 
2005

 

Effective
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 

Fixed Rate

 

 

$

13,388,337

 

 

 

6.11

%

 

 

$

11,908,050

 

 

 

6.22

%

 

Variable Rate

 

 

853,604

 

 

 

4.94

%

 

 

2,198,067

 

 

 

4.95

%

 

 

 

 

$

14,241,941

 

 

 

6.04

%

 

 

$

14,106,117

 

 

 

6.02

%

 

 

As of September 30, 2006, we had interest rate cap protection agreements on $96.2 million of consolidated variable rate debt. We also hold $370.0 million of notional amount variable rate swap agreements that have a weighted average variable pay rate of 5.36% and a weighted average fixed receive rate of 3.72%. As of September 30, 2006, these agreements effectively converted $370.0 million of fixed rate debt to variable rate debt.

25




Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.   There have been no material changes in our outstanding capital expenditure commitments since December 31, 2005, as previously disclosed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table summarizes the material aspects of our future obligations as of September 30, 2006 for the remainder of 2006 and subsequent years thereafter (dollars in thousands):

 

 

2006

 

2007-2008

 

2009-2011

 

After 2011

 

Total

 

Long Term Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated (1)

 

$

267,399

 

$

2,566,028

 

$

5,764,355

 

$

5,582,659

 

$

14,180,441

 

Pro rata share of Long-Term Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated (2)

 

$

266,579

 

$

2,515,965

 

$

5,705,027

 

$

5,506,898

 

$

13,994,469

 

Joint Ventures (2)

 

22,747

 

534,010

 

1,425,930

 

1,545,396

 

3,528,083

 

Total Pro Rata Share of Long-Term Debt

 

$

289,326

 

$

3,049,975

 

$

7,130,957

 

$

7,052,294

 

$

17,522,552

 

 


(1)          Represents principal maturities and therefore, excludes net premiums and discounts and fair value swaps of $61,500.

(2)          Represents our pro rata share of principal maturities and excludes net premiums and discounts.

Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of our investments in real estate joint ventures which are common in the real estate industry and are described in Note 5 of the notes to the accompanying financial statements. Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture, is typically secured by the joint venture Property, and is non-recourse to us. As of September 30, 2006, we have loan guarantees and other guarantee obligations of $68.8 million and $99.6 million, respectively, to support our total $3.5 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness presented in the table above.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

Buy-sell provisions are common in real estate partnership agreements. Most of our partners are institutional investors who have a history of direct investment in regional mall properties. Our partners in our joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time and if we determine it is in our unitholders’ best interests for us to purchase the joint venture interest, we believe we have adequate liquidity to execute the purchases of the interests without hindering our cash flows or liquidity. Should we decide to sell any of our joint venture interests, we would expect to use the net proceeds from any such sale to reduce outstanding indebtedness.

On November 1, 2006, we acquired our partner’s 50% ownership interest in Mall of Georgia, a regional mall Property, for $252.6 million, including the assumption of our $96.0 million share of debt. As a result, we now own 100% of Mall of Georgia and will consolidate this Property beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006.

Acquisitions.   Although the acquisition of high quality individual properties or portfolios of properties remain an integral component of our growth strategies, we did not acquire any properties during the first nine months of 2006.

Dispositions.   We continue to pursue the sale of Properties that no longer meet our strategic criteria. During the first nine months of 2006, we disposed of Great Northeast Plaza, a community center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in which we held a 50% interest, Wabash Village a community center in West Lafayette, Indiana, in which we held a 100% interest, and Trolley Square a regional mall in Salt Lake City, Utah in which we held a 90% interest. We received net proceeds of $49.3 million and recorded our share of a gain on the disposals totaling $17.0 million. We do not believe the sale of these properties will have a material impact on our future results of operations or cash flows. We believe the disposition of these properties will enhance the average overall quality of our Portfolio.

26




Development Activity

New Developments.   The following describes our new development projects, the estimated total cost, and our share of the estimated total cost and our share of the construction in progress balance as of September 30, 2006 (dollars in millions):

Property

 

Location

 

Gross
Leasable
Area

 

Estimated
Total
Cost (a)

 

Our Share of
Estimated
Total Cost

 

Our Share of
Construction
in Progress

 

Estimated
Opening Date

 

Under Construction:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coconut Point

 

Estero/Bonita Springs, FL

 

1,200,000

 

 

$

229

 

 

 

$

115

 

 

 

$

113

 

 

4th Quarter 2006 (b)

 

Domain, The

 

Austin, TX

 

700,000

 

 

195

 

 

 

195

 

 

 

151

 

 

1st Quarter 2007

 

Hamilton Town Center

 

Noblesville, IN

 

950,000

 

 

142

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

5

 

 

1st Quarter 2008

 

Pier Park

 

Panama City, FL

 

920,000

 

 

127

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

41

 

 

1st Quarter 2008

 

Philadelphia Premium Outlets

 

Limerick, PA

 

430,000

 

 

114

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

23

 

 

4th Quarter 2007

 

Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets

 

Mercedes, TX

 

404,000

 

 

60

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

48

 

 

4th Quarter 2006

 

Shops at Arbor Walk, The

 

Austin, TX

 

460,000

 

 

52

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

42

 

 

4th Quarter 2006

 

Village at SouthPark, The

 

Charlotte, NC

 

81,000

 

 

26

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

12

 

 

1st Quarter 2007

 


(a)              Represents project costs net of land sales, tenant reimbursements for construction and other items (where applicable).

(b)              The estimated opening date represents Phase II only. Phase I opened in the 2nd quarter 2006.

We expect to fund these projects with available cash flow from operations, borrowings from our Credit Facility, or project specific construction loans. We expect our share of the total 2006 new development costs remaining for the year to be approximately $150 million.

Strategic Expansions and Renovations.   In addition to new development, we also incur costs related to construction for significant renovation and/or expansion projects at our Properties. Included in these projects are the renovation and addition of Crate & Barrel and Nordstom at Burlington Mall, expansion and life-style addition at Smith Haven Mall, the acquisition and renovation of several anchor stores previously operated by Federated, and a Neiman Marcus expansion at Lenox Square. Our share of the estimated total net cost and our share of the construction in progress balance as of September 30, 2006 for all of our expansion and renovation activity currently under construction is approximately $502 million and $133 million, respectively.

We expect to fund these projects with available cash flow from operations or borrowings from the Credit Facility. We expect to invest a total of approximately $50 million (our share) on expansion and renovation activities for the remainder of 2006.

International.   We typically reinvest net cash flow from our international investments to fund future international development activity. We believe this strategy mitigates some of the risk of our initial investment and our exposure to changes in foreign currencies. We have also funded our European investments with Euro-denominated borrowings that act as a natural hedge against local currency fluctuations. This has also been the case with our Premium Outlet joint ventures in Japan and Mexico where we use Yen and Peso denominated financing. Currently, our net income exposure to changes in the volatility of the Euro, Yen, and Peso is not material. In addition, since cash flow from operations is currently being reinvested in other development projects, we do not expect to repatriate foreign denominated earnings in the near term.

The carrying amount of our total combined investment in Simon Ivanhoe and Gallerie Commerciali Italia (“GCI”) as of September 30, 2006, net of the related currency translation adjustment, was $337.8 million. Our investments in Simon Ivanhoe and GCI are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Currently five European developments are under construction, which will add approximately 3.2 million square feet of GLA for a total net cost of approximately 590.2 million, of which our share is approximately 160.6 million, or $203.8 million based on current Euro:USD exchange rates.

27




On October 20, 2005, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, effectively acquired our former partner’s 39.5% ownership interest in ERE. On February 13, 2006, pursuant to the terms of our October 20, 2005 transaction with Ivanhoe, we sold a 10.5% interest in this joint venture to Ivanhoe for 45.2 million, or $53.9 million and recorded a gain on the disposition of $34.4 million. This gain is reported in “gain on sales of interests in unconsolidated entities” in the consolidated statements of operations. We then settled all remaining share purchase commitments from the founders of ERE, including the early settlement of some commitments by purchasing an additional 25.8% interest for 55.1 million, or $65.5 million. The result of these transactions equalized our and Ivanhoe’s ownership in Simon Ivanhoe to 50% each.

As of September 30, 2006, the carrying amount of our 40% joint venture investment in the five Japanese Premium Outlet centers net of the related cumulative translation adjustment was $282.9 million. We began an expansion in Nagoya, Japan which will add incremental  GLA of 53,000 square feet for a total projected net cost of ¥1.8 billion, of which our share is approximately ¥0.7 billion, or $6.0 million based on current Yen:USD exchange rates.

In addition to the developments in Europe and Japan, a new development, Yeoju Premium Outlets, was started near Seoul, South Korea. The project will contain 253,000 square feet for a total projected net cost of KRW 78.7 billion, of which our share is approximately KRW 39.1 billion, or approximately $41.8 million based on current KRW:USD exchange rates.

During the period ended September 30, 2006, we finalized the formation of joint venture arrangements to develop and operate retail centers in China with Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund (MSREF) and SZITIC Commercial Property Co., Ltd. (SZITIC CP), retail property subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned trust and investment firm Shenzen International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. (SZITIC) as our partners. The centers will be anchored by Wal-Mart stores and our and MSREF’s ownership will each be 32.5% with SZITIC CP owning 35%. We are planning on initially developing five centers, four of which are currently under construction, with a total equity commitment of approximately $50 million.

Distributions

The Board of Directors of Simon Property, our general partner, declared and we paid a distribution of $0.76 per unit in the third quarter of 2006. Our distributions typically exceed our net income generated in any given year primarily because of depreciation, which is a “non-cash” expense. Our future distributions and the dividends of Simon Property will be determined by Simon Property’s Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for distributions, and what may be required to maintain Simon Property’s status as a REIT.

On May 12, 2006, the Simon Property Board of Directors authorized a common stock repurchase program under which Simon Property may purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of its common stock subject to a maximum aggregate purchase price of $250 million over the next twelve months as market conditions warrant. Simon Property may purchase the shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. There have been no purchases under this program since May, 2006.

Item 3.   Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Sensitivity Analysis.   We disclosed a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis regarding market risk in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in the assumptions used or results obtained regarding market risk since December 31, 2005.

28




Item 4.   Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.   We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2006.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.   There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — Other Information

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

There have been no material developments since July 1, 2006 with respect to the pending litigation disclosed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except that on November 2, all parties agreed to settle the lawsuit brought by Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. on November 9, 1999 in the Federal District Court for the State of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial District (Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. vs. Melvin Simon et al.). As disclosed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q, the settlement terminated our beneficial interest in Mall of America. This action was dismissed, with prejudice, and mutual releases were delivered by all parties to the proceeding.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such routine litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Through the period covered by this report, there were no significant changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in “Part I, Item 1: Business” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 5. Other Information

During the quarter covered by this report, the Audit Committee of Simon Property’s Board of Directors approved Ernst & Young, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to perform certain international tax compliance and consulting services. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

29




Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

 

Exhibit Descriptions

1.1  

 

Underwriting agreement dated as of August 22, 2006, among Simon Property Group, L.P., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as the representatives of the several underwriters named therin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the current Report on Form 8-K filed by Simon Property Group, L.P. on August 24, 2006).

31.1  

 

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2  

 

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32  

 

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

30




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P

 

By Simon Property Group, Inc.,
General Partner

 

/s/ Stephen E. Sterrett

 

Stephen E. Sterrett

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Date: November 13, 2006

 

31



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Simon, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 121-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006

 

/s/ David Simon

 

 

David Simon

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

Simon Property Group, Inc.

General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.

 

32



EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen E. Sterrett, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 121-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006

/s/ Stephen E. Sterrett

 

Stephen E. Sterrett

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.

 

33



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David Simon

 

David Simon

 

Chief Executive Officer
of Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.

 

Date: November 13, 2006

 

/s/ Stephen E. Sterrett

 

Stephen E. Sterrett

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Simon Property Group, Inc.
General Partner of Simon Property Group, L.P.

 

Date: November 13, 2006

 

 

34