UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State of incorporation or organization)

33-11491

(Commission File No.)

34-1755769

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

225 West Washington Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

(Address of principal executive offices)

(317) 636-1600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes   x       No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer:

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   o       No   x

Registrant has no common stock outstanding.

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Form 10-Q

INDEX

2

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except unit amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

1.   Organization

Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), is a majority owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Simon Property”). Simon Property is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In these condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.

We are engaged primarily in the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate, primarily regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers and community/lifestyle centers. As of September 30, 2006, we owned or held an interest in 284 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 170 regional malls, 69 community/lifestyle centers, 35 Premium Outlet centers and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 38 states and Puerto Rico (collectively, the “Properties”, and individually, a “Property”). We also own interests in eight parcels of land held in the United States for future development (together with the Properties, the “Portfolio”). Finally, we have ownership interests in 52 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland); five Premium Outlet centers in Japan; and one Premium Outlet center in Mexico.

2.   Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries, and all significant inter-company amounts have been eliminated. Due to the seasonal nature of certain operational activities, the results for the interim period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be obtained for the full fiscal year.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of September 30, 2006, of our 342 properties we consolidated 197 wholly-owned properties and 19 additional properties that are less than wholly-owned, but which we control or for which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for the remaining 126 properties using the equity method of accounting (joint venture properties). We manage the day-to-day operations of 58 of the 126 joint venture properties but have determined that our partner or partners have substantive participating rights in regards to the assets and operations of these joint venture properties.

We allocate our net operating results after preferred distributions based on our partners’ respective weighted average ownership interest in the Operating Partnership. In addition, Simon Property owns certain of our preferred units. Simon Property’s weighted average ownership interest in the Operating Partnership was 79.1% and 78.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Simon Property’s ownership interest in us was 79.1% and 79.0%, respectively. We adjust the limited partners’ interest at the end of each period to reflect their respective ownership interest in the Operating Partnership.

6

We made certain reclassifications of prior period amounts in the financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on net income previously reported. Also, the statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods ended September 30, 2005 have been reclassified to reflect significant dispositions of properties sold.

3.   Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We collect funds at the point of sale and then remit those funds to the banks that issue our co-branded gift cards for further processing. As a result, cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2006 includes $26.8 million related to these gift card programs, which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes.

Accounting for Beneficial Interests in Mall of America

As previously disclosed, in January 2006, an entity controlled by the Simon family assigned to us its right to receive cash flow, capital distributions, and related profits and losses with respect to a portion of its ownership interest in the Mall of America through Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”). The beneficial interest was transferred subject to a credit facility repayable from MOAA’s distributions from the property. As a result of this assignment, we began recognizing our share of MOAA’s income during the first quarter of 2006, including the proportionate share of earnings of MOAA since August 2004 through the first quarter of 2006 of $10.2 million. This income is included with “income from unconsolidated entities and beneficial interests, net” in our consolidated results of operations. We have accounted for our beneficial interests in MOAA under the equity method of accounting. On November 2, 2006, the Simon family entity transferred its partnership interest to an affiliate of another partner in MOAA as part of a settlement of pending litigation disclosed in Note 8, terminating our beneficial interests. We will cease recording income from this property’s operations as a result of this transaction. We also expect to record a gain during the fourth quarter of 2006 of approximately $85 million.

4.   Per Unit Data

We determine basic earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period. We determine diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of common units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common units were converted into units at the earliest date possible. The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per unit.

For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2006, potentially dilutive securities include stock options of Simon Property and certain preferred units which are exchangeable for units. The only potentially dilutive securities that had a dilutive effect for the three and nine months ended September 30,

7

2006 and 2005 were stock options of Simon Property. When stock options are exercised we issue an equal number of units to Simon Property. Common units may be exchanged for shares of Simon Property common stock, on a one-for one basis, in certain circumstances. We accrue distributions when they are declared.

5.   Investment in Unconsolidated Entities

Real Estate Joint Ventures

Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties, and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio. We held joint venture ownership interests in 68 Properties in the United States as of September 30, 2006 and 69 at December 31, 2005. We held interests in two joint ventures which owned 52 European shopping centers as of September 30, 2006 and  December 31, 2005. We also held an interest in five joint venture properties in Japan and one joint venture property in Mexico. We account for these Properties using the equity method of accounting.

Substantially all of our joint venture Properties are subject to rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, or other sale rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which results in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the joint venture interest.

On November 1, 2006, we acquired our partner’s 50% ownership interest in Mall of Georgia, a regional mall Property, for $252.6 million, including the assumption of our $96.0 million share of debt. As a result, we now own 100% of Mall of Georgia and will consolidate this Property beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006.

International Joint Venture Investments

We conduct our international operations in Europe through our two European joint venture investment entities; Simon Ivanhoe B.V./S.à.r.l. (“Simon Ivanhoe”), which was formerly known as European Retail Enterprises B.V./S.à.r.l (“ERE”), and Gallerie Commerciali Italia (“GCI”). The carrying amount of our total combined investment in these two joint venture investments is $337.8 million and $287.4 million as of  September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, net of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The Operating Partnership has a 50% ownership in Simon Ivanhoe and a 49% ownership in GCI as of September 30, 2006.

On October 20, 2005, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, effectively acquired our former partner’s 39.5% ownership interest in ERE. On February 13, 2006, pursuant to the terms of our October 20, 2005 transaction with Ivanhoe, we sold a 10.5% interest in this joint venture to Ivanhoe for €45.2 million, or $53.9 million, and recorded a gain on the disposition of $34.4 million. This gain is reported in “gain on sales of assets and interests in other unconsolidated entities, net” in the consolidated statements of operations. We then settled all remaining share purchase commitments from the founders of ERE, including the early settlement of some commitments, by purchasing an additional 25.8% interest in Simon Ivanhoe for €55.1 million, or $65.5 million. The result of these transactions equalized our and Ivanhoe’s ownership in Simon Ivanhoe to 50% each.

We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in Japan through joint venture partnerships with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. and Sojitz Corporation (formerly known as Nissho Iwai Corporation). The carrying amount of our investment in these Premium Outlet joint ventures in Japan is $282.9 million and $287.7 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, net of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The Operating Partnership has a 40% ownership in the Japan Premium Outlet joint ventures.

8

During the period ended September 30, 2006, we finalized the formation of joint venture arrangements to develop and operate retail centers in China with Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund (MSREF) and SZITIC Commercial Property Co., Ltd. (SZITIC CP), retail property subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned trust and investment firm Shenzen International Trust & Investment Co., Ltd. (SZITIC), as our partners. The centers will be anchored by Wal-Mart stores and our and MSREF’s ownership will each be 32.5% with SZITIC CP owning 35%. We are planning on initially developing five centers, four of which are currently under construction, with a total equity commitment of approximately $50 million. We account for these investments in China under the equity method of accounting.

Summary Financial Information

Summary financial information of all of our joint ventures and a summary of our investment in and share of income from such joint ventures follow. We condensed into separate line items major captions of the statements of operations for joint venture interests sold or consolidated. Consolidation occurs when we acquire an additional interest in the joint venture and, as a result, gain unilateral control of the Property or are determined to be the primary beneficiary. We reclassify these line items into “discontinued joint venture interests” on the balance sheets and statements of operations, if material, so that we may present comparative results of operations for those joint venture interests held as of September 30, 2006.

“Excess Investment” represents the unamortized difference of our investment over our share of the equity in the underlying net assets of the joint ventures acquired. We amortize excess investment over the life of the related Properties, typically no greater than 40 years, and the amortization is included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

9

On January 11, 2005, Metrocenter, a joint venture regional mall property was sold. We recognized our share of the gain of $11.8 million, net of the write-off of the related investment and received $62.6 million representing our share of the proceeds from this disposition.

On April 25, 2006, Great Northeast Plaza, a joint venture community center was sold. We recognized our share of the gain of $7.7 million, net of the write-off of the related investment and received $8.8 million representing our share of the proceeds from this disposition.

Our share of the gain resulting from the sale of Metrocenter and Great Northeast Plaza are shown separately in “gain (loss) on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, net” in the consolidated statement of operations.

10

6.   Debt

Unsecured Debt

On March 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services raised its corporate credit rating for us to ‘A-’ from ‘BBB+’ which resulted in a decrease in the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our unsecured revolving $3 billion credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to 37.5 basis points over LIBOR from 42.5 basis points over LIBOR. The revision to our rating also decreased the facility fee on the Credit Facility to 12.5 basis points from 15 basis points.

On May 15, 2006, we sold two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $800 million at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.93%. The first tranche is $400.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.75% due May 1, 2012 and the second tranche is $400.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 6.10% due May 1, 2016. We used the proceeds of the offering and the termination of forward-starting swap arrangements to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.

On August 29, 2006, we sold two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $1.1 billion at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.73%. The first tranche is $600.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.60% due September 1, 2011 and the second tranche is $500.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.875% due March 1, 2017. We used proceeds from the offering to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.

Credit Facility.   Other significant draws on the Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were as follows:

Other amounts drawn on the Credit Facility were primarily for general working capital purposes. We repaid a total of $2.0 billion on the Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The total outstanding balance on the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2006 was $291.4 million, and the maximum amount outstanding during the quarter was approximately $1.3 billion. During the first nine months of 2006, the weighted average outstanding balance on the Credit Facility was approximately $1.3 billion.

Acquisition Facility.   We borrowed $1.8 billion in 2004 to finance the cash portion of our acquisition of Chelsea. As disclosed above, this facility has been fully repaid.

Secured Debt

Total secured indebtedness was $4.3 billion and $4.6 billion at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we repaid $217.7 million in mortgage loans, unencumbering four properties.

7.   Partners’ Equity

Under The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, on February 21, 2006, the Compensation Committee of Simon Property’s Board of Directors awarded 426,750 restricted shares of Simon Property common stock to employees under this Plan at a fair value of $83.48 per share. On May 11,

11

2006, our non-employee Directors were awarded 9,660 shares of restricted stock under this Plan at a fair value of $81.26 per share. The fair market value of the restricted stock awarded on February 21, 2006 has been deferred and is being amortized over a four-year vesting service period. The fair market value of the restricted stock awarded on May 11, 2006 has been deferred and is being amortized over a one-year vesting service period. As a result of the awards of restricted stock, we issued a like number of units to Simon Property in accordance with our partnership agreement.

During the first nine months of 2006, five limited partners exchanged 86,800 units for a like number of shares of common stock of Simon Property, increasing Simon Property’s interest in us.

On May 12, 2006, the Simon Property Board of Directors authorized a common stock repurchase program under which Simon Property may purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of its common stock subject to a maximum aggregate purchase price of $250 million over the next twelve months as market conditions warrant. Simon Property may purchase the shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. There have been no purchases under this program since May, 2006.

As previously disclosed, for the quarter ending on March 31, 2006, holders of Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units (“Series I Preferred Units”) and Simon Property’s Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series I Preferred Stock”) could elect to convert their securities during the quarter beginning on April 3, 2006 into units in the Operating Partnership and shares of Simon Property common stock, respectively. The optional conversion is as a result of the closing sale price of Simon Property’s common stock exceeding the applicable trigger price per share for a period of 20 trading days in the last 30 trading days of the quarter. The conversion trigger price was also met during the second quarter of 2006. At the current conversion price of $79.48, each Series I Preferred Unit was convertible into 0.78637 of a common unit and each share of Series I Preferred Stock was convertible into 0.78637 of a share of Simon Property common stock. If holders of a Series I Preferred Unit convert into common units, then the holder may also elect to convert those units into common stock on a one-for-one basis in accordance with our partnership agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, 238,982 shares of Series I Preferred Stock were converted into 187,593 shares of Simon Property common stock and Simon Property converted a like number of its Series I Preferred Units into common units. As of September 30, 2006, the conversion trigger price of $79.37 had been met and the Series I Preferred Unit is convertible into 0.78745 of a common unit and the Series I Preferred Stock is convertible into 0.78745 of a share of Simon Property common stock beginning October 2, 2006 through December 29, 2006.

Subsequent to September 30, 2006, Simon Property redeemed all 8,000,000 outstanding shares of its 8¾% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share plus accrued unpaid dividends. Concurrently with that redemption, we redeemed the 8¾% preferred units held by Simon Property at that same price. We will record a $7 million charge to net income during the fourth quarter of 2006 related to these transactions.

Preferred units whose redemption is outside of our control have been classified as temporary equity in the accompanying balance sheets.

8.   Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

There have been no material developments since July 1, 2006 with respect to the pending litigation disclosed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except that on November 2, all parties agreed to settle the lawsuit brought by Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. on November 9, 1999 in the Federal District Court for the State of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial District (Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. vs. Melvin Simon et al.). As disclosed in note 3 to these consolidated financial statements, the settlement terminated our beneficial

12

interest in Mall of America. This action was dismissed, with prejudice, and mutual releases were delivered by all parties to the proceeding.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such routine litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Guarantees of Indebtedness

Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture, and is typically secured by the joint venture Property, which is non-recourse to us. As of September 30, 2006, we have loan guarantees and other guarantee obligations of $68.8 million and $99.6 million, respectively, to support our total $3.5 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness in the event that the joint venture partnership defaults under the terms of the underlying arrangement. Mortgages which are guaranteed by us are secured by the property of the joint venture and that property could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation.

9.   Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, we disposed of certain non-significant properties summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

We had no consolidated property acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

10.   Recent Financial Accounting Standards

In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ratified its consensus in EITF Issue 04-05, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (Issue 04-05). The effective date for Issue 04-05 is June 29, 2005 for all new or modified partnerships and January 1, 2006 for all other partnerships for the applicable provisions. The adoption of the provisions of EITF 04-05 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—an amendment of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29.”  This Statement requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless: (a) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits; or (b) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” This FSP amends SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and SFAS No. 124, “Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations,” and APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” This FSP provides guidance on the determination of when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss. This FSP also requires disclosure about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments.

13

The guidance in this FSP is effective in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 is a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” This Statement requires voluntary changes in accounting to be accounted for retrospectively and all prior periods to be restated as if the newly adopted policy had always been used, unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required most voluntary changes in accounting to be recognized by including the cumulative effect of the change in accounting in net income in the period of change. This Statement also requires a change in method of depreciation, amortization or depletion for a long-lived asset be accounted for as a change in estimate that is affected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” This Statement requires that a public entity measure the cost of equity-based service awards based on the grant date fair value of the award. All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are required to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair value. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period after June 15, 2005. Other than the reclassification of the unamortized portion of our restricted stock awards to capital in excess of par in the consolidated balance sheets, the adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We began expensing the vested portion of restricted stock awards to the recipients in the consolidated statements of operations in 2002.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation also provides guidance on description, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 becomes effective on January 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this Interpretation.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 is definitional and disclosure oriented and addresses how companies should approach measuring fair value when required by GAAP; it does not create or modify any current GAAP requirements to apply fair value accounting. The Standard provides a single definition for fair value that is to be applied consistently for all accounting applications, and also generally describes and prioritizes according to reliability the methods and inputs used in valuations. FAS 157 prescribes various disclosures about financial statement categories and amounts which are measured at fair value, if such disclosures are not already specified elsewhere in GAAP. The new measurement and disclosure requirements of FAS 157 are effective for us in the first quarter of 2008. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 157 to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.

14

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this report. Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: our ability to meet debt service requirements, the availability of financing, changes in our credit rating, changes in market rates of interest and foreign exchange rates for foreign currencies, the ability to hedge our interest rate risk, risks associated with the acquisition, development and expansion of properties, general risks related to retail real estate, the liquidity of real estate investments, environmental liabilities, international, national, regional and local economic climates, changes in market rental rates, trends in the retail industry, relationships with anchor tenants, the inability to collect rent due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise, risks relating to our joint venture properties, costs of common area maintenance, competitive market forces, risks related to international activities, insurance costs and coverage, impact of terrorist activities, inflation and maintenance of REIT status. We discussed these and other risks and uncertainties under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. We may update that discussion in this or subsequent quarterly reports, but otherwise we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Overview

Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), is a majority owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Simon Property”). Simon Property is our general partner and a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In this discussion, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.

We are engaged in the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate properties, primarily regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers and community/lifestyle centers. As of September 30, 2006, we owned or held an interest in 284 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 170 regional malls, 69 community/lifestyle centers, 35 Premium Outlet centers and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 38 states plus Puerto Rico (collectively, the “Properties”, and individually, a “Property”). We also own interests in eight parcels of land held in the United States for future development (together with the Properties, the “Portfolio”). Finally, we have ownership interests in 52 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland); five Premium Outlet centers in Japan; and one Premium Outlet center in Mexico.

Operating Fundamentals

We generate the majority of revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

·       Base minimum rents and cart and kiosk rentals,

·       Overage and percentage rents based on tenants’ sales volume, and

·       Recoveries of a significant amount of our recoverable expenditures, which consist of property operating, real estate tax, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotional expenditures.

Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

15

We seek growth in our earnings and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our properties and investments. We seek to accomplish this growth through the following:

·       Focusing on leasing to increase revenues and utilization of economies of scale to reduce operating expenses,

·       Expanding and re-tenanting existing franchise locations at competitive market rates,

·       Adding mixed-use elements to our Portfolio through our land intensification initiatives. This may include adding elements such as multifamily, condominiums, hotel and self-storage at selected locations, and

We also grow by generating supplemental revenues in our existing real estate portfolio, from outlot parcel sales and, due to our size and tenant relationships, from the following:

·       Simon Brand Ventures (“Simon Brand”) mall marketing initiatives, including fees derived from the marketing, promotion, and sale of bank-issued co-branded gift cards. Simon Brand revenues also include payment services, national media contracts, a national beverage contract and other contracts with national companies.

·       Simon Business Network (“Simon Business”) offers property operating services to our tenants and others resulting from its relationships with vendors.

We focus on high quality real estate across the retail real estate spectrum. We expand or renovate to enhance existing assets’ profitability and market share when we believe the investment of our capital meets our risk-reward criteria. We develop new properties in major metropolitan areas that exhibit strong population and economic growth.

We routinely review and evaluate a number of acquisition opportunities based on their complement to our Portfolio. Lastly, we are selectively expanding our international presence. Our international strategy includes partnering with established real estate companies and financing international investments with local currency to minimize foreign exchange risk.

To support our overall growth goals, we employ a three-fold capital strategy:

·       Provide the capital necessary to fund growth.

·       Maintain sufficient flexibility to access capital in many forms, both public and private.

·       Manage our overall financial structure in a fashion that preserves our investment grade ratings.

Results Overview

Diluted earnings per unit decreased  $0.03 during the first nine months of 2006, or 2.3%, to $1.27 from $1.30 for the same period last year. The 2006 results include a $34.4 million gain (or $0.12 per diluted unit) from the sale of partnership interests in one of our European joint ventures to our new partner, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, and recognition of $15.3 million in income (or $0.05 per diluted unit) from contributed beneficial interests, representing the right to receive cash flow, capital distributions, and related profits and losses of Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”). Included in 2005 results is a gain upon the disposition of the Riverway and O’Hare International Center office building properties that resulted in a gain of $125.4 million (or $0.45 per diluted unit).

Our core business fundamentals remained strong during the first nine months of 2006. Regional mall comparable sales per square foot (“psf”) strengthened during the first nine months of 2006, increasing 6.8% to $474 psf from $444 psf for the same period in 2005 reflecting robust retail demand and the disposition of non-core properties. Our regional mall average base rents increased 2.7% to $35.23 psf as of September 30, 2006 from $34.30 psf as of September 30, 2005.  In addition, our regional mall leasing spreads were $6.06 psf as of September 30, 2006 compared to $7.26 psf as of September 30, 2005 principally as a result of leasing mix. The operating fundamentals of the Premium Outlet centers and

16

community/lifestyle centers also contributed to the increase in our operating results for the nine month period as seen in the following section entitled Portfolio Data. Finally, regional mall occupancy was 92.5% as of September 30, 2006 as compared to 92.6% as of September 30, 2005. The slight decline results from an increase in square footage lost to bankruptcy proceedings and store closures.

During the first nine months of 2006 we disposed of three properties as follows:

·       On April 25, 2006, Great Northeast Plaza, a community center located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was sold for $8.8 million, and we recorded a gain on disposition of $7.7 million. We held a 50% interest in this property.

·       On July 27, 2006, Wabash Village, a community center located in West Lafayette, Indiana was sold for $2.6 million, and we recorded a gain on disposition of $2.0 million. We held a 100% interest in this property.

·       On August 3, 2006, Trolley Square, a regional mall located in Salt Lake City, Utah was sold for $38.6 million, and we recorded a gain on disposition of $7.3 million. We held a 90% interest in this property.

Regarding financing activities, despite the increasing interest rate environment resulting in an approximate 150 basis point increase in LIBOR (5.32% at September 30, 2006 versus 3.86% at September 30, 2005), our effective overall borrowing rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased only 23 basis points as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Our financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are highlighted by the following:

·       We repaid $300 million in unsecured notes that bore interest at 7.38%, and a $59.1 million term loan that bore interest at 7.26%.

·       We paid off one mortgage totaling $140.0 million that bore interest at LIBOR plus 138 basis points.

·       We made the final $600 million payment on the facility we used to fund the cash portion of our 2004 acquisition of  Chelsea Property Group, Inc. (“Chelsea”).

·       We repaid two mortgages totaling $58.0 million that each bore interest at 8.25%.

·       On March 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services raised its corporate credit rating for us to ‘A-’ from ‘BBB+’ which resulted in a decrease in the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our unsecured revolving $3 billion credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to 37.5 basis points over LIBOR from 42.5 basis points over LIBOR. The revision to our rating also decreased the facility fee on the Credit Facility to 12.5 basis points from 15 basis points.

·       We issued two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $800 million at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.93%. We used the net proceeds of $803.9 million, which includes $10.1 million proceeds from terminated forward-starting swap arrangements, to reduce the borrowings on our Credit Facility.

·       We paid off one mortgage totaling $19.8 million that bore interest at 8.12%.

·       We issued two tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $1.1 billion at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.73%. We used the proceeds of the offering to reduce borrowings on our Credit Facility.

·       Borrowings on the Credit Facility decreased to approximately $291.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, principally as a result of the above repayments. The September 30, 2006 outstanding balance encompassed only Euro and Yen denominated borrowings.

17

Portfolio Data

The Portfolio data discussed in this overview includes the following key operating statistics: occupancy, average base rent per square foot and comparable sales per square foot for our three domestic platforms. We include acquired Properties in this data beginning in the year of acquisition. The following table sets forth these key operating statistics for:

·       Properties that we consolidate in our consolidated financial statements,

·       Properties that we account for under the equity method as unconsolidated joint ventures, and

·       the foregoing two categories of Properties on a total Portfolio basis.

Domestic Property Data: