UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State of incorporation or organization)

33-11491

(Commission File No.)

34-1755769

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

National City Center

115 West Washington Street, Suite 15 East

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

(Address of principal executive offices)

(317) 636-1600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   þ       No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer:

 

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   o       No   þ

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Form 10-Q

INDEX

				Page
Part I — Financial Information
	Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005		3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005		4
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005		5
		Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15
	Item 3.	Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk		27
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		27
Part II — Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		27
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		28
	Item 5.	Other Information		28
	Item 6.	Exhibits		28
Signatures				29

 

2

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except unit amounts)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

1.                 Organization

Simon Property Group, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, is a majority owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc. (“Simon Property”), a Delaware corporation. Simon Property is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In these condensed notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. We are engaged primarily in the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate, primarily regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers and community/lifestyle centers. As of March 31, 2006, we owned or held an interest in 286 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 171 regional malls, 71 community/lifestyle centers, 34 Premium Outlet centers and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 39 states and Puerto Rico (collectively, the “Properties”, and individually, a “Property”). We also own interests in ten parcels of land held in the United States for future development (together with the Properties, the “Portfolio”). Finally, we have ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy, and Poland); five Premium Outlet centers in Japan; and one Premium Outlet center in Mexico.

2.                 Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries, and all significant inter-company amounts have been eliminated. Due to the seasonal nature of certain operational activities, including overage rent revenues and property operating expenses, the results for the interim period ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be obtained for the full fiscal year.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of March 31, 2006, of our 343 properties we consolidated 197 wholly-owned properties and 20 additional properties that are less than wholly-owned, which we control or for which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for the remaining 126 properties using the equity method of accounting (joint venture properties). We manage the day-to-day operations of 59 of the 126 joint venture properties but have determined that our partner or partners have substantive participating rights in regards to the assets and operations of these joint venture properties.

We allocate our net operating results after preferred distributions based on our partners’ respective weighted average ownership. In addition, Simon Property owns certain of our preferred units. Simon Property’s weighted average ownership interest in the Operating Partnership was 79.0% and 78.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Simon Property’s ownership interest us was 79.1% and 79.0%, respectively. We adjust the limited partners’ interest at the end of each period to reflect changes in their respective ownership interest in the Operating Partnership.

6

---

We made certain reclassifications of prior period amounts in the financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on net income previously reported. Also, the statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods ended March 31, 2005 have been reclassified to reflect significant dispositions of properties sold during 2005.

3.                 Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For the bank-issued co-branded gift card programs that we administer, we collect funds at the point of sale and then remit those funds to the banks for further processing. As a result, cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2006 includes $52.0 million related to these gift card programs, which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes.

Accounting for Beneficial Interests in Mall of America

As discussed in Note 8 to these condensed notes to consolidated financial statements, a portion of the litigation relating to Mall of America was resolved in January 2006, and as a result, a partnership interest in Mall of America previously transferred to an affiliate of Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. was transferred to Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”), a general partnership in which members of the Simon family have a 50% ownership interest. Subsequent to that transfer, the Simon family entity assigned to us the right to receive cash flow, capital distributions, and related profits and losses with respect to the Simon family’s portion of that interest. As a result of this assignment, we recognized a $10.2 million gain in the first quarter of 2006, including the proportionate share of earnings of the partnership since August 2004 through the first quarter of 2006. This gain has been reported as “income from beneficial interests, net” in our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006. We are accounting for our beneficial interests in this entity under the equity method of accounting.

4.                 Per Unit Data

We determine basic earnings per unit of limited partnership interest based on the weighted average number of units outstanding during the period. We determine diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common units were converted into units at the earliest date possible. The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per unit.

 

For the three months ending March 31, 2006, potentially dilutive securities include the stock options of Simon Property and certain preferred units. The only potentially dilutive security that had a dilutive effect for the three months ended March 31, 2006, and 2005 were stock options of Simon Property. When stock options are exercised we issue an equal number of units to Simon Property. Units may be exchanged

7

---

for shares of Simon Property common stock, on a one-for one basis, in certain circumstances. We accrue distributions when they are declared.

5.                 Investment in Unconsolidated Entities

Real Estate Joint Ventures

Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties, and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio. We held joint venture ownership interests in 69 Properties in the United States as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. We also held interests in two joint ventures which owned 51 European shopping centers as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. We also held an interest in five joint venture properties in Japan and one joint venture property in Mexico. We account for these Properties using the equity method of accounting

Substantially all of our joint venture Properties are subject to rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, or other sale rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which will result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the joint venture interest.

International Joint Venture Investments

We conduct our international operations in Europe through our two European joint venture investment entities; Simon Ivanhoe B.V./S.à.r.l. (“Simon Ivanhoe”), formerly known as European Retail Enterprises B.V./S.à.r.l (“ERE”), and Gallerie Commerciali Italia (“GCI”), The carrying amount of our total combined investment in these two joint venture investments is $333.6 million and $287.4 million as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, net of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The Operating Partnership has a 50% ownership in Simon Ivanhoe and a 49% ownership in GCI as of March 31, 2006.

On October 20, 2005, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, effectively acquired our former partner’s 39.5% ownership interest in ERE. On February 13, 2006, pursuant to the terms of our October 20, 2005 transaction with Ivanhoe, we sold a 10.5% interest in this joint venture to Ivanhoe for €45.2 million, or $53.9 million, and recorded a gain on the disposition of $34.4 million. This gain is reported in “gain on sales of interests in unconsolidated entities, net” in the consolidated statements of operations. We then settled all remaining share purchase commitments from the founders of ERE, including the early settlement of some commitments, by purchasing an additional 25.8% interest for €55.1 million, or $65.5 million. The result of these transactions equalized our and Ivanhoe’s ownership in Simon Ivanhoe to 50% each.

We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in Japan through joint venture partnerships with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. and Sojitz Corporation (formerly known as Nissho Iwai Corporation). The carrying amount of our investment in these Japanese Premium Outlet joint ventures is $285.0 million and $287.7 million as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, net of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The Operating Partnership has a 40% ownership in these Japanese Premium Outlet joint ventures.

8

---

Summary financial information of the joint ventures and a summary of our investment in and share of income from such joint ventures follow. We condensed into separate line items major captions of the statements of operations for joint venture interests sold or consolidated. Consolidation occurs when we acquire an additional interest in the joint venture and, as a result, gain unilateral control of the Property or are determined to be the primary beneficiary. We reclassify these line items into “Discontinued Joint Venture Interests” and “Consolidated Joint Venture Interests” on the balance sheets and statements of operations, if material, so that we may present comparative results of operations for those joint venture interests held as of March 31, 2006.

 

9

---

 

 

On January 11, 2005, Metrocenter, a joint venture regional mall property was sold. We recognized our share of the gain of $11.8 million, net of the write-off of the related investment and received $62.6 million representing our share of the proceeds from this disposition.

“Excess Investment” represents the unamortized difference of our investment over our share of the equity in the underlying net assets of the joint ventures acquired. We amortize excess investment over the life of the related Properties, typically no greater than 40 years, and the amortization is included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

10

6.   Debt

Unsecured Debt

On March 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services raised its corporate credit rating for us to ‘A-’ from ‘BBB+’ which resulted in a decrease in the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our unsecured revolving $3 billion credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to 37.5 basis points over LIBOR from 42.5 basis points over LIBOR. The revision to our rating also decreased the facility fee on the Credit Facility to 12.5 basis points from 15 basis points.

On May 9, 2006, the Operating Partnership entered into an underwriting agreement with respect to the issuance of two new tranches of senior unsecured notes totaling $800 million at a weighted average fixed interest rate of 5.925%. The first tranche of $400 million is at a fixed interest rate of 5.75% due May 1, 2012 (6 year notes), and the second tranche of $400 million is at a fixed interest rate of 6.10% due May 1, 2016 (10 year notes). The Operating Partnership expects to receive net proceeds of approximately $794 million from the issuance of these notes and will use the proceeds to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility. Prior to the issuance of these notes, the Operating Partnership entered into forward-starting swap arrangements on $500 million of these borrowings as of an earlier date, thereby reducing the effective weighted average borrowing rate on the 6 year notes and 10 year notes to 5.71% and 5.91%, respectively.

Credit Facility.   Significant activity on the Credit Facility during the three-month period ended March 31, 2006 was as follows:

                                                                                                                                               

Other amounts drawn on the Credit Facility were primarily for general working capital purposes. The total aggregate amount of our repayments on the Credit Facility during the three month period ended March 31, 2006 was $110.0 million. The total outstanding balance on the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2006, and the maximum amount outstanding during the quarter, was approximately $2.0 billion. During the first three months of 2006, the weighted average outstanding balance on the Credit Facility was approximately $1.3 billion.

Acquisition Facility.   We borrowed $1.8 billion in 2004 to finance the cash portion of our acquisition of Chelsea. On March 27, 2006, we made the final principal payment due on this facility. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 55 basis points with an additional 15 basis point facility fee on all loans outstanding and provided for variable grid pricing based upon our credit rating.

Secured Debt

Total secured indebtedness was $4.4 billion and $4.6 billion at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, we repaid $140.0 million in mortgage loans, unencumbering one property.

7.   Partners’ Equity

Under The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, on February 21, 2006, Simon Property Group’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors awarded 426,750 shares of Simon Property at a fair value of $83.48 per share. The fair market value of the restricted stock awarded has been deferred and is being amortized over a four-year vesting period. The issuance of these 2006 restricted stock awards

11

---

utilized existing shares held by Simon Property as treasury shares.  As a result, we issued a like number of units to Simon Property in accordance with our partnership agreement.

During the first three months of 2006, four limited partners exchanged 16,800 units for a like number of shares of common stock of Simon Property, increasing Simon Property’s interest in us.

On May 11, 2005, Simon Property’s Board of Directors authorized a common stock repurchase program under which Simon Property may purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of its common stock subject to a maximum aggregate purchase price of $250 million over the next twelve months as market conditions warrant. Simon Property may repurchase the shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As shares are repurchased, the number of outstanding units is reduced on an equivalent basis. The program has 5,184,600 shares, limited to $191.4 million, remaining for repurchase. There were no purchases under this program during the first quarter of 2006.

Holders of  our Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units (“Series I Preferred Units”) and Simon Property’s Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series I Preferred Stock”) have the right to convert their securities during the quarter beginning on April 3, 2006 and ending on June 30, 2006. The Series I Preferred Units are convertible into units in the Operating Partnership and the Series I Preferred Stock are convertible into shares of Simon Property common stock. The conversion right is the result of the closing sale price of Simon Property’s common stock exceeding the trigger price of $79.59 for a period of 20 consecutive trading days in the last 30 trading days of the quarter. At the current conversion price, each Series I Preferred Unit is convertible into .7853 of a unit and each share of Series I Preferred Stock is convertible into 0.7853 of a share of common stock. If holders of a Series I Preferred Unit converts into units, then the holder may also elect to convert those units into common stock on a one-for-one basis in accordance with our partnership agreement. To the extent holders of Series I Preferred Stock convert their shares into common stock, Simon Property would convert a like number of its Series I Preferred Units into units.

Preferred units whose redemption is outside of our control have been classified as temporary equity in the accompanying balance sheets.

8.   Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

Except as described in the following paragraph, there have not been any material developments in the legal proceedings we described in our Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

As previously disclosed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are a defendant in a suit filed on November 9, 1999 in the District Court for the State of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial District (Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, v. Melvin Simon, et al.). In January 2006, and as more fully described in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we resolved a portion of the litigation between Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. (“Triple Five”) and, among others, the Mall of America, certain members of the Simon family and entities allegedly controlled by such individuals, and us. In April 2005, the federal Appellate Court modified the remedy in the Mall of America case, requiring that the transfer of a partnership interest originally purchased from Teachers’ Insurance and Annuity of America in 1999 and transferred to Triple Five in August, 2004, should have been transferred to Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”), a partnership in which members of the Simon family have an interest. In January, 2006, the transfer of this interest from Triple Five to MOAA was completed. The result on our consolidated financial statements is discussed in Note 3 to these condensed notes to consolidated financial statements. This transfer resolved a portion of the Mall of America litigation. It is not possible to provide any assurance as to the outcome of the remaining litigation related to the Mall of America.

12

---

We are involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such routine litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Guarantees of Indebtedness

Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture, and is typically secured by the joint venture Property, which is non-recourse to us. As of March 31, 2006, we have loan guarantees and other guarantee obligations of $33.0 million and $45.6 million, respectively, to support our total $3.3 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness in the event that the joint venture partnership defaults under the terms of the underlying arrangement. Mortgages which are guaranteed by us are secured by the property of the joint venture partnership and could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation.

9.   Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions

We had no property acquisitions or dispositions during the three months ended March 31, 2006.

10.   Recent Financial Accounting Standards

In June 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ratified its consensus in EITF Issue 04-05, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (Issue 04-05). The effective date for Issue 04-05 is June 29, 2005 for all new or modified partnerships and January 1, 2006 for all other partnerships for the applicable provisions. The adoption of the provisions of EITF 04-05 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – an amendment of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29.” This Statement requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless: (a) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits; or (b) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” This FSP amends SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and SFAS No. 124, “Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations,” and APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” This FSP provides guidance on the determination of when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss. This FSP also requires disclosure about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in this FSP is effective in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 is a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” This Statement requires voluntary changes in accounting to be accounted for retrospectively and all prior periods to be restated as if the newly adopted policy had always been used, unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required most voluntary changes in accounting to be recognized by including the cumulative effect of the change in accounting in net income in the period of change. This Statement also requires a change in method of depreciation, amortization or depletion for a long-lived asset be accounted for as a change in estimate that

13

---

is affected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” This Statement requires that a public entity measure the cost of equity-based service awards based on the grant date fair value of the award. All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are required to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair value. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period after June 15, 2005. Other than the reclassification of the unamortized portion of our restricted stock awards to capital in excess of par in the consolidated balance sheets, the adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. This is as a result of our changing our method of accounting for stock-based compensation during 2002 whereby we began expensing the vested portion of the award to the recipients in the consolidated statements of operations.

14

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this report. Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: international, national, regional and local economic climates, competitive market forces, changes in market rental rates, trends in the retail industry, the inability to collect rent due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise, risks associated with acquisitions, the impact of terrorist activities, environmental liabilities, pending litigation, maintenance of REIT status, changes in applicable laws, rules and regulations, changes in market rates of interest and exchange rates for foreign currencies. We discussed some important risks and uncertainties under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. We may update that discussion in this or subsequent quarterly reports, but otherwise we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Overview

Simon Property Group, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, is a majority owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc. (“Simon Property”). Simon Property is our general partner and a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In this discussion, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. We are engaged in the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate properties, primarily regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers and community/lifestyle centers. As of March 31, 2006, we owned or held an interest in 286 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 171 regional malls, 71 community/lifestyle centers, 34 Premium Outlet centers and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 39 states plus Puerto Rico (collectively, the “Properties”, and individually, a “Property”). We also own interests in ten parcels of land held in the United States for future development (together with the Properties, the “Portfolio”). Finally, we have ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy, and Poland); five Premium Outlet centers in Japan; and one Premium Outlet center in Mexico.

Operating Fundamentals

We generate the majority of revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

·                    Base minimum rents and cart and kiosk rentals,

·                    Overage and percentage rents based on tenants’ sales volume, and

·                    Recoveries of a significant amount of our recoverable expenditures, which consist of property operating, real estate tax, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotional expenditures.

Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

15

---

We seek growth in our earnings, and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our regional malls, Premium Outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and international investments. We seek to accomplish this growth through the following:

·                    Focusing on leasing to increase revenues and utilization of economies of scale to reduce operating expenses,

·                    Expanding and re-tenanting existing franchise locations at competitive market rates,

·                    Adding mixed-use elements to our Portfolio through our land intensification initiatives. This may include adding elements such as multifamily, condominiums, hotel and self-storage at selected locations, and

We also grow by generating supplemental revenues in our existing real estate portfolio, from outlot parcel sales and, due to our size and tenant relationships, from the following:

·                    Simon Brand Ventures (“Simon Brand”) mall marketing initiatives, including fees derived from the issuance of bank-issued co-branded gift cards. Simon Brand revenues also include payment services, national media contracts, a national beverage contract and other contracts with national companies.

·                    Simon Business Network (“Simon Business”) property operating services to our tenants and others resulting from its relationships with vendors.

We strive to develop high quality real estate across the retail real estate spectrum. We pursue strategic expansion and renovation activity to enhance existing assets’ profitability and market share when we believe the investment of our capital meets our risk-reward criteria. We selectively develop new properties in major metropolitan areas that exhibit strong population and economic growth.

We also seek to acquire high quality retail real estate within each of our three domestic platforms. As part of our acquisition strategy, we review and evaluate a number of acquisition opportunities based on their complement to our Portfolio.

Lastly, we are selectively expanding our international presence. Our strategy to investing internationally includes partnering with established real estate companies and financing international investments with local currency to minimize foreign exchange risk.

To support our overall growth goals, we employ a three-fold capital strategy:

·                    Provide the capital necessary to fund growth.

·                    Maintain sufficient flexibility to access capital in many forms, both public and private.

·                    Manage our overall financial structure in a fashion that preserves our investment grade ratings.

Results Overview

Diluted earnings per common unit increased $0.21 during the first three months of 2006, or 80.8%, to $0.47 from $0.26 for the same period last year. This increase included a $34.4 million gain (or $0.16 per diluted unit) from the sale of partnership interests in one of our European joint ventures to our new partner, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec. Also in the first quarter of 2006, we recognized a $10.2 million gain (or $0.05 per diluted unit) related to beneficial interests that were contributed to us, representing the right to receive cash flow, capital distributions, and related profits and losses of Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”). This represents our share of the net operating results of the partnership that owns the Mall of America (“MOAP”) for the period of August 2004 through March 31, 2006. We received these beneficial interests as a result of resolving certain litigation matters in January, 2006, more fully described in the condensed notes to consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2006 in this Form 10-Q and in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

16

---

Our core business fundamentals remained strong during the first three months of 2006. Regional mall comparable sales per square foot (“psf”) strengthened during the first three months of 2006, increasing 6.0% to $461 psf from $435 psf for the same period in 2005 reflecting robust retail demand and the disposition of non-core properties. Our regional mall average base rents increased 2.7% to $34.83 psf as of March 31, 2006 from $33.90 psf as of March 31, 2005. In addition, we maintained strong regional mall leasing spreads of $10.66 psf as of March 31, 2006 compared to $8.88 psf as of March 31, 2005. Finally, regional mall occupancy increased by ten basis points to 91.6% as of March 31, 2006 from 91.5% as of March 31, 2005. Fundamentals of the Premium Outlet centers and community/lifestyle centers were also positive contributors to the increase in operating results for the quarter as seen in the following section entitled Portfolio Data.

Regarding financing activities, despite significantly increasing rate environments resulting an approximate 196 basis point increase in LIBOR (4.83% at March 31, 2006 versus 2.87% at March 31, 2005), our effective overall borrowing rate for the three months ended March 31, 2006 increased only 32 basis points as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2005. Further, from December 31, 2005 to March 31, 2006, our effective overall borrowing rate decreased six basis points due to repayment of higher rate debt. Our financing activities for the quarter were highlighted by the following:

·                    We repaid $300 million in unsecured notes that bore interest at 7.38%, and a $59.1 million term loan that bore interest at 7.26%.

·                    We paid off one mortgage totaling $140.0 million that bore interest at LIBOR plus 138 basis points.

·                    We repaid the final $600 million payment on the facility we used to fund the cash portion of our 2004 acquisition of Chelsea Property Group, Inc.

·                    Borrowings on the Credit facility increased to approximately $2.0 billion during the three months ended March 31, 2006, principally as a result of the above repayments.

·                    On March 31, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services raised its corporate credit rating for us to ‘A-’ from ‘BBB+’ which resulted in a decrease in the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our unsecured revolving $3 billion credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to 37.5 basis points over LIBOR from 42.5 basis points over LIBOR. The revision to our rating also decreased the facility fee on the Credit Facility to 12.5 basis points from 15 basis points.

17

---

Portfolio Data

The Portfolio data discussed in this overview includes the following key operating statistics: occupancy, average base rent per square foot and comparable sales per square foot for our three domestic platforms. We include acquired Properties in this data beginning in the year of acquisition and we do not include any properties located outside of the United States. The following table sets forth these key operating statistics for:

·                    Properties that we consolidate in our consolidated financial statements,

·                    Properties that we account for under the equity method as unconsolidated joint ventures, and

·                    the foregoing two categories of Properties on a total Portfolio basis.

(1)                       Percentages may not recalculate due to rounding.

Occupancy Levels and Average Base Rent Per Square Foot.   Occupancy and average base rent are based on mall and freestanding Gross Leaseable Area (“GLA”) owned by us (“Owned GLA”) in the regional malls, all tenants at the Premium Outlet centers, and all tenants at community/lifestyle centers. We believe

18

---

the continued growth in regional mall occupancy is primarily the result of the overall quality of our Portfolio. The result of the growth in occupancy is an increase in nearly every category of revenue. Our Portfolio has maintained stable occupancy and increased average base rents despite the uncertain economic climate.

Comparable Sales Per Square Foot.   Comparable sales include total reported retail tenant sales at Owned GLA (for mall and freestanding stores with less than 10,000 square feet) in the regional malls and all reporting tenants at the Premium Outlet centers and community/lifestyle centers. Retail sales at Owned GLA affect revenue and profitability levels because sales determine the amount of minimum rent that can be charged, the percentage rent realized, and the recoverable expenses (common area maintenance, real estate taxes, etc.) that tenants can afford to pay.

International Property Data

The following key operating statistics are provided for our international properties, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Discussion regarding our results of operations for our investment in unconsolidated entities is included in our year-over-year comparisons which follow.

(1)          Does not include our center in Mexico (Premium Outlets Punta Norte), which opened December 2004.

(2)          Amounts recorded for our international investment entities transactions utilize conversion factors, as appropriate, of:   USD:Euro of 0.832 and 0.762, and USD:Yen of 116.90 and 104.55, both for 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Results of Operations

In addition to the activity discussed in the Results Overview, the following acquisitions, dispositions, and openings affected our consolidated results from continuing operations in the comparative periods:

·                    On December 28, 2005, the deed for Biltmore Square was surrendered to the bank in full consideration of the $26 million mortgage on the property, which bore interest at a fixed rate of 7.95%, and had an anticipated maturity date of December 11, 2010.

·                    On November 17, 2005, we sold our interest in Cheltenham Square for $71.5 million and recognized a gain on its disposition of $19.7 million.

·                    In November 2005, we opened Rockaway Plaza, a 450,000 square foot community center located in Rockaway, New Jersey, adjacent to our Rockaway Townsquare.

·                    On October 7, 2005, we opened Firewheel Town Center, a 785,000 square foot open-air regional mall located 15 miles northeast of downtown Dallas in Garland, Texas

19

---

·                    On July 15, 2005, we opened Wolf Ranch, a 600,000 square foot open-air community center located in Georgetown, Texas.

·                    On June 1, 2005, we sold the Riverway and O’Hare International Center office building complexes, in Rosemont, Illinois for $257.3 million and recognized a gain on their disposition of $125.1 million

·                    On May 6, 2005, we opened Seattle Premium Outlets.

·                    On March 15, 2005, we and our joint venture partner completed the construction of, obtained permanent financing for, and opened St. Johns Town Center (St. Johns), a 1.5 million square foot open-air retail project in Jacksonville, Florida. Prior to the completion, we consolidated St. Johns as we were responsible for 85% of the development cost. At permanent financing, we received a distribution from the partnership of $15.7 million, and the ownership percentages were each adjusted to 50%. We now account for St. Johns using the equity method of accounting.

In addition to the activity discussed in the Results Overview, the following acquisitions, dispositions, and openings affected our income from unconsolidated entities in the comparative periods:

·                    On November 18, 2005, we purchased a 37.99% interest in Springfield Mall in Springfield, Pennsylvania for approximately $39.3 million, including the issuance of our share of debt of $29.1 million.

·                    On November 21, 2005, we purchased a 50% interest in Coddingtown Mall in Santa Rosa, California for approximately $37.1 million, including the assumption of our share of debt of $10.5 million.

·                    In March 2005, we opened Toki Premium Outlets in Japan.

·                    On January 11, 2005, Metrocenter, a regional mall located in Phoenix, Arizona, was sold. We held a 50% interest in Metrocenter.

Our consolidated discontinued operations reflect results of the following significant property dispositions. We had no dispositions in the first quarter of 2006.

 

For the purposes of the following comparison between the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, the above transactions are referred to as the Property Transactions. In the following discussions of our results of operations, “comparable” refers to Properties open and operating throughout the first quarter in both 2006 and 2005.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

Minimum rents, excluding rents from our consolidated Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives, increased $24.5 million during the period, of which the Property Transactions accounted for $4.0 million of the increase. Total amortization of the fair market value of in-place leases increased minimum rents by $3.6 million over that of the first quarter of 2005. Comparable rents, excluding rents from Simon Brand and Simon Business, increased $20.5 million, or 4.5%. This was primarily due to the leasing of space at

20

---

higher rents that resulted in an increase in minimum rents of $18.2 million. In addition, rents from carts, kiosks, and other temporary tenants increased comparable rents by $0.4 million.

Total overage rents increased $2.7 million, or 20.3%, reflecting the increases in tenants’ sales.

Tenant reimbursements, excluding Simon Business initiatives, increased $10.1 million, of which the Property Transactions accounted for $1.8 million. The remainder of the increase of $8.3 million, or 4.0%, was in comparable Properties and was due to inflationary increases in property operating costs.

Total other income, excluding Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives, increased $5.4 million, and was the result of:

·                    $6.3 million in increased lease settlement activity for the quarter;

·                    $1.8 million in increased interest income driven by increasing depository rates;

·                    $1.5 million in collections on a note receivable which had been previously reserved for;

·                    $1.2 million in gains on the sale of air rights at a property in Texas to a residential joint venture;

·                    offset by a $4.7 million decrease in land sale activity and decreases of $0.7 million in other net activity on comparable Properties.

Revenues from Simon Brand and Simon Business initiatives increased $2.5 million to $34.4 million from $31.9 million. The increase in revenues is primarily due to:

·                    increased revenue from the bank-issued co-branded gift card programs,

·                    increased rents and fees from service providers,

·                    increased advertising rentals, and

·                    increased event and sponsorship income.

Simon Brand and Simon Business expenses decreased $2.4 million, primarily as a result of decreases in operating expenses of the co-branded gift card programs, which are included in total property operating expenses.

Property operating expenses increased $5.6 million, $4.6 million from comparable properties (representing an increase of 4.6%) principally as a result of inflationary increases, and the remainder from new openings.

Real estate taxes increased $10.3 million due principally to a $6.5 million multi-year assessment settlement at a Property and increases in expenses at our other comparable properties of $3.7 million, or 5.2%, driven by reassessments and rate increases.

Repairs and maintenance decreased $2.0 million as a result of decreased comparable property repair needs.

Provision for credit losses decreased $2.3 million from the prior period due principally to a recovery of receivables from prior bankruptcies that were previously fully reserved for.

Home office and regional costs increased $3.1 million due to incremental personnel costs as a result of accruals necessitated by an additional pay period in the first quarter of 2006 versus that of 2005.

Other expenses increased $2.2 million primarily due to ground rent expenses of $1.6 million and increased professional fees.

Interest expense increased $8.9 million due to the following factors:

·                    the impact of increases in our average borrowing rates for our variable rate debt offset by a decrease in variable rate debt of approximately $1.2 billion due to repayment activity; and

·                    the impact of increased fixed rate debt of $803 million, which are generally at higher rates than our variable rate debt, due to the issuances of unsecured notes in June and November of 2005.

21

---

The minority interest increase was the result of our allocating to our minority interest partner their share of the aforementioned multi-year real estate tax assessment settlement on a Property in which we hold a 53% interest.

We recorded a $34.4 million gain on the sale of a 10.5% interest in ERE to Ivanhoe and also recorded a $10.2 million gain related to the receipt of beneficial interests in MOAA. The transaction and related accounting are more fully described in the condensed notes to consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Because we generate revenues primarily from long-term leases, our financing strategy relies primarily on long-term fixed rate debt. We manage our floating rate debt to be approximately 15–25% of total outstanding indebtedness by setting interest rates for each financing or refinancing based on current market conditions. We also enter into interest rate protection agreements as appropriate to assist in managing our interest rate risk. We derive most of our liquidity from leases that generate positive net cash flow from operations and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities that totaled $325.5 million during the first three months of 2006. In addition, our Credit Facility provides an alternative source of liquidity as our cash needs vary from time to time.

Our balance of cash and cash equivalents decreased $38.0 million during 2006 to $299.0 million as of March 31, 2006. The March 31, 2006 balances includes $52.0 million related to our co-branded gift card programs, which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes.

On March 31, 2006, the Credit Facility had available borrowing capacity of approximately $1.0 billion net of outstanding borrowings of $2.0 billion and letters of credit of $23.1 million. During the first three months of 2006, the maximum amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $2.0 billion and the weighted average amount outstanding was $1.3 billion. The weighted average interest rate was 4.53% for the period ended March 31, 2006.

We and the Operating Partnership also have access to public equity and long term unsecured debt markets and access to private equity from institutional investors at the Property level. Our current senior unsecured debt ratings are A- by Standard & Poor’s and Baa1 by Moody’s Investors Service.

Cash Flows

Our net cash flow from operating activities and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 totaled $325.5 million. We also received proceeds of $53.9 million from the sale of partnership interests during the first three months of 2006. In addition, we had a net use of cash from all of our debt financing and repayment activities in this period of $36.6 million. These activities are further discussed below in Financing and Debt. We also:

·                    repurchased units and preferred units amounting to $2.7 million,

·                    paid distributions on units of $212.0 million,

·                    paid distributions on preferred units totaling $25.4 million,

·                    funded consolidated capital expenditures of $136.3 million. These capital expenditures include development costs of $64.3 million, renovation and expansion costs of $55.1 million, and tenant costs and other operational capital expenditures of $16.9 million, and

·                    funded investments in unconsolidated entities of $79.6 million.

22

In general, we anticipate that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet operating expenses, monthly debt service, recurring capital expenditures, and distributions to stockholders necessary to maintain Simon Property’s REIT qualification for 2006 and on a long-term basis. In addition, we expect to be able to obtain capital for nonrecurring capital expenditures, such as acquisitions, major building renovations and expansions, as well as for scheduled principal maturities on outstanding indebtedness, from:

·       excess cash generated from operating performance and working capital reserves,

·       borrowings on our Credit Facility,

·       additional secured or unsecured debt financing, or

·       additional equity raised by Simon Property in the public or private markets and contributed to us in exchange for units.

Financing and Debt

Unsecured Debt

On May 9, 2006, the Operating Partnership agreed to issue $800 million of senior unsecured notes as more fully described in the condensed notes to consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q. Proceeds from the issuance of the notes will be used to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.

Credit Facility.   Significant activity on the Credit Facility during the three-month period ended March 31, 2006 was as follows:

 

Other amounts drawn on the Credit Facility were primarily for general working capital purposes. The total aggregate amount of our repayments on the Credit Facility during the three month period ended March 31, 2006 was $110.0 million. The total outstanding balance on the Credit Facility as of March 31, 2006, and the maximum amount outstanding, was approximately $2.0 billion. During the first three months of 2006, the weighted average outstanding balance on the Credit Facility was approximately $1.3 billion.

Acquisition Facility.   We borrowed $1.8 billion to finance the cash portion of our acquisition of Chelsea in 2004. On March 27, 2006, we made the final principal payment due on this facility. The facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 55 basis points with an additional 15 basis point facility fee on all loans outstanding, and provided for variable grid pricing based upon our credit rating.

Secured Debt

Total secured indebtedness was $4.4 billion and $4.6 billion at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, we repaid $140.0 million in mortgage loans, unencumbering one property. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, we exercised our option to extend the maturity of several mortgages, which resulted in changes to scheduled or anticipated debt maturities on a consolidated basis. The repayment of these mortgages will now be in years beyond 2006.

23

---

Summary of Financing

Our consolidated debt, adjusted to reflect outstanding derivative instruments, and the effective weighted average interest rates as of March 31 and December 31 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

As of March 31, 2006, we had interest rate cap protection agreements on $303.7 million of consolidated variable rate debt. We also hold $370.0 million of notional amount variable rate swap agreements that have a weighted average variable pay rate of 5.08% and a weighted average fixed receive rate of 3.72%. As of March 31, 2006, the net effect of these agreements effectively converted $370.0 million of fixed rate debt to variable rate debt.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.   There have been no material changes in our outstanding capital expenditure commitments since December 31, 2005, as previously disclosed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table summarizes the material aspects of our future obligations as of March 31, 2006 for the remainder of 2006 and subsequent years thereafter (dollars in thousands):

(1)             Represents principal maturities and therefore, excludes net premiums and discounts and fair value swaps of $75,802.

(2)             Represents our pro rata share of principal maturities and excludes net premiums and discounts.

Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of our investments in real estate joint ventures which are common in the real estate industry and are described in Note 5 of the notes to the accompanying financial statements. Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture, is typically secured by the joint venture Property, and is non-recourse to us. As of March 31, 2006, we have loan guarantees and other guarantee obligations of $33.0 million and $45.6 million, respectively, to support our total $3.3 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness presented in the table above.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

Buy/sell provisions are common in real estate partnership agreements. Most of our partners are institutional investors who have a history of direct investment in regional mall properties. Our partners in our joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time and if we determine it is in our unitholders’ best interests for us to purchase the joint venture interest, we believe we have adequate liquidity to execute the purchases of the interests without hindering our cash flows or liquidity. Should we decide to sell any of our

24

---

joint venture interests, we would expect to use the net proceeds from any such sale to reduce outstanding indebtedness.

Acquisitions.   Although the acquisition of high quality individual properties or portfolios of properties remain an integral component of our growth strategies, we did not acquire any properties during the first three months of 2006.

Dispositions.   We expect to sell Properties and other assets that no longer meet our strategic criteria. However, we did not dispose of any properties during the first three months of 2006.

Development Activity

New Developments.   The following describes our new development projects, the estimated total cost, and our share of the estimated total cost and our share of the construction in progress balance as of March 31, 2006 (dollars in millions):

(a)              Represents the project costs net of land sales, tenant reimbursements for construction, and other items (where applicable).

(b)              The estimated opening date represents Phase I only. Phase II estimated opening date is 4th quarter 2006.

We expect to fund these capital projects with available cash flow from operations, borrowings from our Credit Facility, or project specific construction loans. We expect our share of the total 2006 new development costs remaining for the year to be approximately $450 million.

Strategic Expansions and Renovations.   The following describes our significant renovation and/or expansion projects currently under construction, the estimated total cost, our share of the estimated total cost and our share of the construction in progress balance as of March 31, 2006 (dollars in millions):

(a)              Represents the project costs net of land sales, tenant reimbursements for construction, and other items (where applicable).

We expect to fund these capital projects with available cash flow from operations or borrowings from the Credit Facility. We have other renovation and/or expansion projects currently under construction or in preconstruction development and expect to invest a total of approximately $225 million (our share) on expansion and renovation activities for the remainder of 2006.

International.   Part of our international expansion strategy is to reinvest net cash flow to fund other future international developments. We believe that reinvesting the cash flows derived overseas in foreign denominated development and redevelopment projects mitigates some of the risk to our initial investment and to changes in foreign currencies. In addition, to date we have funded the majority of our European

25

---

investments with Euro-denominated borrowings that act as a natural hedge against local currency fluctuations. This has also been the case with our Premium Outlet joint ventures in Japan and Mexico where we use Yen and Peso denominated financing. Currently, our net income exposure to changes in the volatility of the Euro, Yen, and Peso is not material. In addition, since cash flow from operations is currently being reinvested in other development projects, we do not expect to repatriate foreign denominated earnings in the near term.

The carrying amount of our total combined investment in Simon Ivanhoe B.V./S.à.r.l.(“Simon Ivanhoe”) and Gallerie Commerciali Italia (“GCI”) as of March 31, 2006, net of the related currency translation adjustment, was $333.6 million. Our investments in Simon Ivanhoe and GCI are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Currently seven European developments are under construction, which will add approximately 4.4 million square feet of GLA for a total net cost of approximately €690 million, of which our share is approximately €192 million.

On October 20, 2005, Ivanhoe Cambridge, Inc. (“Ivanhoe”), an affiliate of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, effectively acquired our former partner’s 39.5% ownership interest in ERE. On February 13, 2006, pursuant to the terms of our October 20, 2005 transaction with Ivanhoe, we sold a 10.5% interest in this joint venture to Ivanhoe for €45.2 million, or $53.9 million and recorded a gain on the disposition of $34.4 million. This gain is reported in “gain on sales of interests in unconsolidated entities” in the consolidated statements of operations. We then settled all remaining share purchase commitments from the founders of ERE, including the early settlement of some commitments by purchasing an additional 25.8% interest for €55.1 million, or $65.5 million. The result of these transactions equalized our and Ivanhoe’s ownership in Simon Ivanhoe to 50% each.

As of March 31, 2006, the carrying amount of our 40% joint venture investment in the five Japanese Premium Outlet centers net of the related cumulative translation adjustment was $285.0 million. We began expansion in Nagoya, Japan which will add incremental  GLA of 53,000 square feet for a total projected net cost of ¥1.8 billion, of which our share is approximately ¥0.7 billion, or $6.1 million based on current Yen:USD exchange rates.

In addition to the developments in Europe and Japan, a new development, Yeoju Premium Outlets, was started near Seoul, South Korea. The project will contain 253,000 square feet for a total projected net cost of KRW 78.2 billion, of which our share is approximately KRW 39.1 billion, or approximately $39.7 million based on current KRW:USD exchange rates.

Distributions

The Board of Directors of Simon Property, our general partner, declared and we paid a distribution of $0.76 per unit in the first quarter of 2006. We are required to make distributions to maintain Simon Property’s status as a REIT. Our distributions typically exceed our net income generated in any given year primarily because of depreciation, which is a “non-cash” expense. Our future distributions and the dividends of Simon Property will be determined by Simon Property’s Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available distributions, and what may be required to maintain Simon Property’s status as a REIT.

On May 11, 2005, the Board of Directors of Simon Property authorized a common stock repurchase program under which Simon Property may purchase up to $250 million of its common stock over the next twelve months as market conditions warrant. Simon Property may repurchase the shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As shares are repurchased, the number of outstanding units is reduced on an equivalent basis. The program has 5,184,600 shares, limited to $191.4 million, remaining for repurchase. There were no purchases under this program during the first quarter of 2006.

26

---

Item 3.                        Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Sensitivity Analysis.   A comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis regarding market risk is disclosed in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. There have been no material changes in the assumptions used or results obtained regarding market risk since December 31, 2005.

Item 4.                        Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.   We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2006.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.   There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — Other Information

Item 1.                       Legal Proceedings

Except as described in the following paragraph, there have not been any material developments in the legal proceedings we described in our Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

As previously disclosed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are a defendant in a suit filed on November 9, 1999 in the District Court for the State of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial District (Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, v. Melvin Simon, et al.). In January 2006, and as more fully described in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we resolved a portion of the litigation between Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. (“Triple Five”) and, among others, the Mall of America, certain members of the Simon family and entities allegedly controlled by such individuals, and us. In April 2005, the federal Appellate Court modified the remedy in the Mall of America case, requiring that the transfer of a partnership interest in the Mall of America originally purchased from Teachers’ Insurance and Annuity of America) in 1999 and transferred to Triple Five in August 2004, should have been transferred to Mall of America Associates (“MOAA”), a partnership in which members of the Simon family have an interest. In January 2006, the transfer of this interest from Triple Five to MOAA was completed. The result on our consolidated financial statements is discussed in Note 3 to these condensed notes to consolidated financial statements. Although this transfer settled a portion of the litigation involving the Mall of America and its owners, legal proceedings are still underway which may affect our interests with respect to the Mall of America. It is not possible to provide any assurance as to the outcome of the remaining Mall of America litigation.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such routine litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

27

---

Item 1A.                Risk Factors

During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, there were no significant changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in “Part I, Item 1: Business” of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 5.                       Other Information

During the quarter covered by this report, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of Simon Property, did not approve Ernst & Young, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to perform non-audit services. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Item 6.                       Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Descriptions
31.1		Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32		Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

28