Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IV

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009



SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  333-11491
(Commission File No.)
  34-1755769
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

225 West Washington Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)

(317) 636-1600
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None



            Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes ý    No o

            Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý

            Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

            Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o     No o

            Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

            Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o

            Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12-b of the Act). Yes o    No ý

Registrant had no publicly-traded voting equity as of June 30, 2009.

            Registrant has no common stock outstanding.



Documents Incorporated By Reference

            None.


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No.    
  Page No.
Part I

1.

 

Business

 

3
1A.   Risk Factors   7
1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments   11
2.   Properties   11
3.   Legal Proceedings   46
4.   Reserved   46

Part II

5.

 

Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

47
6.   Selected Financial Data   48
7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   49
7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk   65
8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   65
9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   65
9A.   Controls and Procedures   65
9B.   Other Information   67

Part III

10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

68
11.   Executive Compensation   68
12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters   68
13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence   68
14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services   68

Part IV

15.

 

Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules

 

69

Signatures

 

109

2


Table of Contents


Part I

Item 1.    Business

            Simon Property Group, L.P., is a Delaware limited partnership and the majority-owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc. In this report, the terms "Operating Partnership", "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, L.P. and its subsidiaries and the term "Simon Property" refers specifically to Simon Property Group, Inc.

            We own, develop, and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of regional malls, Premium Outlet® Centers, The Mills®, and community/lifestyle centers. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or held an interest in 321 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 162 regional malls, 41 Premium Outlet Centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 36 properties acquired in the 2007 acquisition of The Mills Corporation, or the Mills acquisition, and 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. Of the 36 properties acquired in The Mills portfolio, 16 of these properties are The Mills, 16 are regional malls, and four are community centers. We also own an interest in one parcel of land held in the United States for future development. Internationally, as of December 31, 2009, we had ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland), eight Premium Outlet Centers in Japan, one Premium Outlet Center in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet Center in South Korea. Also, through joint venture arrangements we have a 24% interest in two shopping centers in Italy currently under development. On February 4, 2010, we and our partner entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe S.à.r.l, or Simon Ivanhoe, which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland.

            For a description of our operational strategies and developments in our business during 2009, see the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" which appears in Item 7 to this Form 10-K.

Other Policies

            The following is a discussion of our investment policies, financing policies, conflict of interest policies and policies with respect to certain other activities. One or more of these policies may be amended or rescinded from time to time by Simon Property without a vote by our limited partners.

            While we emphasize equity real estate investments, we may, at our discretion, invest in mortgages and other real estate interests consistent with Simon Property's qualification as a real estate investment trust, or REIT. We do not currently intend to invest to a significant extent in mortgages or deeds of trust; however, we hold a mortgage note which results in us receiving 100% of the economics of a property. We may invest in participating or convertible mortgages if we conclude that we may benefit from the cash flow or any appreciation in the value of the property.

            We may invest in securities of other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers. However, any of these investments would be subject to the percentage ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary to maintain Simon Property's qualification as a REIT. These REIT limitations mean that Simon Property cannot make an investment that would cause its real estate assets to be less than 75% of its total assets. In addition, at least 75% of Simon Property's gross income must be derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including "rents from real property," dividends from other REITs and, in certain circumstances, interest from certain types of temporary investments. At least 95% of Simon Property's income must be derived from such real property investments, and from dividends, interest and gains from the sale or dispositions of stock or securities or from other combinations of the foregoing.

            Subject to REIT limitations, we may invest in the securities of other issuers in connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in real estate. Such an investment would normally be in the form of general or limited partnership or membership interests in special purpose partnerships and limited liability companies that own one or more properties. We may, in the future, acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs, management companies or similar entities where such investments would be consistent with our investment policies.

            We must comply with the covenants contained in our financing agreements that limit our ratio of debt to total assets or market value, as defined. For example, our lines of credit and the indentures for our debt securities contain

3


Table of Contents

covenants that restrict the total amount of debt to 65%, or 60% in relation to certain debt, of total assets, as defined under the related arrangement, and secured debt to 50% of total assets. In addition, these agreements contain other covenants requiring compliance with financial ratios. Furthermore, the amount of debt that we may incur is limited as a practical matter by our desire to maintain acceptable ratings for Simon Property's equity securities and our debt securities.

            We may raise additional capital by issuing units of limited partnership interests, or units, or debt securities, creating joint ventures with existing ownership interests in properties, retention of cash flows or a combination of these methods. If Simon Property's Board of Directors determines to raise additional equity capital, at the Operating Partnership level, we may, without limited partner approval, issue additional units or other equity interests in us. We may issue units in any manner and on such terms and for such consideration as we deem appropriate. This may include issuing units in exchange for property. We may issue preferred units that could be senior to our units and may be convertible into units. Existing holders of units have no preemptive right to purchase units in any subsequent offerings. Any such offering could dilute a limited partner's investment in us.

            We expect most additional borrowings would be made in the form of bank borrowings, publicly and privately placed debt instruments, or purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties. Any such indebtedness may be secured or unsecured. Any such indebtedness may also have full or limited recourse to the borrower or cross-collateralized with other debt, or may be fully or partially guaranteed by us. Although we may borrow to fund the payment of distributions, we currently have no expectation that we will regularly be required to do so.

            On December 8, 2009, we entered into a new $3.565 billion unsecured revolving corporate credit facility which replaced our $3.5 billion unsecured credit facility, or the Credit Facility, which expired on January 11, 2010. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. We also issue debt securities, and we may issue our debt securities which may be convertible into units, preferred units or be accompanied by warrants to purchase equity interests or be exchangeable for stock of Simon Property. We also may sell or securitize our lease receivables. The proceeds from any borrowings or financings may be used for one or more of the following:

            We may also finance acquisitions through the following:

            Our ability to issue units to transferors of properties or other partnership interests may defer gain recognition for tax purposes by the transferor. It may also be advantageous for us since there are ownership limits that restrict the number of units that investors may own.

            We do not have a policy limiting the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any particular property. Mortgage financing instruments, however, usually limit additional indebtedness on such properties. We also have covenants on our unsecured debt that limit our total secured debt.

            Typically, we invest in or form special purpose entities to assist us in obtaining permanent financing at attractive terms. Permanent financing may be structured as a mortgage loan on a single property, or on a group of properties, and generally requires us to provide a mortgage interest on the property in favor of an institutional third party, as a joint venture with a third party, or as a securitized financing. For securitized financings, we create special purpose entities to own the properties. These special purpose entities are structured so that they would not be consolidated with us in the event we would ever become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. We decide upon the structure of the financing based upon the best terms then available to us and whether the proposed financing is consistent with our other business objectives. For accounting purposes, we include the outstanding securitized debt of special purpose entities owning consolidated properties as part of our consolidated indebtedness.

4


Table of Contents

            We maintain policies and have entered into agreements designed to reduce or eliminate potential conflicts of interest. Simon Property has adopted governance principles governing its affairs and the affairs of its subsidiaries and the Simon Property Board of Directors, as well as written charters for each of the standing Committees of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Board of Directors of Simon Property has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of its officers, directors, and employees. At least a majority of the members of the Simon Property Board of Directors must qualify as independent under the listing standards for New York Stock Exchange companies and cannot be affiliated with the Simon family who are significant stockholders. Any transaction between us and the Simons, including property acquisitions, service and property management agreements and retail space leases, must be approved by a majority of Simon Property's non-affiliated directors.

            The sale of certain of our properties may have an adverse tax impact on the Simons and the other limited partners. In order to avoid any conflict of interest between Simon Property and our limited partners, the Simon Property charter requires that at least six of the non-affiliated directors of the Board of Directors must authorize and require us to sell any property we own. Any such sale is subject to applicable agreements with third parties. Noncompetition agreements executed by each of the Simons contain covenants limiting the ability of the Simons to participate in certain shopping center activities in North America.

            We intend to make investments which are consistent with Simon Property's qualification as a REIT, unless the Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in Simon Property's best interests to so qualify as a REIT. The Board of Directors may make such a determination because of changing circumstances or changes in the REIT requirements. We have authority to offer units of equity interest or other securities in exchange for property. We also have authority to repurchase or otherwise reacquire our units or any other securities. Our policy prohibits us from making any loans to the directors or executive officers of Simon Property for any purpose. We may make loans to the joint ventures in which we participate.

Competition

            The retail industry is dynamic and competitive. We compete with numerous merchandise distribution channels including regional malls, outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. Internet retailing sites and catalogs also provide retailers with distribution options beyond existing brick and mortar retail properties and the numerous projects in development by commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate. The existence of competitive alternatives could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the tenants to occupy the properties that we develop and manage as well as for the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties).

            We believe that there are numerous factors that make our properties highly desirable to retailers including:

Certain Activities

            During the past three years, we have:

5


Table of Contents

Employees

            At January 5, 2010, we and our affiliates employed approximately 5,200 persons at various properties and offices throughout the United States, of which approximately 1,900 were part-time. Approximately 1,000 of these employees were located at our corporate headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana and 100 were located at our Chelsea offices in Roseland, New Jersey.

Corporate Headquarters

            Our corporate headquarters are located at 225 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, and our telephone number is (317) 636-1600.

Available Information

            Our Internet website address is www.simon.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available or may be accessed free of charge through the "About Simon/Investor Relations/Financial Information" section of our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

6


Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

            The following factors, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and presented elsewhere by our management from time to time. These factors, among others, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows, and you should carefully consider them. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. You should not consider this list to be a complete statement of all potential risks or uncertainties and we may update them in our future periodic reports.

Risks Relating to Debt and the Financial Markets

            As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated mortgages and other indebtedness, excluding the related premium and discount, totaled $18.6 billion. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to meet required debt service. Our debt service costs generally will not be reduced if developments at the property, such as the entry of new competitors or the loss of major tenants, cause a reduction in the income from the property. Should such events occur, our operations may be adversely affected. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and income from the property is insufficient to pay that indebtedness, the property could be foreclosed upon by the mortgagee resulting in a loss of income and a decline in our total asset value.

            We depend primarily on external financings, principally debt financings, to fund the growth of our business and to ensure that we can meet ongoing maturities of our outstanding debt. Our access to financing depends on our credit rating, the willingness of banks to lend to us and conditions in the capital markets. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the financing we need for future growth or to meet our debt service as obligations mature, or that the financing available to us will be on acceptable terms.

            Our outstanding senior unsecured notes and the preferred stock of Simon Property are periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. These credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry and the economic outlook in general. These credit ratings can also affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financing we obtain. Since we depend primarily on debt financing to fund our growth, adverse changes in our credit rating could have a negative effect on our future growth.

            We manage our exposure to interest rate risk by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of our variable rate debt. In addition, we refinance fixed rate debt at times when we believe rates and terms are appropriate. Our efforts to manage these exposures may not be successful.

            Our use of interest rate hedging arrangements to manage risk associated with interest rate volatility may expose us to additional risks, including a risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement may fail to honor its obligations. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Termination of these hedging agreements typically involves costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs.

Factors Affecting Real Estate Investments and Operations

            We regularly acquire and develop new properties and expand and redevelop existing properties, and these activities are subject to various risks. We may not be successful in pursuing acquisition, development or redevelopment/expansion opportunities. In addition, newly acquired, developed or redeveloped/expanded properties may not perform

7


Table of Contents

as well as expected. We are subject to other risks in connection with any acquisition, development and redevelopment/expansion activities, including the following:

            If a development or redevelopment/expansion project is unsuccessful, either because it is not meeting our expectations when operational or was not completed according to the project planning, we could lose our investment in the project. Further, if we guarantee the property's financing, our loss could exceed our investment in the project.

            Our properties represent a substantial portion of our total consolidated assets. These investments are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties or investments in real estate in response to any changes in economic or other conditions is limited. If we want to sell a property, we cannot assure you that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period or that the sales price of a property will exceed the cost of our investment.

Environmental Risks

            Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require us, as a current or previous owner or operator of real property, to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a property or at impacted neighboring properties. These laws often impose liability regardless of whether the property owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. These laws and regulations may require the abatement or removal of asbestos containing materials in the event of damage, demolition or renovation, reconstruction or expansion of a property and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. Those laws and regulations also govern the installation, maintenance and removal of underground storage tanks used to store waste oils or other petroleum products. Many of our properties contain, or at one time contained, asbestos containing materials or underground storage tanks (primarily related to auto service center establishments or emergency electrical generation equipment). The costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial and could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition but is not estimable. The presence of contamination, or the failure to remediate contamination, may also adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or redevelop a property or to borrow using a property as collateral.

            Although we believe that our portfolio is in substantial compliance with Federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances, this belief is based on limited testing. Nearly all of our properties have been subjected to Phase I or similar environmental audits. These environmental audits have not revealed, nor are we aware of, any environmental liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. However, we cannot assure you that:

8


Table of Contents

Retail Operations Risks

            Our concentration in the retail real estate market means that we are subject to the risks that affect the retail environment generally, including the levels of consumer spending, seasonality, the willingness of retailers to lease space in our shopping centers, tenant bankruptcies, changes in economic conditions, consumer confidence and terrorist activities. The economy appears to be recovering from the recent recession, during which consumer spending in the United States declined significantly. The unemployment rate remains relatively high and consumer confidence remains relatively depressed. We derive our cash flow from operations primarily from retail tenants, many of whom are currently under considerable economic stress. A significant deterioration in our cash flow from operations could require us to curtail planned capital expenditures or seek alternative sources of financing.

            We may not be able to lease new properties to an appropriate mix of tenants or for rents that are consistent with our projections. Also, when leases for our existing properties expire, the premises may not be relet or the terms of reletting, including the cost of allowances and concessions to tenants, may be less favorable than the current lease terms. To the extent that our leasing plans are not achieved, our cash generated before debt repayments and capital expenditures could be adversely affected.

            Regional malls are typically anchored by department stores and other large nationally recognized tenants. The value of some of our properties could be adversely affected if these tenants fail to comply with their contractual obligations, seek concessions in order to continue operations, or cease their operations. Larger store, also referred to as "big box", consolidations typically result in the closure of existing stores or duplicate or geographically overlapping store locations. We do not control the disposition of those department stores or larger stores that we do not own. We also may not control the vacant space that is not re-leased in those stores we do own. Other tenants may be entitled to modify the terms of their existing leases in the event of such closures. The modification could be unfavorable to us as the lessor and could decrease rents or expense recovery charges. Additionally, major tenant closures may result in decreased customer traffic which could lead to decreased sales at other stores. If the sales of stores operating in our properties were to decline significantly due to closing of anchors, economic conditions, or other reasons, tenants may be unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. In the event of default by a tenant or anchor store, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with those parties.

            Although bankruptcy filings by retailers occur regularly in the course of our operations, the number of tenant bankruptcies has increased in the past two years. We continually seek to re-lease vacant spaces resulting from tenant terminations. The bankruptcy of a tenant, particularly an anchor tenant, may make it more difficult to lease the remainder of the affected properties. Future tenant bankruptcies could adversely affect our properties or impact our ability to successfully execute our re-leasing strategy.

Risks Relating to Joint Venture Properties

            As of December 31, 2009, we owned interests in 182 income-producing properties with other parties. Of those, 18 properties are included in our consolidated financial statements. We account for the other 164 properties under the equity method of accounting, which we refer to as joint venture properties. We serve as general partner or property manager for 93 of these 164 properties; however, certain major decisions, such as selling or refinancing these properties, require the consent of the other owners. Of the properties for which we do not serve as general partner or property manager, 61 are in our international joint ventures. The other owners also have other participating rights that we consider substantive for purposes of determining control over the properties' assets. The remaining joint venture

9


Table of Contents

properties are managed by third parties. These limitations may adversely affect our ability to sell, refinance, or otherwise operate these properties.

            Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by a mortgage on the joint venture property. As of December 31, 2009, we had loan guarantees to support $47.2 million of our total $6.5 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness. A default by a joint venture under its debt obligations may expose us to liability under a guaranty or letter of credit.

Other Factors Affecting Our Business

            CAM costs typically include allocable energy costs, repairs, maintenance and capital improvements to common areas, janitorial services, administrative, property and liability insurance costs, and security costs. We historically have used leases with variable CAM provisions that adjust to reflect inflationary increases. We have made a concerted effort to convert our leases to a fixed payment methodology which fixes our tenants' CAM contributions and should in turn reduce the volatility of and limitations on the recoveries we collect from our tenants for the reimbursement of our property operating expenses. However, with respect to both variable and fixed payment methodologies, the amount of CAM charges we bill to our tenants may not allow us to recover all of these operating costs.

            Our properties compete with other retail properties and other forms of retailing such as catalogs and e-commerce websites. Competition may come from regional malls, outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and other shopping centers, both existing as well as future development projects. The presence of competitive alternatives affects our ability to lease space and the level of rents we can obtain. Renovations and expansions at competing sites could also negatively affect our properties.

            We also compete with other retail property developers to acquire prime development sites. In addition, we compete with other retail property companies for tenants and qualified management.

            We hold interests in joint venture properties that operate in Italy, France, Poland, Japan, Korea, and Mexico, and we have a minority investment in common shares of a U.K. retail real estate company. We may pursue additional expansion opportunities outside the United States. International development and ownership activities carry risks that are different from those we face with our domestic properties and operations. These risks include:

            Although our international activities currently are a relatively small portion of our business (international properties represented approximately 6.3% of the GLA of all of our properties at December 31, 2009), to the extent that we expand our international activities, these risks could increase in significance which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

10


Table of Contents

            We maintain commercial general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties in the United States through wholly-owned captive insurance entities and other self-insurance mechanisms. Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd. and Bridgewood Insurance Company, Ltd. are our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries, and have agreed to indemnify our general liability carrier for a specific layer of losses for the properties that are covered under these arrangements. The carrier has, in turn, agreed to provide evidence of coverage for this layer of losses under the terms and conditions of the carrier's policy. A similar policy written through these captive insurance entities also provides initial coverage for property insurance and certain windstorm risks at the properties located in coastal windstorm locations.

            There are some types of losses, including lease and other contract claims that generally are not insured. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property. If this happens, we may still remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property.

            We currently maintain insurance coverage against acts of terrorism on all of our properties in the United States on an "all risk" basis in the amount of up to $1 billion per occurrence for certified foreign acts of terrorism and $500 million per occurrence for non-certified domestic acts of terrorism. The current federal laws which provide this coverage are expected to operate through 2014. Despite the existence of this insurance coverage, any threatened or actual terrorist attacks in high profile markets could adversely affect our property values, revenues, consumer traffic and tenant sales.

Risks Relating to Federal Income Taxes

            Simon Property and two of our subsidiaries have elected to qualify as a REIT. Qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes is governed by highly technical and complex provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. If either of the REIT subsidiaries fails to comply with those provisions, and if available relief provisions do not apply:

            As a result, net income and funds available for distribution to our unitholders would be reduced for those years in which a REIT subsidiary fails to qualify as a REIT. Although we currently intend to operate the REIT subsidiaries so as to qualify each as a REIT, we cannot assure you we will succeed or that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations might cause us to revoke the REIT election of either of the REIT subsidiaries.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

            None.

Item 2.    Properties

            Our U.S. properties primarily consist of regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, community/lifestyle centers, and other properties. These properties contain an aggregate of approximately 244.8 million square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, of which we own approximately 152.3 million square feet. Total estimated retail sales at the properties in 2009 were approximately $58 billion.

11


Table of Contents

            Regional malls typically contain at least one traditional department store anchor or a combination of anchors and big box retailers with a wide variety of smaller stores connecting the anchors. Additional stores are usually located along the perimeter of the parking area. Our 162 regional malls are generally enclosed centers and range in size from approximately 400,000 to 2.3 million square feet of GLA. Our regional malls contain in the aggregate more than 18,600 occupied stores, including approximately 710 anchors, which are mostly national retailers. For comparative purposes, we separate the information in this section on the 16 regional malls acquired from The Mills Corporation in 2007, or the Mills Regional Malls, from the information on our other regional malls.

            Premium Outlet Centers generally contain a wide variety of designer and manufacturer stores located in an open-air center. Our 41 Premium Outlet Centers range in size from approximately 200,000 to 850,000 square feet of GLA. The Premium Outlet Centers are generally located near major metropolitan areas and tourist destinations including New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, Palm Springs, Orlando, Las Vegas, and Honolulu.

            The Mills generally range in size from 1.0 million to 2.3 million square feet of GLA and are located in major metropolitan areas. They have a combination of traditional mall, outlet center, and big box retailers and entertainment uses. The Mills Regional Malls typically range in size from 700,000 to 1.3 million square feet of GLA and contain a wide variety of national retailers.

            Community/lifestyle centers are generally unenclosed and smaller than our regional malls. Our 67 community/lifestyle centers generally range in size from approximately 100,000 to 900,000 square feet of GLA. Community/lifestyle centers are designed to serve a larger trade area and typically contain anchor stores and other national retail tenants, which occupy a significant portion of the GLA of the center. We also own traditional community shopping centers that focus primarily on value-oriented and convenience goods and services. These centers are usually anchored by a supermarket, discount retailer, or drugstore and are designed to service a neighborhood area. Finally, we own open-air centers adjacent to our regional malls designed to take advantage of the drawing power of the mall.

            We also have interests in 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers. These properties range in size from approximately 85,000 to 1.0 million square feet of GLA, are considered non-core to our business model, and in total represent less than 1% of our total operating income before depreciation.

            The following table provides representative data for our U.S. properties on a gross basis as of December 31, 2009:

 
  Regional
Malls
  Premium
Outlet
Centers
  Mills Portfolio
(including The
Mills and Mills
Regional Malls)
  Community/
Lifestyle
Centers
  Other Properties  

% of total property annualized base rent

    62.7 %   15.2 %   16.2 %   5.1 %   0.8 %

% of total property GLA

    65.4 %   7.0 %   16.8 %   8.3 %   2.5 %

% of owned property GLA

    57.7 %   11.1 %   19.5 %   9.1 %   2.6 %

            As of December 31, 2009, approximately 92.1% of the owned GLA in regional malls and the retail space of the other properties was leased, approximately 97.9% of owned GLA in the Premium Outlet Centers was leased, approximately 93.9% of the owned GLA for The Mills and 89.3% of owned GLA for the Mills Regional Malls was leased, and approximately 90.7% of owned GLA in the community/lifestyle centers was leased.

            We hold a 100% interest in 200 of our properties, effectively control 18 properties in which we have a joint venture interest, and hold the remaining 103 properties through unconsolidated joint venture interests. We are the managing or co-managing general partner or member of 311 properties. Substantially all of our joint venture properties are subject to rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, or other sale rights for all partners which are customary in real estate partnership agreements and the industry. Our partners in our joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time, which will result in either the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire their partnership interest or the disposal of our partnership interest.

            The following property table summarizes certain data for our regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, the Mills Regional Malls, and community/lifestyle centers located in the United States, including Puerto Rico, as of December 31, 2009.

12


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
 
  Regional Malls

1.

 

Anderson Mall

 

SC

 

Anderson (Greenville)

 

Fee

 

 

100.0%

 

Built 1972

 

 

83.0

%

 

671,881

 

Belk Ladies Fashion Store, Belk Men's & Home Store, JCPenney, Sears, Dillard's, Books A Million(6)
2.   Apple Blossom Mall   VA   Winchester   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     89.8 %   440,042   Belk, JCPenney, Sears, Eastwynn Theatres
3.   Arsenal Mall   MA   Watertown (Boston)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1999     95.4 %(17)   504,334   Marshalls, Filene's Basement
4.   Atrium Mall   MA   Chestnut Hill (Boston)   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     95.0 %   205,461   Borders Books & Music
5.   Auburn Mall   MA   Auburn (Worcester)   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     99.4 %   588,330   Macy's, Macy's Home Store, Sears
6.   Aventura Mall(1)   FL   Miami Beach   Fee     33.3% (4) Built 1983     96.0 %   2,099,768   Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Macy's Mens & Home Furniture, JCPenney, Sears, Nordstrom, Equinox Fitness Clubs, AMC Theatre
7.   Avenues, The   FL   Jacksonville   Fee     25.0% (4)(2) Built 1990     94.0 %   1,117,396   Belk, Dillard's, JCPenney, Belk Men and Kids, Sears
8.   Bangor Mall   ME   Bangor   Fee     67.4% (15) Acquired 2003     91.6 %   652,842   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods
9.   Barton Creek Square   TX   Austin   Fee     100.0%   Built 1981     98.0 %   1,429,623   Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's Women's & Home, Dillard's Men's & Children's, JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatre
10.   Battlefield Mall   MO   Springfield   Fee and Ground Lease (2056)     100.0%   Built 1970     95.1 %   1,198,568   Macy's, Dillard's Women's, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears
11.   Bay Park Square   WI   Green Bay   Fee     100.0%   Built 1980     93.0 %   710,973   Younkers, Younkers Home Furniture Gallery, Kohl's, ShopKo, Marcus Cinema 16
12.   Bowie Town Center   MD   Bowie (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2001     97.9 %   684,297   Macy's, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Safeway
13.   Boynton Beach Mall   FL   Boynton Beach (Miami)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1985     84.7 %   1,100,250   Macy's, Dillard's Men's & Home, Dillard's Women, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres
14.   Brea Mall   CA   Brea (Los Angeles)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     96.8 %   1,319,678   Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Macy's Men's Children & Home.
15.   Broadway Square   TX   Tyler   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1994     98.5 %   628,103   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
16.   Brunswick Square   NJ   East Brunswick (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1973     95.8 %   765,149   Macy's, JCPenney, Barnes & Noble, Mega Movies
17.   Burlington Mall   MA   Burlington (Boston)   Ground Lease (2048)     100.0%   Acquired 1998     96.6 %   1,317,842   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Nordstrom, Crate & Barrel
18.   Cape Cod Mall   MA   Hyannis   Ground Leases (2029-2073)(7)     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     94.5 %   725,595   Macy's, Macy's Men's and Home, Sears, Best Buy, Marshalls, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinema
19.   Castleton Square   IN   Indianapolis   Fee     100.0%   Built 1972     94.3 %   1,381,405   Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Borders Books & Music, AMC Theatres
20.   Century III Mall   PA   West Mifflin (Pittsburgh)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1979     76.1 %(17)   1,225,538   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Macy's Jr.,(8)
21.   Charlottesville Fashion Square   VA   Charlottesville   Ground Lease (2076)     100.0%   Acquired 1997     94.3 %   569,861   Belk Women's & Children's, Belk Men's & Home, JCPenney, Sears
22.   Chautauqua Mall   NY   Lakewood (Jamestown)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1971     82.3 %   425,291   Sears, JCPenney, Bon Ton, Office Max, Dipson Cinema
23.   Chesapeake Square   VA   Chesapeake (Virginia Beach)   Fee and Ground Lease (2062)     75.0% (12) Built 1989     86.5 %   792,428   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Target, Burlington Coat Factory(6),(11)

13


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
24.   Cielo Vista Mall   TX   El Paso   Fee and Ground Lease (2022)(7)     100.0%   Built 1974     98.0 %   1,244,020   Macy's, Dillard's Women's & Furniture, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres
25.   Circle Centre   IN   Indianapolis   Property Lease (2097)     14.7% (4)(2) Built 1995     96.7 %   735,922   Nordstrom, Carson Pirie Scott, United Artists Theatre
26.   Coconut Point   FL   Estero (Cape Coral)   Fee     50.0% (4) Built 2006     96.2 %(17)   1,196,150   Dillard's, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, DSW, Office Max, PetsMart, Ross Dress for Less, Cost Plus World Market, T.J. Maxx, Hollywood Theatres, Super Target
27.   Coddingtown Mall   CA   Santa Rosa   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2005     86.2 %   791,943   Macy's, JCPenney, Whole Foods(6),(8)
28.   College Mall   IN   Bloomington   Fee and Ground Lease (2048)(7)     100.0%   Built 1965     86.2 %   636,563   Macy's, Sears, Target, Dick's Sporting Goods, Bed Bath & Beyond
29.   Columbia Center   WA   Kennewick   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1987     92.6 %   768,430   Macy's, Macy's Mens & Children, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinema
30.   Copley Place   MA   Boston   Fee     98.1%   Acquired 2002     95.6 %(17)   1,243,500   Neiman Marcus, Barneys New York
31.   Coral Square   FL   Coral Springs (Miami)   Fee     97.2%   Built 1984     95.9 %   941,339   Macy's Mens, Children & Home, Macy's Women, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
32.   Cordova Mall   FL   Pensacola   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     98.3 %   851,563   Dillard's Men's, Dillard's Women's, Belk, Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond, Cost Plus World Market, Ross Dress for Less
33.   Cottonwood Mall   NM   Albuquerque   Fee     100.0%   Built 1996     96.5 %   1,040,700   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, United Artists Theatre,(11)
34.   Crossroads Mall   NE   Omaha   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1994     59.7 %   677,320   Sears, Target, Barnes & Noble,(11)
35.   Crystal Mall   CT   Waterford   Fee     74.6% (4) Acquired 1998     89.2 %   782,829   Macy's, JC Penney, Sears, Bed Bath & Beyond, Christmas Tree Store
36.   Crystal River Mall   FL   Crystal River   Fee     100.0%   Built 1990     77.2 %   420,109   JCPenney, Sears, Belk, Kmart, Regal Cinema
37.   Dadeland Mall   FL   Miami   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1997     100.0 %   1,487,689   Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Macy's, Macy's Children & Home, JCPenney
38.   DeSoto Square   FL   Bradenton   Fee     100.0%   Built 1973     78.2 %   678,310   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears,(8)
39.   Domain, The   TX   Austin   Fee     100.0%   Built 2006     92.8 %(17)   674,588   Neiman Marcus, Macy's, Borders Books & Music, Dick's Sporting Goods, Gold Class Cinemas(6), Dillard's(6)
40.   Eastland Mall   IN   Evansville   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     95.6 %   865,310   Macy's, JCPenney, Dillard's
41.   Edison Mall   FL   Fort Myers   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1997     96.8 %   1,050,922   Dillard's, Macy's Mens, Children & Home, Macy's Women, JCPenney, Sears
42.   Emerald Square   MA   North Attleboro (Providence—RI)   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     89.9 %   1,022,545   Macy's, Macy's Mens & Home Store, JCPenney, Sears
43.   Empire Mall(1)   SD   Sioux Falls   Fee and Ground Lease (2033)(7)     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     94.5 %   1,074,085   Macy's, Younkers, JCPenney, Sears, Gordmans, Hy-Vee
44.   Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The   VA   Arlington (Washington, DC)   Fee     42.5% (4) Built 1989     99.3 %(17)   988,904   Nordstrom, Macy's
45.   Fashion Mall at Keystone, The   IN   Indianapolis   Ground Lease (2067)     100.0%   Acquired 1997     92.8 %   683,490   Saks Fifth Avenue, Crate & Barrel, Nordstrom, Keystone Art Cinema

14


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
46.   Fashion Valley   CA   San Diego   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2001     99.0 %   1,723,143   Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman-Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, AMC Theatres
47.   Firewheel Town Center   TX   Garland (Dallas)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2005     81.0 %(17)   1,004,241   Dillard's, Macy's, Barnes & Noble, DSW, Cost Plus World Market, AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ethan Allen
48.   Florida Mall, The   FL   Orlando   Fee     50.0% (4) Built 1986     96.4 %   1,769,207   Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, H&M
49.   Forest Mall   WI   Fond Du Lac   Fee     100.0%   Built 1973     92.7 %   500,174   JCPenney, Kohl's, Younkers, Sears, Cinema I & II
50.   Forum Shops at Caesars, The   NV   Las Vegas   Ground Lease (2050)     100.0%   Built 1992     98.5 %   620,431    
51.   Galleria, The   TX   Houston   Fee and Ground Lease (2029)     31.5% (4) Acquired 2002     94.0 %   2,298,144   Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's (2 locations), Borders Books & Music, Galleria Tennis/Athletic Club
52.   Granite Run Mall   PA   Media (Philadelphia)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     83.4 %   1,032,675   JCPenney, Sears, Boscov's, Granite Run 8 Theatres, Acme, Kohl's
53.   Great Lakes Mall   OH   Mentor (Cleveland)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1961     87.2 %(17)   1,234,588   Dillard's Men's, Dillard's Women's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatres
54.   Greendale Mall   MA   Worcester (Boston)   Fee and Ground Lease (2009)(7)     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     92.4 %(17)   430,819   T.J. Maxx 'N More, Best Buy, DSW,(8)
55.   Greenwood Park Mall   IN   Greenwood (Indianapolis)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1979     97.8 %   1,280,183   Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, AMC Theatres
56.   Gulf View Square   FL   Port Richey (Tampa)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1980     82.4 %   753,572   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Best Buy
57.   Gwinnett Place   GA   Duluth (Atlanta)   Fee     75.0%   Acquired 1998     81.4 %(17)   1,279,516   Belk, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears, Eastern Wells Market(6)
58.   Haywood Mall   SC   Greenville   Fee and Ground Lease (2017)(7)     100.0%   Acquired 1998     97.9 %   1,231,469   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Belk
59.   Independence Center   MO   Independence (Kansas City)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1994     97.2 %   1,032,630   Dillard's, Macy's, Sears
60.   Indian River Mall   FL   Vero Beach   Fee     50.0% (4) Built 1996     82.1 %   737,007   Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatres
61.   Ingram Park Mall   TX   San Antonio   Fee     100.0%   Built 1979     93.4 %   1,125,708   Dillard's, Dillard's Home Store, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Bealls
62.   Irving Mall   TX   Irving (Dallas)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1971     84.1 %   1,053,052   Macy's, Dillard's, Sears, Burlington Coat Factory, La Vida Fashion and Home Décor, General Cinema
63.   Jefferson Valley Mall   NY   Yorktown Heights (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1983     93.9 %   580,100   Macy's, Sears, H&M, Movies at Jefferson Valley
64.   King of Prussia   PA   King of Prussia (Philadelphia)   Fee     12.4% (4)(15) Acquired 2003     93.0 %(17)   2,615,101   Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's (Court), Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, Macy's (Court), JCPenney, Sears, Crate & Barrel,(8)
65.   Knoxville Center   TN   Knoxville   Fee     100.0%   Built 1984     79.6 %(17)   978,027   JCPenney, Belk, Sears, The Rush Fitness Center, Regal Cinema,(11)
66.   La Plaza Mall   TX   McAllen   Fee and Ground Lease (2040)(7)     100.0%   Built 1976     98.6 %   1,199,643   Macy's, Macy's Home Store, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Joe Brand

15


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
67.   Laguna Hills Mall   CA   Laguna Hills (Los Angeles)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1997     92.4 %   865,170   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Laguna Hills Cinema, Nordstrom Rack, Total Woman Gym & Spa
68.   Lake Square Mall   FL   Leesburg (Orlando)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     73.4 %   559,088   JCPenney, Sears, Belk, Target, AMC Theatres, Books-A-Million
69.   Lakeline Mall   TX   Cedar Park (Austin)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1995     97.3 %   1,097,944   Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
70.   Lehigh Valley Mall   PA   Whitehall   Fee     37.6% (4)(15) Acquired 2003     96.8 %(17)   1,169,188   Macy's, JCPenney, Boscov's, Barnes & Noble, HH Gregg(6), Babies R Us
71.   Lenox Square   GA   Atlanta   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     96.5 %   1,544,793   Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Macy's
72.   Liberty Tree Mall   MA   Danvers (Boston)   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     91.2 %   858,165   Marshalls, The Sports Authority, Target, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Kohl's, Best Buy, Staples, AC Moore, K&G Fashion Superstore, AMC Theatres, Nordstrom Rack, Off Broadway Shoes
73.   Lima Mall   OH   Lima   Fee     100.0%   Built 1965     90.7 %   737,679   Macy's, JCPenney, Elder-Beerman, Sears
74.   Lincolnwood Town Center   IL   Lincolnwood (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1990     95.0 %   421,382   Kohl's, Carson Pirie Scott
75.   Lindale Mall(1)   IA   Cedar Rapids   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     86.5 %   688,593   Von Maur, Sears, Younkers
76.   Livingston Mall   NJ   Livingston (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     94.5 %   984,599   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Barnes & Noble
77.   Longview Mall   TX   Longview   Fee     100.0%   Built 1978     90.3 %   638,605   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Bealls,(11)
78.   Mall at Chestnut Hill, The   MA   Chestnut Hill (Boston)   Lease (2039)(9)     47.2% (4) Acquired 2002     89.9 %   474,929   Bloomingdale's, Bloomingdale's Home Furnishing and Men's Store
79.   Mall at Rockingham Park, The   NH   Salem (Boston)   Fee     24.6% (4) Acquired 1999     98.7 %   1,020,232   JCPenney, Sears, Macy's,(11)
80.   Mall of Georgia   GA   Buford (Atlanta)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1999     95.8 %   1,795,702   Nordstrom, Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, Haverty's Furniture, Bed Bath & Beyond(16), Regal Cinema
81.   Mall of New Hampshire, The   NH   Manchester   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     97.8 %   811,290   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Best Buy, A.C. Moore
82.   Maplewood Mall   MN   Minneapolis   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2002     91.0 %   929,788   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Barnes & Noble
83.   Markland Mall   IN   Kokomo   Ground Lease (2041)     100.0%   Built 1968     96.4 %   416,092   Sears, Target, MC Sporting Goods,(8)
84.   McCain Mall   AR   N. Little Rock   Fee     100.0%   Built 1973     92.5 %   775,281   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears,(11)
85.   Melbourne Square   FL   Melbourne   Fee     100.0%   Built 1982     81.5 %   665,119   Macy's, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, Dillard's Women's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods,(8)
86.   Menlo Park Mall   NJ   Edison (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1997     96.9 %(17)   1,322,885   Nordstrom, Macy's, Barnes & Noble, Cineplex Odeon, WOW! Work Out World, Fortunoff Backyard Store(6)
87.   Mesa Mall(1)   CO   Grand Junction   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     87.9 %   882,172   Sears, Herberger's, JCPenney, Target, Cabela's(6)
88.   Miami International Mall   FL   Miami   Fee     47.8% (4) Built 1982     92.1 %   1,071,449   Macy's Mens & Home, Macy's Women & Children, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
89.   Midland Park Mall   TX   Midland   Fee     100.0%   Built 1980     92.9 %   617,576   Dillard's, Dillard's Mens & Juniors, JCPenney, Sears, Bealls, Ross Dress for Less
90.   Miller Hill Mall   MN   Duluth   Ground Lease (2013)     100.0%   Built 1973     96.6 %   805,552   JCPenney, Sears, Younkers, Barnes & Noble, DSW

16


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
91.   Montgomery Mall   PA   North Wales (Philadelphia)   Fee     60.0% (15) Acquired 2003     85.8 %   1,147,480   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods,(11)
92.   Muncie Mall   IN   Muncie   Fee     100.0%   Built 1970     92.9 %   634,997   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Elder Beerman
93.   North East Mall   TX   Hurst (Dallas)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1971     96.7 %   1,670,157   Nordstrom, Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Rave Theatre
94.   Northfield Square   IL   Bourbonnais   Fee     31.6% (12) Built 1990     90.4 %   530,011   Carson Pirie Scott Women's, Carson Pirie Scott Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Movies 10
95.   Northgate Mall   WA   Seattle   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1987     94.1 %   1,058,542   Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Toys 'R Us, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW
96.   Northlake Mall   GA   Atlanta   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     86.8 %   961,104   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's
97.   NorthPark Mall   IA   Davenport   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     90.6 %   1,073,101   Dillard's, Von Maur, Younkers, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble
98.   Northshore Mall   MA   Peabody (Boston)   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     93.6 %(17)   1,581,213   JCPenney, Sears, Filene's Basement, Nordstrom, Macy's Mens/Furniture, Macys, H&M, Barnes & Noble, Toys 'R Us, Shaw's Grocery
99.   Northwoods Mall   IL   Peoria   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1983     95.0 %   693,963   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears
100.   Oak Court Mall   TN   Memphis   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1997     94.5 %(17)   848,974   Dillard's, Dillard's Mens, Macy's
101.   Ocean County Mall   NJ   Toms River (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     98.8 %   890,133   Macy's, Boscov's, JCPenney, Sears
102.   Orange Park Mall   FL   Orange Park (Jacksonville)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1994     98.6 %   954,994   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres
103.   Orland Square   IL   Orland Park (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1997     98.5 %   1,210,124   Macy's, Carson Pirie Scott, JCPenney, Sears
104.   Oxford Valley Mall   PA   Langhorne (Philadelphia)   Fee     65.0% (15) Acquired 2003     91.9 %(17)   1,332,202   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, United Artists Theatre,(11)
105.   Paddock Mall   FL   Ocala   Fee     100.0%   Built 1980     95.4 %   554,029   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Belk
106.   Penn Square Mall   OK   Oklahoma City   Ground Lease (2060)     94.5%   Acquired 2002     98.6 %   1,050,684   Macy's, Dillard's Women's, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Dickinson Theatre
107.   Pheasant Lane Mall   NH   Nashua (Manchester)       (14) Acquired 2002     94.7 %   869,722   JCPenney, Sears, Target, Macy's,(8)
108.   Phipps Plaza   GA   Atlanta   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     93.7 %   818,137   Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Belk, AMC Theatres
109.   Plaza Carolina   PR   Carolina (San Juan)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     92.5 %(17)   1,077,281   JCPenney, Sears, Tiendas Capri, Pueblo Xtra, Best Buy
110.   Port Charlotte Town Center   FL   Port Charlotte (Punta Gorda)   Fee     80.0% (12) Built 1989     90.3 %   766,723   Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Bealls, Sears, DSW, Regal Cinema
111.   Prien Lake Mall   LA   Lake Charles   Fee and Ground Lease (2025)(7)     100.0%   Built 1972     95.3 %   791,249   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres, Kohl's
112.   Quaker Bridge Mall   NJ   Lawrenceville (Trenton)   Fee     38.0% (4)(15) Acquired 2003     93.0 %   1,098,559   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears
113.   Richmond Town Square   OH   Richmond Heights (Cleveland)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1966     93.7 %   1,016,028   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinemas
114.   River Oaks Center   IL   Calumet City (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1997     90.2 %(17)   1,356,960   Macy's, Carson Pirie Scott, JCPenney, Sears

17


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
115.   Rockaway Townsquare   NJ   Rockaway (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     96.3 %   1,243,848   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears
116.   Rolling Oaks Mall   TX   San Antonio   Fee     100.0%   Built 1988     86.7 %(17)   883,369   Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears
117.   Roosevelt Field   NY   Garden City (New York)   Fee and Ground Lease (2090)(7)     100.0%   Acquired 1998     96.1 %(17)   2,225,748   Bloomingdale's, Bloomingdale's Furniture Gallery, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Loews Theatre, Xsport Fitness
118.   Ross Park Mall   PA   Pittsburgh   Fee     100.0%   Built 1986     94.8 %   1,208,241   JCPenney, Sears, Nordstrom, L.L. Bean, Macy's
119.   Rushmore Mall(1)   SD   Rapid City   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     76.2 %   835,097   JCPenney, Herberger's, Sears, Carmike Cinemas, Hobby Lobby, Toys R Us,(11)
120.   Santa Rosa Plaza   CA   Santa Rosa   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     97.4 %   692,275   Macy's, Sears,(11)
121.   Seminole Towne Center   FL   Sanford (Orlando)   Fee     45.0% (4)(2) Built 1995     89.2 %   1,125,976   Macy's, Dillard's, Belk, JCPenney, Sears, United Artists Theatre, H&M
122.   Shops at Mission Viejo, The   CA   Mission Viejo (Los Angeles)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1979     97.7 %   1,148,957   Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Macy's (2 locations)
123.   Shops at Sunset Place, The   FL   S. Miami   Fee     37.5% (4)(2) Built 1999     90.8 %   514,429   NikeTown, Barnes & Noble, GameWorks, Z Gallerie, LA Fitness, AMC Theatres, Splitsville
124.   Smith Haven Mall   NY   Lake Grove (New York)   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 1995     95.3 %   1,287,415   Macy's, Macy's Furniture Gallery, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble
125.   Solomon Pond Mall   MA   Marlborough (Boston)   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     99.2 %   886,327   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
126.   South Hills Village   PA   Pittsburgh   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1997     94.2 %(17)   1,141,179   Macy's, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Carmike Cinemas,(11)
127.   South Shore Plaza   MA   Braintree (Boston)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     97.4 %   1,160,760   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Filene's Basement, Nordstrom(6), Target(6)
128.   Southern Hills Mall(1)   IA   Sioux City   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     81.9 %   796,680   Younkers, JCPenney, Sears, Scheel's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, Carmike Cinemas
129.   Southern Park Mall   OH   Youngstown   Fee     100.0%   Built 1970     94.0 %   1,190,065   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres
130.   SouthPark   NC   Charlotte   Fee & Ground Lease (2040)(10)     100.0%   Acquired 2002     94.0 %   1,625,365   Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Crate & Barrel, Joseph Beth Booksellers
131.   SouthPark Mall   IL   Moline   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     76.1 %   1,017,116   Dillard's, Von Maur, Younkers, JCPenney, Sears
132.   SouthRidge Mall(1)   IA   Des Moines   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     53.4 %   889,046   JCPenney, Younkers, Sears, Target
133.   Springfield Mall(1)   PA   Springfield (Philadelphia)   Fee     38.0% (4)(15) Acquired 2005     84.6 %   589,263   Macy's, Target
134.   Square One Mall   MA   Saugus (Boston)   Fee     49.1% (4) Acquired 1999     97.2 %   929,330   Macy's, Sears, Best Buy, T.J. Maxx N More, Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, Filene's Basement
135.   St. Charles Towne Center   MD   Waldorf (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1990     96.4 %   979,904   Macy's, Macy's Home Store, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Dick Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres

18


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
136.   St. Johns Town Center   FL   Jacksonville   Fee     50.0% (4) Built 2005     99.1 %   1,222,579   Dillard's, Target, Ashley Furniture Home Store, Barnes & Noble, Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, DSW, JoAnn Fabrics, PetsMart
137.   Stanford Shopping Center   CA   Palo Alto (San Francisco)   Ground Lease (2054)     100.0%   Acquired 2003     98.0 %(17)   1,364,356   Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Macy's Mens Store
138.   Summit Mall   OH   Akron   Fee     100.0%   Built 1965     94.7 %   770,221   Dillard's Women's & Children's, Dillard's Men's & Home, Macy's
139.   Sunland Park Mall   TX   El Paso   Fee     100.0%   Built 1988     94.1 %   917,642   Macy's, Dillard's Women's & Children's, Dillard's Men's & Home, Sears, Forever 21,(8)
140.   Tacoma Mall   WA   Tacoma (Seattle)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1987     87.5 %   1,248,990   Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, David's Bridal, Forever 21(6)
141.   Tippecanoe Mall   IN   Lafayette   Fee     100.0%   Built 1973     90.2 %   862,773   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods, H.H. Gregg
142.   Town Center at Aurora   CO   Aurora (Denver)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     83.2 %   1,081,725   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Century Theatres
143.   Town Center at Boca Raton   FL   Boca Raton (Miami)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     98.7 %   1,753,585   Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Sears, Crate & Barrel
144.   Town Center at Cobb   GA   Kennesaw (Atlanta)   Fee     75.0%   Acquired 1998     95.5 %   1,275,928   Belk, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Macy's Furniture
145.   Towne East Square   KS   Wichita   Fee     100.0%   Built 1975     93.8 %   1,120,581   Dillard's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears
146.   Towne West Square   KS   Wichita   Fee     100.0%   Built 1980     85.4 %   941,485   Dillard's Women's & Home, Dillard's Men's & Children, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, The Movie Machine
147.   Treasure Coast Square   FL   Jensen Beach   Fee     100.0%   Built 1987     89.7 %   878,213   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Borders Books & Music, Regal Cinema
148.   Tyrone Square   FL   St. Petersburg (Tampa)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1972     93.1 %   1,095,029   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Borders Books & Music
149.   University Park Mall   IN   Mishawaka   Fee     100.0%   Built 1979     91.3 %   922,625   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble
150.   Upper Valley Mall   OH   Springfield   Fee     100.0%   Built 1971     80.4 %   739,469   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Elder-Beerman, MC Sporting Goods, Chakeres Theatres
151.   Valle Vista Mall   TX   Harlingen   Fee     100.0%   Built 1983     50.7 %   651,110   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Big Lots(6), Forever 21
152.   Valley Mall   VA   Harrisonburg   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     82.8 %   506,333   JCPenney, Belk, Target, Books A Million,(8)
153.   Virginia Center Commons   VA   Glen Allen (Richmond)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1991     89.3 %   784,830   Macy's, Dillard's Men's, Dillard's Women's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears
154.   Walt Whitman Mall   NY   Huntington Station (New York)   Ground Lease (2022)     100.0%   Acquired 1998     95.5 %   1,027,405   Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale's, Lord & Taylor, Macy's
155.   Washington Square   IN   Indianapolis   Fee     100.0%   Built 1974     74.2 %   963,220   Sears, Target, Dick's Sporting Goods, Burlington Coat Factory, Kerasotes Theatres,(11)
156.   West Ridge Mall   KS   Topeka   Fee     100.0%   Built 1988     92.3 %   992,403   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Burlington Coat Factory
157.   West Town Mall   TN   Knoxville   Ground Lease (2042)     50.0% (4) Acquired 1991     98.0 %   1,335,164   Belk Women, Dillard's, JCPenney, Belk Men, Home and Kids, Sears, Regal Cinema

19


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
158.   Westchester, The   NY   White Plains (New York)   Fee     40.0% (4) Acquired 1997     94.0 %(17)   827,393   Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom
159.   Westminster Mall   CA   Westminster (Los Angeles)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     86.5 %   1,186,978   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Target
160.   White Oaks Mall   IL   Springfield   Fee     80.7%   Built 1977     81.2 %(17)   919,871   Macy's, Bergner's, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods,(8)
161.   Wolfchase Galleria   TN   Memphis   Fee     94.5%   Acquired 2002     94.4 %   1,152,554   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Malco Theatres
162.   Woodland Hills Mall   OK   Tulsa   Fee     94.5%   Acquired 2002     98.7 %   1,092,057   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
                                         
    Total Regional Mall GLA               160,034,865    
                                         

 

 

Premium Outlet Centers

1.

 

Albertville Premium Outlets

 

MN

 

Albertville (Minneapolis)

 

Fee

 

 

100.0%

 

Acquired 2004

 

 

92.8

%

 

429,563

 

Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, Lucky Brand, Nautica, Nike, Old Navy, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
2.   Allen Premium Outlets   TX   Allen (Dallas)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.8 %   441,542   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
3.   Aurora Farms Premium Outlets   OH   Aurora (Cleveland)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     93.7 %   300,383   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Liz Claiborne, Michael Kors, Nautica, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
4.   Camarillo Premium Outlets   CA   Camarillo (Los Angeles)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     98.0 %   673,912   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Diesel, Giorgio Armani, Hugo Boss, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger
5.   Carlsbad Premium Outlets   CA   Carlsbad (San Diego)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.7 %   288,029   Adidas, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Calvin Klein, Coach, Crate & Barrel, Gap Outlet, Guess, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger
6.   Carolina Premium Outlets   NC   Smithfield (Raleigh)   Ground Lease (2029)     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.1 %   438,981   Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, Liz Claiborne, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
7.   Chicago Premium Outlets   IL   Aurora (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2004     100.0 %   437,342   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Diesel, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Giorgio Armani, J.Crew, Kate Spade, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Sony, Theory
8.   Cincinnati Premium Outlets   OH   Monroe (Cincinnati)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2009     98.7 %   338,327   Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear Company, Gap Outlet, Hanes Brands, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks 5th Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, The North Face

20


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
9.   Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets   CT   Clinton (New Haven)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     98.4 %   276,164   Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger
10.   Columbia Gorge Premium Outlets   OR   Troutdale (Portland)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     95.8 %   163,885   Adidas, Calvin Klein, Carter's, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Guess, Levi's, Liz Claiborne, Tommy Hilfiger
11.   Desert Hills Premium Outlets   CA   Cabazon (Palm Springs)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.9 %   501,771   Burberry, Coach, Dior, Elie Tahari, Giorgio Armani, Gucci, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, True Religion, Yves Saint Laurent, Zegna
12.   Edinburgh Premium Outlets   IN   Edinburgh (Indianapolis)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     98.0 %   377,784   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Levi's, Nautica, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
13.   Folsom Premium Outlets   CA   Folsom (Sacramento)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     98.8 %   296,035   BCBG Max Azria, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Nautica, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
14.   Gilroy Premium Outlets   CA   Gilroy (San Jose)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     96.1 %   577,909   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, J.Crew, Hugo Boss, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion
15.   Houston Premium Outlets   TX   Houston   Fee     100.0%   Built 2008     99.4 %   425,500   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Juicy Couture, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, True Religion, Tommy Hilfiger
16.   Jackson Premium Outlets   NJ   Jackson   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     98.9 %   285,833   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
17.   Jersey Shore Premium Outlets   NJ   Tinton Falls   Fee     100.0%   Built 2008     97.0 %   434,367   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Brooks Brothers, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Guess, J. Crew, Kate Spade, Michael Kors, Theory, Nike, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour
18.   Johnson Creek Premium Outlets   WI   Johnson Creek (Milwaukee)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     89.4 %   277,672   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Columbia Sportswear, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Nike, Old Navy, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
19.   Kittery Premium Outlets   ME   Kittery   Ground Lease (2014)     100.0%   Acquired 2004     97.4 %   264,771   Adidas, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
20.   Las Americas Premium Outlets   CA   San Diego   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2007     98.3 %   560,873   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Sony, Tommy Bahama, True Religion

21


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
21.   Las Vegas Outlet Center   NV   Las Vegas   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     100.0 %   469,046   Adidas, Aeropostale, Ann Taylor, Bose, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Gymboree, Levi's, Liz Claiborne, Nautica, Nike, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
22.   Las Vegas Premium Outlets   NV   Las Vegas   Fee     100.0%   Built 2003     100.0 %   538,681   A/X Armani Exchange, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Coach, David Yurman, Diesel, Dolce & Gabbana, Elie Tahari, Etro, Hugo Boss, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tag Heuer, Ted Baker, True Religion
23.   Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets   VA   Leesburg (Washington D.C.)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     97.1 %   517,700   Ann Taylor, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Coach, Crate & Barrel, Diesel, DKNY, Juicy Couture, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Under Armour, Williams-Sonoma
24.   Liberty Village Premium Outlets   NJ   Flemington   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     94.1 %   164,260   Ann Taylor, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Michael Kors, Nautica, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
25.   Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets   IN   Michigan City   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     96.0 %   454,315   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
26.   Napa Premium Outlets   CA   Napa   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.6 %   179,386   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Lucky Brand, Nautica, Tommy Hilfiger
27.   North Georgia Premium Outlets   GA   Dawsonville (Atlanta)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     98.2 %   539,982   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Williams-Sonoma
28.   Orlando Premium Outlets   FL   Orlando   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     100.0 %   549,434   Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, Dior, Fendi, Giorgio Armani, Hugo Boss, J. Crew, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tag Heuer, Theory
29.   Osage Beach Premium Outlets   MO   Osage Beach   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     91.6 %   393,051   Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
30.   Petaluma Village Premium Outlets   CA   Petaluma (Santa Rosa)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     96.6 %   195,968   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, Nike, Puma, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
31.   Philadelphia Premium Outlets   PA   Limerick (Philadelphia)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2007     96.9 %   549,106   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Sony

22


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
32.   Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets   TX   Mercedes (McAllen)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2006     96.9 %   584,790   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Gap Outlet, Guess, Hugo Boss, Loft Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger
33.   Round Rock Premium Outlets   TX   Round Rock (Austin)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2006     98.0 %   488,903   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger
34.   Seattle Premium Outlets   WA   Tulalip (Seattle)   Ground Lease (2034)     100.0%   Built 2005     99.1 %   443,760   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Hugo Boss, J. Crew, Juicy Couture, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger
35.   St. Augustine Premium Outlets   FL   St. Augustine (Jacksonville)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     97.0 %   328,557   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
36.   The Crossings Premium Outlets   PA   Tannersville   Fee and Ground Lease (2019)(7)     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.3 %   411,114   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Guess, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
37.   Vacaville Premium Outlets   CA   Vacaville   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     98.3 %   437,650   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, DKNY, Gucci, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger
38.   Waikele Premium Outlets   HI   Waipahu (Honolulu)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.5 %   209,937   A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Guess, Michael Kors,Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion
39.   Waterloo Premium Outlets   NY   Waterloo   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     96.5 %   417,549   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, VF Outlet
40.   Woodbury Commons Premium Outlets   NY   Central Valley (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     100.0 %   844,734   Banana Republic, Burberry, Chanel, Chloe, Coach, Dior, Dolce & Gabbana, Fendi, Giorgio Armani, Gucci, Lacoste, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Oscar de la Renta, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragmo, Theory, Tory Burch, Versace, Yves St. Laurent
41.   Wrentham Village Premium Outlets   MA   Wrentham (Boston)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     99.7 %   635,997   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Elie Tahari, Hugo Boss, J. Crew, Lacoste, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragmo, Sony, Williams-Sonoma, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour
                                         
    Total U.S. Premium Outlet Centers GLA               17,144,563    
                                         

23


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
 
  Community/Lifestyle Centers

1.

 

Arboretum at Great Hills

 

TX

 

Austin

 

Fee

 

 

100.0%

 

Acquired 1998

 

 

87.4

%

 

206,827

 

Barnes & Noble, Pottery Barn
2.   Bloomingdale Court   IL   Bloomingdale (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1987     96.2 %   630,359   Best Buy, T.J. Maxx N More, Office Max, Old Navy, Wal-Mart, Dick's Sporting Goods, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Picture Show,(8)
3.   Brightwood Plaza   IN   Indianapolis   Fee     100.0%   Built 1965     100.0 %   38,493    
4.   Charles Towne Square   SC   Charleston   Fee     100.0%   Built 1976     100.0 %   71,794   Regal Cinema
5.   Chesapeake Center   VA   Chesapeake (Virginia Beach)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1989     96.1 %   305,935   K-Mart, Movies 10, Petsmart, Michaels, Value City Furniture
6.   Clay Terrace   IN   Carmel (Indianapolis)   Fee     50.0% (4) Built 2004     94.7 %(17)   614,458   Dick's Sporting Goods, Whole Foods, DSW, Bouncertown
7.   Cobblestone Court   NY   Victor   Fee     35.7% (4)(13) Built 1993     98.8 %   265,477   Dick's Sporting Goods, Kmart, Office Max
8.   Countryside Plaza   IL   Countryside (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1977     87.7 %   403,756   Best Buy, Home Depot, PetsMart, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Office Depot, Value City Furniture
9.   Crystal Court   IL   Crystal Lake (Chicago)   Fee     37.9% (4)(13) Built 1989     58.8 %   278,978   (8)
10.   Dare Centre   NC   Kill Devil Hills   Ground Lease (2058)     100.0%   Acquired 2004     100.0 %   168,707   Belk, Food Lion
11.   DeKalb Plaza   PA   King of Prussia (Philadelphia)   Fee     50.3% (15) Acquired 2003     100.0 %   101,742   Changed property name from Dekalb; ACME Grocery,(11)
12.   Eastland Convenience Center   IN   Evansville   Ground Lease (2075)     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     96.1 %   175,639   Toys 'R Us, Bed Bath & Beyond, Marshalls,(8)
13.   Empire East(1)   SD   Sioux Falls   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     98.1 %   297,278   Kohl's, Target, Bed Bath & Beyond
14.   Fairfax Court   VA   Fairfax (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     41.3% (4)(13) Built 1992     85.8 %   254,301   Burlington Coat Factory, Offenbacher's,(8)
15.   Forest Plaza   IL   Rockford   Fee     100.0%   Built 1985     93.2 %   428,039   Kohl's, Marshalls, Michaels, Factory Card Outlet, Office Max, Bed Bath & Beyond, Petco, Babies R' Us, Toys R' Us,(8)
16.   Gaitway Plaza   FL   Ocala   Fee     32.2% (4)(13) Built 1989     100.0 %   208,755   Books-A-Million, Office Depot, T.J. Maxx, Ross Dress for Less, Bed Bath & Beyond
17.   Gateway Shopping Center   TX   Austin   Fee     100.0%   2004     89.2 %   513,017   Star Furniture, Best Buy, Recreational Equipment, Inc., Whole Foods, Crate & Barrel, The Container Store, Old Navy, Regal Cinema, Nordstrom Rack,(8)
18.   Great Lakes Plaza   OH   Mentor (Cleveland)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1976     89.6 %   164,104   Michael's, Best Buy, HH Gregg,(8)
19.   Greenwood Plus   IN   Greenwood (Indianapolis)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1979     100.0 %   155,319   Best Buy, Kohl's
20.   Hamilton Town Center   IN   Noblesville (Indianapolis)   Fee     50.0% (4) Built 2008     88.5 %   655,490   JCPenney, Borders, Dick's Sporting Goods, Old Navy, Stein Mart, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW, Hamilton 16 IMAX
21.   Henderson Square   PA   King of Prussia (Philadelphia)   Fee     76.0% (15) Acquired 2003     96.0 %   107,383   Genuardi's Family Market,(8)
22.   Highland Lakes Center   FL   Orlando   Fee     100.0%   Built 1991     75.0 %   492,321   Marshalls, Bed Bath & Beyond, American Signature Furniture, Ross Dress for Less, Burlington Coat Factory,(8)

24


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
23.   Indian River Commons   FL   Vero Beach   Fee     50.0%   Built 1997     100.0 %   255,942   Lowe's, Best Buy, Ross Dress for Less, Bed Bath & Beyond, Michael's
24.   Ingram Plaza   TX   San Antonio   Fee     100.0%   Built 1980     100.0 %   111,518   Sheplers, Macy's Home Store
25.   Keystone Shoppes   IN   Indianapolis   Ground Lease (2067)     100.0%   Acquired 1997     93.9 %   29,140    
26.   Lake Plaza   IL   Waukegan (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1986     93.6 %   215,568   Home Owners Bargain Outlet,(8)
27.   Lake View Plaza   IL   Orland Park (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1986     83.8 %   367,843   Factory Card Outlet, Best Buy, Petco, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Golf Galaxy, Value City Furniture,(11)
28.   Lakeline Plaza   TX   Cedar Park (Austin)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1998     88.2 %   387,430   T.J. Maxx, Old Navy, Best Buy, Ross Dress for Less, Office Max, PetsMart, Party City, Cost Plus World Market, Toys 'R Us,(8)
29.   Lima Center   OH   Lima   Fee     100.0%   Built 1978     88.2 %   236,878   Kohl's, Hobby Lobby, T.J. Maxx
30.   Lincoln Crossing   IL   O'Fallon (St. Louis)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1990     95.5 %   243,326   Wal-Mart, PetsMart, The Home Depot
31.   Lincoln Plaza   PA   King of Prussia (Philadelphia)   Fee     65.0% (15) Acquired 2003     98.6 %   267,965   Burlington Coat Factory, AC Moore, Michaels, T.J. Maxx, Home Goods, HH Gregg(6),(8)
32.   MacGregor Village   NC   Cary   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     58.6 %   144,042    
33.   Mall of Georgia Crossing   GA   Buford (Atlanta)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1999     98.1 %   440,610   Best Buy, American Signature Furniture, T.J. Maxx 'n More, Nordstrom Rack, Staples, Target
34.   Markland Plaza   IN   Kokomo   Fee     100.0%   Built 1974     100.0 %   90,527   Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond
35.   Martinsville Plaza   VA   Martinsville   Ground Lease (2046)     100.0%   Built 1967     97.1 %   102,105   Rose's, Food Lion
36.   Matteson Plaza   IL   Matteson (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1988     69.7 %   270,892   Dominick's,(8)
37.   Muncie Plaza   IN   Muncie   Fee     100.0%   Built 1998     98.6 %   172,621   Kohl's, Target, Shoe Carnival, T.J. Maxx, MC Sporting Goods, Kerasotes Theatres
38.   New Castle Plaza   IN   New Castle   Fee     100.0%   Built 1966     72.8 %   91,648   Ace Hardware(6), Aaron's Rents(6)
39.   North Ridge Plaza   IL   Joliet (Chicago)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1985     84.3 %   305,070   Hobby Lobby, Office Max, Minnesota Fabrics, Burlington Coat Factory, Ultra Foods Grocery
40.   North Ridge Shopping Center   NC   Raleigh   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     95.8 %   166,667   Ace Hardware, Kerr Drugs, Harris-Teeter Grocery
41.   Northwood Plaza   IN   Fort Wayne   Fee     100.0%   Built 1974     83.8 %   208,076   Target, Cinema Grill
42.   Palms Crossing   TX   McAllen   Fee     100.0%   Built 2007     100.0 %   337,249   Bealls, DSW, Barnes & Noble, Babies 'R Us, Sports Authority, Guitar Center, Cavendar's Boot City, Best Buy
43.   Pier Park   FL   Panama City Beach   Fee     100.0%   Built 2008     95.1 %   815,670   Dillard's, JCPenney, Target, Old Navy, Borders, Grand Theatres, Ron Jon Surf Shop
44.   Plaza at Buckland Hills, The   CT   Manchester   Fee     41.3% (4)(13) Built 1993     62.5 %   334,885   Jo-Ann Fabrics, Party City, Toys 'R Us, Michaels, PetsMart,(11)

25


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
45.   Regency Plaza   MO   St. Charles (St. Louis)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1988     95.5 %   287,473   Wal-Mart, Sam's Wholesale Club, PetSmart
46.   Richardson Square   TX   Richardson (Dallas)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2008     100.0 %   517,265   Lowe's, Ross Dress for Less, Sears, Super Target, Anna's Linens
47.   Ridgewood Court   MS   Jackson   Fee     35.7% (4)(13) Built 1993     99.3 %   369,500   T.J. Maxx, Lifeway Christian Bookstore, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Michaels, Marshalls
48.   Rockaway Commons   NJ   Rockaway (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     90.9 %   149,570   Best Buy, Acme Grocery,(8)
49.   Rockaway Town Plaza   NJ   Rockaway (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     100.0 %   459,241   Target, PetsMart, Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres
50.   Royal Eagle Plaza   FL   Coral Springs (Miami)   Fee     42.0% (4)(13) Built 1989     98.4 %   199,059   Stein Mart,(11)
51.   Shops at Arbor Walk, The   TX   Austin   Ground Lease (2056)     100.0%   Built 2006     89.0 %   442,585   Home Depot, Marshall's, DSW, Golf Galaxy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Ethan Allen
52.   Shops at North East Mall, The   TX   Hurst (Dallas)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1999     97.8 %   365,008   Michael's, PetsMart, Old Navy, T.J. Maxx, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Barnes & Noble
53.   St. Charles Towne Plaza   MD   Waldorf (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1987     75.3 %   394,604   K & G Menswear, CVS, Shoppers Food Warehouse, Dollar Tree, Value City Furniture, Big Lots,(8)
54.   Teal Plaza   IN   Lafayette   Fee     100.0%   Built 1962     22.4 %   101,087   Pep Boys,(8)
55.   Terrace at the Florida Mall   FL   Orlando   Fee     100.0%   Built 1989     80.2 %   346,693   Marshalls, American Signature Furniture, Global Import, Target, Bed Bath & Beyond,(8)
56.   Tippecanoe Plaza   IN   Lafayette   Fee     100.0%   Built 1974     100.0 %   90,522   Best Buy, Barnes & Noble
57.   University Center   IN   Mishawaka   Fee     100.0%   Built 1980     52.5 %   150,524   Michael's, Best Buy
58.   Village Park Plaza   IN   Carmel (Indianapolis)   Fee     35.7% (4)(13) Built 1990     98.6 %   549,623   Bed Bath & Beyond, Ashley Furniture HomeStore(16), Kohl's, Wal-Mart, Marsh, Menards, Regal Cinema
59.   Washington Plaza   IN   Indianapolis   Fee     100.0%   Built 1976     57.1 %   50,107    
60.   Waterford Lakes Town Center   FL   Orlando   Fee     100.0%   Built 1999     100.0 %   949,678   Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx, Bed Bath & Beyond, Old Navy, Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Office Max, PetsMart, Target, Ashley Furniture HomeStore, L.A. Fitness, Regal Cinema
61.   West Ridge Plaza   KS   Topeka   Fee     100.0%   Built 1988     86.6 %   254,519   T.J. Maxx, Toys 'R Us, Target
62.   West Town Corners   FL   Altamonte Springs (Orlando)   Fee     32.2% (4)(13) Built 1989     96.9 %   385,643   Sports Authority, PetsMart, Winn-Dixie Marketplace, American Signature Furniture, Wal-Mart, Lowes Home Improvement
63.   Westland Park Plaza   FL   Orange Park (Jacksonville)   Fee     32.2% (4)(13) Built 1989     81.9 %   163,254   Sports Authority, PetsMart, Burlington Coat Factory
64.   White Oaks Plaza   IL   Springfield   Fee     100.0%   Built 1986     93.2 %   391,474   T.J. Maxx, Office Max, Kohl's, Babies 'R Us, Country Market
65.   Whitehall Mall   PA   Whitehall   Fee     38.0% (15)(4) Acquired 2003     92.6 %   588,566   Sears, Kohl's, Bed Bath & Beyond, Borders Books & Music, Gold's Gym, Buy Buy Baby
66.   Willow Knolls Court   IL   Peoria   Fee     35.7% (4)(13) Built 1990     96.7 %   382,377   Burlington Coat Factory, Kohl's, Sam's Wholesale Club, Willow Knolls 14, Office Max
67.   Wolf Ranch Town Center   TX   Georgetown (Austin)   Fee     100.0%   Built 2005     79.8 %   626,457   Kohl's, Target, Michaels, Best Buy, Office Depot, Old Navy, PetsMart, T.J. Maxx, DSW
                                         
    Total Community/Lifestyle Center GLA     20,348,673    
                                         

26


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
   
   
   
  Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
   
   
   
   
   
 
   
   
   
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
   
   
   
 
  Other Properties
  State   City (CBSA)   Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
 
 
Property Name

1.

 

Crossville Outlet Center

 

TN

 

Crossville

 

Fee

 

 

100.0%

 

Acquired 2004

 

 

94.4

%

 

151,205

 

Bass, Dressbarn, Kasper, L'eggs Hanes Bali Playtex, Liz Claiborne, Rack Room Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
2.   Factory Merchants Branson   MO   Branson   Ground Lease (2021)     100.0%   Acquired 2004     60.3 %   273,657   Carter's, Crocs, Izod, Jones New York, Pendleton, Reebok, Tuesday Morning
3.   Factory Stores of America-Boaz   AL   Boaz   Ground Lease (2027)     100.0%   Acquired 2004     77.5 %   111,636   Bon Worth, Easy Spirit, Rue21, VF Outlet
4.   Factory Stores of America—Georgetown   KY   Georgetown   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     95.9 %   173,330   Bass, Dressbarn, Rack Room Shoes, Rue 21, Van Heusen
5.   Factory Stores of America—Graceville   FL   Graceville   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     100.0 %   84,066   Factory Brand Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
6.   Factory Stores of America—Lebanon   MO   Lebanon   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     100.0 %   85,930   Dressbarn, Factory Brand Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
7.   Factory Stores of America—Nebraska City   NE   Nebraska City   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     97.8 %   89,615   Bass, Easy Spirit, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
8.   Factory Stores of America—Story City   IA   Story City   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     78.6 %   112,510   Dressbarn, Factory Brand Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
9.   Factory Stores of North Bend   WA   North Bend   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 2004     94.7 %   223,611   Adidas, Bass, Carter's, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Izod, Nike, Nine West, PacSun, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
10.   The Shoppes at Branson Meadows   MO   Branson   Ground Lease (2021)     100.0%   Acquired 2004     73.2 %   286,489   Branson Meadows Cinemas, Dressbarn, VF Outlet
11.   Highland Mall(1)   TX   Austin   Fee and Ground Lease (2070)     50.0% (4) Acquired 1998     51.1 %   1,077,898   Dillard's Men's and Women's, Macy's,(8)
12.   Mall at The Source, The   NY   Westbury (New York)   Fee     25.5% (4)(2) Built 1997     76.2 %   722,883   Fortunoff Backyard Store(6), Off 5th-Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom Rack, David's Bridal, Golf Galaxy,(8)
13.   Nanuet Mall   NY   Nanuet (New York)   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1998     36.3 %   912,615   Macy's, Sears,(8)
14.   Palm Beach Mall   FL   West Palm Beach (Miami)   Fee     100.0%   Built 1967     16.8 %   1,082,909   JCPenney, Sears(16),(8)
15.   University Mall   FL   Pensacola   Fee     100.0%   Acquired 1994     0.0 %   709,711   JCPenney, Sears, Belk
                                         
    Total Other GLA     6,098,065    
                                         

27


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
   
   
   
  Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
   
   
   
   
   
 
  Mills Properties
   
   
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
   
   
   
 
  The Mills®
  State   City (CBSA)   Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
 
 
Property Name

1.

 

Arizona Mills

 

AZ

 

Tempe (Phoenix)

 

Fee

 

 

25.0%

(4)

Acquired 2007

 

 

93.8

%

 

1,244,726

 

Marshalls, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, Burlington Coat Factory, Sears Appliance Outlet, Gameworks, Sports Authority, Ross Dress for Less, JCPenney Outlet, Group USA, Harkins Cinemas, IMAX Theatre, F.Y.E., Sea Life Center(6)
2.   Arundel Mills   MD   Hanover (Baltimore)   Fee     29.6% (4) Acquired 2007     99.7 %   1,293,011   Bass Pro Shops, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, The Children's Place, Dave & Buster's, F.Y.E., H&M, Medieval Times, Modell's, Neiman Marcus Last Call, OFF 5TH Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Old Navy, T.J. MAXX, Cinemark Egyptian 24 Theatres
3.   Colorado Mills   CO   Lakewood (Denver)   Fee     18.8% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     83.1 %   1,098,098   Borders Books Music Café, Eddie Bauer Outlet, Last Call Clearance Center from Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, OFF 5TH Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Sports Authority, Super Target, United Artists Theatre
4.   Concord Mills   NC   Concord (Charlotte)   Fee     29.6% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     99.3 %   1,333,923   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, FYE, The Children's Place Outlet, Dave & Buster's, NIKE, TJ Maxx, Group USA, Sun & Ski, AC Moore, Off Broadway Shoes, Old Navy, Bed Bath & Beyond, NASCAR Speedpark, AMC Theatres, Best Buy(6)
5.   Discover Mills   GA   Lawrenceville (Atlanta)   Fee     25.0% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     94.5 %   1,183,079   Bass Pro Shops, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Medieval Times, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, ROSS Dress for Less, Sears Appliance Outlet, Sun & Ski Sports, Urban Behavior, Spaha Skatepark, Dave & Buster's, AMC Theatres
6.   Franklin Mills   PA   Philadelphia   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     87.0 %   1,719,292   Dave & Buster's, JC Penney Outlet Store, Burlington Coat Factory, Marshalls HomeGoods, Modell's Sporting Goods, Group USA, Bed Bath & Beyond, Sam Ash Music, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shores, Sears Appliance Outlet, H&M, Spaha Skatepark, AMC Theatres
7.   Grapevine Mills   TX   Grapevine (Dallas)   Fee     29.6% (4) Acquired 2007     96.3 %   1,776,870   Bed, Bath & Beyond, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, The Children's Place, Forever 21, Group USA—The Clothing Co. JCPenney Outlet, Marshalls, NIKE, OFF 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, Old Navy, Virgin Megastore, Gameworks, AMC Theatres, Dr. Pepper Star Center, Sun & Ski Sports, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Sears Appliance Outlet, Bass Pro Outdoor World, Spaha Skatepark, Off Broadway Shoes(6)
8.   Great Mall   CA   Milpitas (San Jose)   Fee     24.5% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     94.9 %   1,355,734   Last Call Neiman Marcus, Sports Authority, Group USA, Old Navy, Kohl's, Dave & Busters, H&M, Sears Appliance Outlet, Burlington Coat Factory, Marshalls, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, NIKE, Century Theatres, Bed Bath & Beyond, XXI Forever
9.   Gurnee Mills   IL   Gurnee (Chicago)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     95.7 %   1,810,682   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath & Beyond, Burlington Coat Factory, H & M, Kohl's, Marshall's Home Goods, Off 5th—Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Nickles & Dimes, Sears Grand, The Sports Authority, TJ Maxx, VF Outlet, Marcus Cinemas, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Value City Furniture

28


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
10.   Katy Mills   TX   Katy (Houston)   Fee     31.3% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     89.9 %   1,554,899   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath and Beyond, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, F.Y.E.-For Your Entertainment, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus Last Call Clearance Center, Nike Factory Store, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Sun & Ski Sports, AMC Theatres, Old Navy, Off Broadway Shoes, XXI Forever
11.   Ontario Mills   CA   Ontario   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     93.2 %   1,476,974   Burlington Coat Factory, Totally for Kids, NIKE, Gameworks, The Children's Place Outlet, Marshalls, JCPenney Outlet, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nordstrom Rack, Dave & Busters, Group USA, Sam Ash Music, Off Broadway Shoes, AMC Theatres, H&M, F.Y.E., Second Spin
12.   Opry Mills   TN   Nashville   Fee     24.5% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     97.6 %   1,159,314   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Dave & Buster's, The Gibson Showcase, Bed Bath & Beyond, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Barnes & Noble, Old Navy, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Nike Factory Store, Sun & Ski Sports, BLACKLION, Regal Cinemas, XXI Forever, VF Outlet
13.   Potomac Mills   VA   Prince William (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     98.1 %   1,550,514   Group USA, Marshall's, TJ Maxx, Sears Appliance Outlet, Old Navy, JCPenney Outlet, Urban Behavior, Burlington Coat Factory, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Nordstrom Rack, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Costco Warehouse, The Children's Place, AMC Theatres, Modell's Sporting Goods, Books-A-Million, H&M, Last Call Neiman Marcus, XXI Forever
14.   Sawgrass Mills   FL   Sunrise (Miami)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     99.8 %   2,251,047   American Signature Home, Beall's Outlet, Bed Bath & Beyond, Brandsmart USA, Burlington Coat Factory, Gameworks, JCPenney Outlet Store, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus Last Call Clearance Center, Nike Factory Store, Nordstrom Rack, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Ron Jon Surf Shop, The Sports Authority, Super Target, TJ Maxx, VF Factory Outlet, Wannado City, FYE, Off Broadway Shoes, Regal Cinemas, GAP Outlet, Books-A-Million
15.   St. Louis Mills   MO   Hazelwood (St. Louis)   Fee     25.0% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     80.8 %   1,174,876   Bed Bath & Beyond, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Cabela's, iceZONE, Marshalls MegaStore, NASCAR SpeedPark, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Sears Appliance Outlet, The Children's Place Outlet, Regal Cinemas, Plan 9 Skatepark
16.   The Block at Orange   CA   Orange (Los Angeles)   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     92.1 %   720,973   Dave & Buster's, Vans Skatepark, Lucky Strike Lanes, Borders Books & Music, Hilo Hattie, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, AMC Theatres, Nike Factory Store, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shoes, H&M(6)
                                         
    Subtotal The Mills®     22,704,012    
                                         

29


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
    Mills Regional Malls                                      

17.

 

Briarwood Mall

 

MI

 

Ann Arbor

 

Fee

 

 

25.0%

(4)

Acquired 2007

 

 

95.5

%

 

970,429

 

Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Von Maur
18.   Del Amo Fashion Center   CA   Torrance (Los Angeles)   Fee     25.0% (4)(2) Acquired 2007     89.6 %(17)   2,381,128   Macy's, Macy's, Macy's Home & Furnishings, JCPenney, Sears, Marshalls, T.J. Maxx, Barnes & Noble, JoAnn Fabrics, Crate & Barrel, L.A. Fitness, Burlington Coat Factory, AMC Theatres
19.   Dover Mall   DE   Dover   Fee     34.1% (4) Acquired 2007     94.6 %   885,622   Macy's, JCPenney, Boscov's, Sears, Carmike Cinemas
20.   Esplanade, The   LA   Kenner (New Orleans)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     83.9 %   899,407   Dillard's, Dillard's Men's, Macy's,(11)
21.   Falls, The   FL   Miami   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     93.3 %   807,255   Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Regal Cinema
22.   Galleria at White Plains, The   NY   White Plains (New York)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     79.0 %   863,293   Macy's, Sears, H&M
23.   Hilltop Mall   CA   Richmond (San Francisco)   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     75.8 %   1,077,326   JCPenney, Sears, Macy's, Wal-Mart, 24 Hour Fitness
24.   Lakeforest Mall   MD   Gaithersburg (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     84.5 %   1,045,387   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears, H&M
25.   Mall at Tuttle Crossing, The   OH   Dublin (Columbus)   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     97.4 %   1,107,706   Macy's, Macy's, Sears, JCPenney
26.   Marley Station   MD   Glen Burnie (Baltimore)   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     82.1 %   1,069,106   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, The Movies at Marley Station, Gold's Gym,(11)
27.   Meadowood Mall   NV   Reno   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     89.1 %(17)   876,391   Macy's Men's, Macy's, Sears, JCPenney, Sports Authority
28.   Northpark Mall   MS   Ridgeland   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     97.2 %   955,735   Dillard's, JCPenney, Belk, Regal Cinema
29.   Shops at Riverside, The   NJ   Hackensack (New York)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     86.8 %   762,197   Bloomingdale's, Saks Fifth Avenue, Barnes & Noble, Pottery Barn
30.   Southdale Center   MN   Edina (Minneapolis)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     91.0 %(17)   1,338,840   Macy's, JCPenney, Marshall's, AMC Theatres,(8)
31.   Southridge Mall   WI   Greendale (Milwaukee)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     90.5 %   1,211,830   JC Penney, Sears, Kohl's, Boston Store, Cost Plus World Market,(8)
32.   Stoneridge Shopping Center   CA   Pleasanton (San Francisco)   Fee     25.0% (4) Acquired 2007     97.1 %   1,301,273   Macy's Women's, Macy's Men's, Nordstrom, Sears, JCPenney, H&M
                                         
    Subtotal Mills Regional Malls     17,552,925    
                                         

30


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease)(3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy(5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
    Mills Community Centers                                  

33.

 

Arundel Mills Marketplace

 

MD

 

Hanover (Baltimore)

 

Fee

 

 

29.6%

(4)

Acquired 2007

 

 

100.0

%

 

101,613

 

Michael's, Staples, HH Gregg(6)
34.   Concord Mills Marketplace   NC   Concord (Charlotte)   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     100.0 %   230,683   BJ's Wholesale Club, Garden Ridge
35.   Denver West Village   CO   Lakewood   Fee     18.8% (4) Acquired 2007     98.5 %   310,160   Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Office Max, Whole Foods, DSW, Ultimate Electronics, Christy Sports, United Artists
36.   Liberty Plaza   PA   Philadelphia   Fee     50.0% (4) Acquired 2007     99.0 %   371,618   Wal-Mart, Dick's Sporting Goods, Raymour & Flanigan, Pathmark Food Market
                                         
    Subtotal Mills Community Centers     1,014,074    
                                         
    Total Mills Properties               41,271,011    
                                         
    Total U.S. Properties GLA     244,897,177    
                                         

31


Table of Contents

FOOTNOTES:


(1)
This property is managed by a third party.

(2)
Our direct and indirect interests in some of the properties held as joint venture interests are subject to preferences on distributions in favor of other partners or us.

(3)
The date listed is the expiration date of the last renewal option available to the operating entity under the ground lease. In a majority of the ground leases, we have a right of first refusal or the right to purchase the lessor's interest. Unless otherwise indicated, each ground lease listed in this column covers at least 50% of its respective property.

(4)
Joint venture properties accounted for under the equity method.

(5)
Regional Malls—Executed leases for all company-owned GLA in mall stores, excluding majors. Premium Outlet Centers—Executed leases for all company-owned GLA (or total center GLA). Community/Lifestyle Centers — Executed leases for all company-owned GLA including majors and mall stores.

(6)
Indicates anchor or major that is currently under development.

(7)
Indicates ground lease covers less than 50% of the acreage of this property.

(8)
Indicates vacant anchor space(s).

(9)
The lease at the Mall at Chestnut Hill includes the entire premises including land and building.

(10)
Indicates ground lease covers outparcel only.

(11)
Indicates vacant anchor owned by another company, but we still collect rent and/or fees under an agreement.

(12)
We receive substantially all the economic benefit of the property due to a preference or advance.

(13)
Outside partner receives substantially all of the economic benefit due to a partner preference.

(14)
We own a mortgage note that encumbers Pheasant Lane Mall that entitles us to 100% of the economics of this property.

(15)
Our indirect ownership interest is through an approximately 76% ownership interest in Kravco Simon Investments.

(16)
Indicates anchor has announced its intent to close this location.

(17)
Mall & Freestanding GLA includes office space as follows:

    Arsenal Mall—107,188 sq. ft.   Northshore Mall—12,367 sq. ft.
    Century III Mall—30,032 sq. ft.   Oak Court Mall—126,583 sq. ft.
    Coconut Point—1,325 sq. ft.   Oxford Valley Mall—110,324 sq. ft.
    Clay Terrace—110,754 sq. ft.   Plaza Carolina—28,436 sq. ft.
    The Domain—92,954 sq. ft.   River Oaks Center—116,912 sq. ft.
    Copley Place—867,601 sq. ft.   Rolling Oaks Mall—6,383 sq. ft.
    Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The—169,089 sq. ft.   Roosevelt Field—1,610 sq. ft.
    Firewheel Town Center—74,999 sq. ft.   South Hills Village—4,361 sq. ft.
    Great Lakes Mall—2,051 sq. ft.   Stanford Shopping Center—5,748 sq. ft.
    Greendale Mall—119,860 sq. ft.   The Westchester—820 sq. ft.
    Gwinnett Place—32,603 sq. ft.   White Oaks Mall—7,807 sq. ft.
    King of Prussia Mall—13,100 sq. ft.   Del Amo Fashion Center—114,413 sq. ft.
    Knoxville Center—1,455 sq. ft.   Meadowood Mall—6,013 sq. ft.
    Lehigh Valley Mall—11,754 sq. ft.   Southdale Center—20,295 sq. ft.
    Menlo Park Mall—52,424 sq. ft.    

32


Table of Contents

International Properties

            Our ownership interests in properties outside the United States are primarily owned through joint venture arrangements. However, we have a direct minority investment in Liberty International, PLC, or Liberty, as further described below.

            The following summarizes our joint venture investments in Europe and the underlying countries in which these joint ventures own and operate real estate properties as of December 31, 2009:

Joint Venture Investment   Ownership
Interest
  Properties
open and
operating
  Countries of
Operation

Gallerie Commerciali Italia, S.p.A., or GCI

    49.0 %   44   Italy

Simon Ivanhoe

    50.0 %   7   France, Poland

            In addition, we jointly hold with a third party an interest in one parcel of land for development near Paris, France outside of these two joint ventures. Simon Ivanhoe and GCI are fully integrated European retail real estate developers, owners and managers.

            Our properties in Europe consist primarily of hypermarket-anchored shopping centers. Substantially all of our European properties are anchored by either the hypermarket retailer Auchan, primarily in Italy, who is also our partner in GCI, or are anchored by the hypermarket Carrefour in France and Poland. Certain of the properties in Italy are subject to leaseholds whereby GCI leases all or a portion of the premises from a third party who is entitled to receive substantially all the economic benefits of that portion of the properties. Auchan and Carrefour are the two largest hypermarket operators in Europe. These centers comprise over 13.4 million square feet of GLA and were 95.9% leased as of December 31, 2009.

            On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge Inc., or Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for their interests, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

            We and Ivanhoe Cambridge have the right to participate with Unibail-Rodamco in the potential development of up to five new retail projects in the Simon Ivanhoe pipeline, subject to customary approval rights. We will own a 25% interest in any of these projects in which we agree to participate.

            We also hold real estate interests in eight joint venture properties in Japan, one joint venture property in Mexico, and one joint venture property in Korea. The eight Japanese Premium Outlet Centers operate in various cities throughout Japan and are held in a joint venture with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. These centers comprise over 2.4 million square feet of GLA and were 99.6% leased as of December 31, 2009.

            The following summarizes our holdings in these international joint ventures and the underlying countries in which these joint ventures own and operate real estate properties as of December 31, 2009:

Holdings   Ownership
Interest
  Properties
open and
operating
  Countries of Operation

Chelsea Japan Co. Ltd.

    40.0 %   8   Japan

Premium Outlets Punta Norte (Mexico City)

    50.0 %   1   Mexico

Yeoju Premium Outlets (Seoul)

    50.0 %   1   South Korea

            In 2009, we completed construction and opened Ami Premium Outlets, a 224,500 square foot center located outside Tokyo, Japan. We have a 40% interest in this property consistent with the ownership structure of our other Japanese investments. We also completed construction and opened a 171,800 square foot expansion at Kobe-Sanda

33


Table of Contents


Premium Outlets in Hyougo-ken, Japan. Also in December 2009, we recognized a loss on our joint venture interests in our shopping centers in China. We sold our interests to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million.

            We hold a minority interest in Liberty which is a U.K. Real Estate Investment Trust that operates regional shopping centers and owns other prime retail assets throughout the U.K. Liberty is a U.K. FTSE 100 listed company, with shareholders' funds of £3.2 billion and property investments of £6.1 billion, of which its U.K. regional shopping centers comprise 70%. Assets of the group under control by or joint control with Liberty amount to £9.3 billion. Our interest in Liberty is less than 6% of its outstanding shares. We adjust the carrying value of this investment quarterly using quoted market prices, including a related foreign exchange component.

            The following property table summarizes certain data for our properties located in Europe, Japan, Mexico, and Korea at December 31, 2009.

34


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
International Property Table

 
  COUNTRY/Property Name   City (Metropolitan area)   Ownership
Interest
  SPG
Effective
Ownership
  Year
Built
  Total Gross
Leasable Area
  Retail Anchors and
Major Tenants
    FRANCE                            
1.   Bay 2   Torcy (Paris)   Fee     50.0 % 2003     576,800   Carrefour, Leroy Merlin
2.   Bay 1   Torcy (Paris)   Fee     50.0 % 2004     348,900   Conforama, Go Sport
3.   Bel'Est   Bagnolet (Paris)   Fee     17.5 % 1992     173,100   Auchan
4.   Villabé A6   Villabé (Paris)   Fee     7.5 % 1992     284,300   Carrefour
5.   Wasquehal   Wasquehal (Lille)   Fee     50.0 % 2006     254,700   Carrefour
                               
    Subtotal France                       1,637,800    
    ITALY                            
6.   Ancona — Senigallia   Senigallia (Ancona)   Fee     49.0 % 1995     82,800   Cityper
7.   Ascoli Piceno — Grottammare   Grottammare (Ascoli Piceno)   Fee     49.0 % 1995     94,800   Cityper
8.   Ascoli Piceno — Porto Sant'Elpidio   Porto Sant'Elpidio (Ascoli Piceno)   Fee     49.0 % 1999     162,300   Cityper
9.   Bari — Casamassima   Casamassima (Bari)   Fee     49.0 % 1995     547,800   Auchan, Coin, Eldo, Bata, Leroy Merlin, Decathlon
10.   Bari — Modugno   Modugno (Bari)   Fee     49.0 % 2004     143,500   Auchan, euronics, Decathlon
11.   Brescia — Mazzano   Mazzano (Brescia)   Fee / Leasehold (2)     49.0 %(2) 1994     230,700   Auchan, Bricocenter
12.   Brindisi-Mesagne   Mesagne (Brindisi)   Fee     49.0 % 2003     228,600   Auchan, Leroy Merlin, Piazza Italia, Euronics
13.   Cagliari — Santa Gilla   Cagliari   Fee / Leasehold (2)     49.0 %(2) 1992     190,700   Auchan, Bricocenter
14.   Catania — La Rena   Catania   Fee     49.0 % 1998     146,200   Auchan
15.   Cinisello   Cinisello (Milano)   Fee     49.0 % 2007     375,600   Auchan, Darty, Scarpe & Scarpe, H&M, Piazza Italia, Conbipel
16.   Cuneo   Cuneo (Torino)   Fee     49.0 % 2004     282,200   Auchan, Bricocenter, Decathlon, Euronics
17.   Giugliano   Giugliano (Napoli)   Fee     49.0 %(5) 2006     754,500   Auchan, Leroy Merlin, Decathlon, Conbipel, Scarpe & Scarpe, Euronics, Eldo
18.   Milano — Rescaldina   Rescaldina (Milano)   Fee     49.0 % 2000     377,100   Auchan, Bricocenter, Decathlon, Media World
19.   Milano — Vimodrone   Vimodrone (Milano)   Fee     49.0 % 1989     190,600   Auchan, Bricocenter
20.   Napoli — Pompei   Pompei (Napoli)   Fee     49.0 % 1990     91,400   Auchan
21.   Nola — Volcano Buono   Nola (Napoli)   Fee     22.1 % 2007     876,000   Auchan, Coin, Holiday Inn, Media World, Piazza Italia, H&M, Cisalfa, Zara
22.   Padova   Padova   Fee     49.0 % 1989     105,800   Auchan
23.   Palermo   Palermo   Fee     49.0 % 1990     82,900   Auchan
24.   Pesaro — Fano   Fano (Pesaro)   Fee     49.0 % 1994     112,300   Auchan
25.   Pescara   Pescara   Fee     49.0 % 1998     161,500   Auchan, Euronics
26.   Pescara — Cepagatti   Cepagatti (Pescara)   Fee     49.0 % 2001     269,800   Auchan, Bata
27.   Piacenza — San Rocco al Porto   San Rocco al Porto (Piacenza)   Fee     49.0 % 1992     179,200   Auchan, Darty
28.   Porta Di Roma   Roma   Fee     19.6 % 2007     1,255,400   Auchan, Leroy Merlin, UGC Theatres, Ikea, Media World, Decathlon, H&M, Zara
29.   Roma — Collatina   Collatina (Roma)   Fee     49.0 % 1999     63,600   Auchan
30.   Sassari — Predda Niedda   Predda Niedda (Sassari)   Fee / Leasehold (2)     49.0 %(2) 1990     233,700   Auchan, Bricocenter, Media World
31.   Taranto   Taranto   Fee     49.0 % 1997     201,700   Auchan, Bricocenter
32.   Torino   Torino   Fee     49.0 % 1989     171,800   Auchan
33.   Torino — Venaria   Venaria (Torino)   Fee     49.0 % 1982     165,600   Auchan, Bricocenter
34.   Venezia — Mestre   Mestre (Venezia)   Fee     49.0 % 1995     246,700   Auchan

35


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
International Property Table

 
  COUNTRY/Property Name   City (Metropolitan area)   Ownership
Interest
  SPG
Effective
Ownership
  Year
Built
  Total Gross
Leasable Area
  Retail Anchors and
Major Tenants
    ITALY (continued)                            
35.   Vicenza   Vicenza   Fee     49.0 % 1995     98,500   Auchan
36.   Ancona   Ancona   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1993     165,200   Auchan
37.   Bergamo   Bergamo   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1976     119,900   Auchan
38.   Brescia — Concesio   Concesio (Brescia)   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1972     117,500   Auchan, Bata
39.   Cagliari — Marconi   Cagliari   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1994     193,400   Auchan, Bricocenter, Bata
40.   Catania — Misterbianco   Misterbianco (Catania)   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1989     99,300   Auchan
41.   Merate — Lecco   Merate (Lecco)   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1976     162,000   Auchan, Bricocenter
42.   Milano — Cesano Boscone   Cesano Boscone (Milano)   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 2005     283,900   Auchan, Darty
43.   Milano — Nerviano   Nerviano (Milano)   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1991     111,600   Auchan
44.   Monza   Monza   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 2008     211,700   Auchan, H&M
45.   Napoli — Mugnano di Napoli   Mugnano di Napoli   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1992     192,900   Auchan, Bricocenter
46.   Olbia   Olbia   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1993     207,600   Auchan, Zara
47.   Roma — Casalbertone   Roma   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1998     147,600   Auchan
48.   Torino — Rivoli   Rivoli (Torino)   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1986     94,100   Auchan
49.   Verona — Bussolengo   Bussolengo (Verona)   Leasehold (3)     49.0 %(3) 1975     164,600   Auchan, Bricocenter
                               
    Subtotal Italy                       10,394,600    
    POLAND                            
50.   Arkadia Shopping Center   Warsaw   Fee     50.0 % 2004     1,103,000   Carrefour, Leroy Merlin, Media, Saturn, Cinema City, H & M, Zara, Royal Collection, Peek & Clopperburg
51.   Wilenska Station Shopping Center   Warsaw   Fee     50.0 % 2002     308,600   Carrefour
                               
    Subtotal Poland                       1,411,600    
    JAPAN                            
52.   Ami Premium Outlets   Ami (Tokyo)   Fee     40.0 % 2009     224,500   Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, Gap, OshKosh B'Gosh, Tommy Hilfiger
53.   Gotemba Premium Outlets   Gotemba City (Tokyo)   Fee     40.0 % 2000     481,900   Bally, Coach, Diesel, Gap, Gucci, Jill Stuart, L.L. Bean, Nike, Tod's
54.   Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets   Hyougo-ken (Osaka)   Ground Lease (2026)     40.0 % 2007     365,300   BCBG, Bose, Coach, Cole Haan, Lego, Nike, Petit Bateau, Max Azria, Theory
55.   Rinku Premium Outlets   Izumisano (Osaka)   Ground Lease (2020)     40.0 % 2000     322,800   Bally, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap, Nautica, Nike, Timberland, Versace
56.   Sano Premium Outlets   Sano (Tokyo)   Ground Lease (2022)     40.0 % 2003     390,700   Bally, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Nautica, New Yorker, Nine West, Timberland
57.   Sendai-Izumi Premium Outlets   Izumi Park Town (Sendai)   Ground Lease (2027)     40.0 % 2008     164,200   Levi's, Miss Sixty, OshKosh B'Gosh, Pleats Please Issey Miyake, St. John, T-Fal, Tasaki, United Arrows, PLS+T, Ray Ban
58.   Toki Premium Outlets   Toki (Nagoya)   Ground Lease (2024)     40.0 % 2005     231,900   Adidas, Brooks Brothers, Bruno Magli, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Furla, Nautica, Nike, Timberland, Versace
59.   Tosu Premium Outlets   Fukuoka (Kyushu)   Ground Lease (2023)     40.0 % 2004     239,800   BCBG, Bose, Coach, Cole Haan, Lego, Nike, Petit Bateau, Max Azria, Theory
                               
    Subtotal Japan                       2,421,100    

36


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
International Property Table

 
  COUNTRY/Property Name   City (Metropolitan area)   Ownership
Interest
  SPG
Effective
Ownership
  Year
Built
  Total Gross
Leasable Area
  Retail Anchors and
Major Tenants
    MEXICO                            
60.   Punta Norte Premium Outlets   Mexico City   Fee     50.0 % 2004     244,200   Christian Dior, Sony, Nautica, Levi's, Nike Rockport, Reebok, Adidas, Samsonite
                               
    Subtotal Mexico                       244,200    
    SOUTH KOREA                            
61.   Yeoju Premium Outlets   Yeoju   Fee     50.0 % 2007     249,900   Armani, Burberry, Dunhill, Ermenegildo Zegna, Salvatore Ferragamo
                               
    Subtotal South Korea                       249,900    
                               
    TOTAL INTERNATIONAL ASSETS                       16,359,200    
                               

FOOTNOTES:

37


Table of Contents

            We have direct or indirect ownership interests in approximately 700 acres of land held in the United States for future development.

            Due to the size of our portfolio, we focus on energy efficiency as a core sustainability strategy. Through the continued use of energy conservation practices, energy efficiency projects, and continuous monitoring and reporting, we have reduced our energy consumption at comparable properties every year since 2003. As a result, excluding new developments and expansions, we reduced the electricity usage over which we have direct control by 238 million kWhs since 2003. This represents a 17% percent reduction in electricity usage across a portfolio of comparable properties and reflects an annual value of over $27.5 million in avoided operating costs. Our documented reduction in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from our energy management efforts is 140,000 metric tons CO2e.

            Simon Property was awarded NAREIT's Leader in the Light Award for the fifth year in a row and is the only company to have achieved the Leader in the Light distinction every single year since NAREIT launched the program in 2005. Simon Property was also included in the 2009 Carbon Disclosure Project's Global 500 Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index. The 2009 Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index highlights 50 companies worldwide that have displayed the most professional approach to corporate governance with respect to climate change disclosure practices. Simon Property was the only real estate company to be recognized.

            The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages and other indebtedness encumbering our properties, and the properties held by our domestic and international joint venture arrangements, and also our unsecured corporate debt. Substantially all of the mortgage and property related debt is nonrecourse to us.

38


Table of Contents


MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name   Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service
  Maturity
Date
 

Consolidated Indebtedness:

                         

Secured Indebtedness:

                         

Simon Property Group, LP:

                         

Anderson Mall

    6.20%   $ 27,270   $ 2,216     10/10/12  

Arsenal Mall HCHP Office

    8.20%     973     202     05/05/16  

Bangor Mall

    6.15%     80,000     4,918   (2)   10/01/17  

Battlefield Mall

    4.60%     92,750     6,154     07/01/13  

Bloomingdale Court

    8.15%     26,573     2,376     11/01/15  

Brunswick Square

    5.65%     82,244     5,957     08/11/14  

Carolina Premium Outlets — Smithfield

    9.10%     19,386   (6)   2,114     03/10/13   (25)

Century III Mall

    6.20%     80,498   (9)   6,541     10/10/12  

Chesapeake Square

    5.84%     69,849     5,162     08/01/14  

Copley Place

    0.88%   (1)   200,000     1,762   (2)   08/01/10   (3)

Coral Square

    8.00%     81,667     8,065     10/01/10  

The Crossings Premium Outlets

    5.85%     52,505     4,649     03/13/13  

Crossroads Mall

    6.20%     40,617     3,285     10/10/12  

Crystal River

    7.63%     14,676     1,385     11/11/10   (25)

Dare Centre

    9.10%     1,614   (6)   176     03/10/13   (25)

DeKalb Plaza

    5.28%     2,946     233     01/01/15  

Desoto Square

    5.89%     63,799     4,561     07/01/14  

The Factory Shoppes at Branson Meadows

    9.10%     9,016   (6)   983     03/10/13   (25)

Factory Stores of America

    9.10%     15,579   (6)   1,699     03/10/13   (25)

Forest Mall

    6.20%     16,190   (10)   1,316     10/10/12  

Forest Plaza

    7.50%     18,957     1,685     10/10/19  

Forum Shops at Caesars, The

    4.78%     515,335     34,564     12/01/10  

Gateway Shopping Center

    5.89%     87,000     5,124   (2)   10/01/11  

Greenwood Park Mall

    8.00%     79,756   (37)   7,044     08/01/16  

Gwinnett Place

    5.68%     115,000     6,532   (2)   06/08/12  

Henderson Square

    6.94%     14,367     1,270     07/01/11  

Highland Lakes Center

    6.20%     14,924   (9)   1,213     10/10/12  

Independence Center

    5.94%     200,000     11,886   (2)   07/10/17  

Ingram Park Mall

    6.99%     75,884   (20)   6,724     08/11/11  

Kittery Premium Outlets

    5.39%   (11)   43,556   (7)   2,347   (2)   07/10/13   (3)

Knoxville Center

    6.99%     57,464   (20)   5,092     08/11/11  

Lake View Plaza

    8.00%     16,000     1,409     01/01/15  

Lakeline Plaza

    7.50%     17,759     1,578     10/10/19  

Las Americas Premium Outlets

    5.84%     180,000     10,511   (2)   06/11/16  

Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets

    5.39%   (11)   88,623   (7)   4,775   (2)   07/10/13   (3)

Longview Mall

    6.20%     30,300   (9)   2,462     10/10/12  

MacGregor Village

    9.10%     6,492   (6)   708     03/10/13   (25)

Mall of Georgia

    7.09%     181,606   (32)   16,649     07/01/10  

Markland Mall

    6.20%     21,437   (10)   1,742     10/10/12  

Midland Park Mall

    6.20%     31,295   (10)   2,543     10/10/12  

Montgomery Mall

    5.17%     87,806     6,307     05/11/14   (25)

Muncie Plaza

    7.50%     7,383     656     10/10/19  

Northfield Square

    6.05%     28,344     2,485     02/11/14  

Northlake Mall

    6.99%     66,290   (20)   5,874     08/11/11  

North Ridge Shopping Center

    9.10%     7,929   (6)   865     03/10/13   (25)

Oxford Valley Mall

    6.76%     71,975     7,801     01/10/11  

39


Table of Contents


MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name   Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service
  Maturity
Date
 

Palm Beach Mall

    6.20%     50,725     4,068     10/10/12  

Penn Square Mall

    7.75%     99,422     8,597     04/01/16  

Philadelphia Premium Outlets

    4.19%   (11)   190,000     7,969   (2)   07/30/14   (3)

Plaza Carolina — Fixed

    7.50%     89,524     7,552     06/01/14  

Plaza Carolina — Variable Swapped

    7.63%   (11)   99,050     8,498     06/01/14  

Port Charlotte Town Center

    7.98%     50,423     4,680     12/11/10   (25)

Regency Plaza

    5.50%   (24)   4,000   (4)   273     12/14/14   (3)

Richmond Towne Square

    6.20%     43,957   (10)   3,572     10/10/12  

SB Boardman Plaza Holdings

    5.94%     22,916     1,682     07/01/14  

SB Trolley Square Holding

    9.03%     27,453     2,880     08/01/10  

Secured Term Loan

    0.93%   (1)   735,000     6,842   (2)   03/05/12   (3)

South Park Mall

    8.00%     197,463   (37)   17,434     08/01/16  

St. Charles Towne Plaza

    5.50%   (24)   26,000   (4)   1,772     12/14/14   (3)

Stanford Shopping Center

    2.38%   (1)   240,000     5,714   (2)   07/01/13   (3)

Summit Mall

    5.42%     65,000     3,526   (2)   06/10/17  

Sunland Park Mall

    8.63%   (13)   32,835     3,773     01/01/26  

Tacoma Mall

    7.00%     120,426     10,778     10/01/11  

Texas Lifestyle Centers Secured Loan

    3.85%   (5)   260,000   (8)   10,009   (2)   09/23/13   (3)

Town Center at Cobb

    5.74%     280,000     16,072   (2)   06/08/12  

Towne West Square

    6.99%     49,671   (20)   4,402     08/11/11  

University Park Mall

    1.08%   (1)   100,000   (32)   1,081   (2)   07/09/10   (3)

Upper Valley Mall

    5.89%     47,640     3,406     07/01/14  

Valle Vista Mall

    5.35%     40,000     3,598   (2)   05/10/17  

Walt Whitman Mall

    8.00%     121,669   (37)   10,742     08/01/16  

Washington Square

    5.94%     29,777     2,194     07/01/14  

Waterloo Premium Outlets

    5.39%   (11)   72,822   (7)   3,923   (2)   07/10/13   (3)

West Ridge Mall

    5.89%     68,392     4,885     07/01/14  

West Ridge Plaza

    5.50%   (24)   5,000   (4)   341     12/14/14   (3)

White Oaks Mall

    5.54%     50,000     2,768   (2)   11/01/16  

White Oaks Plaza

    7.50%     14,766     1,312     10/10/19  

Wolfchase Galleria

    5.64%     225,000     12,700   (2)   04/01/17  

Woodland Hills Mall

    7.79%     96,941     8,414     04/05/19  
                         

Total Consolidated Secured Indebtedness

        $ 6,599,506              

40


Table of Contents


MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name   Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service
  Maturity
Date
 

Unsecured Indebtedness:

                         

Simon Property Group, LP:

                         

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility — USD

    0.61%   (15) $   $   (2)   03/31/13  

Revolving Credit Facility — Yen Currency

    0.54%   (15)   238,950   (33)   1,290   (2)   03/31/13  

Revolving Credit Facility — Euro Currency

    0.83%   (15)   207,112   (34)   1,715   (2)   03/31/13  

Unsecured Notes — 4C

    7.38%     200,000     14,750   (14)   06/15/18  

Unsecured Notes — 6B

    7.75%     200,000     15,500   (14)   01/20/11  

Unsecured Notes — 8A

    6.35%     350,000     22,225   (14)   08/28/12  

Unsecured Notes — 9A

    4.88%     300,000     14,625   (14)   03/18/10  

Unsecured Notes — 9B

    5.45%     200,000     10,900   (14)   03/15/13  

Unsecured Notes — 10B

    4.90%     200,000     9,800   (14)   01/30/14  

Unsecured Notes — 11A

    4.88%     400,000     19,500   (14)   08/15/10  

Unsecured Notes — 11B

    5.63%     500,000     28,125   (14)   08/15/14  

Unsecured Notes — 12 A

    5.10%     600,000     30,600   (14)   06/15/15  

Unsecured Notes — 12 B

    4.60%     400,000     18,400   (14)   06/15/10  

Unsecured Notes — 13 A

    5.38%     500,000     26,875   (14)   06/01/11  

Unsecured Notes — 13 B

    5.75%     600,000     34,500   (14)   12/01/15  

Unsecured Notes — 14 A

    5.75%     400,000     23,000   (14)   05/01/12  

Unsecured Notes — 14 B

    6.10%     400,000     24,400   (14)   05/01/16  

Unsecured Notes — 15 A

    5.60%     600,000     33,600   (14)   09/01/11  

Unsecured Notes — 15 B

    5.88%     500,000     29,375   (14)   03/01/17  

Unsecured Notes — 16 A

    5.00%     600,000     30,000   (14)   03/01/12  

Unsecured Notes — 16 B

    5.25%     650,000     34,125   (14)   12/01/16  

Unsecured Notes — 19A

    5.30%     700,000     37,100   (14)   05/30/13  

Unsecured Notes — 19B

    6.13%     800,000     49,000   (14)   05/30/18  

Unsecured Notes — 20A

    10.35%     650,000     67,275   (14)   04/01/19  

Unsecured Notes — 21A

    6.75%     1,100,000     74,250   (14)   05/15/14  
                         

          11,296,062              

The Retail Property Trust, subsidiary:

                         

Unsecured Notes — CPI 4

    7.18%     75,000     5,385   (14)   09/01/13  

Unsecured Notes — CPI 5

    7.88%     250,000     19,688   (14)   03/15/16  
                         

          325,000              

CPG Partners, LP, subsidiary:

                         

Unsecured Notes — CPG 5

    8.25%     150,000     12,375   (14)   02/01/11  

Unsecured Notes — CPG 6

    6.88%     100,000     6,875   (14)   06/15/12  

Unsecured Notes — CPG 7

    6.00%     150,000     9,000   (14)   01/15/13  
                         

          400,000              
                         
 

Total Consolidated Unsecured Indebtedness

        $ 12,021,062              
                         
 

Total Consolidated Indebtedness at Face Amounts

        $ 18,620,568              
 

Net Premium on Indebtedness

          47,530              
 

Net Discount on Indebtedness

          (37,796 )            
                         
 

Total Consolidated Indebtedness

        $ 18,630,302              
                         
 

Our Share of Consolidated Indebtedness

        $ 18,354,130              
                         

41


Table of Contents


MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name   Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service
  Maturity
Date
 

Joint Venture Indebtedness:

                         

Secured Indebtedness:

                         

Ami Premium Outlets

    2.09%   $ 130,116   (26) $ 2,716   (2)   09/25/23  

Apple Blossom Mall

    7.99%     36,071     3,607     09/10/10  

Arizona Mills

    7.90%     132,072     12,728     10/05/10  

Arkadia Shopping Center

    4.68%   (31)   146,622     6,863   (2)   05/31/12  

Arkadia Shopping Center — 2

    6.73%   (31)   168,986     13,359     05/31/12  

Arundel Marketplace

    5.92%     11,394     884     01/01/14  

Arundel Mills

    6.14%     385,000     23,639   (2)   08/01/14  

Atrium at Chestnut Hill

    6.89%     43,821     3,880     03/11/11   (25)

Auburn Mall

    7.99%     42,221     4,222     09/10/10  

Aventura Mall

    5.91%     430,000     25,392   (2)   12/11/17  

Avenues, The

    5.29%     71,286     5,325     04/01/13  

Bay 1 (Torcy) — Fixed

    4.15%   (31)   17,860     740   (2)   05/31/11  

Bay 1 (Torcy) — Variable

    1.40%   (31)   2,303     32   (2)   05/31/11  

Bay 2 (Torcy) — Fixed

    4.24%   (31)   66,031     2,797   (2)   06/30/11  

Bay 2 (Torcy) — Variable

    1.40%   (31)   9,195     129   (2)   06/30/11  

Block at Orange

    6.25%     220,000     13,753   (2)   10/01/14  

Briarwood Mall

    7.50%     119,726     10,641     11/30/16  

Cape Cod Mall

    6.80%     88,969     7,821     03/11/11  

Circle Centre Mall

    5.02%     71,378     5,165     04/11/13  

Clay Terrace

    5.08%     115,000     5,842   (2)   10/01/15  

Cobblestone Court

    1.23%   (1)   2,628     77     04/16/10  

Coconut Point

    5.83%     230,000     13,409   (2)   12/10/16  

Coddingtown Mall

    1.38%   (1)   15,500     214   (2)   07/14/10  

Colorado Mills

    2.01%   (18)   164,308     3,304   (2)   11/12/11  

Concord Marketplace

    5.76%     13,268     1,013     02/01/14  

Concord Mills Mall

    6.13%     163,990     13,208     12/07/12  

Crystal Mall

    5.62%     94,591     7,319     09/11/12   (25)

Dadeland Mall

    6.75%     180,609     15,566     02/11/12   (25)

Del Amo

    1.73%   (1)   335,000     5,799   (2)   01/23/13   (3)

Denver West Village

    8.15%     21,826     2,153     10/01/11  

Discover Mills — 1

    7.32%     23,700     1,735   (2)   12/11/11  

Discover Mills — 2

    6.08%     135,000     8,212   (2)   12/11/11  

Domain Residential Phase II

    2.23%   (1)   31,561     704   (2)   07/22/13   (3)

Domain Residential Building P

    2.23%   (1)   3,631     81   (2)   11/07/11   (3)

Domain Westin

    2.18%   (1)   22,172     484   (2)   10/15/13   (3)

Dover Mall & Commons

    2.18%   (29)   83,756   (35)   1,827   (2)   02/01/12   (3)

Eastland Mall

    5.79%     168,000     9,734   (2)   06/01/16  

Emerald Square Mall

    5.13%     129,453     9,479     03/01/13  

Empire Mall

    5.79%     176,300     10,215   (2)   06/01/16  

Esplanade, The

    2.18%   (29)   75,136   (35)   1,639   (2)   02/01/12   (3)

Falls, The

    7.50%     115,735     10,287     11/30/16  

Fashion Centre Pentagon Retail

    6.63%     149,341     12,838     09/11/11   (25)

Fashion Centre Pentagon Office

    5.50%   (30)   40,000     2,200   (2)   10/01/12   (3)

Fashion Valley Mall

    4.00%   (28)   350,000     14,000   (2)   10/09/13  

Firewheel Residential

    5.91%     22,949     1,356   (2)   11/20/16   (3)

Florida Mall, The

    7.55%     243,081     22,766     12/10/10  

Franklin Mills

    5.65%     290,000     16,385   (2)   06/01/17  

Gaitway Plaza

    4.60%     13,900   (17)   640   (2)   07/01/15  

Galleria at White Plains

    2.18%   (29)   125,566   (35)   2,739   (2)   02/01/12   (3)

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Facility A

    5.37%   (16)   333,880     23,699     12/22/11   (3)

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Facility B

    5.85%   (16)   330,770     24,832     12/22/11  

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Catania

    1.43%   (16)   89,737     1,284   (2)   12/17/10  

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Cinisello — Fixed

    5.38%   (16)   107,064     7,382     03/31/15  

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Cinisello — Variable

    1.45%   (16)   74,535     1,823     03/31/15  

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Giugliano A

    4.77%   (16)   38,699     1,847   (2)   10/20/13  

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Giugliano B

    4.78%   (16)   36,314     2,692     10/20/13  

Galleria Commerciali Italia — Giugliano C

    5.19%   (16)   15,308     1,568     10/20/13  

Granite Run Mall

    5.83%     116,577     8,622     06/01/16  

42


Table of Contents


MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name   Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service
  Maturity
Date
 

Grapevine Mills

    5.90%   (11)   270,000     15,937   (2)   09/22/14   (3)

Great Mall of the Bay Area

    6.01%     270,000     16,227   (2)   08/28/15   (3)

Greendale Mall

    6.00%     45,000     2,699   (2)   10/01/16  

Gotemba Premium Outlets — Fixed

    1.55%     67,448   (26)   11,147     10/25/14  

Gotemba Premium Outlets — Variable

    0.67%   (12)   8,046   (26)   1,203     05/31/12  

Gurnee Mills

    5.77%     321,000     18,512   (2)   07/01/17  

Hamilton Town Center

    1.83%   (1)   95,283     1,745   (2)   05/29/12   (3)

Highland Mall

    6.83%     63,980     5,571     07/10/11  

Hilltop Mall

    4.99%     64,350     3,211   (2)   07/08/12  

Houston Galleria — 1

    5.44%     643,583     34,985   (2)   12/01/15  

Houston Galleria — 2

    5.44%     177,417     9,644   (2)   12/01/15  

Indian River Commons

    5.21%     9,625     637     11/01/14  

Indian River Mall

    5.21%     65,213     4,313     11/01/14  

Katy Mills

    6.69%     143,596     12,207     01/09/13  

King of Prussia Mall — 1

    7.49%     127,047     23,183     01/01/17  

King of Prussia Mall — 2

    8.53%     8,936     1,685     01/01/17  

Kobe Sanda Premium Outlets — Fixed

    1.49%     23,399   (26)   3,036     01/31/14  

Kobe Sanda Premium Outlets — Variable

    0.93%   (12)   53,781   (26)   6,744     01/31/14  

Lakeforest Mall

    4.90%     141,050     6,904   (2)   07/08/10  

Lehigh Valley Mall

    0.79%   (36)   150,000     1,186   (2)   08/09/10   (3)

Liberty Plaza

    5.68%     43,000     2,442   (2)   06/01/17  

Liberty Tree Mall

    5.22%     35,000     1,827   (2)   10/11/13  

Mall at Rockingham

    5.61%     260,000     14,586   (2)   03/10/17  

Mall at Tuttle Crossing

    5.05%     114,578     7,774     11/05/13  

Mall of New Hampshire

    6.23%     134,814     10,079     10/05/15  

Marley Station

    4.89%     114,400     5,595   (2)   07/01/12  

Meadowood Mall

    1.10%   (27)   150,880     1,661   (2)   01/09/12  

Mesa Mall

    5.79%     87,250     5,055   (2)   06/01/16  

Miami International Mall

    5.35%     93,113     6,533     10/01/13  

Mills Senior Loan Facility

    1.48%   (1)   695,000     10,293   (2)   06/07/12   (3)

Net Leases I

    7.96%     26,501     2,109   (2)   10/10/10  

Net Leases II

    9.35%     20,873     1,952   (2)   01/10/23  

Northpark Mall — Mills

    2.18%   (29)   105,543   (35)   2,302   (2)   02/01/12   (3)

Northshore Mall

    5.03%     201,627     13,566     03/11/14   (25)

Ontario Mills

    4.98%   (11)   175,000     8,718   (2)   12/05/13   (3)

Opry Mills

    6.16%     280,000     17,248   (2)   10/10/14  

Plaza at Buckland Hills, The

    4.60%     24,800   (17)   1,142   (2)   07/01/15  

Potomac Mills

    5.83%     410,000     23,901   (2)   07/11/17  

Quaker Bridge Mall

    7.03%     18,767     2,407     04/01/16  

Ridgewood Court

    4.60%     14,650   (17)   674   (2)   07/01/15  

Rinku Premium Outlets

    1.84%     31,390   (26)   7,291     11/25/14  

Rushmore Mall

    5.79%     94,000     5,446   (2)   06/01/16  

Sano Premium Outlets

    0.56%   (12)   48,641   (26)   18,146     05/31/18  

Sawgrass Mills

    5.82%     820,000     47,724   (2)   07/01/14  

Seminole Towne Center

    3.23%   (22)   69,140     4,871     08/09/11   (3)

Sendai Premium Outlets

    0.52%   (12)   37,083   (26)   4,120     10/31/18  

Shops at Riverside, The

    1.03%   (1)   138,000     1,423   (2)   11/14/11   (3)

Shops at Sunset Place, The

    2.42%   (21)   80,848     4,692     05/09/10   (3)

Smith Haven Mall

    5.16%     180,000     9,283   (2)   03/01/16  

Solomon Pond

    3.97%     107,182     6,505     08/01/13  

Source, The

    6.65%     124,000     8,246   (2)   09/30/10  

Southdale Center

    5.18%     186,550     9,671   (2)   04/01/10  

Southern Hills Mall

    5.79%     101,500     5,881   (2)   06/01/16  

SouthPark Residential

    1.63%   (1)   41,146     1,126     02/28/10   (3)

Southridge Mall

    5.23%     124,000     6,489   (2)   04/01/12  

43


Table of Contents


MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name   Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service
  Maturity
Date
 

Springfield Mall

    1.33%   (1)   72,300     962   (2)   12/01/10   (3)

Square One

    6.73%     85,957     7,380     03/11/12  

St. Johns Town Center

    5.06%     170,000     8,602   (2)   03/11/15  

St. John's Town Center Phase II

    5.50%   (11)   77,500     4,266   (2)   05/10/15   (3)

St. Louis Mills

    6.39%     90,000     5,751   (2)   01/08/12  

Stoneridge Shopping Center

    7.50%     228,659     19,214     11/30/16  

Toki Premium Outlets — Fixed

    1.80%     9,108   (26)   2,560     10/31/11  

Tosu Premium Outlets — Fixed

    1.50%     7,603   (26)   2,149     08/24/13  

Tosu Premium Outlets — Variable

    0.67%   (12)   10,409   (26)   3,539     01/31/12  

Valley Mall

    5.83%     45,340     3,357     06/01/16  

Villabe A6 — Bel'Est — Fixed

    6.16%   (31)   10,013     616   (2)   08/31/11  

Villabe A6 — Bel'Est — Variable

    1.40%   (31)   2,557     36   (2)   08/31/11  

Village Park Plaza

    4.60%     29,850   (17)   1,374   (2)   07/01/15  

West Town Corners

    4.60%     18,800   (17)   865   (2)   07/01/15  

West Town Mall

    6.34%     210,000     13,309   (2)   12/01/17  

Westchester, The

    4.86%     500,000     24,300   (2)   06/01/10  

Whitehall Mall

    7.00%     12,029     1,149     11/01/18  

Wilenska Station Shopping Center — Fixed

    5.05%   (31)   26,781     1,351   (2)   08/31/11  

Wilenska Station Shopping Center — Variable

    2.23%   (31)   16,125     360   (2)   08/31/11  
                         
 

Total Joint Venture Secured Indebtedness at Face Amounts

        $ 16,432,997              

Unsecured Indebtedness:

                         

TMLP Trust Preferred Unsecured Securities

    7.38%     100,000     7,375   (2)   03/30/36   (19)
                         

Total Joint Venture Unsecured Indebtedness

          100,000              
 

Net Premium on Indebtedness

         
17,872
             
 

Net Discount on Indebtedness

          (1,593 )            
 

Total Joint Venture Indebtedness

        $ 16,549,276              
                         
 

Our Share of Joint Venture Indebtedness

        $ 6,552,370   (23)            
                         

(Footnotes on following page)

44


Table of Contents

(Footnotes for preceding pages)


(1)
Variable rate loans based on LIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 56 bps to 450 bps. LIBOR as of December 31, 2009 was 0.23%.

(2)
Requires monthly payment of interest only.

(3)
Includes applicable extension available at the Operating Partnership's option.

(4)
Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(5)
We have executed a swap agreement that fixes the interest rate on $200 million of this loan at 4.35%.

(6)
Loans secured by these Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted. Factory Stores of America includes Boaz, Georgetown, Graceville, Lebanon, Nebraska City and Story City.

(7)
Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(8)
Loan is secured by The Domain Shopping Center, Palms Crossing, and Shops at Arbor Walk and is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(9)
Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized.

(10)
Loans secured by these four Properties are cross-collateralized.

(11)
Associated with these loans are interest rate swap agreements that effectively fix the interest rate of the loans at the all-in rate presented.

(12)
Variable rate loans based on Yen LIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 35 bps to 187.5 bps. Yen LIBOR as of December 31, 2009 was 0.1650%.

(13)
Lender also participates in a percentage of certain gross receipts above a specified base. This threshold was met and additional interest was paid in 2009.

(14)
Requires semi-annual payments of interest only.

(15)
On December 8, 2009, we entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new facility contains an accordian feature up to $4.0 billion and will mature on March 31, 2013. The base interest on the credit facility is LIBOR plus 210 basis points. The balance as of December 31, 2009 reflects interest at LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points as the borrowings on the new facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, $3.1 billion was available after outstanding borrowings and letter of credits.

(16)
Amounts shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 716.0 million. Associated with these loans are interest rate swap agreements with a total combined Euro 601.4 million notional amount that effectively fixes Facility A and B, Giugliano, and a portion of Cinisello at 5.50%.

(17)
Loans secured by these five Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(18)
LIBOR + 1.780%, with LIBOR capped at 4.000%.

(19)
Redeemable beginning 3/30/11, pricing re-sets every 5 years based on an index of LIBOR + 2.375%.

(20)
Loans secured by these four Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(21)
Interest rate spread uses weighted average spread payable on the loan. As of 12/31/09, the spread was 2.189%, with LIBOR capped at 7.50%.

(22)
LIBOR + 3.000%, with LIBOR capped at 8.500%.

(23)
Our share of indebtedness for joint ventures excludes our share of indebtedness of $145.9 million in joint venture entities in which Gallerie Commerciali Italia holds a non-controlling interest.

(24)
Through an interest rate floor agreement, the LIBOR rate is currently fixed at 1.50%.

(25)
The maturity date shown represents the Anticipated Maturity Date of the loan which is typically 10-20 years earlier than the stated Maturity Date of the loan. Should the loan not be repaid at the Anticipated Repayment Date the applicable interest rate shall increase as specified in the loan agreement.

(26)
Amounts shown in US Dollar Equivalent. Yen equivalent 39,382.5 million

(27)
LIBOR + 0.870%, with LIBOR capped at 4.000%.

(28)
Through an interest rate floor agreement, the LIBOR rate is currently fixed at 1.00%.

(29)
LIBOR + 1.950%, with LIBOR capped at 6.00%.

(30)
LIBOR + 4.500%, with LIBOR capped at 8.250%. Through an interest rate floor agreement, the LIBOR rate is currently fixed at 1.50%.

45


Table of Contents

(31)
Amounts shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 325.5 million. Associated with these loans are interest rate swap agreements with a total combined Euro 304.4 million notional amount that effectively fixed these loans at a combined 5.44%.

(32)
Loan was paid off after 12/31/09.

(33)
Amounts shown in US Dollar Equivalent. Balances include borrowings on multi-currency tranche of Yen 22,125.0 million.

(34)
Amounts shown in US Dollar Equivalent. Balances include borrowings on multi-currency tranche of Euro 144.5 million.

(35)
Loans secured by these four Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(36)
LIBOR + 0.560%, with LIBOR capped at 7.00%.

(37)
Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized.

The changes in consolidated mortgages and other indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 are as follows:

 
  2009   2008   2007  

Balance, Beginning of Year

  $ 18,042,532   $ 17,218,674   $ 15,394,489  
 

Additions during period:

                   
   

New Loan Originations

    2,073,874     1,833,677     3,362,732  
   

Loans assumed in acquisitions and consolidations

            399,545  
   

Net Premium

    3,162     (7,192 )   (1,669 )
 

Deductions during period:

                   
   

Loan Retirements

    (1,427,858 )   (930,818 )   (1,862,145 )
   

Amortization of Net Premiums

    (10,627 )   (14,611 )   (13,661 )
   

Scheduled Principal Amortization

    (50,781 )   (57,198 )   (60,617 )
               

Balance, End of Year

  $ 18,630,302   $ 18,042,532   $ 17,218,674  
               

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

            We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Item 4.    Reserved

46


Table of Contents


Part II

Item 5.    Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

            There is no established trading market for our units or preferred units. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the distributions declared on our units:

 
  Declared
Distributions
 

2008

       

1st Quarter

  $ 0.90  

2nd Quarter

    0.90  

3rd Quarter

    0.90  

4th Quarter

    0.90  

2009

       

1st Quarter

  $ 0.90  

2nd Quarter

    0.60  

3rd Quarter

    0.60  

4th Quarter

    0.60  

            The number of holders of record of units was 254 as of February 25, 2010.

            We make distributions to our limited and general partners in order to maintain Simon Property's qualification as a REIT. Simon Property is required each year to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its taxable income after certain adjustments. Future distributions will be determined at the discretion of Simon Property's Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for distribution, and what may be required to maintain Simon Property's status as a REIT.

            On February 2, 2010, Simon Property's Board of Directors approved a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.60 per share, payable all in cash. The distribution rate on our units is equal to the dividend rate on Simon Property's common stock. Distributions during 2009 aggregated $2.70 per unit and were paid in a combination of cash and units. Distributions during 2008, which aggregated to $3.60 per unit, were paid entirely in cash.

            We did not issue any equity securities that were not required to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, during the fourth quarter of 2009.

            During 2009, holders of Series I preferred units were not eligible to convert their preferred units into units as the triggering price of $75.34 was not met. As of December 31, 2009, the conversion trigger price of $74.18 had been met and each Series I preferred unit became convertible into 0.847495 of a unit through March 31, 2010.

47


Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

            The following tables set forth selected financial data. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Other data we believe is important in understanding trends in our business is also included in the tables.

 
  As of or for the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007   2006   2005  
 
  (in thousands, except per unit data)
 

OPERATING DATA:

                               
 

Total consolidated revenue

  $ 3,775,216   $ 3,783,155   $ 3,650,799   $ 3,332,154   $ 3,166,853  
 

Consolidated income from continuing operations

    387,262     599,560     674,605     729,727     503,148  
 

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 343,572   $ 529,726   $ 549,678   $ 614,911   $ 510,581  

BASIC EARNINGS PER UNIT:

                               
 

Income from continuing operations

  $ 1.06   $ 1.88   $ 2.09   $ 2.20   $ 1.27  
 

Discontinued operations

            (0.13 )       0.55  
                       
 

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 1.06   $ 1.88   $ 1.96   $ 2.20   $ 1.82  
                       
 

Weighted average units outstanding

    324,102     282,508     281,035     279,567     279,825  

DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT:

                               
 

Income from continuing operations

  $ 1.05   $ 1.87   $ 2.08   $ 2.19   $ 1.27  
 

Discontinued operations

            (0.13 )       0.55  
                       
 

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 1.05   $ 1.87   $ 1.95   $ 2.19   $ 1.82  
                       
 

Diluted weighted average units outstanding

    325,764     283,059     281,813     280,471     280,696  
 

Distributions per unit (1)

  $ 2.70   $ 3.60   $ 3.36   $ 3.04   $ 2.80  

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

                               
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 3,957,718   $ 773,544   $ 501,982   $ 929,360   $ 337,048  
 

Total assets

    25,948,266     23,422,749     23,442,466     22,003,173     21,068,666  
 

Mortgages and other indebtedness

    18,630,302     18,042,532     17,218,674     15,394,489     14,106,117  
 

Total equity

  $ 5,182,962   $ 3,101,967   $ 3,414,612   $ 4,040,676   $ 4,444,227  

OTHER DATA:

                               
 

Cash flow provided by (used in):

                               
   

Operating activities

  $ 1,720,520   $ 1,635,887   $ 1,559,432   $ 1,316,148   $ 1,195,141  
   

Investing activities

    (418,991 )   (1,022,275 )   (2,049,576 )   (607,432 )   (52,434 )
   

Financing activities

  $ 1,882,645   $ (342,050 ) $ 62,766   $ (116,404 ) $ (1,325,743 )
   

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

    1.30x     1.46x     1.53x     1.73x     1.56x  

Notes

(1)
Represents distributions declared per period.

48


Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

            You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this report.

            Simon Property Group, L.P., is a Delaware limited partnership and the majority-owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc. In this discussion, the terms "Operating Partnership", "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, L.P. and its subsidiaries and the term "Simon Property" refers specifically to Simon Property Group, Inc.

            We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers, The Mills®, and community/lifestyle centers. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or held an interest in 321 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 162 regional malls, 41 Premium Outlet centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 36 properties acquired in the 2007 acquisition of The Mills Corporation, or the Mills acquisition, and 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. Of the 36 properties acquired in the Mills portfolio, 16 of these properties are The Mills, 16 are regional malls, and four are community centers. Internationally, as of December 31, 2009, we had ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland), eight Premium Outlet centers in Japan, one Premium Outlet center in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet center in South Korea. Also, through joint venture arrangements we have a 24% interest in two shopping centers in Italy currently under development. During 2009, we recognized a loss on the sale of four of our U.S. properties and all of our shopping centers in operation or under development in China. We also agreed to purchase a portfolio of 22 outlet shopping centers. The purchase is expected to close in the first half of 2010. In early 2010, we and our joint venture partner agreed to sell our interests in seven shopping centers in France and Poland.

            We generate the majority of our revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

            Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

            We seek growth in earnings, funds from operations, or FFO, and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our properties and investments. We seek to accomplish this growth through the following:

            We also grow by generating supplemental revenue from the following activities:

49


Table of Contents

            We focus on high quality real estate across the retail real estate spectrum. We expand or renovate to enhance existing assets' profitability and market share when we believe the investment of our capital meets our risk-reward criteria. We selectively develop new properties in metropolitan areas that exhibit strong population and economic growth.

            We routinely review and evaluate acquisition opportunities based on their ability to complement our portfolio. Our international strategy includes partnering with established real estate companies and financing international investments with local currency to minimize foreign exchange risk.

            To support our growth, we employ a three-fold capital strategy:

            Diluted earnings per unit of limited partnership interest, or units, decreased $0.82 during 2009, or 43.9%, to $1.05 from $1.87 for 2008. The decrease is primarily due to losses on asset sales and impairment charges. These included a $140.5 million, or $0.44 per unit, other-than-temporary impairment charge related to our investment in Liberty International, PLC, or Liberty, a U.K. REIT. We recorded the other-than-temporary charge in the second quarter of 2009 due to the significance and duration of the decline in quoted fair value, including the related currency exchange component, below the carrying value of the securities. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we also recorded adjustments in the carrying values of three underperforming assets, including one consolidated operating property and two joint venture assets, the write-off of certain predevelopment costs related to projects that we no longer plan to pursue due to economic conditions, and adjustments to carrying values for certain parcels of land, amounting to $88.1 million, or $0.27 per unit, net of related tax benefit and noncontrolling interest share. We also recorded net losses related to the sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities of $30.1 million, or $0.09 per unit. For 2009, earnings per unit were diluted by approximately $0.21 per unit as a result of Simon Property's two equity offerings and from the units we issued in the quarterly distributions. For 2008, we recorded a $20.3 million, or $0.07 per diluted unit, loss on extinguishment of debt related to our redemption of the 7% MandatOry Par Put Remarked Securities, or MOPPRS. In addition, we recorded impairment charges of $21.2 million, or $0.07 per diluted unit, during 2008.

            In the United States, our business fundamentals were relatively stable, except for tenant sales psf which were down across the portfolio, and were dependent upon asset type, geographic location, and mix of specialty and luxury tenants. Average base rents for the regional mall and domestic Premium Outlet portfolios were relatively stable for 2009. The regional malls average base rent ended the year at $40.04 psf, or an increase of 1.4% over 2008. The domestic Premium Outlets average base rent ended the year at $33.45 psf, or an increase of 21.0%. The stability of the occupancy, rent psf, and releasing rental spread fundamentals contributed to the growth in our operating results despite the adverse economic conditions affecting our tenants and retail consumers.

            Internationally, in 2009, we and our joint venture partners opened one additional center and expanded one existing Premium Outlet Center in Japan which added an aggregate 396,300 square feet of retail space to the international portfolio. Also in December 2009, we recognized a loss on our joint venture interests in our shopping centers in China. We sold our interests to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million.

            On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe S.à.r.l , or Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge Inc. , or Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for their interests, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

            We and Ivanhoe Cambridge have the right to participate with Unibail-Rodamco in the potential development of up to five new retail projects in the Simon Ivanhoe pipeline, subject to customary approval rights. We will own a 25% interest in any of these projects in which we agree to participate.

50


Table of Contents

            Our effective overall borrowing rate at December 31, 2009 increased 50 basis points to 5.62% as compared to 5.12% at December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily due to a $1.4 billion increase in our portfolio of relatively higher rate fixed rate debt. Our financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, included:

            On January 12, 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer for any and all senior unsecured notes of ten outstanding series with maturity dates ranging from 2011 to March 2013. The total principal amount of the notes accepted for purchase on January 26, 2010 was approximately $2.3 billion, with a weighted average duration of 2.0 years and a weighted coupon of 5.76%. We purchased the tendered notes with cash on hand and the proceeds from an offering of $2.25 billion of senior unsecured notes that closed on January 25, 2010. The senior notes offering was comprised of $400.0 million of 4.20% notes due 2015, $1.25 billion of 5.65% notes due 2020 and $600.0 million of 6.75% notes due 2040. We will report a $165.6 million charge to earnings in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the tender offer.

51


Table of Contents

United States Portfolio Data

            The portfolio data discussed in this overview includes the following key operating statistics: occupancy; average base rent per square foot; and comparable sales per square foot for our four domestic platforms. We include acquired properties in this data beginning in the year of acquisition and remove properties sold in the year disposed. For comparative purposes, we separate the information in this section on the 16 regional malls we acquired from The Mills Corporation in 2007, or the Mills Regional Malls, from the information on our other regional malls. We do not include any properties located outside of the United States in this section. The following table sets forth these key operating statistics for:

 
  2009   %/Basis Points
Change(1)
  2008   %/Basis Points
Change(1)
  2007   %/Basis Point
Change(1)
 

Regional Malls:

                                     

Occupancy

                                     

Consolidated

    92.4%     -20 bps     92.6%     -130 bps     93.9%     +90 bps  

Unconsolidated

    91.4%     -50 bps     91.9%     -80 bps     92.7%     -80 bps  

Total Portfolio

    92.1%     -30 bps     92.4%     -110 bps     93.5%     +30 bps  

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

                                     

Consolidated

  $ 38.43     0.6%   $ 38.21     5.4%   $ 36.24     4.2%  

Unconsolidated

  $ 43.19     2.8%   $ 42.03     8.5%   $ 38.73     6.2%  

Total Portfolio

  $ 40.04     1.4%   $ 39.49     6.5%   $ 37.09     4.8%  

Comparable Sales per Square Foot

                                     

Consolidated

  $ 410     (7.9% ) $ 445     (5.7% ) $ 472     2.2%  

Unconsolidated

  $ 483     (7.6% ) $ 523     (1.3% ) $ 530     4.9%  

Total Portfolio

  $ 433     (7.9% ) $ 470     (4.3% ) $ 491     3.2%  

Premium Outlet Centers:

                                     

Occupancy

    97.9%     -100 bps     98.9%     -80 bps     99.7%     +30 bps  

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

  $ 33.45     21.0%   $ 27.65     7.7%   $ 25.67     5.9%  

Comparable Sales per Square Foot

  $ 500     (1.8% ) $ 509     1.0%   $ 504     7.0%  

The Mills®:

                                     

Occupancy

    93.9%     -60 bps     94.5%     +40 bps     94.1%      

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

  $ 19.62     0.6%   $ 19.51     2.4%   $ 19.06      

Comparable Sales per Square Foot

  $ 369     (0.8% ) $ 372       $ 372      

Mills Regional Malls:

                                     

Occupancy

    89.3%     190 bps     87.4%     -210 bps     89.5%      

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

  $ 35.41     (4.3% ) $ 36.99     3.8%   $ 35.63      

Comparable Sales per Square Foot

  $ 380     (9.1% ) $ 418     (5.9% ) $ 444      

Community/Lifestyle Centers:

                                     

Occupancy

                                     

Consolidated

    89.3%         89.3%     -360 bps     92.9%     +140 bps  

Unconsolidated

    93.2%     -10 bps     93.3%     -330 bps     96.6%     +10 bps  

Total Portfolio

    90.7%         90.7%     -340 bps     94.1%     +90 bps  

Average Base Rent per Square Foot

                                     

Consolidated

  $ 13.94     1.8%   $ 13.70     7.6%   $ 12.73     7.0%  

Unconsolidated

  $ 12.55     1.1%   $ 12.41     4.7%   $ 11.85     1.5%  

Total Portfolio

  $ 13.45     1.5%   $ 13.25     6.6%   $ 12.43     5.2%  

(1)
Percentages may not recalculate due to rounding. Percentage and basis point changes are representative of the change from the comparable prior period.

            Occupancy Levels and Average Base Rent Per Square Foot.    Occupancy and average base rent are based on mall and freestanding Gross Leasable Area, or GLA, owned by us in the regional malls, and all tenants at The Mills, Premium

52


Table of Contents


Outlet Centers, and community/lifestyle centers. Our portfolio has maintained relatively stable occupancy and increased the aggregate average base rents despite continuing economic difficulties.

            Comparable Sales Per Square Foot.    Comparable sales include total reported retail tenant sales at owned GLA (for mall and freestanding stores with less than 10,000 square feet) in the regional malls, and all reporting tenants at The Mills and the Premium Outlet Centers and community/lifestyle centers. Retail sales at owned GLA affect revenue and profitability levels because sales determine the amount of minimum rent that can be charged, the percentage rent realized, and the recoverable expenses (common area maintenance, real estate taxes, etc.) that tenants can afford to pay.

International Property Data

            The following are selected key operating statistics for certain of our international properties.

 
  2009   % Change   2008   % Change   2007  

European Shopping Centers

                               

Occupancy

    95.9%           98.4%           98.7%  

Comparable sales per square foot

    €400     (2.7% )   €411     (2.4% )   €421  

Average rent per square foot

    €31.41     4.3%     €30.11     1.8%     €29.58  

International Premium Outlet Centers(1)

                               

Occupancy

    99.6%           99.9%           100%  

Comparable sales per square foot

    ¥94,468     2.7%     ¥92,000     (1.3% )   ¥93,169  

Average rent per square foot

    ¥4,714     0.6%     ¥4,685     1.3%     ¥4,626  

(1)
Does not include one center in Mexico (Premium Outlets Punta Norte) and one center in Korea (Yeoju Premium Outlets).

Critical Accounting Policies

            The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue, and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, see Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

53


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

            In addition to the activity discussed above in "Results Overview," the following acquisitions, property openings, and other activity significantly affected our consolidated results from continuing operations in the comparative periods:

54


Table of Contents

            In addition to the activities discussed above and in "Results Overview", the following acquisitions, dispositions, and property openings affected our income from unconsolidated entities in the comparative periods:

            For the purposes of the following comparisons between the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the above transactions are referred to as the property transactions. In the

55


Table of Contents


following discussions of our results of operations, "comparable" refers to properties open and operating throughout both the current and prior year.

            During 2009, we sold four consolidated properties that had an aggregate book value of $13.7 million for aggregate sales proceeds of $3.9 million, resulting in a net loss on sale of $9.8 million. The loss on sale of these assets recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and the operating results of the properties that we sold or disposed of during 2009 were not significant to our consolidated results of operations. The following is a list of the consolidated properties we sold and the date of disposition:

Property
  Date of Disposition

Knoxville Commons

  November 2, 2009

Park Plaza

  November 2, 2009

Eastland Plaza

  October 30, 2009

Raleigh Springs Mall

  October 15, 2009

            In 2008 we had no consolidated property dispositions.

            During 2007, we disposed of five consolidated properties that had an aggregate book value of $91.6 million for aggregate sales proceeds of $56.4 million, resulting in a net loss on sale of approximately $35.3 million. The loss on sale of these assets has been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. The operating results of the properties that we sold or disposed of during 2007 were not significant to our consolidated results of operations. The following is a list of consolidated property dispositions and the date of disposition for which we have reported the results of sale within discontinued operations:

Property
  Date of Disposition

Lafayette Square

  December 27, 2007

University Mall

  September 28, 2007

Boardman Plaza

  September 28, 2007

Griffith Park Plaza

  September 20, 2007

Alton Square

  August 2, 2007

Year Ended December 31, 2009 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2008

            Minimum rents increased $24.9 million in 2009, of which the property transactions accounted for $27.3 million of the increase, offset by a decrease in comparable minimum rents of $2.4 million, or 0.1%. The decrease in comparable minimum rents was primarily attributable to a $15.4 million decline in the fair market value of in-place lease amortization and a $12.6 million decrease in straight-line rents, offset by an increase in minimum rents of $22.8 million and an increase in comparable rents from carts, kiosks, and other temporary tenants of $2.8 million. Overage rents decreased $15.3 million or 15.3%, as a result of a reduction in tenant sales for the period as compared to the prior year.

            Tenant reimbursements decreased $3.7 million, due to a $14.8 million, or 1.4%, decrease in the comparable properties as a result of a decrease in expenditures allocable to tenants paying common area maintenance on a proportionate basis, offset by an $11.1 million increase attributable to the property transactions.

            Management fees and other revenues decreased $8.4 million principally as a result of decreased earned premiums of our wholly-owned captive insurance entities and lower fee revenue due to the reduction in development, leasing and joint venture property refinancing activity.

            Total other income decreased $5.4 million, and was principally the result of the following:

These decreases were offset in part by a $6.5 million increase in land sale activity primarily related to a land sale in the fourth quarter of 2009 and a $5.8 million increase in lease settlement income.

            Property operating expenses decreased $30.2 million, or 6.6%, primarily related to lower utility costs resulting from our cost control and cost reduction initiatives.

56


Table of Contents

            Depreciation and amortization expense increased $28.1 million due to the impact of prior year openings and expansion activity and acceleration of depreciation for certain properties scheduled for redevelopment.

            Repairs and maintenance decreased $16.1 million due to our cost savings efforts.

            Home and regional office expense decreased $34.8 million primarily due to decreased personnel costs attributable to our cost control initiatives and lower incentive compensation levels.

            During 2009, we recognized a non-cash charge of $140.5 million representing an other-than-temporary impairment in the fair value below the carrying value of our minority investment in Liberty. We recorded the charge to earnings due to the significance and duration of the decline in the total share price, including currency revaluations. In addition, we recorded impairment charges in 2009 of $56.9 million related to one regional mall, certain parcels of land and certain predevelopment costs related to projects no longer being pursued. In 2008, we recognized an impairment of $16.5 million primarily representing the write-down of a mall property to its estimated net realizable value and the write-off of predevelopment costs for various development opportunities which we no longer plan to pursue.

            During 2009, we recorded $5.7 million in transaction expenses related to costs associated with significant acquisition related activities. In accordance with the required adoption of a new accounting pronouncement effective January 1, 2009, all transaction costs are expensed as incurred and are no longer capitalized as a component of acquisition cost as prior accounting guidance permitted.

            Interest expense increased $44.9 million primarily related to our issuance of $500 million of senior unsecured notes on August 11, 2009, $600 million senior unsecured notes on May 15, 2009 and $650 million senior unsecured notes on March 25, 2009, offset by decreased interest expense on our Credit Facility due to the payoff of the U.S. tranche and other property debt refinancings.

            The 2008 period included a loss on extinguishment of debt of $20.3 million in the second quarter of 2008 related to the redemption of $200 million in remarketable debt securities. We extinguished the debt because the remarketing reset base rate was above the rate for 30-year U.S. Treasury securities at the date of redemption.

            Income tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries decreased $8.8 million due to the recognition of a $5.8 million tax benefit in 2009 related to the adjustment of the carrying value of our investment in an unconsolidated non-retail real estate entity.

            Income from unconsolidated entities increased $8.0 million as a result of our 2008 joint venture openings and expansion activity, interest rate savings from favorable interest rates and debt refinancings, and additional depreciation provisions related to the finalization of purchase accounting on asset basis step-ups in the 2008 period associated with the acquisition of Mills, offset by the gain recognized in 2008 from our disposition of an investment holding of non-retail real estate adjacent to one of our regional mall operating properties.

            In 2009, we recognized a $42.7 million impairment charge representing our share of impairment charges recorded by unconsolidated entities and also impairment charges on our investment in certain unconsolidated entities for which we deemed the declines in value below our carrying amount other-than-temporary.

            The loss on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities of $30.1 million in 2009 was the result of the sale of one regional mall, three community centers, and our 32.5% joint venture interests in our shopping centers operating or under development in China.

            Preferred unit distribution requirements decreased $20.5 million as a result of the conversion of preferred units to units during 2008.

Year Ended December 31, 2008 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2007

            Minimum rents increased $137.2 million in 2008, of which the property transactions accounted for $64.6 million of the increase. Comparable rents increased $72.6 million, or 3.6%. This was primarily due to an increase in minimum rents of $82.1 million and an $8.5 million increase in straight-line rents, offset by a $16.4 million decrease in comparable property activity, primarily attributable to lower amounts of fair market value of in-place lease amortization. Overage rents decreased $9.8 million or 8.9%, as a result of a reduction in tenant sales for the period as compared to the prior year.

57


Table of Contents

            Tenant reimbursements increased $42.8 million, due to a $26.9 million increase attributable to the property transactions and a $15.9 million, or 1.6%, increase in the comparable properties due to our ongoing initiative to convert leases to a fixed reimbursement methodology for common area maintenance costs.

            Management fees and other revenues increased $18.7 million principally as a result of the full year of additional management fees derived from managing the properties acquired in the Mills acquisition, and additional leasing and development fees as a result of incremental joint venture property activity.

            Total other income decreased $56.6 million principally as a result of the following:

These decreases were offset in part by a $3.1 million increase in net other activity.

            Depreciation and amortization expense increased $63.8 million in 2008 primarily due to our acquisition, expansion and renovation activity and the accelerated depreciation of tenant improvements for tenant leases terminated during the period and for properties scheduled for redevelopment.

            Real estate taxes increased $21.3 million from the prior period, $9.0 million of which is related to the property transactions, and $12.3 million from our comparable properties due to the effect of increases resulting from reassessments, higher tax rates, and the effect of expansion and renovation activities.

            Repairs and maintenance decreased $12.3 million due to our cost savings efforts.

            Provision for credit losses increased $14.5 million primarily due to an increase in tenant bankruptcies and tenant delinquencies. This was reflected in total square footage lost to tenant bankruptcies of 1,104,000 during 2008 as compared to only 69,000 square feet in 2007.

            Home and regional office expense increased $8.3 million primarily due to increased personnel costs, primarily the result of the Mills acquisition, and the increased expense from certain incentive compensation plans.

            Other expenses increased $6.1 million due to increased consulting and professional fees, including legal fees and related costs.

            In 2008, we recognized impairment charges of $16.5 million primarily representing the write-down of a mall property to its estimated net realizable value and the write-off of predevelopment costs for various development opportunities that we no longer plan to pursue.

            Interest expense increased marginally by $1.3 million despite an $823.9 million increase in consolidated borrowings to fund our development and redevelopment activities, and the full year impact of our borrowings to fund the Mills-related loans, due to a 55 basis point decline in our weighted average borrowing rates. This decrease in weighted average borrowing rates was driven primarily by a decline in the applicable LIBOR rate for a majority of our consolidated floating rate debt instruments, including the Credit Facility.

            We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $20.3 million in the second quarter of 2008 related to the redemption of $200 million in remarketable debt securities. We extinguished the debt because the remarketing reset base rate was above the rate for 30-year U.S. Treasury securities at the date of redemption.

            Income tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries increased $14.9 million due primarily to a $19.5 million tax benefit recognized in 2007 related to the impairment charge resulting from of the write-off of our investment in a land joint venture in Phoenix, Arizona.

            Income from unconsolidated entities decreased $5.9 million, due primarily to the impact of the Mills acquisition (net of eliminations). On a net basis, our share of loss from SPG-FCM increased $4.7 million from the prior period due to a full year of SPG-FCM activity in 2008 as compared to only nine months of activity in 2007. The loss was driven by depreciation and amortization expense on asset basis step-ups in purchase accounting.

58


Table of Contents

            In 2007, we recognized an impairment charge of $55.1 million related to a land joint venture in Phoenix, Arizona.

            The gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities of $92.0 million in 2007 was primarily the result of Simon Ivanhoe selling its interest in certain assets located in Poland.

            In 2007, the loss on sale of discontinued operations of $35.3 million represents the net loss upon disposition of five non-core properties consisting of three regional malls and two community/lifestyle centers.

            Preferred unit distribution requirements decreased $17.9 million as a result of the conversion or exchange of preferred units to units and the redemption of the Series G preferred units in the fourth quarter of 2007.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

            Because we generate revenues primarily from long-term leases, our financing strategy relies primarily on long-term fixed rate debt. We manage our floating rate debt to be at or below 15-25% of total outstanding indebtedness by negotiating interest rates for each financing or refinancing based on current market conditions. Floating rate debt currently comprises approximately 12% of our total consolidated debt at December 31, 2009. We also enter into interest rate protection agreements as appropriate to assist in managing our interest rate risk. We derive most of our liquidity from leases that generate positive net cash flow from operations and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities that totaled $1.9 billion during 2009. In addition, the new credit facility provides an alternative source of liquidity as our cash needs vary from time to time.

            Our balance of cash and cash equivalents increased $3.2 billion during 2009 to $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2009. December 31, 2009 and 2008 balances include $38.1 million and $29.8 million, respectively, related to our co-branded gift card programs, which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes.

            On December 31, 2009, we had available borrowing capacity of approximately $3.1 billion under the Credit Facility, net of outstanding borrowings of $446.1 million and letters of credit of $5.7 million. During 2009, the maximum amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $1.6 billion and the weighted average amount outstanding was $669.8 million. The weighted average interest rate was 0.94% for the year ended December 31, 2009. On December 8, 2009, we entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. Borrowings on the new facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010 when the Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings on the Credit Facility were transitioned to the new credit facility.

            We and/or Simon Property also have access to public equity and long term unsecured debt markets and access to private equity from institutional investors at the property level.

            Our business model requires us to regularly access the debt and equity capital markets to raise funds for acquisition and development activity, redevelopment capital, and to refinance maturing debt. The turmoil in the capital markets that began in 2008 and which now shows signs of abating had an impact on many businesses', including ours, ability to access debt and equity capital. We raised approximately $3.4 billion in the public capital markets in 2009; however, there is no assurance we will be able to continue to do so in future periods or on similar terms or conditions. We believe we have sufficient cash on hand and availability under the new credit facility to address our debt maturities and capital needs through 2010.

            As discussed further in Financing and Debt below, on January 12, 2010, we commenced a tender offer to purchase ten outstanding series of notes. We subsequently purchased $2.285 billion of notes on January 26, 2010. The purchase of the notes was primarily funded with proceeds from the sale of $2.25 billion of senior unsecured notes issued on January 25, 2010.

            On February 16, 2010, Simon Property announced a written offer made to acquire General Growth Properties, Inc., or General Growth, in a transaction valued at more than $10 billion, including approximately $9 billion in cash. Of this consideration, approximately $7 billion will be paid to unsecured creditors, representing par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends and interest. The transaction would not be subject to a financing condition and would be financed through cash on hand, asset sales and through equity co-investments in acquired properties by strategic institutional investors, with the balance coming from our new credit facility. The offer indicated a willingness to discuss consideration consisting in whole or in part of equity in lieu of the cash portion of the consideration to

59


Table of Contents

General Growth's stockholders, and perhaps certain of its unsecured creditors, for those who would prefer to receive equity. The offer is subject to confirmatory due diligence and the negotiation and execution of a definitive transaction agreement, as well as required bankruptcy court and creditor approvals. As of the filing of this report, there is no agreement for such a transaction.

            On February 16, 2007, SPG-FCM, a 50/50 joint venture between one of our affiliates and funds managed by Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., or Farallon, entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Mills for $25.25 per common share in cash. The acquisition of Mills and its interests in the 36 properties that remain at December 31, 2009 was completed in April 2007. As of December 31, 2009, we and Farallon had each funded $650.0 million into SPG-FCM to acquire all of the common stock of Mills. As part of the transaction, we also made loans to SPG-FCM and Mills primarily at rates of LIBOR plus 270-275 basis points. These funds were used by SPG-FCM and Mills to repay loans and other obligations of Mills, including the redemption of preferred stock, during 2007. As of December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance of our loan to SPG-FCM was $632.0 million, and the average outstanding balance during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009 of all loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills was approximately $589.5 million. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded approximately $9.3 million, $15.3 million and $39.1 million in interest income (net of inter-entity eliminations) related to these loans, respectively. We also recorded fee income, including fee income amortization related to up-front fees on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills, during 2009, 2008 and 2007 of approximately $3.7 million, $3.1 million and $17.4 million (net of inter-entity eliminations), respectively, for providing refinancing services to Mills' properties and SPG-FCM. The existing loan facility to SPG-FCM bears a rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points and matures on June 7, 2010, with two available one-year extensions. Fees charged on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the loan.

            The Mills acquisition involved the purchase of all Mills' outstanding shares of common stock and common units for approximately $1.7 billion (at $25.25 per share or unit), the assumption of $954.9 million of preferred stock, the assumption of a proportionate share of property-level mortgage debt, of which SPG-FCM's share approximated $3.8 billion, the assumption of $1.2 billion in unsecured loans provided by us, costs to effect the acquisition, and certain liabilities and contingencies, including an ongoing investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8 billion. SPG-FCM has completed its purchase price allocations for the Mills acquisition using valuations developed with the assistance of a third-party professional appraisal firm.

            In conjunction with the Mills acquisition, we acquired a majority interest in two properties in which we previously held a 50% ownership interest (Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place) and as a result we have consolidated these two properties at the date of acquisition.

            In addition to the loans provided to SPG-FCM, we also provide management services to substantially all of the properties in which SPG-FCM holds an interest.

            Our net cash flow from operating activities and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities totaled $1.9 billion during 2009. In addition, we received net proceeds from our debt financing and repayment activities in 2009 of $542.1 million. These activities are further discussed below in "Financing and Debt". Also during 2009, we:

            In general, we anticipate that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet operating expenses, monthly debt service, recurring capital expenditures, and distributions to partners necessary to maintain Simon

60


Table of Contents


Property's REIT qualification on a long-term basis. In addition, we expect to be able to obtain capital for nonrecurring capital expenditures, such as acquisitions, major building renovations and expansions, as well as for scheduled principal maturities on outstanding indebtedness, from:

            We expect to generate positive cash flow from operations in 2010, and we consider these projected cash flows in our sources and uses of cash. These cash flows are principally derived from retail tenants, many of whom continue to experience considerable financial distress. A significant deterioration in projected cash flows from operations could cause us to increase our reliance on available funds from the new credit facility, curtail planned capital expenditures, or seek other additional sources of financing as discussed above.

            Our unsecured debt at December 31, 2009 consisted of approximately $11.6 billion of our senior unsecured notes and $446.1 million outstanding under the Credit Facility. The total outstanding balance of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009 was comprised of the U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings which expired on January 11, 2010. The balance as of December 31, 2009 reflects interest at LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points and an additional facility fee of 12.5 basis points as these borrowings were made under the Credit Facility. On December 8, 2009, we entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. The base interest on the new credit facility is LIBOR plus 210 basis points and includes a facility fee of 40 basis points. Borrowings on the new credit facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010 when the Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings on the Credit Facility were transitioned to the new credit facility.

            During the year ended December 31, 2009, we drew amounts from the Credit Facility to fund the redemption of $600.0 million of maturing senior unsecured notes. We repaid a total of $1.2 billion on the Credit Facility during the year ended December 31, 2009. The maximum outstanding balance during the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $1.6 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the weighted average outstanding balance of the Credit Facility was approximately $669.8 million.

            On March 25, 2009, we issued $650.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 10.35%. The proceeds from the offering were used to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility and for general business purposes.

            On May 15, 2009, we issued $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 6.75%. The proceeds from the offering were used for general business purposes. The notes were re-opened on August 11, 2009, and an additional $500.0 million of senior unsecured notes were issued. We used the proceeds from the offering for general business purposes.

            On January 12, 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer for any and all senior unsecured notes of ten outstanding series with maturity dates ranging from 2011 to March 2013. The total principal amount of the notes accepted for purchase on January 26, 2010 was approximately $2.3 billion, with a weighted average duration of 2.0 years and a weighted coupon of 5.76%. We purchased the tendered notes with cash on hand and the proceeds from an offering of $2.25 billion of senior unsecured notes that closed on January 25, 2010. The senior notes offering was comprised of $400.0 million of 4.20% notes due 2015, $1.25 billion of 5.65% notes due 2020 and $600.0 million of 6.75% notes due 2040. We will report a $165.6 million charge to earnings in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the tender offer.

            Total secured indebtedness was $6.6 billion and $6.3 billion at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

61


Table of Contents

            On July 30, 2009, we borrowed $400.0 million on a mortgage that is secured by Greenwood Park Mall, Southpark Mall, and Walt Whitman Mall, which matures on August 1, 2016 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.00%. This is a cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted loan as it pertains to these properties.

            Our consolidated debt, adjusted to reflect outstanding derivative instruments, and the effective weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

Debt Subject to
  Adjusted Balance
as of
December 31,
2009
  Effective
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
  Adjusted Balance
as of
December 31,
2008
  Effective
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
 

Fixed Rate

  $ 16,814,240     6.10%   $ 15,424,318     5.76%  

Variable Rate

    1,816,062     1.19%     2,618,214     1.31%  
                   

  $ 18,630,302     5.62%   $ 18,042,532     5.12%  
                   

            As of December 31, 2009, we had $694.2 million of notional amount fixed rate swap agreements that have a weighted average fixed pay rate of 2.79% and a weighted average variable receive rate of 0.60%. As of December 31, 2009, the net effect of these agreements effectively converted $694.2 million of variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.

            Contractual Obligations and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements:    The following table summarizes the material aspects of our future obligations as of December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

 
  2010   2011 to 2012   2013 to 2015   After 2015   Total  

Long Term Debt

                               

Consolidated(1)

  $ 2,311,705   $ 4,965,828   $ 6,424,036   $ 4,918,999   $ 18,620,568  
                       

Pro Rata Share Of Long Term Debt:

                               
 

Consolidated(2)

  $ 2,292,867   $ 4,835,957   $ 6,355,112   $ 4,860,737   $ 18,344,673  
 

Joint Ventures(2)

    788,956     1,931,365     2,190,793     1,633,423     6,544,537  
                       

Total Pro Rata Share Of Long Term Debt

    3,081,823     6,767,322     8,545,905     6,494,160     24,889,210  

Consolidated Capital Expenditure Commitments(3)

    27,938     357             28,295  

Joint Venture Capital Expenditure Commitments(3)

    6,115     3,779             9,894  

Consolidated Ground Lease Commitments(4)

    16,782     33,760     51,974     630,654     733,170  
                       

Total

  $ 3,132,658   $ 6,805,218   $ 8,597,879   $ 7,124,814   $ 25,660,569  
                       

(1)
Represents principal maturities only and therefore, excludes net premiums and discounts of $9,734 and all required interest payments. We incurred interest expense during 2009 of $992.1 million, net of capitalized interest of $14.5 million.

(2)
Represents our pro rata share of principal maturities and excludes net premiums and discounts.

(3)
Represents our pro rata share of capital expenditure commitments.

(4)
Represents only the minimum non-cancellable lease period, excluding applicable lease extension and renewal options.

            Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of our investments in real estate joint ventures which are common in the real estate industry and are described in Note 7 of the notes to the accompanying financial statements. Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture, is typically secured by the joint venture property, and is non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2009, we had loan guarantee obligations to support $47.2 million to support our total $6.5 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness presented in the table above.

62


Table of Contents

            During 2009, the holders of 500,891 Series I preferred units exercised their rights to exchange the preferred units for shares of Simon Property's Series I preferred stock.

            Buy-sell provisions are common in real estate partnership agreements. Most of our partners are institutional investors who have a history of direct investment in retail real estate. Our partners in our joint venture properties may initiate these provisions at any time. If we determine it is in our unitholders' best interests for us to purchase the joint venture interest and we believe we have adequate liquidity to execute the purchase without hindering our cash flows, then we may initiate these provisions or elect to buy. If we decide to sell any of our joint venture interests, we expect to use the net proceeds to reduce outstanding indebtedness or to reinvest in development, redevelopment, or expansion opportunities.

            Acquisitions.    Although the acquisition of high quality individual properties or portfolios of properties remains an integral component of our growth strategies, we did not acquire any properties during 2009.

            We entered into a definitive agreement in December 2009 to acquire all of the outlet shopping centers currently owned by Prime Outlets Acquisition Company and certain of its affiliated entities, or the 'Prime Outlets', subject to Prime Outlets' existing fixed rate indebtedness and preferred stock. The Prime Outlets consist of 22 high quality outlet centers located in major metropolitan markets. We will pay consideration (consisting of cash and units of the Operating Partnership) of approximately $0.7 billion for the owners' interests in the Prime Outlets. The acquisition is subject to several closing conditions relating to certain financing arrangements of the Prime Outlets. Assuming all closing conditions are satisfied on a timely basis, we expect the transaction will close in the second quarter of 2010.

            Dispositions.    We continue to pursue the sale of properties that no longer meet our strategic criteria or that are not the primary retail venue within their trade area. In 2009, we sold the following wholly-owned properties: Raleigh Springs, a regional mall located in Memphis, Tennessee; Eastland Plaza, a community center located in Tulsa, Oklahoma; Knoxville Commons, a community center located in Knoxville, Tennessee; and Park Plaza, a community center located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. We received net proceeds of $3.9 million on the U.S. property dispositions and recorded a net loss on these dispositions of $9.8 million. Also in December 2009, we recognized a loss on our joint venture interests in our shopping centers operating and under development in China. We sold our interests to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million. The loss on sales of these wholly owned entities and our joint venture interests in China is included in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the 2009 consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for the assets, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

            We do not believe the sale of these properties and joint venture interests will have a material impact on our future results of operations or cash flows. We believe the disposition of these assets will enhance the average overall quality of our portfolio.

            New Domestic Developments.    Given the significant downturn in the economy, we have substantially reduced our development spending. On August 6, 2009, we opened Cincinnati Premium Outlets, a 400,000 square foot upscale manufacturers' outlet center located in Monroe, OH. The total cost to complete this project was approximately $93.0 million, which was funded with available cash from operations. Also included in development projects is a 600,000 square foot Phase II expansion at The Domain, which is expected to open in the first half of 2010. Other than these projects, our share of other 2009 new developments was not significant.

            Strategic Domestic Expansions and Renovations.    In addition to new development, we incur costs related to construction for significant renovation and expansion projects at our properties. On April 23, 2009, we opened The

63


Table of Contents

Promenade at Camarillo Premium Outlets, a 220,000 square foot expansion of an existing center. The total cost to complete this project was approximately $73.0 million and was funded with available cash from operations. Included in our renovation and expansion projects is the addition of Nordstrom at South Shore Plaza, which is expected to open in the first half of 2010. We expect to fund this capital project with cash flow from operations. Our share of the cost of renovation or expansion projects that we expect to initiate or complete in 2010 is approximately $40.0 million.

            The following table summarizes total capital expenditures on consolidated properties on a cash basis:

 
  2009   2008   2007  

New Developments and Other

  $ 160   $ 327   $ 432  

Renovations and Expansions

    159     432     349  

Tenant Allowances

    43     72     106  

Operational Capital Expenditures

    14     43     130  
               

Total

  $ 376   $ 874   $ 1,017  
               

            International Development Activity.    We typically reinvest net cash flow from our international investments to fund future international development activity. We believe this strategy mitigates some of the risk of our initial investment and our exposure to changes in foreign currencies. We have also funded our European investments with Euro-denominated borrowings that act as a natural hedge against local currency fluctuations. This has also been the case with our Premium Outlet Centers in Japan and Mexico where we use Yen and Peso denominated financing, respectively. Currently, our consolidated net income exposure to changes in the volatility of the Euro, Yen, Peso and other foreign currencies is not material. We expect our share of international development costs for 2010 will be approximately $65.0 million.

            The carrying amount of our total combined investment in Simon Ivanhoe and GCI, as of December 31, 2009, including all related components of other comprehensive income, was $298.8 million. On December 14, 2009, we made an additional capital contribution to GCI of $79.4 million which was used to fund certain liabilities of the joint venture. The contribution increased our investment in GCI but did not impact our ownership percentage of the venture. Our investments in Simon Ivanhoe and GCI are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Currently, two European developments are under construction which will add approximately 942,000 square feet of GLA for a total net cost of approximately €221 million, of which our share is approximately €53 million, or $76.0 million based on current Euro:USD exchange rates. Although we agreed to sell our joint venture interest in Simon Ivanhoe in 2010, we and Ivanhoe Cambridge have the right to participate with Unibail-Rodamco in the potential development of up to five new retail projects in the Simon Ivanhoe pipeline, subject to customary approval rights. We will own a 25% interest in any of these projects in which we agree to participate.

            As of December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of our 40% joint venture investment in the eight Japanese Premium Outlet Centers including all related components of other comprehensive income was $302.2 million. In 2009, we completed construction and opened Ami Premium Outlets, a 224,500 square foot center located outside Tokyo, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 15.4 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 6.2 billion, or $66.8 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates. We also completed construction and opened a 171,800 square foot expansion at Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets in Hyougo-ken, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 7.6 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 3.0 billion, or $33.0 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates. Currently, Toki Premium Outlets Phase III and Tosu Premium Outlets Phase III are under construction in Japan. Toki Premium Outlets Phase III is a 62,000 square foot expansion to the Toki Premium Outlet Center located in Toki, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 2.2 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 864 million, or $9.4 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates. Tosu Premium Outlets Phase III is a 52,000 square foot expansion to the Tosu Premium Outlet Center located in Fukuoka, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 3.2 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 1.3 billion, or $13.7 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates.

            We hold a minority interest in Liberty which is a U.K. Real Estate Investment Trust that operates regional shopping centers and owns other prime retail assets throughout the U.K. Liberty is a U.K. FTSE 100 listed company, with shareholders' funds of £3.2 billion and property investments of £6.1 billion, of which its U.K. regional shopping centers comprise 70%. Assets of the group under control or joint control amount to £9.3 billion. Our interest in Liberty

64


Table of Contents

is less than 6% of its outstanding shares. We adjust the carrying value of this investment quarterly using quoted market prices, including a related foreign exchange component.

Distributions and Stock Repurchase Program

            Distributions during 2009 aggregated $2.70 per unit and were paid in a combination of cash and units. Distributions during 2008 aggregated $3.60 per unit and were paid entirely in cash. We must pay a minimum amount of distributions to maintain Simon Property's status as a REIT. Our distributions typically exceed our consolidated net income generated in any given year primarily because of depreciation, which is a "non-cash" expense. Future distributions will be determined by the Simon Property Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for distributions, and what may be required to maintain Simon Property's status as a REIT.

            Simon Property's Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of common stock through July 2009. No purchases were made as part of this program in 2009. The program was not renewed and has now expired.

Forward-Looking Statements

            Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be deemed "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the impact of a prolonged recession, our ability to meet debt service requirements, the availability and terms of financing, changes in our credit rating, changes in market rates of interest and foreign exchange rates for foreign currencies, the ability to hedge interest rate risk, risks associated with the acquisition, development and expansion of properties, general risks related to retail real estate, the liquidity of real estate investments, environmental liabilities, changes in market rental rates, trends in the retail industry, relationships with anchor tenants, the inability to collect rent due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise, risks relating to joint venture properties, competitive market forces, risks related to international activities, insurance costs and coverage, terrorist activities, and maintenance of our status as a real estate investment trust. We discuss these and other risks and uncertainties under the heading "Risk Factors" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. We may update that discussion in subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, but otherwise we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Item 7A.    Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk

            Please refer to the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 under the caption Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

            Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements contained in Item 15.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

            None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

            Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.    We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009.

65


Table of Contents

            Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

            Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.    We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, Simon Property's Board of Directors, principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by Simon Property's management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

            Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

            We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

            Based on that assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on their assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. Their report is included within Item 9A of this Form 10-K.

66


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.
and The Partners of Simon Property Group, L.P.:

            We have audited Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

            We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

            A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

            Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

            In our opinion, Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

            We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries, and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15, and our report dated March 12, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 12, 2010

 

 

Item 9B.    Other Information

            During the fourth quarter of the year covered by this report, the Audit Committee of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Board of Directors approved certain non-audit tax compliance services to be provided by Ernst & Young, LLP, Simon Property's independent registered public accounting firm. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

67


Table of Contents


Part III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

            We are a limited partnership and Simon Property is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon Property can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

            We are a limited partnership and Simon Property is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon Property can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

            We are a limited partnership and Simon Property is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon Property can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

            We are a limited partnership and Simon Property is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon Property can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

            The Audit Committee of Simon Property's Board of Directors pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, prior to commencement of services. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve specific services up to specified individual and aggregate fee amounts. These pre-approval decisions are presented to the full Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting after such approvals are made. We have incurred fees as shown below for services from Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young has advised us that it has billed or will bill these indicated amounts for the following categories of services for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

 
  2009   2008  

Audit Fees (1)

  $ 2,853,000   $ 2,776,000  

Audit-Related Fees (2)

    5,119,000     5,254,000  

Tax Fees (3)

    777,000     1,144,000  

All Other Fees

         

(1)
Audit Fees include fees for the audit of the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for us, Simon Property, and certain of our subsidiaries and services associated with Securities and Exchange Commission registration statements, periodic reports, and other documents issued in connection with securities offerings.

(2)
Audit-Related Fees include audits of individual properties and schedules of recoverable common area maintenance costs to comply with lender, joint venture partner or tenant requirements and accounting consultation and due diligence services. Our share of these Audit-Related Fees for the years ended 2009 and 2008 are approximately 46% and 51%, respectively.

(3)
Tax Fees include fees for international and other tax consulting services. Tax Fees also include return compliance services associates with the tax returns for The Mills Corporation and related subsidiaries and joint ventures. Our share of these fees for 2009 and 2008 is approximately 75% and 35%, respectively.

68



Part IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 
   
  Page No.  
(1)   Financial Statements        

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

70

 
    Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008     71  
    Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007     72  
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007     73  
    Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007     74  
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements     75  

(2)

 

Financial Statement Schedule

 

 

 

 

 

 

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries Schedule III — Schedule of Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

 

 

111

 

 

 

Notes to Schedule III

 

 

118

 

(3)

 

Exhibits

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Exhibit Index attached hereto is hereby incorporated by reference to this Item.

 

 

119

 

69


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.
and The Partners of Simon Property Group, L.P.:

            We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

            We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

            In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

            We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 12, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 12, 2010

 

 

70


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except unit amounts)

 
  December 31, 2009   December 31, 2008  

ASSETS:

             
 

Investment properties, at cost

  $ 25,336,189   $ 25,205,715  
   

Less — accumulated depreciation

    7,004,534     6,184,285  
           

    18,331,655     19,021,430  
 

Cash and cash equivalents

    3,957,718     773,544  
 

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

    402,729     414,856  
 

Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity

    1,468,577     1,663,886  
 

Deferred costs and other assets

    1,155,587     1,028,333  
 

Note receivable from related party

    632,000     520,700  
           
   

Total assets

  $ 25,948,266   $ 23,422,749  
           

LIABILITIES:

             
 

Mortgages and other indebtedness

  $ 18,630,302   $ 18,042,532  
 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue

    987,530     1,086,248  
 

Cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity

    457,754     380,730  
 

Other liabilities and accrued distributions

    159,345     155,151  
           
   

Total liabilities

    20,234,931     19,664,661  
           

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

             

Preferred Units, various series, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties

   
530,373
   
656,121
 

EQUITY:

             

Partners' Equity

             
 

Preferred units, 796,948 and 891,183 units outstanding, respectively. Liquidation values $39,847 and $42,486, respectively

    45,704     48,671  
 

General Partner, 285,748,271 and 231,319,644 units outstanding, respectively

    4,412,433     2,576,307  
 

Limited Partners, 57,804,779 and 56,368,410 units outstanding, respectively

    892,603     627,799  
           
   

Total partners' equity

    5,350,740     3,252,777  

Nonredeemable noncontrolling deficit interests in properties, net

    (167,778 )   (150,810 )
           
   

Total equity

    5,182,962     3,101,967  
           
   

Total liabilities and equity

  $ 25,948,266   $ 23,422,749  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

71


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

 
  For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

REVENUE:

                   
 

Minimum rent

  $ 2,316,838   $ 2,291,919   $ 2,154,713  
 

Overage rent

    84,922     100,222     110,003  
 

Tenant reimbursements

    1,062,227     1,065,957     1,023,164  
 

Management fees and other revenues

    124,059     132,471     113,740  
 

Other income

    187,170     192,586     249,179  
               
   

Total revenue

    3,775,216     3,783,155     3,650,799  
               

EXPENSES:

                   
 

Property operating

    425,703     455,874     454,510  
 

Depreciation and amortization

    997,598     969,477     905,636  
 

Real estate taxes

    333,957     334,657     313,311  
 

Repairs and maintenance

    91,736     107,879     120,224  
 

Advertising and promotion

    93,565     96,783     94,340  
 

Provision for credit losses

    22,655     24,035     9,562  
 

Home and regional office costs

    110,048     144,865     136,610  
 

General and administrative

    18,124     20,987     19,587  
 

Impairment charge

    197,353     16,489      
 

Transaction expenses

    5,697          
 

Other

    72,088     69,061     62,987  
               
   

Total operating expenses

    2,368,524     2,240,107     2,116,767  
               

OPERATING INCOME

    1,406,692     1,543,048     1,534,032  

Interest expense

    (992,065 )   (947,140 )   (945,852 )

Loss on extinguishment of debt

        (20,330 )    

Income tax benefit (expense) of taxable REIT subsidiaries

    5,220     (3,581 )   11,322  

Income from unconsolidated entities

    40,220     32,246     38,120  

Impairment charge from investments in unconsolidated entities

    (42,697 )   (4,683 )   (55,061 )

(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities

    (30,108 )       92,044  
               

Consolidated income from continuing operations

    387,262     599,560     674,605  

Discontinued operations

        (25 )   (117 )

Loss on sale of discontinued operations

            (35,252 )
               

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME

    387,262     599,535     639,236  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    5,496     11,091     12,903  

Preferred unit requirements

    38,194     58,718     76,655  
               

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS

  $ 343,572   $ 529,726   $ 549,678  
               

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS
ATTRIBUTABLE TO:

                   
   

General Partner

  $ 283,098   $ 422,517   $ 436,164  
   

Limited Partners

    60,474     107,209     113,514  
               
   

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 343,572   $ 529,726   $ 549,678  
               

BASIC EARNINGS PER UNIT

                   
   

Income from continuing operations

  $ 1.06   $ 1.88   $ 2.09  
   

Discontinued operations

            (0.13 )
               
   

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 1.06   $ 1.88   $ 1.96  
               

DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT

                   
   

Income from continuing operations

  $ 1.05   $ 1.87   $ 2.08  
   

Discontinued operations

            (0.13 )
               
   

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 1.05   $ 1.87   $ 1.95  
               
 

Consolidated net income

  $ 387,262   $ 599,535   $ 639,236  
 

Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedge agreements

    1,509     (50,973 )   (10,760 )
 

Net (loss) gain on derivative instruments reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense

    (14,754 )   (3,205 )   902  
 

Currency translation adjustments

    (8,244 )   (6,953 )   6,297  
 

Changes in available-for-sale securities and other

    224,694     (168,619 )   2,020  
               
 

Comprehensive income

    590,467     369,785     637,695  
 

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    5,496     11,091     12,903  
               
 

Comprehensive income attributable to unitholders

  $ 584,971   $ 358,694   $ 624,792  
               

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

72


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

 
  For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

                   
 

Consolidated net income

  $ 387,262   $ 599,535   $ 639,236  
   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities —

                   
     

Depreciation and amortization

    1,009,490     956,827     875,284  
     

Impairment charges

    240,050     21,172     55,061  
     

Loss (gain) on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities

    30,108         (92,044 )
     

Loss on sale of discontinued operations

            35,252  
     

Straight-line rent

    (24,653 )   (33,672 )   (20,907 )
     

Equity in income of unconsolidated entities

    (40,220 )   (32,246 )   (38,120 )
     

Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities

    105,318     118,665     101,998  
   

Changes in assets and liabilities —

                   
     

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

    37,465     (14,312 )   (40,976 )
     

Deferred costs and other assets

    (28,089 )   (21,295 )   (70,138 )
     

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, deferred revenues and other liabilities

    3,789     41,213     114,786  
               
       

Net cash provided by operating activities

    1,720,520     1,635,887     1,559,432  
               

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

                   
   

Acquisitions

            (263,098 )
   

Funding of loans to related parties

    (120,000 )   (8,000 )   (2,752,400 )
   

Repayments of loans from related parties

    8,700     35,300     2,204,400  
   

Capital expenditures, net

    (376,275 )   (874,286 )   (1,017,472 )
   

Cash impact from the consolidation and de-consolidation of properties

            6,117  
   

Net proceeds from sale of partnership interest, other assets and discontinued operations

    33,106         56,374  
   

Investments in unconsolidated entities

    (107,204 )   (137,509 )   (687,327 )
   

Purchase of marketable and non-marketable securities

    (132,984 )   (355,994 )   (29,644 )
   

Sale of marketable securities

    74,116     8,997     16,989  
   

Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities and other

    201,550     309,217     416,485  
               
       

Net cash used in investing activities

    (418,991 )   (1,022,275 )   (2,049,576 )
               

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

                   
   

Issuance of units

    1,642,228     11,106     156,710  
   

Purchase of preferred units and partnership units

        (16,009 )   (83,993 )
   

Preferred unit redemptions

    (87,689 )   (1,845 )   (300,468 )
   

Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties

    (30,706 )   (28,251 )   (91,032 )
   

Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in properties

    2,795     4,005     2,903  
   

Partnership distributions

    (186,050 )   (1,075,895 )   (1,020,674 )
   

Mortgage and other indebtedness proceeds, net of transaction costs

    3,220,706     4,456,975     5,577,083  
   

Mortgage and other indebtedness principal payments

    (2,678,639 )   (3,692,136 )   (4,177,763 )
               
       

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

    1,882,645     (342,050 )   62,766  
               

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   
3,184,174
   
271,562
   
(427,378

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year

   
773,544
   
501,982
   
929,360
 
               

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year

  $ 3,957,718   $ 773,544   $ 501,982  
               

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

73


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in thousands)

 
  Preferred
Units
  Simon Property
(Managing General
Partner)
  Limited
Partners
  Noncontrolling
interests
  Total Equity  

Balance at December 31, 2006

  $ 202,859   $ 3,070,882   $ 831,392   $ (64,457 ) $ 4,040,676  
                       

General partner contributions (231,025 units)

         
7,604
               
7,604
 

Series J preferred stock premium and amortization

    (328 )                     (328 )

Accretion of preferred units

    1,157                       1,157  

Issuance of 147,241 limited partner common units for the purchase of Maine Premium Outlets

                16,362           16,362  

Issuance of 67,309 limited partner common units to the Mills Limited Partners

                8,055           8,055  

Series C preferred units (160,865 units) converted to limited partner common units (121,727 units)

    (4,504 )         4,504            

Series I preferred units (65,907 units) converted to common units (51,987 units)

          3,296                 3,296  

Series I preferred units (606,400 units) converted to limited partner common units (478,144 units)

                30,320           30,320  

Limited partner units converted to common units (1,692,474 units)

          22,781     (22,781 )          

Series G preferred stock redemption (3,000,000 units)

    (150,000 )                     (150,000 )

Series L preferred stock issuance (6,000,000 units)

    150,000                       150,000  

Series L preferred stock redemption (6,000,000 units)

    (150,000 )                     (150,000 )

Treasury unit purchase (572,000 units)

          (49,269 )               (49,269 )

Stock incentive program (222,725 units, net)

                             

Amortization of stock incentive

          26,779                 26,779  

Common units retired (23,000)

          (2,291 )               (2,291 )

Other (includes 322,135 limited partner units converted to cash)

          (8,236 )   (36,837 )   (7,687 )   (52,760 )

Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased ownership in the Operating Partnership

          26,466     (26,466 )          

Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity

    (13,268 )   (749,196 )   (194,823 )   (82,010 )   (1,039,297 )

Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $63,387

    13,268     436,164     113,514     12,903     575,849  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

          (1,152 )   (389 )         (1,541 )
                       

Balance at December 31, 2007

  $ 49,184   $ 2,783,828   $ 722,851   $ (141,251 ) $ 3,414,612  
                       

General partner contributions (282,106 units)

         
11,886
               
11,886
 

Series J preferred stock premium and amortization

    (329 )                     (329 )

Series C preferred units (6,583 units) converted to limited partner common units (4,981 units)

    (184 )         184            

Series I preferred units (6,437,072 units) converted to common units (5,151,776 units)

          321,854                 321,854  

Series I preferred units (1,493,904 units) converted to limited partner common units (1,187,238 units)

                74,695           74,695  

Limited partner units converted to common units (2,574,608 units)

          31,351     (31,351 )          

Stock incentive program (276,872 units, net)

                             

Amortization of stock incentive

          28,640                 28,640  

Other (includes 162,451 limited partner units converted to cash)

          (5,834 )   (16,797 )   5,103     (17,528 )

Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased ownership in the Operating Partnership

          (23,455 )   23,455            

Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity

    (3,531 )   (811,327 )   (205,850 )   (25,753 )   (1,046,461 )

Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $55,187

    3,531     422,517     107,209     11,091     544,348  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

          (183,153 )   (46,597 )         (229,750 )
                       

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $ 48,671   $ 2,576,307   $ 627,799   $ (150,810 ) $ 3,101,967  
                       

General partner contributions (181,850 units)

         
4,725
               
4,725
 

Issuance of units related to Simon Property public offerings (40,250,000 units)

          1,638,340                 1,638,340  

Series J preferred stock premium and amortization

    (328 )                     (328 )

Limited partner units converted to common units (1,866,474 units)

          24,033     (24,033 )          

Series C preferred units (94,235 units) converted to limited partner units (51,447 units)

                2,638           2,638  

Series D preferred units (1,269,524 units) converted to limited partner units (614,055 units)

              38,086           38,086  

Stock incentive program (254,227 units, net)

                             

Amortization of stock incentive

          22,870                 22,870  

Other

    (2,639 )   (5,276 )   624     2,712     (4,579 )

Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased ownership in the Operating Partnership

          (171,446 )   171,446            

Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity

    (3,337 )   (742,699 )   (159,392 )   (25,176 )   (930,604 )

Units issued to common unitholders (11,876,076 units) and limited partners (2,637,341 units)

          620,503     133,734           754,237  

Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $34,857

    3,337     283,098     60,474     5,496     352,405  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

          161,978     41,227           203,205  
                       

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $ 45,704   $ 4,412,433   $ 892,603   $ (167,778 ) $ 5,182,962  
                       

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

74


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

1.    Organization

            Simon Property Group, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership and the majority-owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc. In these notes to consolidated financial statements, the terms "Operating Partnership", "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, L.P., and its subsidiaries and the term "Simon Property" refers to Simon Property Group, Inc. Simon Property is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Pursuant to our partnership agreement, we are required to pay all expenses of Simon Property.

            We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers, The Mills®, and community/lifestyle centers. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or held an interest in 321 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 162 regional malls, 41 Premium Outlet centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 36 properties acquired in the 2007 acquisition of The Mills Corporation, or the Mills acquisition, and 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. Of the 36 properties acquired in the Mills portfolio, 16 of these properties are The Mills, 16 are regional malls, and four are community centers. We also own an interest in one parcel of land held in the United States for future development. Internationally, as of December 31, 2009, we had ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland), eight Premium Outlet centers in Japan, one Premium Outlet center in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet center in South Korea. Also, through joint venture arrangements we have a 24% interest in two shopping centers in Italy currently under development.

            We generate the majority of our revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

            Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

            We also generate supplemental revenue from the following activities:

2.    Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

            The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries, and all significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.

            We consolidate properties that are wholly owned or properties that we own less than 100% but we control. Control of a property is demonstrated by, among other factors, our ability to:

75


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

2.    Basis of Presentation and Consolidation (Continued)

            We also consolidate a variable interest entity, or VIE, when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Our determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE considers all relationships between us and the VIE, including management agreements and other contractual arrangements, when determining the party obligated to absorb the majority of the expected losses, as defined, by accounting standards. There have been no changes during 2009 in conclusions about whether an entity qualifies as a VIE or whether we are the primary beneficiary of any previously identified VIE. During 2009, we did not provide financial or other support to a previously identified VIE that we were not previously contractually obligated to provide.

            Investments in partnerships and joint ventures represent our noncontrolling ownership interests in properties. We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting. We initially record these investments at cost and we subsequently adjust for net equity in income or loss, which we allocate in accordance with the provisions of the applicable partnership or joint venture agreement, and cash contributions and distributions. The allocation provisions in the partnership or joint venture agreements are not always consistent with the legal ownership interests held by each general or limited partner or joint venture investee primarily due to partner preferences. We separately report investments in joint ventures for which accumulated distributions have exceeded investments in and our share of net income of the joint ventures within "Cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity" in the consolidated balance sheets. The net equity of certain joint ventures is less than zero because of financing or operating distributions that are usually greater than net income, as net income includes non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.

            As of December 31, 2009, we consolidated 200 wholly-owned properties and 18 additional properties that are less than wholly-owned, but which we control or for which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for the remaining 164 properties using the equity method of accounting (joint venture properties). We manage the day-to-day operations of 93 of the 164 joint venture properties but have determined that our partner or partners have substantive participating rights in regards to the assets and operations of these joint venture properties. Our investments in joint ventures in Europe, Japan, Mexico and Korea comprise 61 of the remaining 71 properties. The international properties are managed by joint ventures in which we share oversight responsibility with our partner. Additionally, we account for our investment in SPG-FCM Ventures, LLC, or SPG-FCM, which acquired The Mills Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiary, The Mills Limited Partnership, or collectively Mills, in April 2007, using the equity method of accounting. We have determined that SPG-FCM is not a VIE and that Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., or Farallon, our joint venture partner, has substantive participating rights with respect to the assets and operations of SPG-FCM pursuant to the applicable partnership agreements.

            We allocate our net operating results after preferred distributions based on our partners' respective ownership. In addition, Simon Property owns series of our preferred units that have terms comparable to outstanding shares of Simon Property preferred stock. Simon Property's weighted average ownership interest in us was as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Weighted average ownership interest

    82.4 %   79.8 %   79.4 %

            As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, Simon Property's ownership interest was 83.2% and 80.4%, respectively. We adjust the limited partners' interest at the end of each period to reflect their ownership interest.

            We made certain reclassifications of prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2009 presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income available to common unitholders or earnings per unit.

76


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

            We record investment properties at cost. Investment properties include costs of acquisitions; development, predevelopment, and construction (including allocable salaries and related benefits); tenant allowances and improvements; and interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction. We capitalize improvements and replacements from repair and maintenance when the repair and maintenance extends the useful life, increases capacity, or improves the efficiency of the asset. All other repair and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. We capitalize interest on projects during periods of construction until the projects are ready for their intended purpose based on interest rates in place during the construction period. The amount of interest capitalized during each year is as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Capitalized interest

  $ 14,502   $ 27,847   $ 35,793  

            We record depreciation on buildings and improvements utilizing the straight-line method over an estimated original useful life, which is generally 10 to 40 years. We review depreciable lives of investment properties periodically and we make adjustments when necessary to reflect a shorter economic life. We amortize tenant allowances, tenant inducements and tenant improvements utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter. We record depreciation on equipment and fixtures utilizing the straight-line method over seven to ten years.

            We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, declines in cash flows, occupancy and comparable sales per square foot at the property. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization plus its residual value is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to income the excess of carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. We estimate fair value using unobservable market data such as operating income, estimated capitalization rates, or multiples, leasing prospects and local market information. We may decide to sell properties that are held for use and the sale prices of these properties may differ from their carrying values. We also review our investments including investments in unconsolidated entities if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the fair value of the investments is other-than-temporary.

            Certain of our real estate assets contain asbestos. The asbestos is appropriately contained, in accordance with current environmental regulations, and we have no current plans to remove the asbestos. If these properties were demolished, certain environmental regulations are in place which specify the manner in which the asbestos must be handled and disposed. Because the obligation to remove the asbestos has an indeterminable settlement date, we are not able to reasonably estimate the fair value of this obligation.

            We allocate the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component which may be derived from various observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions. Also, we may utilize third party valuation specialists. These components typically include buildings, land and intangibles related to in-place leases and we estimate:

77


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

            Amounts allocated to building are depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the acquired building or related improvements. We amortize amounts allocated to tenant improvements, in-place lease assets and other lease-related intangibles over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We also estimate the value of other acquired intangible assets, if any, which are amortized over the remaining life of the underlying related leases or intangibles.

            We reclassify any material operations and gains or losses on disposal related to consolidated properties sold during the period to discontinued operations. During 2007, we reported the net loss upon sale on five consolidated assets sold in "Loss on sale of discontinued operations" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The operating results of the assets disposed of in 2007 were not significant to our consolidated results of operations. There were no consolidated assets sold during 2008. During 2009, we reported the net loss of approximately $9.8 million upon the sale of four consolidated assets in "(Loss) gain on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The loss on these assets and the operating results were not significant to our consolidated results of operations.

            We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents generally consist of commercial paper, bankers acceptances, Eurodollars, repurchase agreements, and money markets. Our gift card programs are administered by banks. We collect gift card funds at the point of sale and then remit those funds to the banks for further processing. As a result, cash and cash equivalents, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, includes a balance of $38.1 million and $29.8 million, respectively, related to these gift card programs which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk include our cash and cash equivalents and our trade accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents with institutions with high credit quality. However, at certain times, such cash and cash equivalents may be in excess of FDIC and SIPC insurance limits. See Notes 4, 8, and 10 for disclosures about non-cash investing and financing transactions.

            Marketable securities consist primarily of the investments of our captive insurance subsidiaries, our investment in shares of stock of Liberty International PLC, or Liberty, our deferred compensation plan investments, and certain investments held to fund the debt service requirements of debt previously secured by investment properties that have been sold.

            The types of securities included in the investment portfolio of our captive insurance subsidiaries typically include U.S. Treasury or other U.S. government securities as well as corporate debt securities with maturities ranging from less than 1 to 10 years. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are valued based upon quoted market prices or other observable inputs when quoted market prices are not available. The amortized cost of debt securities, which approximates fair value, held by our captive insurance subsidiaries is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Our investment in Liberty is also accounted for as an available-for-sale security. Liberty operates regional shopping centers and is the owner of other retail assets throughout the United Kingdom, as well as certain real estate assets in the U.S. Our interest in Liberty is adjusted to

78


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


their quoted market price, including a related foreign exchange component. Changes in the values of these securities are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the gain or loss is realized or until any unrealized loss is deemed to be other-than-temporary. We review any declines in value of these securities for other-than-temporary impairment and consider the severity and duration of any decline in value. To the extent an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis is established. Subsequent changes are then recognized through other comprehensive income unless another other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred.

            During 2009, we recognized a non-cash charge of $140.5 million, or $0.44 per diluted unit, representing an other-than-temporary impairment in fair value below the carrying value of our investment in Liberty. At June 30 and December 31, 2009, we owned 35.4 million shares at a weighted average original cost per share of £5.74. As of June 30 and December 31, 2009, Liberty's quoted market price was £3.97 and £5.15 per share, respectively. As a result of the significance and duration of the decline in the total share price at June 30, 2009, including currency revaluations, we deemed the decline in value as other-than-temporary impairment establishing a new cost basis of our investment in Liberty. As a result, changes in available-for-sale securities and other in the 2009 consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income include the reclassification of $140.5 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings related to this non-cash charge. Prior to the quarter ending June 30, 2009, the changes in value of our Liberty investment were reflected in other comprehensive income. Effective July 1, 2009, we resumed marking to market our Liberty investment through other comprehensive income. The resulting mark-to-market adjustment at December 31, 2009 was an increase in the carrying value of Liberty of $58.2 million with a corresponding adjustment in other comprehensive income.

            Our insurance subsidiaries are required to maintain statutory minimum capital and surplus as well as maintain a minimum liquidity ratio. Therefore, our access to these securities may be limited. Our deferred compensation plan investments are classified as trading securities and are valued based upon quoted market prices. The investments have a matching liability recorded as the amounts are fully payable to the employees that earned the compensation. Changes in the values of these securities and changes to the matching liability to employees are both recognized in earnings and as a result the impact to consolidated net income is zero. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we have investments of $51.7 million and $53.4 million, respectively, which must be used to fund the debt service requirements of debt related to investment properties sold. These investments are classified as held-to-maturity and are recorded at amortized cost as we have the ability and intent to hold these investments to maturity.

            During 2008, we made an investment of $70 million in a non-marketable security that we account for under the cost method. To the extent an other-than-temporary decline in fair value is deemed to have occurred, we would adjust this investment to its estimated fair value.

            Net unrealized gains as of December 31, 2009 were approximately $59.4 million and represented the valuation and related currency adjustments for our marketable securities. As of December 31, 2009, other than the adjustment related to our investment in Liberty recorded during the second quarter, we do not consider any decline in value of any of our other marketable and non-marketable securities to be an other-than-temporary impairment, as these market value declines, if any, are not significant, have existed for a short period of time, and, in the case of debt securities, we have the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity.

            We hold marketable securities that total $464.1 million at December 31, 2009, and are considered to have Level 1 fair value inputs. In addition, we have derivative instruments which are classified as having Level 2 inputs which consist primarily of interest rate swap agreements with a gross liability balance of $13.0 million and a gross asset balance of $0.3 million and interest rate cap agreements with a minimal asset value. Level 1 fair value inputs are quoted prices for identical items in active, liquid and visible markets such as stock exchanges. Level 2 fair value inputs are observable information for similar items in active or inactive markets, and appropriately consider counterparty

79


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

creditworthiness in the valuations. Level 3 fair value inputs reflect our best estimate of inputs and assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation estimate. Certain wholly owned assets and equity method investments in real estate were determined to be impaired in 2009. We used Level 3 inputs in estimating the fair value of these assets to measure our impairment. Note 8 includes discussion of the fair value of debt.

            We prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

            Our primary business is the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate. We have aggregated our retail operations, including regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, and community/lifestyle centers, into one reportable segment because they have similar economic characteristics and we provide similar products and services to similar types of tenants. Further, all material operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant comprises more than 10% of consolidated revenues.

            Deferred costs and other assets include the following as of December 31:

 
  2009   2008  

Deferred financing and lease costs, net

  $ 265,906   $ 237,619  

In-place lease intangibles, net

    13,900     33,280  

Acquired above market lease intangibles, net

    19,424     32,812  

Marketable securities of our captive insurance companies

    75,703     105,860  

Goodwill

    20,098     20,098  

Other marketable securities

    388,427     210,867  

Prepaids, notes receivable and other assets, net

    372,129     387,797  
           

  $ 1,155,587   $ 1,028,333  
           

            Our deferred costs consist primarily of financing fees we incurred in order to obtain long-term financing and internal and external leasing commissions and related costs. We record amortization of deferred financing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective loans or agreements. Our deferred leasing costs consist primarily of capitalized salaries and related benefits in connection with lease originations. We record amortization of deferred

80


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

leasing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Details of these deferred costs as of December 31 are as follows:

 
  2009   2008  

Deferred financing and lease costs

  $ 417,975   $ 444,220  

Accumulated amortization

    (152,069 )   (206,601 )
           

Deferred financing and lease costs, net

  $ 265,906   $ 237,619  
           

            We report amortization of deferred financing costs, amortization of premiums, and accretion of discounts as part of interest expense. Amortization of deferred leasing costs is a component of depreciation and amortization expense. We amortize debt premiums and discounts, which are included in mortgages and other indebtedness, over the remaining terms of the related debt instruments. These debt premiums or discounts arise either at the debt issuance or as part of the purchase price allocation of the fair value of debt assumed in acquisitions. The accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive income include amortization as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

  $ 20,408   $ 17,044   $ 15,467  

Amortization of debt premiums, net of discounts

    (10,627 )   (14,701 )   (23,000 )

Amortization of deferred leasing costs

    32,744     31,674     26,033  

            The average life of in-place lease intangibles is approximately 5.5 years and is amortized over the remaining life of the leases of the related property on the straight-line basis and is included with depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The fair market value of above and below market leases is amortized into revenue over the remaining lease life as a component of reported minimum rents. The weighted average remaining life of these intangibles is approximately 1.2 years. The unamortized amount of below market leases is included in "Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues" in the consolidated balance sheets and was $60.9 million and $94.3 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount of amortization of above and below market leases, net for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $20.0 million, $35.4 million, and $44.6 million, respectively. If a lease is terminated prior to the original lease termination, any remaining unamortized intangible is charged to earnings.

            Details of intangible assets as of December 31 are as follows:

 
  2009   2008  

In-place lease intangibles

  $ 90,183   $ 160,125  

Accumulated amortization

    (76,283 )   (126,845 )
           

In-place lease intangibles, net

  $ 13,900   $ 33,280  
           

Acquired above market lease intangibles

  $ 104,690   $ 144,224  

Accumulated amortization

    (85,266 )   (111,412 )
           

Acquired above market lease intangibles, net

  $ 19,424   $ 32,812  
           

81


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

            Estimated future amortization, and the increasing (decreasing) effect on minimum rents for our above and below market leases as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

 
  Below Market
Leases
  Above Market
Leases
  Increase to
Minimum
Rent, Net
 

2010

  $ 22,117   $ (6,958 ) $ 15,159  

2011

    15,663     (4,909 )   10,754  

2012

    10,669     (3,703 )   6,966  

2013

    6,527     (2,592 )   3,935  

2014

    2,803     (1,119 )   1,684  

Thereafter

    3,124     (143 )   2,981  
               

  $ 60,903   $ (19,424 ) $ 41,479  
               

            On January 1, 2009, we adopted newly issued accounting guidance on disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities which amends and expands previous disclosure requirements. The guidance requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives and quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments. We record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. We use a variety of derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage or hedge the risks associated with our indebtedness and interest payments. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps. We require that hedging derivative instruments be highly effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. As a result, there was no significant ineffectiveness from any of our derivative activities during the period. We formally designate any instrument that meets these hedging criteria as a hedge at the inception of the derivative contract.

            As of December 31, 2009, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives related to interest rate risk:

Interest Rate Derivative
  Number of Instruments   Notional Amount  
Interest Rate Swaps     4   $ 694.2 million  
Interest Rate Caps     3   $ 388.4 million  

            The carrying value of our interest rate swap agreements, at fair value, is a net liability of $12.7 million as of December 31, 2009, of which $13.0 million is included with other liabilities and $0.3 million is included with deferred costs and other assets. The interest rate cap agreements were of no net value at December 31, 2009 and we generally do not apply hedge accounting to these arrangements. The total gross accumulated other comprehensive loss related to our derivative activities, including our share of the other comprehensive loss from joint venture properties, was approximately $52.3 million as of December 31, 2009.

            We are also exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on investments denominated in a foreign currency that we hold, primarily in Japan and Europe. We use currency forward agreements to manage our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates on certain Yen-denominated receivables. Currency forward agreements involve fixing the USD-Yen exchange rate for delivery of a specified amount of foreign currency on a specified date. The currency forward agreements are typically cash settled in US dollars for their fair value at or close to their settlement date. We entered into USD-Yen forwards during 2009 for approximately ¥3 billion that we expect to receive through April 2011

82


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


at an average exchange rate of 97.1 USD:Yen, of which approximately ¥1.6 billion remains as of December 31, 2009. The December 31, 2009 liability balance related to these forwards was $0.7 million and is included in other liabilities. We have reflected the changes in fair value for these forward contracts in earnings. The underlying currency adjustments on the foreign-denominated receivables are also reflected in income and generally offset the amounts in earnings for these forward contracts.

            We have no credit-risk-related hedging or derivative activities.

            Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard for noncontrolling interests, which requires a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary to be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest to be included within consolidated net income. This standard also requires consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent's ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. In connection with our adoption, which was fully reflected in our December 31, 2008 Form 10-K/A, we also reviewed and retrospectively adopted the measurement and classification provisions for redeemable securities as further discussed below. As a result, we adjust the carrying amounts of noncontrolling redeemable interests held by third parties in certain of our properties to redemption values at each reporting date. Because holders of the noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties can require us to redeem these interests for cash, we classify these noncontrolling redeemable interests outside of permanent equity. Adjustments to the carrying amounts of these noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties, to reflect the change in redemption value at the end of each reporting period, are recorded to partners' equity.

            We classify our 6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units, or Series I preferred units, our Series D 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, or Series D preferred units, and our 7.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, or 7.5% preferred units, in temporary equity due to the possibility that we could be required to redeem the securities for cash. For the Series I preferred units, the holders have the ability to redeem this series of preferred units for cash upon the occurrence of a change in control event, which would include a change in the majority of the directors on Simon Property Group's Board of Directors, or the Board, that occurs over a two year period. Such a change in Board composition could be deemed outside of our control. For the Series D preferred units and 7.5% preferred units, the redemption of these series of preferred units requires the delivery of fully registered shares of Simon Property common stock. The previous and current carrying amount of all of these series of preferred units is equal to their liquidation value, which is the amount payable upon the occurrence of any event that could potentially result in cash settlement.

            Our evaluation of the appropriateness of classifying the units held by Simon Property and limited partners within permanent equity considered several significant factors in determining the appropriate classification of those units in the consolidated balance sheets. First, as a limited partnership, all routine decisions relating to our operations and distributions are made by Simon Property, acting as our sole General Partner. The decisions of the General Partner are made by the Board and Simon Property's management. We have no other governance structure. Secondly, the sole asset of Simon Property is its interest in us. As a result, a share of Simon Property common stock (if owned by us) is best characterized as being similar to a treasury share and thus not an asset of the Operating Partnership.

            Limited partners have the right under our partnership agreement to exchange their units for shares of Simon Property common stock or cash as selected by the General Partner. Accordingly, we classify limited partner units in permanent equity because we have the unrestricted ability to issue shares of Simon Property common stock to limited partners exercising their exchange rights rather than using cash or other assets. Under our partnership agreement, we are required to redeem units held by Simon Property only when Simon Property has redeemed shares of its common stock. We classify units held by Simon Property in permanent equity because the decision to redeem those units would be made through our governance structure, with Simon Property making the decision on our behalf.

83


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

            The components of the carrying value, which is at liquidation value, of the preferred units and the carrying amount of the noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties classified in temporary equity are further discussed in Note 10.

            Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (which includes nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties) is now a component of consolidated net income. In addition, the individual components of other comprehensive income are presented in the aggregate for both controlling and noncontrolling interests, with the portion attributable to noncontrolling interests deducted from comprehensive income attributable to unitholders.

            A rollforward of noncontrolling interests for the years ending December 31 is as follows:

 
  2009   2008   2007  

Noncontrolling nonredeemable interests, beginning of period

  $ (150,810 ) $ (141,251 ) $ (64,457 )

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    5,496     11,091     12,903  

Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders

    (25,176 )   (25,753 )   (82,010 )

Other

    2,712     5,103     (7,687 )
               

Total noncontrolling nonredeemable interests in properties, end of period

  $ (167,778 ) $ (150,810 ) $ (141,251 )
               

            The components of our accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following as of December 31:

 
  2009   2008  

Cumulative translation adjustments

  $ (10,768 ) $ (2,524 )

Accumulated derivative losses, net

    (52,345 )   (39,100 )

Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net

    59,358     (165,336 )
           

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

  $ (3,755 ) $ (206,960 )
           

            Included in cumulative translation adjustment is the loss related to the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on foreign currency denominated debt of $1.7 million and $46.9 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, that hedges the currency exposure related to certain of our foreign investments. The net unrealized gains as of December 31, 2009 of $59.4 million represents the valuation and related currency adjustments for our marketable securities, primarily related to our investment in Liberty. In the second quarter of 2009 we reclassified $140.5 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings related to our investment in Liberty as a result of our assessment that the decline in value was deemed an other-than-temporary impairment.

            We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We accrue minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the terms of their respective leases. Substantially all of our retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. We recognize overage rents only when each tenant's sales exceed the applicable sales threshold.

            We structure our leases to allow us to recover a significant portion of our property operating, real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotion expenses from our tenants. A substantial portion of our leases, other than those for anchor stores, require the tenant to reimburse us for a substantial portion of our operating

84


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


expenses, including common area maintenance, or CAM, real estate taxes and insurance. This significantly reduces our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. Such property operating expenses typically include utility, insurance, security, janitorial, landscaping, food court and other administrative expenses. We accrue reimbursements from tenants for recoverable portions of all these expenses as revenue in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. For approximately 80% of our leases in the U.S. regional mall portfolio, we receive a fixed payment from the tenant for the CAM component. Without the fixed-CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses and CAM capital expenditures for the property. We also receive escrow payments for these reimbursements from substantially all our non-fixed CAM tenants and monthly fixed CAM payments throughout the year. We recognize differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year. These differences were not material in any period presented. Our advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred.

            Management fees and other revenues are generally received from our unconsolidated joint venture properties as well as third parties. Management fee revenue is earned based on a contractual percentage of joint venture property revenue. Development fee revenue is earned on a contractual percentage of hard costs to develop a property. Leasing fee revenue is earned on a contractual per square foot charge based on the square footage of current year leasing activity. We recognize revenue for these services provided when earned based on the underlying activity.

            Insurance premiums written and ceded are recognized on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies. Insurance losses are reflected in property operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive income and include estimates for losses incurred but not reported as well as losses pending settlement. Estimates for losses are based on evaluations by third-party actuaries and management's best estimates. Total insurance reserves for our insurance subsidiaries and other self-insurance programs as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximated $117.2 million and $116.5 million, respectively, and are included in "Other liabilities and accrued distributions" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

            We recognize fee revenues from our co-branded gift card programs when the fees are earned under the related arrangements with the card issuer. Generally, these revenues are recorded at the issuance of the gift card for handling fees.

            We record a provision for credit losses based on our judgment of a tenant's creditworthiness, ability to pay and probability of collection. In addition, we also consider the retail sector in which the tenant operates and our historical collection experience in cases of bankruptcy, if applicable. Accounts are written off when they are deemed to be no longer collectible. Presented below is the activity in the allowance for credit losses and includes the activities related to discontinued operations during the following years:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Balance, beginning of period

  $ 44,650   $ 33,810   $ 32,817  

Consolidation of previously unconsolidated entities

            495  

Provision for credit losses

    22,655     24,037     9,672  

Accounts written off, net of recoveries

    (22,118 )   (13,197 )   (9,174 )
               

Balance, end of period

  $ 45,187   $ 44,650   $ 33,810  
               

85


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

            As a partnership, the allocated share of our income or loss for each year is included in the income tax returns of the partners; accordingly, no accounting for income taxes is required in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. State income, franchise or other taxes were not significant in any of the periods presented.

            Simon Property and two of our subsidiaries are taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations relating to REIT qualification. In order to maintain this REIT status, the regulations require each REIT to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to stockholders and meet certain other asset and income tests as well as other requirements. We intend to continue to make distributions to Simon Property to assist Simon Property in meeting the asset and income tests and other REIT requirements in order to allow it to adhere to these requirements and maintain its REIT status. Our subsidiary REIT entities will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as they continue to distribute in excess of 100% of their taxable income. Thus, we made no provision for federal income taxes for these entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. If Simon Property or either of our REIT subsidiaries fail to qualify as a REIT, Simon Property or that entity will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates for the years in which it failed to qualify. If Simon Property or either of our REIT subsidiaries lost its REIT status, it could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years unless its failure to qualify was due to reasonable cause and certain other conditions were satisfied.

            Simon Property has also elected taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, status for some of our subsidiaries. This enables us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs and participate in activities that do not qualify as "rents from real property". For these entities, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if we believe all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from the change in circumstances that causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset is included in income.

            As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had a net deferred tax asset of $8.7 million and $8.9 million, respectively, related to our TRS subsidiaries. The net deferred tax asset is included in deferred costs and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consists primarily of operating losses and other carryforwards for federal income tax purposes as well as the timing of the deductibility of losses or reserves from insurance subsidiaries. No valuation allowance has been recorded as we believe these amounts will be realized. State income, franchise or other taxes were not significant in any of the periods presented.

4.    Real Estate Acquisitions, Disposals, and Impairment

            We acquire properties to generate both current income and long-term appreciation in value. We acquire individual properties or portfolios of other retail real estate companies that meet our investment criteria and sell properties which no longer meet our strategic criteria. Our consolidated acquisition and disposal activity for the periods presented are highlighted as follows:

            We had no consolidated property acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2009.

            Effective January 1, 2008, we acquired additional interests in three existing consolidated properties of between 1.8% and 5%, for an aggregate $6.2 million in cash. Two of the properties continue to have a noncontrolling interest holder. We now own 100% of the third property.

86


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

4.    Real Estate Acquisitions, Disposals, and Impairment (Continued)

            As a result of the Mills acquisition which is more fully discussed in Note 7, we consolidated two regional mall properties, Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place. In addition to the Mills acquisition, on March 1, 2007, we acquired the remaining 40% interest in both University Park Mall and University Center located in Mishawaka, Indiana from our partner and as a result, we now own 100% of these properties. On March 28, 2007, we acquired The Maine Outlet, a 112,000 square foot outlet center located in Kittery, Maine, adjacent to our Kittery Premium Outlets property. On August 23, 2007, we acquired Las Americas Premium Outlets, a 560,000 square foot upscale outlet center located in San Diego, California. We also purchased an additional 1% interest in Bangor Mall on July 13, 2007, and an additional 6.5% interest in Montgomery Mall on November 1, 2007. The aggregate purchase price of the consolidated assets acquired during 2007, excluding Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place, was approximately $394.2 million, including the assumption of our share of debt of the properties acquired.

            During the year ended December 31, 2009, we sold four consolidated properties for which we received net proceeds of $3.9 million. The loss on disposal (net) totaled $9.8 million and is included in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            We had no consolidated property dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2008.

            During the year ended December 31, 2007, we sold five consolidated properties for which we received net proceeds of $56.4 million. The loss on disposal (net) totaled $35.2 million and is included in "Loss on sale of discontinued operations" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            In 2009, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $240.1 million ($228.6 million, net of a tax benefit of $5.8 million and noncontrolling interest holders' share of $5.7 million). As discussed in Note 3, this non-cash charge includes a $140.5 million other-than-temporary impairment of our investment in Liberty. In addition, the total charge includes adjustments recorded in the fourth quarter in the carrying value of one wholly-owned and one joint venture regional mall, a write-down of five land parcels and two joint venture non-retail real estate assets, and certain predevelopment costs related to projects no longer being pursued.

            In 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $21.2 million ($19.4 million, net of tax benefit), which resulted primarily from a $10.5 million reduction in the carrying value of a regional mall to its estimated net realizable value and the write-off of predevelopment costs related to various projects that we no longer plan to pursue.

5.    Per Unit Data

            We determine basic earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of units outstanding during the period. We determine diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common

87


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

5.    Per Unit Data (Continued)


units were converted into units at the earliest date possible. The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per unit.

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Income attributable to unitholders from continuing operations, after preferred unit requirements

  $ 343,572   $ 529,751   $ 585,047  

Discontinued operations

        (25 )   (35,369 )
               

Net Income available to Unitholders — Basic & Diluted

  $ 343,572   $ 529,726   $ 549,678  
               

Weighted Average Units Outstanding — Basic

    324,102,292     282,508,087     281,034,711  

Effect of stock options of Simon Property

    315,897     551,057     778,471  

Effect of contingently issuable units from unit distributions

    1,345,537          

Weighted Average Units Outstanding — Diluted

    325,763,726     283,059,144     281,813,182  
               

            For the year ending December 31, 2009, potentially dilutive securities include options to purchase shares of Simon Property common stock, contingently issuable units from unit distributions and preferred units that are convertible into or exchangeable for units. The only securities that had a dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2009 were stock options of Simon Property and contingently issuable units from unit distributions. The only security that had a dilutive effect for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were stock options of Simon Property.

            We accrue distributions when they are declared. The taxable nature of the distributions declared for each of the years ended as indicated is summarized as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Total distributions paid per common unit

  $ 2.70   $ 3.60   $ 3.36  
               

Percent taxable as ordinary income

    99.3 %   84.7 %   92.9 %

Percent taxable as long-term capital gains

    0.7 %   1.2 %   7.1 %

Percent nontaxable as return of capital

        14.1 %    
               

    100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
               

88


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

6.    Investment Properties

            Investment properties consist of the following as of December 31:

 
  2009   2008  

Land

  $ 2,757,994   $ 2,795,026  

Buildings and improvements

    22,265,721     22,112,944  
           

Total land, buildings and improvements

    25,023,715     24,907,970  

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

    312,474     297,745  
           

Investment properties at cost

    25,336,189     25,205,715  

Less — accumulated depreciation

    7,004,534     6,184,285  
           

Investment properties at cost, net

  $ 18,331,655   $ 19,021,430  
           

Construction in progress included above

  $ 281,683   $ 358,254  
           

7.    Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

            Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties, and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio. We held joint venture ownership interests in 103 properties in the U.S. as of December 31, 2009. We also held interests in two joint ventures which owned 51 European shopping centers as of December 31, 2009 and 52 as of December 31, 2008. We also held interests in eight joint venture properties under operation in Japan, one joint venture property in Mexico, and one joint venture property in Korea. We account for these joint venture properties using the equity method of accounting.

            Substantially all of our joint venture properties are subject to rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, or other sale or marketing rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the joint venture interest from our partner.

            On February 16, 2007, SPG-FCM, a 50/50 joint venture between one of our affiliates and funds managed by Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., or Farallon, entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Mills for $25.25 per common share in cash. The acquisition of Mills and its interests in the 36 properties that remain at December 31, 2009 was completed in April 2007. As of December 31, 2009, we and Farallon had each funded $650.0 million into SPG-FCM to acquire all of the common stock of Mills. As part of the transaction, we also made loans to SPG-FCM and Mills at rates of LIBOR plus 270-275 basis points. These funds were used by SPG-FCM and Mills to repay loans and other obligations of Mills, including the redemption of preferred stock, during 2007. As of December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance of our loan to SPG-FCM was $632.0 million, and the average outstanding balance during the year ended December 31, 2009 of all loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills was approximately $589.5 million. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded approximately $9.3 million, $15.3 million and $39.1 million in interest income (net of inter-entity eliminations) related to these loans, respectively. We also recorded fee income, including fee income amortization related to up-front fees on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills, during 2009, 2008 and 2007 of approximately $3.7 million, $3.1 million and $17.4 million (net of inter-entity eliminations), respectively, for providing refinancing services to Mills' properties and SPG-FCM. The existing loan facility to SPG-FCM bears a rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points and matures on June 7, 2010, with two available one-year extensions. Fees charged on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the loan.

89


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7.    Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

            As a result of the change in control of Mills, holders of Mills' Series F convertible cumulative redeemable preferred stock had the right to require the repurchase of their shares for cash equal to the liquidation preference per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. During the second quarter of 2007, all of the holders of Mills' Series F preferred stock exercised this right, and Mills redeemed this series of preferred stock for approximately $333.2 million, including accrued dividends. Further, as of August 1, 2007, The Mills Corporation was liquidated and the holders of the remaining series' of Mills preferred stock were paid a liquidation preference of approximately $693.0 million, including accrued dividends.

            During the third quarter of 2007, the holders of less than 5,000 common units in the Mills' operating partnership, or Mills units, received $25.25 in cash, and those holding 5,000 or more Mills units had the option to exchange for cash of $25.25, or our units, based on a fixed exchange ratio of 0.211 of a unit for each Mills unit. That option expired on August 1, 2007. Holders electing to exchange received 66,036 of our units for their Mills units. The remaining Mills units were exchanged for cash.

            Effective July 1, 2007, we or an affiliate of ours began serving as the manager for substantially all of the properties in which SPG-FCM holds an interest. In conjunction with the Mills acquisition, we acquired a majority interest in two properties in which we previously held a 50% ownership interest (Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place) and as a result we have consolidated these two properties at the date of acquisition. We have reclassified the results of these properties in the Joint Venture Statements of Operations into "Income from consolidated joint venture interests."

            The Mills acquisition involved the purchase of all of Mills' outstanding shares of common stock and common units for approximately $1.7 billion (at $25.25 per share or unit), the assumption of $954.9 million of preferred stock, the assumption of a proportionate share of property-level mortgage debt, of which SPG-FCM's share approximated $3.8 billion, the assumption of $1.2 billion in unsecured loans provided by us, costs to effect the acquisition, and certain liabilities and contingencies, including an ongoing investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8 billion. The valuations were developed with the assistance of a third-party professional appraisal firm.

            We subsequently sold our interest in Cincinnati Mills and Broward and Westland Malls, which we acquired through the Mills acquisition, and recognized no gain or loss on these dispositions.

90


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7.    Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

            A summary of our investments in joint ventures and share of income from such joint ventures follows. We condensed into separate line items major captions of the statements of operations for joint venture interests sold or consolidated. Consolidation occurs when we acquire an additional interest in the joint venture and as a result, gain control of the property or become the primary beneficiary of a VIE. We reclassified these line items into "Income from discontinued joint venture interests" and "Income from consolidated joint venture interests" so that we may present comparative results of operations for those joint venture interests held as of December 31, 2009. Balance sheet information for the joint ventures is as follows:

 
  December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2008
 

BALANCE SHEETS

             

Assets:

             

Investment properties, at cost

  $ 21,555,729   $ 21,472,490  

Less — accumulated depreciation

    4,580,679     3,892,956  
           

    16,975,050     17,579,534  

Cash and cash equivalents

    771,045     805,411  

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

    364,968     428,322  

Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity

    235,173     230,497  

Deferred costs and other assets

    477,223     594,578  
           
 

Total assets

  $ 18,823,459   $ 19,638,342  
           

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:

             

Mortgages and other indebtedness

  $ 16,549,276   $ 16,686,701  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue

    834,668     1,070,958  

Other liabilities

    920,596     982,254  
           
 

Total liabilities

    18,304,540     18,739,913  

Preferred units

    67,450     67,450  

Partners' equity

    451,469     830,979  
           
 

Total liabilities and partners' equity

  $ 18,823,459   $ 19,638,342  
           

Our Share of:

             

Partners' equity

  $ 316,800   $ 533,929  

Add: Excess Investment

    694,023     749,227  
           

Our net Investment in Joint Ventures

  $ 1,010,823   $ 1,283,156  
           

            "Excess Investment" represents the unamortized difference of our investment over our share of the equity in the underlying net assets of the joint ventures acquired. We amortize excess investment over the life of the related properties, typically no greater than 40 years, and the amortization is included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

91


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7.    Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

            As of December 31, 2009, scheduled principal repayments on joint venture properties' mortgages and other indebtedness are as follows:

2010

  $ 2,096,802  

2011

    1,771,246  

2012

    2,719,029  

2013

    1,849,252  

2014

    2,328,857  

Thereafter

    5,767,811  
       

Total principal maturities

    16,532,997  

Net unamortized debt premiums and discounts

    16,279  
       

Total mortgages and other indebtedness

  $ 16,549,276  
       

92


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7.    Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

            This debt becomes due in installments over various terms extending through 2036 with interest rates ranging from 0.52% to 9.35% and a weighted average rate of 5.06% at December 31, 2009.

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                   

Revenue:

                   

Minimum rent

  $ 1,965,565   $ 1,956,129   $ 1,682,671  

Overage rent

    132,260     130,549     119,134  

Tenant reimbursements

    987,028     1,005,638     852,312  

Other income

    174,611     199,774     201,075  
               
 

Total revenue

    3,259,464     3,292,090     2,855,192  

Operating Expenses:

                   

Property operating

    656,399     671,268     580,910  

Depreciation and amortization

    801,618     775,887     627,929  

Real estate taxes

    261,294     263,054     220,474  

Repairs and maintenance

    110,606     124,272     113,517  

Advertising and promotion

    65,124     70,425     62,182  

Provision for credit losses

    16,123     24,053     22,448  

Impairment charge

    18,249          

Other

    182,201     177,298     162,570  
               
 

Total operating expenses

    2,111,614     2,106,257     1,790,030  
               

Operating Income

    1,147,850     1,185,833     1,065,162  

Interest expense

    (884,539 )   (969,420 )   (853,307 )

(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities

    (4,739 )   (5,123 )   665  

Loss on sale of asset

            (6,399 )
               

Income from Continuing Operations

    258,572     211,290     206,121  

Income from consolidated joint venture interests

            2,562  

Income from discontinued joint venture interests

        47     202  

Gain on disposal or sale of discontinued operations, net

            198,956  
               

Net Income

  $ 258,572   $ 211,337   $ 407,841  
               

Third-Party Investors' Share of Net Income

  $ 170,265   $ 132,111   $ 232,586  
               

Our Share of Net Income

    88,307     79,226     175,255  

Amortization of Excess Investment

    (55,690 )   (46,980 )   (46,503 )

Our Share of Net Gain Related to Properties/Assets Sold

            (90,632 )

Our Share of Impairment Charge from Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

    7,603          
               

Income from Unconsolidated Entities, Net

  $ 40,220   $ 32,246   $ 38,120  
               

            In December 2009 we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $7.6 million representing our share of impairment charges on joint venture properties. This charge represents adjustments to the carrying value of certain parcels of land and the write-off of predevelopment costs related to certain projects no longer being pursued. In addition, in December 2009 we recognized $35.1 million of impairment charges for investments in certain

93


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7.    Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

unconsolidated entities including one regional mall and two non-retail real estate assets for which declines in value below our carrying amount were deemed other-than-temporary.

            During the fourth quarter of 2007, we recorded an impairment charge of $55.1 million, $36.5 million net of tax benefit, representing our entire equity investment in a joint venture, including interest capitalized on our invested equity, which had invested in a parcel of land.

International Joint Venture Investments

            European Joint Ventures.    We conduct our international operations in Europe through our two European joint venture investment entities; Simon Ivanhoe S.à.r.l., or Simon Ivanhoe, and Gallerie Commerciali Italia, or GCI. The carrying amount of our total combined investment in these two joint venture investments is $298.8 million and $224.2 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, including all related components of other comprehensive income. We have a 50% ownership in Simon Ivanhoe and a 49% ownership in GCI as of December 31, 2009. On December 14, 2009, we made an additional capital contribution to GCI of $79.4 million which was used to fund certain liabilities of the joint venture. The contribution increased our investment in GCI but did not impact our ownership percentage of the venture.

            On July 5, 2007, Simon Ivanhoe completed the sale of five non-core assets in Poland and we presented our share of the gain upon this disposition in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

            Asian Joint Ventures.    We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in Japan through joint ventures with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. The carrying amount of our investment in these Premium Outlet joint ventures in Japan is $302.2 million and $312.6 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, including all related components of other comprehensive income. We have a 40% ownership in these Japan Premium Outlet Centers through a joint venture arrangement. During 2007, we completed construction and opened our first Premium Outlet in Korea. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively, our investment in our Premium Outlet in Korea, for which we hold a 50% ownership interest, approximated $26.1 million and $18.0 million including all related components of other comprehensive income.

            In December 2009, we recognized a loss on our 32.5% interests in our shopping centers operating or under development in China. The interests were sold to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million which is included in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the 2009 consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

94


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

8.    Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments

            Our mortgages and other indebtedness, excluding the impact of derivative instruments, consist of the following as of December 31:

 
  2009   2008  

Fixed-Rate Debt:

             

Mortgages and other notes, including $9,757 and $15,312 net premiums, respectively. Weighted average interest and maturity of 6.18% and 4.0 years at December 31, 2009.

  $ 5,239,263   $ 4,192,430  

Unsecured notes, including $23 net discount and $1,887 net premium, respectively. Weighted average interest and maturity of 6.06% and 4.4 years at December 31, 2009.

    11,574,977     10,726,887  
           

Total Fixed-Rate Debt

    16,814,240     14,919,317  

Variable-Rate Debt:

             

Mortgages and other notes, at face value. Weighted average interest and maturity of 1.36% and 2.2 years.

    1,370,000     2,076,927  

Credit Facility (see below)

    446,062     1,046,288  
           

Total Variable-Rate Debt

    1,816,062     3,123,215  
           

Total Mortgages and Other Indebtedness

  $ 18,630,302   $ 18,042,532  
           

            General.    At December 31, 2009, we have pledged 80 properties as collateral to secure related mortgage notes including 8 pools of cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized mortgages encumbering a total of 34 properties. Under these cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage included in the cross-defaulted package may constitute a default under all such mortgages and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the collateral package. Of our 80 encumbered properties, indebtedness on 24 of these encumbered properties and our unsecured debt are subject to various financial performance covenants relating to leverage ratios, annual real property appraisal requirements, debt service coverage ratios, minimum net worth ratios, debt-to-market capitalization, and/or minimum equity values. Our mortgages and other indebtedness may be prepaid but are generally subject to payment of a yield-maintenance premium or defeasance.

            Some of our limited partners guarantee a portion of our consolidated debt through foreclosure guarantees. In total, 54 limited partners provide guarantees of foreclosure of $291.1 million of our consolidated debt at three consolidated properties. In each case, the loans were made by unrelated third party institutional lenders and the guarantees are for the benefit of each lender. In the event of foreclosure of the mortgaged property, the proceeds from the sale of the property are first applied against the amount of the guarantee and also reduce the amount payable under the guarantee. To the extent the sale proceeds from the disposal of the property do not cover the amount of the guarantee, then the limited partner is liable to pay the difference between the sale proceeds and the amount of the guarantee so that the entire amount guaranteed to the lender is satisfied. The debt is non-recourse to us and our affiliates.

Unsecured Debt

            Our unsecured debt consists of approximately $11.6 billion of senior unsecured notes and $446.1 million outstanding under our $3.5 billion unsecured credit facility, or the Credit Facility, at December 31, 2009. The total outstanding balance of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009 was comprised of the U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings. The balance as of December 31, 2009 reflects interest at LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points and an additional facility fee of 12.5 basis points as these borrowings were made under the Credit Facility. On December 8, 2009, we entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility to replace the Credit Facility

95


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

8.    Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)


providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. The base interest on the new credit facility is LIBOR plus 210 basis points and includes a facility fee of 40 basis points. Borrowings on the new credit facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010 when the Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings on the Credit Facility were transitioned to the new credit facility. As of December 31, 2009, we are in compliance with all of the covenants of our unsecured debt.

            During the year ended December 31, 2009, we drew amounts from the Credit Facility to fund the redemption of $600.0 million of maturing senior unsecured notes. We repaid a total of $1.2 billion on the Credit Facility during the year ended December 31, 2009. The maximum outstanding balance during the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $1.6 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the weighted average outstanding balance on the Credit Facility was approximately $669.8 million.

            On March 25, 2009, we issued $650.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 10.35%. We used proceeds from the offering to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.

            On May 15, 2009, we issued $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 6.75%. We used the proceeds from the offering for general business purposes. The offering of these notes was re-opened on August 11, 2009, and an additional $500.0 million of senior unsecured notes were issued. We used the proceeds from the offering for general business purposes.

Secured Debt

            The balance of fixed and variable rate mortgage notes was $6.6 billion and $6.3 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of the 2009 amount, $5.6 billion is nonrecourse to us. The fixed-rate mortgages generally require monthly payments of principal and/or interest. The interest rates of variable-rate mortgages are typically based on LIBOR.

            On July 30, 2009, we borrowed $400.0 million on a mortgage that is secured by Greenwood Park Mall, Southpark Mall, and Walt Whitman Mall, which matures on August 1, 2016 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.00%. This loan is cross-collateralized and contains cross default provisions as it pertains to these properties.

Debt Maturity and Other

            Our scheduled principal repayments on indebtedness as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

2010

  $ 2,311,705  

2011

    2,015,128  

2012

    2,950,700  

2013

    2,493,227  

2014

    2,675,490  

Thereafter

    6,174,318  
       

Total principal maturities

    18,620,568  

Net unamortized debt premium and other

    9,734  
       

Total mortgages and other indebtedness

  $ 18,630,302  
       

96


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

8.    Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

            Our cash paid for interest in each period, net of any amounts capitalized, was as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Cash paid for interest

  $ 994,688   $ 1,001,718   $ 983,219  

Derivative Financial Instruments

            Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates primarily relates to our long-term debt obligations. We manage exposure to interest rate market risk through our risk management strategy by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of variable rate debt. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on financings of certain foreign operations. Our intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposures. We do not enter into either interest rate protection or foreign currency rate protection agreements for speculative purposes.

            We may enter into treasury lock agreements as part of an anticipated debt issuance. If the anticipated transaction does not occur, the cost is charged to consolidated net income. Upon completion of the debt issuance, the cost of these instruments is recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt agreement.

            As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of our outstanding consolidated derivatives is a net liability of $12.7 million, of which $13.0 million is included with other liabilities and $0.3 million is included with deferred costs and other assets. In addition, we recorded the benefits from our treasury lock and interest rate hedge agreements in accumulated other comprehensive loss and the unamortized balance of these agreements is $2.8 million as of December 31, 2009. The net deficit from terminated swap agreements is also recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and the unamortized balance is $2.0 million as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, our outstanding LIBOR based derivative contracts consisted of:

            Within the next year, we expect to reclassify to earnings approximately $14.0 million of losses from the current balance held in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The amount of ineffectiveness relating to cash flow hedges recognized in income during the periods presented was not material.

            Our joint ventures may also enter into interest rate swaps or caps, which are recorded at fair value on the joint venture balance sheets. Included in our accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 is our share of the joint ventures' accumulated derivative losses of $30.1 million and $19.6 million, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

            The carrying value of our variable-rate mortgages and other loans approximates their fair values. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate mortgages using cash flows discounted at current borrowing rates and other indebtedness using cash flows discounted at current market rates. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate unsecured notes using quoted market prices, or, if no quoted market prices are available, we use quoted market prices for securities with similar terms and maturities. The fair values of financial instruments and our related

97


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

8.    Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)


discount rate assumptions used in the estimation of fair value for our consolidated fixed-rate mortgages and other indebtedness as of December 31 is summarized as follows:

 
  2009   2008  

Fair value of fixed-rate mortgages and other indebtedness

  $ 16,580   $ 12,385  

Weighted average discount rates assumed in calculation of fair value for fixed-rate mortgages

    6.11 %   6.33 %

9.    Rentals under Operating Leases

            Future minimum rentals to be received under noncancelable tenant operating leases for each of the next five years and thereafter, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses and percentage rent based on tenant sales volume as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

2010

  $ 1,903,085  

2011

    1,742,176  

2012

    1,553,825  

2013

    1,352,275  

2014

    1,169,506  

Thereafter

    3,276,193  
       

  $ 10,997,060  
       

            Approximately 0.7% of future minimum rents to be received are attributable to leases with an affiliate of one of our limited partners.

10.    Partners' Equity

Temporary Equity

            As discussed in Note 3, as a result of the retrospective adoption of an accounting standard for noncontrolling interests, we classify as temporary equity those securities for which there is the possibility that we could be required to redeem the security for cash, irrespective of the probability of such a possibility. As a result, we reclassified three series of preferred units from permanent equity to temporary equity, and we maintained in permanent equity two series of preferred units. We also reclassified into temporary equity one series of preferred units that was previously reported as mezzanine equity. The noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties included in temporary equity are further

98


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10.    Partners' Equity (Continued)


discussed in Note 3. The carrying values for those securities classified in temporary equity are discussed below and summarized as follows as of December 31:

 
  2009   2008  

6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units, 19,000,000 units authorized, 9,108,635 issued and outstanding

  $ 455,432   $ 455,432  

Series D 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 2,700,000 units authorized, 0 and 1,356,814 issued and outstanding, respectively

        40,704  

7.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 260,000 units authorized, 255,373 issued and outstanding

    25,537     25,537  

7.75%/8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 0 and 850,698 units issued and outstanding, respectively

        85,070  
           

Total carrying value of preferred units

    480,969     606,743  

Noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties

    49,404     49,378  
           

Total preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties

  $ 530,373   $ 656,121  
           

            Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units.    On October 14, 2004, we issued 18,015,506 Series I 6% convertible perpetual preferred units as part of our acquisition of the Chelsea Property Group, or Chelsea. Distributions are made quarterly, at an annual rate of 6% per unit. On or after October 14, 2009, we have the option to redeem the Series I preferred units, in whole or in part, for cash only at a liquidation preference of $50.00 per unit plus accumulated and unpaid distributions. However, if the redemption date falls between the record date and the distribution payment date, the redemption price will be equal to only the liquidation preference only. The redemption may occur only if, for 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before notice of redemption is issued, the closing price per share of common stock exceeds 130% of the applicable conversion price. The Series I preferred units are convertible into a number of fully paid and non-assessable units upon the occurrence of a conversion triggering event. A conversion triggering event includes the following: (a) if we call the Series I preferred units for redemption; or, (b) if Simon Property is a party to a consolidation, merger, binding share exchange, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets; or, (c) if during any fiscal quarter after the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004, the closing sale price of Simon Property's common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter exceeds 125% of the applicable conversion price. If the closing price condition is not met at the end of any fiscal quarter, then conversions are not permitted in the following fiscal quarter. This series of preferred stock can also be put to us for cash upon the occurrence of a change of control event, which would include a change in the majority of our directors that occurs over a two year period. As a result, this series of preferred stock is classified outside permanent equity because such a change in Board composition could be deemed outside our control. The carrying amount of the Series I preferred units of $455,432, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, is equal to its liquidation value, which is the amount payable upon the occurrence of such event.

            If a holder of Series I preferred units converts its Series I preferred units into units, then the holder may also elect to exchange those units into cash or shares of common stock of Simon Property as determined by Simon Property in its sole discretion, subject to an agreement between Simon Property and us as described in the Exchange Rights section below. The holder of Series I preferred units also has the option to exchange the Series I preferred units for an equal number of shares of Series I preferred stock of Simon Property; however, Simon Property may elect to pay cash in lieu of the conversion. In 2009, holders of Series I preferred units exchanged 500,891 Series I preferred units for an equal number of shares of Series I preferred stock of Simon Property. In prior years, 1,115,442 Series I preferred units were exchanged for an equal number of shares of Series I preferred stock of Simon Property. During 2008, we also issued 1,187,238 units as a result of the conversion of 1,493,904 Series I preferred units.

99


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10.    Partners' Equity (Continued)

            As of December 31, 2009, the conversion trigger price of $74.18 had been met and each unit of Series I Preferred Units is convertible into 0.847495 of a unit through March 31, 2010.

            Series D 8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units.    This series of preferred units was redeemed on August 27, 2009, at liquidation value ($30.00 per unit), and $0.3867 in accrued and unpaid distributions and was paid in the form of 614,055 units.

            7.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units    We issued this series of preferred units in connection with the purchase of an additional interest in a joint venture. The preferred units accrue cumulative quarterly distributions at a rate of $7.50 annually. We may redeem the preferred units on or after November 10, 2013, unless there is the occurrence of certain tax triggering events such as death of the initial holder, or the transfer of any units to any person or entity other than the persons or entities entitled to the benefits of the original holder. The redemption price is the liquidation value ($100.00 per preferred unit) plus accrued and unpaid distributions, payable either in cash or fully registered shares of common stock of Simon Property. In the event of the death of a holder of the preferred units, the occurrence of certain tax triggering events applicable to the holder, or on or after November 10, 2006, the holder may require us to redeem the preferred units at the same redemption price payable at our option in either cash or fully registered shares of common stock of Simon Property.

            7.75%/8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units.    This series of preferred units was redeemable on or after January 1, 2011, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain tax triggering events, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation value ($100.00 per unit), accrued and unpaid distributions. On June 30, 2009, upon the occurrence of a tax triggering event, we redeemed all outstanding units for cash.

Permanent Equity

            Preferred units.    The following table summarizes the carrying values of each series of preferred units that were outstanding as of December 31 and classified within permanent equity:

 
  2009   2008  

Series C 7.00% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Units, 2,700,000 units authorized, 0 and 94,235 issued and outstanding, respectively

  $   $ 2,639  

Series J 83/8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 1,000,000 units authorized, 796,948 issued and outstanding, including unamortized premium of $5,856 and $6,185 in 2009 and 2008, respectively

    45,704     46,032  
           

Total preferred units

  $ 45,704   $ 48,671  
           

            Series C 7.00% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Units.    This series of preferred units was redeemed on August 27, 2009, at liquidation value ($28.00 per unit), and $0.3158 in accrued and unpaid distributions and was paid in the form of 30,234 units.

            Series J 83/8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units.    We issued this series of preferred units in 2004 to replace a series of Chelsea preferred units. Distributions accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 83/8% per unit. We can redeem this series, in whole or in part, on and after October 15, 2027 at a redemption price of $50.00 per unit, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions. These preferred units were issued at a premium of $7.5 million as of the date of our acquisition of Chelsea.

            The following authorized series of preferred units had been outstanding in years prior to 2008, but there were no preferred units of such series outstanding at the end of 2009 and 2008: Series B 6.5% Convertible Preferred Units (5,000,000 units); Series E 8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units (1,000,000 units); Series F 8.75%

100


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10.    Partners' Equity (Continued)

Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units (8,000,000 units); Series G 7.89% Cumulative Step-Up Premium Rate Convertible Preferred Units (3,000,000 units); Series H Variable Rate Preferred Units (4,530,000 units); Series K Variable Rate Redeemable Preferred Units (8,000,000 units); and Series L Variable Rate Redeemable Preferred Units (6,000,000 units).

            In 2009, 62 limited partners exchanged 1,866,474 units for an equal number of shares of common stock of Simon Property. We issued an equal number of units to Simon Property, increasing its ownership interest in us.

            On December 18, 2009, we issued 1,802,063 units to Simon Property and 365,981 units to limited partners related to our quarterly distribution. The price per share of Simon Property common stock on December 18, 2009 was $77.78.

            On September 18, 2009, we issued 2,029,044 units to Simon Property and 411,489 units to limited partners related to our quarterly distribution. The price per share of the Simon Property common stock on September 18, 2009 was $73.97.

            On June 19, 2009, we issued 2,525,204 units to Simon Property and 514,720 units to limited partners related to our quarterly distribution. The price per share of the Simon Property common stock on June 19, 2009 was $52.92.

            On May 12, 2009, Simon Property issued 23,000,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $50.00 per share. As a result, we issued 23,000,000 units to Simon Property and used the proceeds from the offering for general working capital purposes.

            On March 25, 2009, Simon Property issued 17,250,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $31.50 per share. As a result, we issued 17,250,000 units to Simon Property and used the proceeds from the offering to repay amounts drawn on the Credit Facility and for general working capital purposes.

            On March 18, 2009, we issued 5,519,765 units to Simon Property and 1,345,151 units to limited partners related to our quarterly distribution. The price per share of the Simon Property common stock on March 18, 2009 was $35.38.

            We issued 181,850 units to Simon Property related to employee and director stock options exercised during 2009. We used the net proceeds from the option exercises of approximately $4.6 million for general working capital purposes.

            Simon Property's Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of common stock through July 2009. No purchases were made as part of this program in 2009. The program was not renewed and has now expired.

Other Equity Activity

            Notes Receivable from Former CPI Stockholders.    Notes receivable of $17.2 million from stockholders of an entity we acquired in 1998 are reflected as a deduction from capital in excess of par value in the consolidated statements of equity in the accompanying financial statements. The notes do not bear interest and become due at the time the underlying shares are sold.

            The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.    We, along with Simon Property, have a stock incentive plan, or the 1998 plan, which provides for the grant of awards with respect to the equity of Simon Property during a ten-year period, in the form of options to purchase shares of Simon Property common stock, or Options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock grants and performance unit awards, collectively, Awards. Options may be granted which are qualified as "incentive stock options" within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and Options which are not so qualified. An aggregate of 11,300,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1998

101


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10.    Partners' Equity (Continued)


plan. Additionally, the partnership agreement requires Simon Property to sell shares to us, at fair value, sufficient to satisfy the exercising of any stock options, and for Simon Property to purchase units for cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares issued on the exercise of stock options.

            Administration.    The 1998 plan is administered by the Simon Property's Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The committee determines which eligible individuals may participate and the type, extent and terms of the awards to be granted to them. In addition, the committee interprets the 1998 plan and makes all other determinations deemed advisable for its administration. Options granted to employees become exercisable over the period determined by the committee. The exercise price of an employee option may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Employee options generally vest over a three-year period and expire ten years from the date of grant. Since 2001, Simon Property have not granted any options to employees, except for a series of reload options we assumed as part of a prior business combination.

            Automatic Awards For Eligible Directors.    Directors of Simon Property who are not employees or employees of affiliates of Simon Property, or Eligible Directors, receive automatic awards under the 1998 plan. Until 2003, these awards took the form of stock options. Since then, the awards have been shares of restricted stock of Simon Property.

            Each eligible director receives on the first day of the first calendar month following his or her initial election an award of restricted stock with a value of $82,500 (pro-rated for partial years of service). Thereafter, as of the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, eligible directors who are re-elected receive an award of restricted stock having a value of $82,500. In addition, eligible directors who serve as chairpersons of the standing committees (excluding the Executive Committee) receive an additional annual award of restricted stock having a value of $10,000 (in the case of the Audit Committee) or $7,500 (in the case of all other standing committees). The Lead Director also receives an annual restricted stock award having a value of $12,500. The restricted stock vests in full after one year.

            Once vested, the delivery of the shares of restricted stock (including reinvested dividends) is deferred under our Director Deferred Compensation Plan until the director retires, dies or becomes disabled or otherwise no longer serves as a director. The directors may vote and are entitled to receive dividends on the underlying shares; however, any dividends on the shares of restricted stock must be reinvested in shares of common stock and held in the deferred compensation plan until the shares of restricted stock are delivered to the former director. The committee successively approved annual stock incentive programs each year from 2001 until 2009 when no program was established.

            In addition to automatic awards, eligible directors may be granted discretionary awards under the 1998 plan.

            Restricted Stock.    The 1998 plan also provides for shares of restricted common stock of Simon Property to be granted to certain employees at no cost to those employees, subject to achievement of certain financial and return-based performance measures established by the committee related to the most recent year's performance. Once granted, the shares of restricted stock then vest annually over a four-year period (25% each year) beginning on January 1 of each year. The cost of restricted stock grants, which is based upon the stock's fair market value on the grant date, is charged to earnings ratably over the vesting period. Through December 31, 2009 a total of 4,992,636 shares of restricted stock, net of forfeitures, have been awarded under the plan. Information regarding restricted stock awards is summarized in the following table for each of the years presented:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Restricted stock shares awarded during the year, net of forfeitures

    254,227     276,872     222,725  

Weighted average fair value of shares granted during the year

  $ 29.44   $ 85.77   $ 120.55  

Amortization expense

  $ 22,870   $ 28,640   $ 26,779  

102


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10.    Partners' Equity (Continued)

            The weighted average life of our outstanding options as of December 31, 2009 is 1.7 years. Information relating to Director Options and Employee Options from December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2009 is as follows:

 
  Director Options   Employee Options  
 
  Options   Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
  Options   Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 

Shares under option at December 31, 2006

    16,500   $ 28.57     1,198,263   $ 32.07  
                   

Granted

        N/A     23,000     99.03  

Exercised, none were forfeited during the period

    (16,500 )   28.57     (214,525 )   32.62  
                   

Shares under option at December 31, 2007

      $     1,006,738   $ 33.48  
                   

Granted

                 

Exercised, none were forfeited during the period

            (282,106 )   41.96  
                   

Shares under option at December 31, 2008

      $     724,632   $ 30.18  
                   

Granted

                 

Exercised

            (181,850 )   25.52  

Forfeited

            (37,100 )   70.73  
                   

Shares under option at December 31, 2009

      $     505,682   $ 28.88  
                   

 

 
  Outstanding and Exercisable  
Employee Options:

Range of Exercise Prices
  Options   Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 

$23.41 - $30.38

    429,633     1.21   $ 25.48  

$30.39 - $46.97

    49,749     4.09     46.97  

$46.98 - $50.17

    26,300     4.17     50.17  
                 
 

Total

    505,682         $ 28.88  
                 

            We also maintain a tax-qualified retirement 401(k) savings plan and offer no other postretirement or post employment benefits to our employees.

Exchange Rights

            Limited partners have the right to exchange all or any portion of their units for shares of Simon Property common stock on a one-for-one basis or cash, as determined by Simon Property in its sole discretion. If Simon Property selects cash, Simon Property cannot cause us to redeem the exchanged units for cash without contributing cash to us as partners' equity sufficient to effect the redemption. If sufficient cash is not contributed, Simon Property will be deemed to have elected to exchange the units for shares of Simon Property common stock. The amount of cash to be paid if the exchange right is exercised and the cash option is selected will be based on the trading price of Simon Property's common stock at that time. The number of shares of Simon Property's common stock issued will be the same as the number of units exchanged.

103


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

11.    Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

            We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Lease Commitments

            As of December 31, 2009, a total of 29 of the consolidated properties are subject to ground leases. The termination dates of these ground leases range from 2012 to 2090. These ground leases generally require us to make fixed annual rental payments, or a fixed annual rental plus a percentage rent component based upon the revenues or total sales of the property. Some of these leases also include escalation clauses and renewal options. We incurred ground lease expense included in other expense as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Ground lease expense

  $ 32,086   $ 30,681   $ 30,499  

            Future minimum lease payments due under these ground leases for years ending December 31, excluding applicable extension options, are as follows:

2010

  $ 16,782  

2011

    16,823  

2012

    16,937  

2013

    17,184  

2014

    17,084  

Thereafter

    648,360  
       

  $ 733,170  
       

Insurance

            We maintain commercial general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties in the United States through wholly-owned captive insurance entities and other self-insurance mechanisms. Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd. and Bridgewood Insurance Company, Ltd. are our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries, and have agreed to indemnify our general liability carrier for a specific layer of losses for the properties that are covered under these arrangements. The carrier has, in turn, agreed to provide evidence of coverage for this layer of losses under the terms and conditions of the carrier's policy. A similar policy written through these captive insurance entities also provides initial coverage for property insurance and certain windstorm risks at the properties located in coastal windstorm locations.

            We currently maintain insurance coverage against acts of terrorism on all of our properties in the United States on an "all risk" basis in the amount of up to $1 billion per occurrence for certified foreign acts of terrorism and $500 million per occurrence for non-certified domestic acts of terrorism. The current federal laws which provide this coverage are expected to operate through 2014. Despite the existence of this insurance coverage, any threatened or actual terrorist attacks in high profile markets could adversely affect our property values, revenues, consumer traffic and tenant sales.

104


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

11.    Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Guarantees of Indebtedness

            Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by the joint venture property, which is non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2009, we had loan guarantees of $47.2 million underlying joint venture related mortgage or other indebtedness. Mortgages which are guaranteed by us are secured by the property of the joint venture and that property could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation.

Concentration of Credit Risk

            We are subject to risks incidental to the ownership and operation of commercial real estate. These risks include, among others, the risks normally associated with changes in the general economic climate, trends in the retail industry, creditworthiness of tenants, competition for tenants and customers, changes in tax laws, interest rate and foreign currency levels, the availability of financing, and potential liability under environmental and other laws. Our regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, and community/lifestyle centers rely heavily upon anchor tenants like most retail properties. Four retailers occupied 535 of the approximately 1,325 anchor stores in the properties as of December 31, 2009. An affiliate of one of these retailers is one of our limited partners.

Limited Life Partnerships

            We are the controlling partner in several consolidated partnerships that have a limited life. We estimated the settlement values of these noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 as approximately $115 million and $130 million, respectively. The settlement values are based on the estimated fair values upon a hypothetical liquidation of the partnership interests and estimated yield maintenance or prepayment penalties associated with the payment to settle any underlying secured mortgage debt.

12.    Related Party Transactions

            Our management company provides management, insurance, and other services to Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc., a related party, and other non-owned properties. Amounts for services provided by our management company and its affiliates to our unconsolidated joint ventures and other related parties were as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007  

Amounts charged to unconsolidated joint ventures

  $ 120,866   $ 125,663   $ 95,564  

Amounts charged to properties owned by related parties

    4,522     4,980     5,049  

            During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded interest income of $9.3 million, $15.3 million and $39.1 million respectively, and financing fee income of $3.7 million, $3.1 million and $17.4 million, respectively, net of inter-entity eliminations, related to the loans that we have provided to Mills and SPG-FCM and lending financing services to those entities and the properties in which they hold an ownership interest.

13.    Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

            In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued new accounting guidance on business combinations and noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements which requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable assets acquired. The guidance also requires acquisition related costs to be expensed as incurred. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. On January 1, 2009, we adopted the guidance which did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

105


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

13.    Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

            In February 2008, the FASB issued a staff position which permitted a one-year deferral for the implementation of previously issued guidance related to fair value measurements with regard to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). On January 1, 2009, we adopted the fair value measurement guidance as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. The adoption had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The provisions of the guidance are applied at such time as a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been calculated prior to adoption.

            In June 2008, the FASB ratified guidance which provides an entity use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise and settlement provisions. We adopted the guidance on January 1, 2009 which had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

            On January 1, 2009, we adopted guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. Under this guidance, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per unit pursuant to the two-class method. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on reported earnings per unit.

            In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The statement introduces new terminology but is based on the same principles that previously existed in the accounting standards. The guidance requires disclosure of the date through which management has evaluated subsequent events and whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. The guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

            In June 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or Codification, which is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification defines a new hierarchy for U.S. GAAP and establishes the Codification as the sole source for authoritative guidance to be applied by nongovernmental entities. The adoption of the Codification changed the manner in which U.S. GAAP guidance is referenced, but did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

            In June 2009, the FASB also issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities, or VIEs. This amendment requires an enterprise to perform a qualitative analysis when determining whether or not it must consolidate a VIE. The amendment also requires an enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise's involvement with VIEs and any significant change in risk exposure due to that involvement, as well as how its involvement with VIEs impacts the enterprise's financial statements. Finally, an enterprise will be required to disclose significant judgments and assumptions used to determine whether or not to consolidate a VIE. This amendment is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Management is in the process of determining the impact of adopting this amendment.

106


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

14.    Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

            Quarterly 2009 and 2008 data is summarized in the table below. Quarterly amounts may not equal annual amounts due to rounding.

 
  First Quarter   Second Quarter   Third Quarter   Fourth Quarter  

2009

                         

Total revenue

  $ 918,492   $ 903,612   $ 924,932   $ 1,028,180  

Operating income

    364,216     224,698     392,177     425,601  

Consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations

    146,248     (14,108 )   139,189     115,933  

Net income (loss) available to unitholders

    106,768     (20,760 )   105,547     91,543  

Income (loss) from continuing operations per unit — Basic

  $ 0.45   ($ 0.08 ) $ 0.38   $ 0.33  

Net income (loss) per unit — Basic

  $ 0.45   ($ 0.08 ) $ 0.38   $ 0.33  

Income (loss) from continuing operations per unit — Diluted

  $ 0.45   ($ 0.08 ) $ 0.38   $ 0.32  

Net income (loss) per unit — Diluted

  $ 0.45   ($ 0.08 ) $ 0.38   $ 0.32  

Weighted average units outstanding

    292,771,470     325,115,460     338,766,765     341,622,416  

Diluted weighted average units outstanding

    292,991,380     325,115,460     339,953,846     342,377,675  

2008

                         

Total revenue

  $ 895,298   $ 922,947   $ 935,594   $ 1,029,316  

Operating income

    351,775     379,038     383,351     428,884  

Consolidated income from continuing operations

    129,022     114,353     159,736     196,449  

Net income available to unitholders

    87,933     76,572     112,809     145,203  

Income from continuing operations per unit — Basic

  $ 0.39   $ 0.34   $ 0.50   $ 0.65  

Net income (loss) per unit — Basic

  $ 0.39   $ 0.34   $ 0.50   $ 0.65  

Income from continuing operations per unit — Diluted

  $ 0.39   $ 0.34   $ 0.50   $ 0.64  

Net income per unit — Diluted

  $ 0.39   $ 0.34   $ 0.50   $ 0.64  

Weighted average units outstanding

    281,224,467     282,382,491     282,384,237     284,025,809  

Diluted weighted average units outstanding

    281,841,042     282,971,297     282,953,695     284,422,986  

15.    Subsequent Events

            We entered into a definitive agreement in December 2009 to acquire all of the outlet shopping centers currently owned by Prime Outlets Acquisition Company and certain of its affiliated entities, or the Prime Outlets, subject to Prime Outlets' existing fixed rate indebtedness and preferred stock. The Prime Outlets consist of 22 outlet centers located in major metropolitan markets. We will pay consideration (consisting of cash and units of the Operating Partnership) of approximately $0.7 billion for the owners' interests in the Prime Outlets. The acquisition is subject to several closing conditions relating to certain financing arrangements of the Prime Outlets. Assuming all closing conditions are satisfied on a timely basis, we expect the transaction will close in the second quarter of 2010.

            On January 12, 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer for any and all senior unsecured notes of ten outstanding series with maturity dates ranging from 2011 to March 2013. The total principal amount of the notes accepted for purchase on January 26, 2010 was approximately $2.3 billion, with a weighted average duration of 2.0 years and a weighted coupon of 5.76%. We purchased the tendered notes with cash on hand and the proceeds from an offering of $2.25 billion of senior unsecured notes that closed on January 25, 2010. The senior notes offering was comprised of $400.0 million of 4.20% notes due 2015, $1.25 billion of 5.65% notes due 2020 and $600.0 million of

107


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

15.    Subsequent Events (Continued)


6.75% notes due 2040. We will report a $165.6 million charge to earnings in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the tender offer.

            On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge Inc., or Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for the interests, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

            On February 16, 2010, Simon Property announced a written offer made to acquire General Growth Properties, Inc., or General Growth, in a transaction valued at more than $10 billion, including approximately $9 billion in cash. Of this consideration, approximately $7 billion will be paid to unsecured creditors, representing par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends and interest. The transaction would not be subject to a financing condition and would be financed through cash on hand, asset sales and through equity co-investments in acquired properties by strategic institutional investors, with the balance coming from our new credit facility. The offer indicated a willingness to discuss consideration consisting in whole or in part of equity in lieu of the cash portion of the consideration to General Growth's stockholders, and perhaps certain of its unsecured creditors, for those who would prefer to receive equity. The offer is subject to confirmatory due diligence and the negotiation and execution of a definitive transaction agreement, as well as required bankruptcy court and creditor approvals. As of the filing of this report, there is no agreement for such a transaction.

108


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.

 

By

 

    /s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner

March 12, 2010

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature   Capacity   Date

 

 

 

 

 
    /s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
  Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
(Principal Executive Officer)
  March 12, 2010

    /s/ HERBERT SIMON

Herbert Simon

 

Chairman Emeritus and Director

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ RICHARD S. SOKOLOV

Richard S. Sokolov

 

President, Chief Operating Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
and Director

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ MELVYN E. BERGSTEIN

Melvyn E. Bergstein

 

Director

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ LINDA WALKER BYNOE

Linda Walker Bynoe

 

Director

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ REUBEN S. LEIBOWITZ

Reuben S. Leibowitz

 

Director

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ J. ALBERT SMITH, JR.

J. Albert Smith, Jr.

 

Director

 

March 12, 2010

109


Table of Contents

Signature   Capacity   Date

 

 

 

 

 
    /s/ KAREN N. HORN

Karen N. Horn
  Director   March 12, 2010

    /s/ ALLAN HUBBARD

Allan Hubbard

 

Director

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ DANIEL C. SMITH

Daniel C. Smith

 

Director

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ STEPHEN E. STERRETT

Stephen E. Sterrett

 

Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
(Principal Financial Officer)

 

March 12, 2010

    /s/ STEVEN K. BROADWATER

Steven K. Broadwater

 

Senior Vice President
and Chief Accounting Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

March 12, 2010

110


SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
  Initial Cost (Note 3)   Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note 3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
Name, Location
  Encumbrances   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
  Date of
Construction

Regional Malls

                                                         

Anderson Mall, Anderson, SC

  $ 27,270   $ 1,712   $ 15,227   $ 1,363   $ 20,347   $ 3,075   $ 35,574   $ 38,649   $ 13,198   1972

Arsenal Mall, Watertown, MA

    974     15,505     47,680         9,603     15,505     57,283     72,788     16,281   1999 (Note 4)

Bangor Mall, Bangor, ME

    80,000     5,478     59,740         8,439     5,478     68,179     73,657     19,068   2004 (Note 5)

Barton Creek Square, Austin, TX

        2,903     20,929     7,983     60,813     10,886     81,742     92,628     40,201   1981

Battlefield Mall, Springfield, MO

    92,749     3,919     27,231     3,000     61,932     6,919     89,163     96,082     48,410   1970

Bay Park Square, Green Bay, WI

        6,358     25,623     4,133     23,301     10,491     48,924     59,415     19,918   1980

Bowie Town Center, Bowie, MD

        2,710     65,044     235     5,022     2,945     70,066     73,011     22,804   2001

Boynton Beach Mall, Boynton Beach, FL

        22,240     78,804     4,666     25,329     26,906     104,133     131,039     36,361   1985

Brea Mall, Brea, CA

        39,500     209,202         24,419     39,500     233,621     273,121     75,793   1998 (Note 4)

Broadway Square, Tyler, TX

        11,470     32,431         21,888     11,470     54,319     65,789     21,642   1994 (Note 4)

Brunswick Square, East Brunswick, NJ

    82,244     8,436     55,838         27,888     8,436     83,726     92,162     34,463   1973

Burlington Mall, Burlington, MA

        46,600     303,618     19,600     89,107     66,200     392,725     458,925     109,314   1998 (Note 4)

Castleton Square, Indianapolis, IN

        26,250     98,287     7,434     70,202     33,684     168,489     202,173     57,429   1972

Century III Mall, West Mifflin, PA

    80,498     17,380     102,364     10     8,379     17,390     110,743     128,133     67,765   1979

Charlottesville Fashion Square, Charlottesville, VA

            54,738         13,767         68,505     68,505     24,847   1997 (Note 4)

Chautauqua Mall, Lakewood, NY

        3,257     9,641         16,238     3,257     25,879     29,136     12,020   1971

Chesapeake Square, Chesapeake, VA

    69,852     11,534     70,461         7,652     11,534     78,113     89,647     38,695   1989

Cielo Vista Mall, El Paso, TX

        1,005     15,262     608     43,751     1,613     59,013     60,626     32,839   1974

College Mall, Bloomington, IN

        1,003     16,245     720     43,466     1,723     59,711     61,434     27,524   1965

Columbia Center, Kennewick, WA

        17,441     66,580         21,593     17,441     88,173     105,614     31,141   1987

Copley Place, Boston, MA

    200,000         378,045         82,083         460,128     460,128     100,206   2002 (Note 4)

Coral Square, Coral Springs, FL

    81,666     13,556     93,630         14,346     13,556     107,976     121,532     49,864   1984

Cordova Mall, Pensacola, FL

        18,626     73,091     7,321     43,912     25,947     117,003     142,950     32,959   1998 (Note 4)

Cottonwood Mall, Albuquerque, NM

        10,122     69,958         3,528     10,122     73,486     83,608     33,010   1996

Crossroads Mall, Omaha, NE

    40,616     639     30,658     409     35,857     1,048     66,515     67,563     28,955   1994 (Note 4)

Crystal River Mall, Crystal River, FL

    14,677     5,393     20,241         4,718     5,393     24,959     30,352     9,701   1990

DeSoto Square, Bradenton, FL

    63,800     9,011     52,675         8,036     9,011     60,711     69,722     24,080   1973

Domain, The, Austin, TX (Note 6)

        45,152     197,010         116,395     45,152     313,405     358,557     23,272   2005

Edison Mall, Fort Myers, FL

        11,529     107,350         28,453     11,529     135,803     147,332     44,774   1997 (Note 4)

Fashion Mall at Keystone, The, Indianapolis, IN

            120,579         47,063         167,642     167,642     55,893   1997 (Note 4)

Firewheel Town Center, Garland, TX

        8,636     82,716         24,714     8,636     107,430     116,066     19,242   2004

Forest Mall, Fond Du Lac, WI

    16,190     721     4,491         8,795     721     13,286     14,007     7,628   1973

Forum Shops at Caesars, The, Las Vegas, NV

    515,335         276,567         205,817         482,384     482,384     125,792   1992

111


SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
  Initial Cost (Note 3)   Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note 3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
Name, Location
  Encumbrances   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
  Date of
Construction

Great Lakes Mall, Mentor, OH

        12,302     100,362         10,449     12,302     110,811     123,113     43,963   1961

Greenwood Park Mall, Greenwood, IN

    79,756     2,423     23,445     5,253     114,940     7,676     138,385     146,061     48,964   1979

Gulf View Square, Port Richey, FL

        13,690     39,991     2,023     19,354     15,713     59,345     75,058     24,168   1980

Gwinnett Place, Duluth, GA

    115,000     17,051     141,191         4,527     17,051     145,718     162,769     44,560   1998 (Note 5)

Haywood Mall, Greenville, SC

        11,585     133,893     6     19,228     11,591     153,121     164,712     62,123   1998 (Note 4)

Independence Center, Independence, MO

    200,000     5,042     45,798         30,779     5,042     76,577     81,619     32,121   1994 (Note 4)

Ingram Park Mall, San Antonio, TX

    75,883     733     17,163     73     20,283     806     37,446     38,252     20,984   1979

Irving Mall, Irving, TX

        6,737     17,479     2,533     41,844     9,270     59,323     68,593     33,697   1971

Jefferson Valley Mall, Yorktown Heights, NY

        4,868     30,304         24,248     4,868     54,552     59,420     28,382   1983

Knoxville Center, Knoxville, TN

    57,464     5,006     21,617     3,712     34,521     8,718     56,138     64,856     28,459   1984

La Plaza Mall, McAllen, TX

        1,375     9,828     6,569     37,748     7,944     47,576     55,520     22,371   1976

Laguna Hills Mall, Laguna Hills, CA

        27,928     55,446         15,975     27,928     71,421     99,349     23,937   1997 (Note 4)

Lakeline Mall, Austin, TX

        10,088     81,568     14     15,965     10,102     97,533     107,635     37,558   1995

Lenox Square, Atlanta, GA

        38,058     492,411         59,056     38,058     551,467     589,525     172,284   1998 (Note 4)

Lima Mall, Lima, OH

        7,662     35,338         10,124     7,662     45,462     53,124     20,174   1965

Lincolnwood Town Center, Lincolnwood, IL

        7,907     63,480     28     7,077     7,935     70,557     78,492     36,846   1990

Livingston Mall, Livingston, NJ

        22,214     105,250         37,483     22,214     142,733     164,947     41,050   1998 (Note 4)

Longview Mall, Longview, TX

    30,300     259     3,567     124     8,013     383     11,580     11,963     5,866   1978

Mall of Georgia, Mill Creek, GA

    181,606     47,492     326,633         3,762     47,492     330,395     377,887     77,040   1999 (Note 5)

Maplewood Mall, Minneapolis, MN

        17,119     80,758         12,635     17,119     93,393     110,512     24,107   2002 (Note 4)

Markland Mall, Kokomo, IN

    21,436         7,568         10,262         17,830     17,830     9,718   1968

McCain Mall, N. Little Rock, AR

            9,515     10,530     10,723     10,530     20,238     30,768     14,382   1973

Melbourne Square, Melbourne, FL

        15,762     55,891     4,160     27,756     19,922     83,647     103,569     28,680   1982

Menlo Park Mall, Edison, NJ

        65,684     223,252         34,457     65,684     257,709     323,393     92,976   1997 (Note 4)

Midland Park Mall, Midland, TX

    31,295     687     9,213         15,004     687     24,217     24,904     13,526   1980

Miller Hill Mall, Duluth, MN

        2,965     18,092         28,217     2,965     46,309     49,274     29,333   1973

Montgomery Mall, Montgomeryville, PA

    87,806     27,105     86,915         26,558     27,105     113,473     140,578     25,593   2004 (Note 5)

Muncie Mall, Muncie, IN

        172     5,776     52     26,863     224     32,639     32,863     16,533   1970

North East Mall, Hurst, TX

        128     12,966     19,010     148,955     19,138     161,921     181,059     65,948   1971

Northfield Square, Bourbonnais, IL

    28,344     362     53,396         1,479     362     54,875     55,237     32,484   2004 (Note 5)

Northgate Mall, Seattle, WA

        24,369     115,992         93,772     24,369     209,764     234,133     59,203   1987

Northlake Mall, Atlanta, GA

    66,291     33,400     98,035         4,111     33,400     102,146     135,546     51,225   1998 (Note 4)

Northwoods Mall, Peoria, IL

        1,185     12,779     2,372     36,238     3,557     49,017     52,574     27,409   1983

Oak Court Mall, Memphis, TN

        15,673     57,304         8,822     15,673     66,126     81,799     24,864   1997 (Note 4)

Ocean County Mall, Toms River, NJ

        20,404     124,945         24,044     20,404     148,989     169,393     46,941   1998 (Note 4)

112


SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
  Initial Cost (Note 3)   Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note 3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
Name, Location
  Encumbrances   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
  Date of
Construction

Orange Park Mall, Orange Park, FL

        12,998     65,121         39,766     12,998     104,887     117,885     41,154   1994 (Note 4)

Orland Square, Orland Park, IL

        35,514     129,906         21,862     35,514     151,768     187,282     55,391   1997 (Note 4)

Oxford Valley Mall, Langhorne, PA

    71,974     24,544     100,287         8,156     24,544     108,443     132,987     49,372   2003 (Note 4)

Paddock Mall, Ocala, FL

        11,198     39,727         16,347     11,198     56,074     67,272     18,705   1980

Penn Square Mall, Oklahoma City, OK

    99,422     2,043     155,958         28,419     2,043     184,377     186,420     61,042   2002 (Note 4)

Pheasant Lane Mall, Nashua, NH

        3,902     155,068     550     15,596     4,452     170,664     175,116     52,805   2004 (Note 5)

Phipps Plaza, Atlanta, GA

        16,725     210,610         21,311     16,725     231,921     248,646     76,724   1998 (Note 4)

Plaza Carolina, Carolina, PR

    188,573     15,493     279,560         20,990     15,493     300,550     316,043     55,466   2004 (Note 4)

Port Charlotte Town Center, Port Charlotte, FL

    50,423     5,471     58,570         15,056     5,471     73,626     79,097     31,207   1989

Prien Lake Mall, Lake Charles, LA

        1,842     2,813     3,091     37,464     4,933     40,277     45,210     19,256   1972

Richmond Town Square, Richmond Heights, OH

    43,957     2,600     12,112         60,116     2,600     72,228     74,828     43,911   1966

River Oaks Center, Calumet City, IL

        30,884     101,224         10,742     30,884     111,966     142,850     40,239   1997 (Note 4)

Rockaway Townsquare, Rockaway, NJ

        44,116     212,257     27     33,088     44,143     245,345     289,488     74,755   1998 (Note 4)

Rolling Oaks Mall, San Antonio, TX

        1,929     38,609         13,905     1,929     52,514     54,443     26,140   1988

Roosevelt Field, Garden City, NY

        163,721     702,008         33,311     163,721     735,319     899,040     234,922   1998 (Note 4)

Ross Park Mall, Pittsburgh, PA

        23,541     90,203         72,422     23,541     162,625     186,166     59,406   1986

Santa Rosa Plaza, Santa Rosa, CA

        10,400     87,864         10,681     10,400     98,545     108,945     32,612   1998 (Note 4)

Shops at Mission Viejo, The, Mission Viejo, CA

        9,139     54,445     7,491     146,869     16,630     201,314     217,944     81,183   1979

South Hills Village, Pittsburgh, PA

        23,445     125,840         16,649     23,445     142,489     165,934     50,152   1997 (Note 4)

South Shore Plaza, Braintree, MA

        101,200     301,495         127,313     101,200     428,808     530,008     104,593   1998 (Note 4)

Southern Park Mall, Boardman, OH

        16,982     77,767     97     23,597     17,079     101,364     118,443     41,451   1970

SouthPark, Charlotte, NC

    197,463     42,092     188,055     100     164,585     42,192     352,640     394,832     91,062   2002 (Note 4)

St. Charles Towne Center, Waldorf, MD

        7,710     52,934     1,180     26,150     8,890     79,084     87,974     37,402   1990

Stanford Shopping Center, Palo Alto, CA

    240,000         339,537         4,730         344,267     344,267     69,994   2003 (Note 4)

Summit Mall, Akron, OH

    65,000     15,374     51,137         39,624     15,374     90,761     106,135     30,368   1965

Sunland Park Mall, El Paso, TX

    32,836     2,896     28,900         7,456     2,896     36,356     39,252     21,221   1988

Tacoma Mall, Tacoma, WA

    120,426     37,803     125,826         75,878     37,803     201,704     239,507     62,843   1987

Tippecanoe Mall, Lafayette, IN

        2,897     8,439     5,517     43,537     8,414     51,976     60,390     32,830   1973

Town Center at Aurora, Aurora, CO

        9,959     56,832     6     56,934     9,965     113,766     123,731     39,427   1998 (Note 4)

Town Center at Boca Raton, Boca Raton, FL

        64,200     307,317         149,623     64,200     456,940     521,140     137,639   1998 (Note 4)

Town Center at Cobb, Kennesaw, GA

    280,000     32,585     158,225         12,644     32,585     170,869     203,454     50,106   1998 (Note 5)

Towne East Square, Wichita, KS

        8,525     18,479     1,429     38,802     9,954     57,281     67,235     31,582   1975

113


SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
  Initial Cost (Note 3)   Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note 3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
Name, Location
  Encumbrances   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
  Date of
Construction

Towne West Square, Wichita, KS

    49,672     972     21,203     61     12,084     1,033     33,287     34,320     19,037   1980

Treasure Coast Square, Jensen Beach, FL

        11,124     72,990     3,067     34,044     14,191     107,034     121,225     39,848   1987

Tyrone Square, St. Petersburg, FL

        15,638     120,962         28,321     15,638     149,283     164,921     56,840   1972

University Park Mall, Mishawaka, IN

    100,000     16,768     112,158     7,000     47,817     23,768     159,975     183,743     88,505   1996 (Note 4)

Upper Valley Mall, Springfield, OH

    47,639     8,421     38,745         10,016     8,421     48,761     57,182     18,095   1979

Valle Vista Mall, Harlingen, TX

    40,000     1,398     17,159     329     20,017     1,727     37,176     38,903     19,229   1983

Virginia Center Commons, Glen Allen, VA

        9,764     50,547     4,149     9,268     13,913     59,815     73,728     26,452   1991

Walt Whitman Mall, Huntington Station, NY

    121,669     51,700     111,258     3,789     42,377     55,489     153,635     209,124     60,850   1998 (Note 4)

Washington Square, Indianapolis, IN

    29,777     6,319     36,495         12,457     6,319     48,952     55,271     41,451   1974

West Ridge Mall, Topeka, KS

    68,392     5,453     34,132     1,168     23,410     6,621     57,542     64,163     24,866   1988

Westminster Mall, Westminster, CA

        43,464     84,709         31,920     43,464     116,629     160,093     35,785   1998 (Note 4)

White Oaks Mall, Springfield, IL

    50,000     3,024     35,692     2,102     38,441     5,126     74,133     79,259     29,573   1977

Wolfchase Galleria, Memphis, TN

    225,000     15,881     128,276         9,068     15,881     137,344     153,225     50,573   2002 (Note 4)

Woodland Hills Mall, Tulsa, OK

    96,941     34,211     187,123         13,024     34,211     200,147     234,358     59,463   2004 (Note 5)

Premium Outlet Centers

                                                         

Albertville Premium Outlets, Albertville, MN

        3,900     97,059         3,575     3,900     100,634     104,534     24,398   2004 (Note 4)

Allen Premium Outlets, Allen, TX

        13,855     43,687     97     18,356     13,952     62,043     75,995     15,159   2004 (Note 4)

Aurora Farms Premium Outlets, Aurora, OH

        2,370     24,326         1,919     2,370     26,245     28,615     12,948   2004 (Note 4)

Camarillo Premium Outlets, Camarillo, CA

        16,670     224,721     558     61,998     17,228     286,719     303,947     46,488   2004 (Note 4)

Carlsbad Premium Outlets, Carlsbad, CA

        12,890     184,990     96     1,954     12,986     186,944     199,930     34,025   2004 (Note 4)

Carolina Premium Outlets, Smithfield, NC

    19,385     3,170     59,863         2,115     3,170     61,978     65,148     17,766   2004 (Note 4)

Chicago Premium Outlets, Aurora, IL

        659     118,005     2,951     8,366     3,610     126,371     129,981     30,748   2004 (Note 4)

Cincinnati Premium Outlets, Monroe, OH

        14,117     71,520             14,117     71,520     85,637     1,496   2008

Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets, Clinton, CT

        2,060     107,556     1,125     1,646     3,185     109,202     112,387     24,068   2004 (Note 4)

Columbia Gorge Premium Outlets, Troutdale, OR

        7,900     16,492         2,207     7,900     18,699     26,599     7,212   2004 (Note 4)

Desert Hills Premium Outlets, Cabazon, CA

        3,440     338,679         3,481     3,440     342,160     345,600     58,991   2004 (Note 4)

Edinburgh Premium Outlets, Edinburgh, IN

        2,857     47,309         10,939     2,857     58,248     61,105     16,078   2004 (Note 4)

Folsom Premium Outlets, Folsom, CA

        9,060     50,281         3,058     9,060     53,339     62,399     15,888   2004 (Note 4)

Gilroy Premium Outlets, Gilroy, CA

        9,630     194,122         6,634     9,630     200,756     210,386     43,334   2004 (Note 4)

Houston Premium Outlets, Cypress, TX

        21,159     69,350         29,801     21,159     99,151     120,310     7,483   2007

Jackson Premium Outlets, Jackson, NJ

        6,413     104,013     3     3,318     6,416     107,331     113,747     19,936   2004 (Note 4)

Jersey Shore Premium Outlets, Tinton Falls, NJ

        16,141     50,979         74,921     16,141     125,900     142,041     6,810   2007

Johnson Creek Premium Outlets, Johnson Creek, WI

        2,800     39,546         5,407     2,800     44,953     47,753     8,905   2004 (Note 4)

Kittery Premium Outlets, Kittery, ME

    43,556     11,832     94,994         5,516     11,832     100,510     112,342     15,376   2004 (Note 4)

Las Americas Premium Outlets, San Diego, CA

    180,000     45,168     251,878         1,992     45,168     253,870     299,038     17,528   2007 (Note 4)

Las Vegas Outlet Center, Las Vegas, NV

        13,085     160,777         4,875     13,085     165,652     178,737     26,104   2004 (Note 4)

Las Vegas Premium Outlets, Las Vegas, NV

        25,435     134,973         60,663     25,435     195,636     221,071     35,631   2004 (Note 4)

114


SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
  Initial Cost (Note 3)   Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note 3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
Name, Location
  Encumbrances   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
  Date of
Construction

Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets, Leesburg, VA

        7,190     162,023         2,860     7,190     164,883     172,073     37,929   2004 (Note 4)

Liberty Village Premium Outlets, Flemington, NJ

        5,670     28,904         1,724     5,670     30,628     36,298     10,929   2004 (Note 4)

Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets, Michigan City, IN

    88,623     6,630     94,138         4,170     6,630     98,308     104,938     27,212   2004 (Note 4)

Napa Premium Outlets, Napa, CA

        11,400     45,023         1,401     11,400     46,424     57,824     11,295   2004 (Note 4)

North Georgia Premium Outlets, Dawsonville, GA

        4,300     132,325         1,859     4,300     134,184     138,484     30,053   2004 (Note 4)

Orlando Premium Outlets, Orlando, FL

        14,040     304,410     15,855     46,533     29,895     350,943     380,838     54,490   2004 (Note 4)

Osage Beach Premium Outlets, Osage Beach, MO

        9,460     85,804     3     3,301     9,463     89,105     98,568     21,963   2004 (Note 4)

Petaluma Village Premium Outlets, Petaluma, CA

        13,322     14,067         305     13,322     14,372     27,694     6,798   2004 (Note 4)

Philadelphia Premium Outlets, Limerick, PA

    190,000     16,676     105,249         15,749     16,676     120,998     137,674     13,119   2006

Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets, Mercedes, TX

        12,229     41,547         36,143     12,229     77,690     89,919     11,223   2005

Round Rock Premium Outlets, Round Rock, TX

        21,977     82,252         2,806     21,977     85,058     107,035     15,859   2005

Seattle Premium Outlets, Seattle, WA

            103,722         16,902         120,624     120,624     21,945   2004 (Note 4)

St. Augustine Premium Outlets, St. Augustine, FL

        6,090     57,670     2     6,959     6,092     64,629     70,721     17,160   2004 (Note 4)

The Crossings Premium Outlets, Tannersville, PA

    52,505     7,720     172,931         9,530     7,720     182,461     190,181     34,238   2004 (Note 4)

Vacaville Premium Outlets, Vacaville, CA

        9,420     84,850         6,712     9,420     91,562     100,982     24,908   2004 (Note 4)

Waikele Premium Outlets, Waipahu, HI

        22,630     77,316         1,820     22,630     79,136     101,766     19,046   2004 (Note 4)

Waterloo Premium Outlets, Waterloo, NY

    72,822     3,230     75,277         5,759     3,230     81,036     84,266     21,307   2004 (Note 4)

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets, Central Valley, NY

        11,110     862,559     1,658     4,004     12,768     866,563     879,331     152,183   2004 (Note 4)

Wrentham Village Premium Outlets, Wrentham, MA

        4,900     282,031         3,922     4,900     285,953     290,853     57,357   2004 (Note 4)

Community/Lifestyle Centers

                                                         

Arboretum at Great Hills, Austin, TX

        7,640     36,774     71     8,678     7,711     45,452     53,163     14,792   1998 (Note 4)

Bloomingdale Court, Bloomingdale, IL

    26,573     8,748     26,184         9,176     8,748     35,360     44,108     16,687   1987

Brightwood Plaza, Indianapolis, IN

        65     128         337     65     465     530     327   1965

Charles Towne Square, Charleston, SC

            1,768     370     10,636     370     12,404     12,774     6,920   1976

Chesapeake Center, Chesapeake, VA

        5,352     12,279         643     5,352     12,922     18,274     4,928   1989

115


SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
  Initial Cost (Note 3)   Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note 3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
Name, Location
  Encumbrances   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
  Date of
Construction

Countryside Plaza, Countryside, IL

        332     8,507     2,554     9,010     2,886     17,517     20,403     7,784   1977

Dare Centre, Kill Devil Hills, NC

    1,614         5,702         213         5,915     5,915     932   2004 (Note 4)

DeKalb Plaza, King of Prussia, PA

    2,946     1,955     3,405         1,125     1,955     4,530     6,485     1,716   2003 (Note 4)

Forest Plaza, Rockford, IL

    18,957     4,132     16,818     453     10,043     4,585     26,861     31,446     9,708   1985

Gateway Shopping Center, Austin, TX

    87,000     24,549     81,437         9,520     24,549     90,957     115,506     21,562   2004 (Note 4)

Great Lakes Plaza, Mentor, OH

        1,028     2,025         5,016     1,028     7,041     8,069     3,863   1976

Greenwood Plus, Greenwood, IN

        1,129     1,792         3,735     1,129     5,527     6,656     2,863   1979

Henderson Square, King of Prussia, PA

    14,367     4,223     15,124         147     4,223     15,271     19,494     3,112   2003 (Note 4)

Highland Lakes Center, Orlando, FL

    14,924     7,138     25,284         1,558     7,138     26,842     33,980     13,306   1991

Ingram Plaza, San Antonio, TX

        421     1,802     4     59     425     1,861     2,286     1,234   1980

Keystone Shoppes, Indianapolis, IN

            4,232         967         5,199     5,199     1,889   1997 (Note 4)

Lake Plaza, Waukegan, IL

        2,487     6,420         1,087     2,487     7,507     9,994     3,590   1986

Lake View Plaza, Orland Park, IL

    16,000     4,702     17,543         12,317     4,702     29,860     34,562     13,316   1986

Lakeline Plaza, Austin, TX

    17,759     5,822     30,875         6,375     5,822     37,250     43,072     14,239   1998

Lima Center, Lima, OH

        1,808     5,151         6,780     1,808     11,931     13,739     4,706   1978

Lincoln Crossing, O'Fallon, IL

        674     2,192         769     674     2,961     3,635     1,256   1990

Lincoln Plaza, King of Prussia, PA

            21,299         3,322         24,621     24,621     9,081   2003 (Note 4)

MacGregor Village, Cary, NC

    6,493     502     8,897         187     502     9,084     9,586     1,417   2004 (Note 4)

Mall of Georgia Crossing, Mill Creek, GA

        9,506     32,892         295     9,506     33,187     42,693     11,953   2004 (Note 5)

Markland Plaza, Kokomo, IN

        206     738         6,260     206     6,998     7,204     2,872   1974

Martinsville Plaza, Martinsville, VA

            584         408         992     992     744   1967

Matteson Plaza, Matteson, IL

        1,771     9,737         2,675     1,771     12,412     14,183     6,426   1988

Muncie Plaza, Muncie, IN

    7,383     267     10,509     87     1,355     354     11,864     12,218     4,356   1998

New Castle Plaza, New Castle, IN

        128     1,621         1,477     128     3,098     3,226     2,081   1966

North Ridge Plaza, Joliet, IL

        2,831     7,699         3,240     2,831     10,939     13,770     4,902   1985

North Ridge Shopping Center, Raleigh, NC

    7,930     385     12,838         493     385     13,331     13,716     2,215   2004 (Note 4)

Northwood Plaza, Fort Wayne, IN

        148     1,414         1,554     148     2,968     3,116     1,844   1974

Palms Crossing, McAllen, TX (Note 6)

        13,923     45,925         6,430     13,923     52,355     66,278     5,448   2006

Pier Park, Panama City Beach, FL

        23,586     73,158         42,162     23,586     115,320     138,906     9,461   2006

Regency Plaza, St. Charles, MO

    4,000     616     4,963         583     616     5,546     6,162     2,479   1988

Richardson Square, Richardson, TX

        6,285         1,268     15,494     7,553     15,494     23,047     895   1977

Rockaway Commons, Rockaway, NJ

        5,149     26,435         7,499     5,149     33,934     39,083     7,918   1998 (Note 4)

Rockaway Town Plaza, Rockaway, NJ

            18,698     2,225     1,754     2,225     20,452     22,677     3,084   2004

Shops at Arbor Walk, The, Austin, TX (Note 6)

        930     42,546         5,090     930     47,636     48,566     7,520   2005

116


SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
  Initial Cost (Note 3)   Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (Note 3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
Name, Location
  Encumbrances   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
  Date of
Construction

Rockaway Commons, Rockaway, NJ

                                                         

Shops at North East Mall, The, Hurst, TX

        12,541     28,177     402     3,666     12,943     31,843     44,786     14,064   1999

St. Charles Towne Plaza, Waldorf, MD

    26,000     8,377     18,993         3,276     8,377     22,269     30,646     10,608   1987

Teal Plaza, Lafayette, IN

        99     878         3,011     99     3,889     3,988     2,754   1962

Terrace at the Florida Mall, Orlando, FL

        2,150     7,623         5,197     2,150     12,820     14,970     4,738   1989

Tippecanoe Plaza, Lafayette, IN

            745     234     5,169     234     5,914     6,148     3,165   1974

University Center, Mishawaka, IN

        3,071     7,413         1,810     3,071     9,223     12,294     6,490   1980

Washington Plaza, Indianapolis, IN

        941     1,697         398     941     2,095     3,036     2,586   1976

Waterford Lakes Town Center, Orlando, FL

        8,679     72,836         14,036     8,679     86,872     95,551     34,254   1999

West Ridge Plaza, Topeka, KS

    5,000     1,376     4,560         1,778     1,376     6,338     7,714     3,032   1988

White Oaks Plaza, Springfield, IL

    14,766     3,169     14,267         1,556     3,169     15,823     18,992     7,098   1986

Wolf Ranch Town Center, Georgetown, TX

        21,785     51,547         6,729     21,785     58,276     80,061     9,665   2004

Other Properties

                                                         

Crossville Outlet Center, Crossville, TN

        263     4,380         223     263     4,603     4,866     890   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Merchants Branson, Branson, MO

        1,383     19,637     1     846     1,384     20,483     21,867     1,801   2004 (Note 4)

The Shoppes at Branson Meadows, Branson, MO

    9,016         5,205         262         5,467     5,467     931   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Stores of America — Boaz, AL

    2,637         924         25         949     949     131   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Stores of America — Georgetown, KY

    6,248     148     3,610         49     148     3,659     3,807     566   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Stores of America — Graceville, FL

    1,857     12     408         66     12     474     486     70   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Stores of America — Lebanon. MO

    1,560     24     214             24     214     238     49   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Stores of America — Nebraska City, NE

    1,464     26     566         31     26     597     623     99   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Stores of America — Story City, IA

    1,812     7     526         5     7     531     538     79   2004 (Note 4)

Factory Stores of North Bend, North Bend, WA

        2,143     36,197         1,989     2,143     38,186     40,329     6,903   2004 (Note 4)

Nanuet Mall, Nanuet, NY

        27,310     162,993         3,322     27,310     166,315     193,625     152,965   1998 (Note 4)

Palm Beach Mall, West Palm Beach, FL

    50,725     11,962     112,437         35,195     11,962     147,632     159,594     104,571   1967

University Mall, Pensacola, FL

        4,256     26,657         3,405     4,256     30,062     34,318     26,506   1994

Development Projects

                                                         

Other pre-development costs

        37,635     7,656             37,635     7,656     45,291        

Other

        3,097     11,047         499     3,097     11,546     14,643     5,758    
                                         

  $ 5,554,138   $ 2,572,883   $ 17,511,497   $ 185,111   $ 4,754,224   $ 2,757,994   $ 22,265,721   $ 25,023,715   $ 6,806,670    
                                         

117


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Schedule III as of December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

(1)    Reconciliation of Real Estate Properties:

            The changes in real estate assets for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 are as follows:

 
  2009   2008   2007  

Balance, beginning of year

  $ 24,907,970   $ 24,163,367   $ 22,644,299  
 

Acquisitions and consolidations

        7,640     743,457  
 

Improvements

    315,928     797,717     1,057,663  
 

Disposals and de-consolidations

    (200,183 )   (60,754 )   (282,052 )
               

Balance, close of year

  $ 25,023,715   $ 24,907,970   $ 24,163,367  
               

            The unaudited aggregate cost of real estate assets for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2009 was $20,019,482.

(2)    Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation:

            The changes in accumulated depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 are as follows:

 
  2009   2008   2007  

Balance, beginning of year

  $ 6,015,677   $ 5,168,565   $ 4,479,198  
 

Acquisitions and consolidations (5)

            12,714  
 

Depreciation expense

    893,139     871,556     808,041  
 

Disposals

    (102,146 )   (24,444 )   (131,388 )
               

Balance, close of year

  $ 6,806,670   $ 6,015,677   $ 5,168,565  
               

            Depreciation of our investment in buildings and improvements reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income is calculated over the estimated original lives of the assets as follows:

(3)
Initial cost generally represents net book value at December 20, 1993, except for acquired properties and new developments after December 20, 1993. Initial cost also includes any new developments that are opened during the current year. Costs of disposals and impairments of property are first reflected as a reduction to cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition.

(4)
Not developed/constructed by us or our predecessors. The date of construction represents the acquisition date.

(5)
Property initial cost for these properties is the cost at the date of consolidation for properties previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accumulated depreciation amounts for properties consolidated which were previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting include the minority interest holders' portion of accumulated depreciation.

(6)
Secured by a $260,000 cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted mortgage loan facility.

118


Table of Contents

Exhibits    

2

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as February 12, 2007, by and among SPG-FCM Ventures, LLC, SPG-FCM Acquisitions,  Inc., SPG-FCM Acquisitions, L.P., The Mills Corporation, and The Mills Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2007).

3.1

 

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 (filed by Simon Property Group, L.P.)).

3.2

 

Eighth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2008).

3.3

 

Agreement between Simon Property Group, Inc. and Simon Property Group, L.P. dated March 7, 2007, but effective as of August 27, 1999, regarding a prior agreement filed under an exhibit 99.1 to Form S-3/A of Simon Property Group, L.P. on November 20, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Registrant's 2008 Form 10-K).

3.4

 

Agreement between Simon Property Group, Inc. and Simon Property Group, L.P. dated April 29, 2009, but effective as of October 14, 2004, regarding redemption of the Registrant's Series I Preferred Units (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2009).

4(a)

 

Indenture, dated as of November 26, 1996, by and among Simon Property Group, L.P. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement of Form S-3 filed on October 21, 1996 (Reg. No. 333-11491)).

10.1

 

$3,500,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2005, among Simon Property Group, L.P., the Institutions named therein as Lenders and the Institutions named therein as Co-Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2005).

10.2

 

Amendment to Credit Agreement among Simon Property Group, L.P., the Institutions named therein as Lenders and the Institutions named therein as Co-Agents, dated October 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2007).

10.3*

 

Simon Property Group, L.P. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2008).

10.4(b)

 

Option Agreement to acquire the Excluded Retail Property (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10).

10.5

 

Voting Agreement dated as of June 20, 2004 among the Simon Property Group, Inc., Simon Property Group, L.P., and certain holders of shares of common stock of Chelsea Property Group, Inc. and/or common units of CPG Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Simon Property Group,  L.P. on June 22, 2004).

10.6

 

$3,565,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of December 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 2009).

12

 

Statement regarding computation of ratios.

21

 

List of Subsidiaries of the Company.

23.1

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

31.1

 

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

 

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32

 

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


(a)
Does not include supplemental indentures which authorize the issuance of debt securities series, none of which exceeds 10% of the total assets of Simon Property Group, L.P. on a consolidated basis. Simon Property Group, L.P. agrees to file copies of any such supplemental indentures upon the request of the Commission.

(b)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit indicated filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993 by a predecessor of Simon Property Group, L.P.

*
Represents a management contract, or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Regulation S-K.

119




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 12


SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands)

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2009   2008   2007   2006   2005  

Earnings:

                               
 

Pre-tax income from continuing operations

  $ 382,042   $ 603,141   $ 663,283   $ 741,097   $ 486,532  
 

Add:

                               
   

Pre-tax (loss) income from 50% or greater than 50% owned unconsolidated entities

    (22,914 )   (29,093 )   (9,061 )   45,313     49,939  
   

Distributed income from less than 50% owned unconsolidated entities

    60,877     61,482     51,594     53,000     66,165  
   

Amortization of capitalized interest

    4,367     4,927     2,462     5,027     2,772  
 

Fixed Charges

    1,247,543     1,254,111     1,196,718     958,818     904,324  
 

Less:

                               
   

Income from unconsolidated entities

    (40,220 )   (32,246 )   (38,120 )   (110,819 )   (81,807 )
   

Interest capitalization

    (14,749 )   (28,451 )   (37,270 )   (34,073 )   (15,502 )
                       

Earnings

  $ 1,616,946   $ 1,833,871   $ 1,829,606   $ 1,658,363   $ 1,412,423  
                       

Fixed Charges:

                               
 

Portion of rents representative of the interest factor

    9,082     8,996     9,032     9,052     8,869  
 

Interest on indebtedness (including amortization of debt expense)

    1,223,712     1,196,334     1,150,416     915,693     879,953  
 

Interest capitalized

    14,749     28,451     37,270     34,073     15,502  
 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

        20,330              
                       

Fixed Charges

  $ 1,247,543   $ 1,254,111   $ 1,196,718   $ 958,818   $ 904,324  
                       

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

    1.30x     1.46x     1.53x     1.73x     1.56x  
                       

            For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, "earnings" have been computed by adding fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest, to income from continuing operations including income from noncontrolling interests and our share of income from 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates which have fixed charges, and our share of distributed operating income from less than 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates instead of our share of income from the less than 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates. There are generally no restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures where no preference in favor of the other owners of the joint venture exists. "Fixed charges" consist of interest costs, whether expensed or capitalized, the interest component of rental expenses, preferred distributions, losses on extinguishment of debt, and amortization of debt issuance costs.

120




QuickLinks

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P. Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (in thousands)

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 21


List of Subsidiaries of Simon Property Group, L.P.

Subsidiary
 
Jurisdiction
The Retail Property Trust   Massachusetts
Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.    Illinois
Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.    Texas
Shopping Center Associates   New York
Simon Capital Limited Partnership   Delaware
M.S. Management Associates, Inc.    Delaware
Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd.    Bermuda
Marigold Indemnity, Ltd.    Delaware
Bridgewood Insurance Company, Ltd.    Bermuda
Simon Business Network, LLC   Delaware
Simon Brand Ventures, LLC   Indiana
Simon Global Limited   United Kingdom
Simon Services, Inc.    Delaware
Simon Property Group Administrative Services Partnership, L.P.    Delaware
SPGGC, LLC   Virginia
Kravco Simon Investments, L.P.    Pennsylvania
SPG ML Holdings, LLC   Delaware
Simon Management Associates II, LLC   Delaware
Simon Management Associates, LLC   Delaware
CPG Partners, L.P.    Delaware

            Omits names of subsidiaries that as of December 31, 2009 were not, in the aggregate, a "significant subsidiary."

121




QuickLinks

List of Subsidiaries of Simon Property Group, L.P.

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

            We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-132513-01) of Simon Property Group, L.P. and in the related prospectus of our reports dated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 
   
    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 12, 2010

122




QuickLinks

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 31.1


Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            I, David Simon, certify that:

            1.     I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

            2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

            4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

            5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


Date: March 12, 2010

 

 

 

 

/s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner

123




QuickLinks

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 31.2


Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            I, Stephen E. Sterrett, certify that:

            1.     I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

            2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

            3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

            4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

            5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


Date: March 12, 2010

 

 

 

 

/s/ STEPHEN E. STERRETT

Stephen E. Sterrett
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner

124




QuickLinks

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of Simon Property Group, L.P., on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
March 12, 2010
   

/s/ STEPHEN E. STERRETT

Stephen E. Sterrett
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
March 12, 2010

 

 

125




QuickLinks

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002