Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IV

Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  001-36110
(Commission File No.)
  34-1755769
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

225 West Washington Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)

(317) 636-1600
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
2.375% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020   New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



            Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes ý    No o

            Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No ý

            Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

            Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

            Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

            Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o

            Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12-b of the Act). Yes o    No ý

            Registrant had no publicly-traded voting equity as of June 30, 2014.

            Registrant has no common stock outstanding.



Documents Incorporated By Reference

            None.


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No.    
  Page No.  
Part I  

1.

 

Business

 

 

3

 
1A.   Risk Factors     7  
1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments     12  
2.   Properties     13  
3.   Legal Proceedings     39  
4.   Mine Safety Disclosures     39  

Part II

 

5.

 

Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

 

40

 
6.   Selected Financial Data     41  
7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     42  
7A.   Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk     59  
8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     60  
9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     98  
9A.   Controls and Procedures     98  
9B.   Other Information     98  

Part III

 

10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

 

99

 
11.   Executive Compensation     99  
12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters     99  
13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence     99  
14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services     99  

Part IV

 

15.

 

Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules

 

 

100

 

Signatures

 

 

101

 

2


Table of Contents


Part I

Item 1.    Business

            Simon Property Group, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership and the majority-owned partnership subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. In this discussion, the terms "Operating Partnership", "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, L.P. and its subsidiaries and the term "Simon" refers specifically to Simon Property Group, Inc. Simon is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. REITs will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as they continue to distribute not less than 100% of their taxable income. According to our partnership agreement, we are required to pay all expenses of Simon.

            We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of malls, Premium Outlets® and The Mills®. As of December 31, 2014, we owned or held an interest in 207 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 109 malls, 68 Premium Outlets, 13 Mills, 3 community centers, and 14 other retail properties in 37 states and Puerto Rico. We have four outlets under development and have redevelopment and expansion projects, including the addition of anchors and big box tenants, underway at more than 25 properties in the U.S. and Asia. Internationally, as of December 31, 2014, we had ownership interests in nine Premium Outlets in Japan, three Premium Outlets in South Korea, two Premium Outlets in Canada, one Premium Outlet in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet in Malaysia. As of December 31, 2014, we had noncontrolling ownership interests in five outlet properties in Europe through our joint venture with McArthurGlen. Of the five properties, two are located in Italy and one each is located in Austria, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Additionally, as of December 31, 2014, we owned a 28.9% equity stake in Klépierre SA, or Klépierre, a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in, shopping centers located in 13 countries in Europe.

            On May 28, 2014, as further discussed in Note 3 to the notes to the consolidated financial statements, we completed the spin-off of our interests in 98 properties comprised of substantially all of our strip center business and our smaller enclosed malls to Washington Prime Group Inc., or Washington Prime, an independent, publicly traded REIT (now doing business as WP GLIMCHER). The historical results of operations of the Washington Prime properties as well as the related assets and liabilities are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

            For a description of our operational strategies and developments in our business during 2014, see Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this Form 10-K.

Other Policies

            The following is a discussion of our investment policies, financing policies, conflict of interest policies and policies with respect to certain other activities. One or more of these policies may be amended or rescinded from time to time by Simon without a stockholder vote.

            While we emphasize equity real estate investments, we may also provide secured financing to or invest in equity or debt securities of other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers consistent with Simon's qualification as a REIT. However, any of these investments would be subject to the percentage ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification. These REIT limitations mean that we cannot make an investment that would cause Simon's real estate assets to be less than 75% of its total assets. Simon must also derive at least 75% of its gross income directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including "rents from real property," dividends from other REITs and, in certain circumstances, interest from certain types of temporary investments. In addition, Simon must also derive at least 95% of its gross income from such real property investments, and from dividends, interest and gains from the sale or dispositions of stock or securities or from other combinations of the foregoing.

            Subject to REIT limitations, we may invest in the securities of other issuers in connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in real estate. Such an investment would normally be in the form of general or limited partnership or membership interests in special purpose partnerships and limited liability companies that own one or more properties. We may, in the future, acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs, management companies or similar entities where such investments would be consistent with our investment policies.

3


Table of Contents

            Because Simon's REIT qualification requires it to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income, we regularly access the debt markets to raise the funds necessary to finance acquisitions, develop and redevelop properties, and refinance maturing debt. We must comply with the covenants contained in our financing agreements that limit our ratio of debt to total assets or market value, as defined. For example, our lines of credit and the indentures for our debt securities contain covenants that restrict the total amount of debt to 65%, or 60% in relation to certain debt, of total assets, as defined under the related arrangement, and secured debt to 50% of total assets. In addition, these agreements contain other covenants requiring compliance with financial ratios. Furthermore, the amount of debt that we may incur is limited as a practical matter by our desire to maintain acceptable ratings for Simon's equity securities and our debt securities. We strive to maintain investment grade ratings on our debt securities at all times, but we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in the future.

            We may raise additional capital by issuing units of partnership interest, or units, or debt securities, creating joint ventures with existing ownership interests in properties, entering into joint venture arrangements for new development projects, retaining cash flows or a combination of these methods. If Simon's Board of Directors determines to raise equity capital at the Operating Partnership level, we may, without limited partner approval, issue additional units or other equity interests in us. We may issue units in any manner and on such terms and for such consideration as we deem appropriate. This may include issuing units in exchange for property. We may issue preferred units that could be senior to our units and may be convertible into units or Simon stock. Existing holders of units have no preemptive right to purchase units in any subsequent offerings. Any such offering could dilute a limited partner's investment in us.

            We expect most future borrowings would be made in the form of bank borrowings, publicly and privately placed debt instruments, or purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties. Any such indebtedness may be secured or unsecured. Any such indebtedness may also have full or limited recourse to the borrower or cross-collateralized with other debt, or may be fully or partially guaranteed by us. Although we may borrow to fund the payment of distributions, we currently have no expectation that we will regularly do so.

            On April 7, 2014, we amended and extended our $4.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, or Credit Facility. The Credit Facility's initial borrowing capacity of $4.0 billion may be increased to $5.0 billion during its term. The initial maturity date of the Credit Facility was extended to June 30, 2018 and can be extended for an additional year to June 30, 2019 at our sole option. We also have an additional $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, or Supplemental Facility, which may be increased to $2.5 billion during its term. The Supplemental Facility will initially mature on June 30, 2016 and can be extended for an additional year at our sole option. We may issue debt securities which may be convertible into units, preferred units or be accompanied by warrants to purchase equity interests or be exchangeable for stock of Simon. We also may sell or securitize our lease receivables.

            On October 6, 2014, we established a global unsecured commercial paper note program, or the Commercial Paper program. Under the terms of the program, we may issue unsecured Commercial Paper notes, denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros and other currencies, up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $500.0 million, or the non-U.S. dollar equivalent thereof. Notes issued in non-U.S. currencies may be issued by one or more of our subsidiaries and are guaranteed by us. Our Commercial Paper program is supported by our credit facilities and if necessary or appropriate, we may make one or more draws under the credit facilities to pay amounts outstanding from time to time on the Commercial Paper program.

            We may also finance our business through the following:

            We may also issue units to transferors of properties or other partnership interests which may permit the transferor to defer gain recognition for tax purposes.

            We do not have a policy limiting the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any particular property. Mortgage financing instruments, however, usually limit additional indebtedness on such properties. Additionally, our unsecured credit facilities, unsecured note indentures and other contracts may limit our ability to borrow and contain limits on mortgage indebtedness we may incur.

4


Table of Contents

            Typically, we invest in or form special purpose entities to assist us in obtaining secured permanent financing at attractive terms. Permanent financing may be structured as a mortgage loan on a single property, or on a group of properties, and generally requires us to provide a mortgage lien on the property or properties in favor of an institutional third party, as a joint venture with a third party, or as a securitized financing. For securitized financings, we create special purpose entities to own the properties. These special purpose entities, which are common in the real estate industry, are structured so that they would not be consolidated in a bankruptcy proceeding involving a parent company. We decide upon the structure of the financing based upon the best terms then available to us and whether the proposed financing is consistent with our other business objectives. For accounting purposes, we include the outstanding securitized debt of special purpose entities owning consolidated properties as part of our consolidated indebtedness.

            We maintain policies and have entered into agreements designed to reduce or eliminate potential conflicts of interest. Simon has adopted governance principles governing the function, conduct, selection, orientation and duties of its subsidiaries and the Simon Board of Directors, as well as written charters for each of the standing Committees of Simon's Board of Directors. In addition, the Board of Directors of Simon has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of its officers, directors, and employees and those of its subsidiaries, including us. At least a majority of the members of the Simon Board of Directors must qualify as independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, companies and cannot be affiliated with the Simon family who are significant stockholders of Simon and/or unitholders in us. In addition, the Audit and Compensation Committees of Simon's Board of Directors are comprised of independent members in accordance with the independence requirements of the NYSE. Any transaction between us and the Simons, including property acquisitions, service and property management agreements and retail space leases, must be approved by a majority of Simon's non-affiliated directors.

            The sale of certain of our properties may have an adverse tax impact on the Simons or other of our limited partners. In order to avoid any conflict of interest, the Simon charter requires that at least six of the non-affiliated directors of the Board of Directors must authorize and require us to sell any property we own. Any such sale is subject to applicable agreements with third parties. Noncompetition agreements executed by Herbert Simon and David Simon contain covenants limiting their ability to participate in certain shopping center activities.

            We intend to make investments which are consistent with Simon's qualification as a REIT, unless Simon's Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in Simon's best interests to so qualify as a REIT. The Board of Directors may make such a determination because of changing circumstances or changes in the REIT requirements. We have authority to offer units or other securities in exchange for property. We also have authority to repurchase or otherwise reacquire our units or any other securities. Our policy prohibits us from making any loans to the directors or executive officers of Simon for any purpose. We may make loans to the joint ventures in which we participate. Additionally, we may make or buy interests in loans for real estate properties owned by others.

Competition

            The retail industry is dynamic and competitive. We compete with numerous merchandise distribution channels including malls, outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with internet retailing sites and catalogs which provide retailers with distribution options beyond existing brick and mortar retail properties. The existence of competitive alternatives could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the tenants to occupy the properties that we develop and manage as well as for the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties). We believe that there are numerous factors that make our properties highly desirable to retailers including:

5


Table of Contents

Certain Activities

            During the past three years, we have:

Employees

            At December 31, 2014, we and our affiliates employed approximately 5,250 persons at various properties and offices throughout the United States, of which approximately 1,850 were part-time. Approximately 1,100 of these employees were located at our corporate headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Corporate Headquarters

            Our corporate headquarters are located at 225 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, and our telephone number is (317) 636-1600.

Available Information

            Our Internet website address is www.simon.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available or may be accessed free of charge through the "About Simon/Investor Relations/Financial Information" section of our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

6


Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

            The following factors, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and presented elsewhere by our management from time to time. These factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows, and you should carefully consider them. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or which are currently not believed to be material may also affect our actual results. We may update these factors in our future periodic reports.

Risks Relating to Debt and the Financial Markets

             We have a substantial debt burden that could affect our future operations.

            As of December 31, 2014, our consolidated mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, excluding related premium and discount, totaled $20.8 billion. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to meet required debt service. Our debt service costs generally will not be reduced if developments at the property, such as the entry of new competitors or the loss of major tenants, cause a reduction in the income from the property. Should such events occur, our operations may be adversely affected. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and income from such property is insufficient to pay that indebtedness, the property could be foreclosed upon by the mortgagee resulting in a loss of income and a decline in our total asset value.

             Disruption in the credit markets or downgrades in our credit ratings may adversely affect our ability to access external financings for our growth and ongoing debt service requirements.

            We depend on external financings, principally debt financings, to fund the growth of our business and to ensure that we can meet ongoing maturities of our outstanding debt. Our access to financing depends on our credit rating, the willingness of banks to lend to us and conditions in the capital markets. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the financing we need for future growth or to meet our debt service as obligations mature, or that the financing available to us will be on acceptable terms.

             Adverse changes in our credit rating could affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.

            Our outstanding senior unsecured notes, the Commercial Paper program, and the preferred stock of Simon are periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. The credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry and the economic outlook in general. Our credit rating can affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financing we obtain. Since we depend primarily on debt financing to fund our growth, adverse changes in our credit rating could have a negative effect on our future growth.

             Our hedging interest rate protection arrangements may not effectively limit our interest rate risk.

            We selectively manage our exposure to interest rate risk by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of our variable rate debt. In addition, we refinance fixed rate debt at times when we believe rates and terms are appropriate. Our efforts to manage these exposures may not be successful.

            Our use of interest rate hedging arrangements to manage risk associated with interest rate volatility may expose us to additional risks, including a risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement may fail to honor its obligations. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Termination of these hedging agreements typically involves costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs.

Factors Affecting Real Estate Investments and Operations

             We face risks associated with the acquisition, development, redevelopment and expansion of properties.

            We regularly acquire and develop new properties and expand and redevelop existing properties, and these activities are subject to various risks. We may not be successful in pursuing acquisition, development or redevelopment/expansion opportunities. In addition, newly acquired, developed or redeveloped/expanded properties may not perform as well as

7


Table of Contents

expected. We are subject to other risks in connection with any acquisition, development and redevelopment/expansion activities, including the following:

            If a development or redevelopment/expansion project is unsuccessful, either because it is not meeting our expectations when operational or was not completed according to the project planning, we could lose our investment in the project. Further, if we guarantee the property's financing, our loss could exceed our investment in the project.

             Real estate investments are relatively illiquid.

            Our properties represent a substantial portion of our total consolidated assets. These investments are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties or investments in real estate in response to any changes in economic or other conditions may be limited. If we want to sell a property, we cannot assure you that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period or that the sales price of a property will exceed the cost of our investment.

             Our international expansion may subject us to different or greater risk from those associated with our domestic operations.

            As of December 31, 2014, we held interests in joint venture properties that operate in Austria, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Korea, Canada, and the United Kingdom. We also have an equity stake in Klépierre, a publicly-traded European real estate company which operates in 13 countries in Europe. Accordingly, our operating results and the value of our international operations may be impacted by any unhedged movements in the foreign currencies in which those operations transact and in which our net investment in the foreign operation is held. We may pursue additional expansion and development opportunities outside the United States. International development and ownership activities carry risks that are different from those we face with our domestic properties and operations. These risks include:

            Our international activities represented approximately 9.0% of our net operating income, or NOI, for the year ended December 31, 2014. To the extent that we expand our international activities, the above risks could increase in significance, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Environmental Risks

             As owners of real estate, we can face liabilities for environmental contamination.

            Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require us, as a current or previous owner or operator of real property, to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a property or at impacted neighboring properties. These laws often impose liability regardless of whether the property owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic

8


Table of Contents

substances. These laws and regulations may require the abatement or removal of asbestos containing materials in the event of damage, demolition or renovation, reconstruction or expansion of a property and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. Those laws and regulations also govern the installation, maintenance and removal of underground storage tanks used to store waste oils or other petroleum products. Many of our properties contain, or at one time contained, asbestos containing materials or underground storage tanks (primarily related to auto service center establishments or emergency electrical generation equipment). The costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial and could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition but is not estimable. The presence of contamination, or the failure to remediate contamination, may also adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or redevelop a property or to borrow using a property as collateral.

             Our efforts to identify environmental liabilities may not be successful.

            Although we believe that our portfolio is in substantial compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances, this belief is based on limited testing. Nearly all of our properties have been subjected to Phase I or similar environmental audits. These environmental audits have not revealed, nor are we aware of, any environmental liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. However, we cannot assure you that:

Retail Operations Risks

             Overall economic conditions may adversely affect the general retail environment.

            Our concentration in the retail real estate market means that we are subject to the risks that affect the retail environment generally, including the levels of consumer spending, seasonality, the willingness of retailers to lease space in our shopping centers, tenant bankruptcies, changes in economic conditions, increasing use of the internet by retailers and consumers, consumer confidence, casualties and other natural disasters, and the potential for terrorist activities. The economy and consumer spending appear to be recovering from the effects of the recent recession. We derive our cash flow from operations primarily from retail tenants, many of whom have been and continue to be under some degree of economic stress. A significant deterioration in our cash flow from operations could require us to curtail planned capital expenditures or seek alternative sources of financing.

             We may not be able to lease newly developed properties and renew leases and relet space at existing properties.

            We may not be able to lease new properties to an appropriate mix of tenants or for rents that are consistent with our projections. Also, when leases for our existing properties expire, the premises may not be relet or the terms of reletting, including the cost of allowances and concessions to tenants, may be less favorable than the current lease terms. To the extent that our leasing plans are not achieved, our cash generated before debt repayments and capital expenditures could be adversely affected. Changes in economic and operating conditions that occur subsequent to our review of recoverability of investment property and other assets could impact the assumptions used in that assessment and could result in future charges to earnings if assumptions regarding those investments differ from actual results.

             Some of our properties depend on anchor stores or major tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of one or more of these anchor stores or major tenants.

            Our properties are typically anchored by department stores and other large nationally recognized tenants. The value of some of our properties could be materially adversely affected if these department stores or major tenants fail to comply with their contractual obligations or cease their operations.

            For example, among department stores and other large stores — often referred to as "big box" stores — corporate merger activity typically results in the closure of duplicate or geographically overlapping store locations. Further sustained

9


Table of Contents

adverse pressure on the results of our department stores and major tenants may have a similarly sustained adverse impact upon our own results. Certain department stores and other national retailers have experienced, and may continue to experience for the foreseeable future given current macroeconomic uncertainty and less-than-desirable levels of consumer confidence, considerable decreases in customer traffic in their retail stores, increased competition from alternative retail options such as those accessible via the Internet and other forms of pressure on their business models. As pressure on these department stores and national retailers increases, their ability to maintain their stores, meet their obligations both to us and to their external lenders and suppliers, withstand takeover attempts by investors or rivals or avoid bankruptcy and/or liquidation may be impaired and result in closures of their stores. Other tenants may be entitled to modify the economic or other terms of their existing leases in the event of such closures. The modification could be unfavorable to us as the lessor, and could decrease rents or expense recovery charges.

            Additionally, department store or major tenant closures may result in decreased customer traffic, which could lead to decreased sales at our properties. If the sales of stores operating in our properties were to decline significantly due to the closing of anchor stores or other national retailers, adverse economic conditions, or other reasons, tenants may be unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. In the event of any default by a tenant, we may not be able to fully recover, and/or may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover, amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with such parties.

             We face potential adverse effects from tenant bankruptcies.

            Bankruptcy filings by retailers can occur regularly in the course of our operations. We continually seek to re-lease vacant spaces resulting from tenant terminations. The bankruptcy of a tenant, particularly an anchor tenant, may make it more difficult to lease the remainder of the affected properties. Future tenant bankruptcies could adversely affect our properties or impact our ability to successfully execute our re-leasing strategy.

             We face a wide range of competition that could affect our ability to operate profitably.

            Our properties compete with other retail properties and other forms of retailing such as catalogs and e-commerce websites. Competition may come from malls, outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and other shopping centers, both existing as well as future development projects, as well as catalogs and e-commerce. The presence of competitive alternatives affects our ability to lease space and the level of rents we can obtain. New construction, renovations and expansions at competing sites could also negatively affect our properties.

            We also compete with other retail property developers to acquire prime development sites. In addition, we compete with other retail property companies for tenants and qualified management.

Risks Relating to Joint Venture Properties and our Investment in Klépierre

             We have limited control with respect to some properties that are partially owned or managed by third parties, which may adversely affect our ability to sell or refinance them.

            As of December 31, 2014, we owned interests in 95 income-producing properties with other parties. Of those, 13 properties are included in our consolidated financial statements. We account for the other 82 properties, or the joint venture properties, as well as our investment in Klépierre, using the equity method of accounting. We serve as general partner or property manager for 60 of these 82 properties; however, certain major decisions, such as approving the operating budget and selling, refinancing and redeveloping the properties require the consent of the other owners. Of the properties for which we do not serve as general partner or property manager, 19 are in our international joint ventures. The international properties are managed locally by joint ventures in which we share control of the properties with our partner. The other owners have participating rights that we consider substantive for purposes of determining control over the properties' assets. The remaining joint venture properties and Klépierre are managed by third parties. These limitations may adversely affect our ability to sell, refinance, or otherwise operate these properties.

             We guarantee debt or otherwise provide support for a number of joint venture properties.

            Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by a mortgage on the joint venture property, which is non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2014, we had guaranteed joint venture related mortgage indebtedness of $223.5 million (of which we have a right of recovery from our venture partners of $78.7 million). A default by a joint venture under its debt obligations may expose us to liability under a guaranty. We may elect to fund cash needs of a joint venture through equity contributions (generally on a basis proportionate to our ownership interests), advances or partner loans, although such fundings are not typically required contractually or otherwise.

10


Table of Contents

Other Factors Affecting Our Business

             Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.

            We maintain insurance coverage with third party carriers who provide a portion of the coverage for specific layers of potential losses including commercial general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties in the United States. The initial portion of coverage not provided by third party carriers is either insured through our wholly-owned captive insurance companies or other financial arrangements controlled by us. A third party carrier has, in turn, agreed to provide evidence of coverage for this layer of losses under the terms and conditions of the carrier's policy. A similar policy written through our captive insurance entities also provides initial coverage for property insurance and certain windstorm risks at the properties located in coastal windstorm locations.

            There are some types of losses, including lease and other contract claims, which generally are not insured. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue it could generate.

            We currently maintain insurance coverage against acts of terrorism on all of our properties in the United States on an "all risk" basis in the amount of up to $1 billion. The current federal laws which provide this coverage are expected to operate through 2020. Despite the existence of this insurance coverage, any threatened or actual terrorist attacks where we operate could adversely affect our property values, revenues, consumer traffic and tenant sales.

             We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology (IT) networks and related systems.

            We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations (including managing our building systems) and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.

             Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.

            The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of Simon's executive management team and key employees, and Simon's ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that Simon will retain our key executive management team and employees or that Simon will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals for these positions in the future. Losing any one or more of these persons could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Risks Relating to Income Taxes

             The failure of our REIT subsidiaries to maintain their qualifications as REITs or the loss of favorable tax treatment in certain of our international operations could have adverse tax consequences to us, our unitholders, and Simon.

            We are subject to certain income-based taxes, both domestically and internationally, and other taxes, including state and local taxes, franchise taxes, and withholding taxes on dividends from certain of our international investments. We currently receive favorable tax treatment in various domestic and international jurisdictions through tax rules and

11


Table of Contents

regulations or through international treaties. Should we no longer receive such benefits, the amount of taxes we pay may increase.

            In the U.S., Simon and certain of our subsidiaries have elected to qualify as REITs. Qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes is governed by highly technical and complex provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. We believe our REIT subsidiaries are organized and have been operated in a manner which allows our REIT subsidiaries and Simon to qualify for taxation as REITs. We intend to continue to operate in this manner. However, qualification as a REIT depends upon meeting ongoing asset and income tests and other requirements for asset diversification, distribution levels and diversity of ownership under the Internal Revenue Code. If a REIT subsidiary fails to comply with those provisions and if available relief provisions do not apply:

            As a result, net income and funds available for distribution to our unitholders would be reduced for those years in which a REIT subsidiary fails to qualify as a REIT. Although we currently intend to operate the REIT subsidiaries so as to qualify each as a REIT, we cannot assure you we will succeed or that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations might not cause us to revoke the REIT election of a REIT subsidiary.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

            None.

12


Table of Contents

Item 2.    Properties

            Our U.S. properties primarily consist of malls, Premium Outlets, The Mills, community centers and other retail properties. These properties contain an aggregate of approximately 182.0 million square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA.

            Malls typically contain at least one traditional department store anchor or a combination of anchors and big box retailers with a wide variety of smaller stores connecting the anchors. Additional stores are usually located along the perimeter of the parking area. Our 109 malls are generally enclosed centers and range in size from approximately 425,000 to 2.5 million square feet of GLA. Our malls contain in the aggregate more than 13,900 occupied stores, including approximately 516 anchors, which are predominately national retailers.

            Premium Outlets generally contain a wide variety of designer and manufacturer stores located in open-air centers. Our 68 Premium Outlets range in size from approximately 150,000 to 850,000 square feet of GLA. The Premium Outlets are generally located near major metropolitan areas and/or tourist destinations.

            The 13 properties in The Mills generally range in size from 1.1 million to 2.2 million square feet of GLA and are located in major metropolitan areas. They have a combination of traditional mall, outlet center, and big box retailers and entertainment uses.

            We also have interests in three community centers and 14 other retail properties. The community centers range in size from 230,000 to 900,000 square feet of GLA. The other retail properties range in size from approximately 150,000 to 750,000 square feet of GLA and are considered non-core to our business model. In total, the community centers and other retail properties represent 1.4% of our total operating income before depreciation and amortization.

            As of December 31, 2014, approximately 97.1% of the owned GLA in malls and Premium Outlets was leased and approximately 98.4% of the owned GLA for The Mills was leased.

            We wholly own 133 of our properties, effectively control 13 properties in which we have a joint venture interest, and hold the remaining 61 properties through unconsolidated joint venture interests. We are the managing or co-managing general partner or member of 204 properties in the United States. Certain of our joint venture properties are subject to various rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, put and call rights, or other sale or marketing rights for partners which are customary in real estate partnership agreements and the industry. We and our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions) which may result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings, or the use of units, to acquire the joint venture interest from our partner.

            The following property table summarizes certain data for our malls, Premium Outlets, The Mills, community centers and other retail properties located in the United States, including Puerto Rico, as of December 31, 2014.

13


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal Ownership   Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
    Malls                                      
1.    Apple Blossom Mall   VA   Winchester   Fee     49.1 % (4) Acquired 1999     97.3%     473,153   Belk, JCPenney, Sears, Carmike Cinemas
2.   Auburn Mall   MA   Auburn   Fee     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     100.0 %   586,242   Macy's (9), Sears
3.   Aventura Mall (1)   FL   Miami Beach (Miami)   Fee     33.3 % (4) Built 1983     98.7%     2,104,735   Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Macy's Men's & Home Furniture, JCPenney, Sears, Nordstrom, Equinox Fitness Clubs, AMC Theatres
4.   Avenues, The   FL   Jacksonville   Fee     25.0 % (4)(2) Built 1990     97.6%     1,114,367   Belk, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Forever 21
5.   Bangor Mall   ME   Bangor   Fee     87.6 % Acquired 2003     99.4%     652,531   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods
6.   Barton Creek Square   TX   Austin   Fee     100.0 % Built 1981     98.9%     1,429,568   Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's (9), JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatre
7.   Battlefield Mall   MO   Springfield   Fee and Ground Lease (2056)     100.0 % Built 1970     95.7%     1,201,576   Macy's, Dillard's (9), JCPenney, Sears, MC Sporting Goods
8.   Bay Park Square   WI   Green Bay   Fee     100.0 % Built 1980     89.8%     711,747   Younkers, Younkers Home Furniture Gallery, Kohl's, ShopKo, Marcus Cinema 16
9.   Brea Mall   CA   Brea (Los Angeles)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     98.9%     1,319,398   Nordstrom, Macy's (9), JCPenney, Sears
10.   Briarwood Mall   MI   Ann Arbor   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2007     96.1%     983,111   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Von Maur, MC Sporting Goods
11.   Broadway Square   TX   Tyler   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1994     95.3%     627,361   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
12.   Burlington Mall   MA   Burlington (Boston)   Fee and Ground Lease (2048) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 1998     98.2%     1,317,237   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Nordstrom, Crate & Barrel
13.   Cape Cod Mall   MA   Hyannis   Fee and Ground Leases (2029-2073) (7)     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     96.3%     721,896   Macy's (9), Sears, Best Buy, Marshalls, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinema
14.   Castleton Square   IN   Indianapolis   Fee     100.0 % Built 1972     98.6%     1,383,066   Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres
15.   Cielo Vista Mall   TX   El Paso   Fee and Ground Lease (2022) (7)     100.0 % Built 1974     100.0 %   1,245,895   Macy's, Dillard's (9), JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres
16.   Coconut Point   FL   Estero   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 2006     96.8%     1,204,897   Dillard's, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, DSW, Office Max, PetsMart, Ross Dress for Less, Cost Plus World Market, T.J. Maxx, Hollywood Theatres, Super Target, Michael's, Sports Authority
17.   Coddingtown Mall   CA   Santa Rosa   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2005     66.8%     822,943   Macy's, JCPenney, Whole Foods, Target
18.   College Mall   IN   Bloomington   Fee and Ground Lease (2048) (7)     100.0 % Built 1965     98.6%     636,255   Macy's, Sears, Target, Dick's Sporting Goods, Bed Bath & Beyond
19.   Columbia Center   WA   Kennewick   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1987     97.8%     771,137   Macy's (9), JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinema, DSW (6)
20.   Copley Place   MA   Boston   Fee     94.4 % (12) Acquired 2002     97.8%     1,242,603   Neiman Marcus, Barneys New York
21.   Coral Square   FL   Coral Springs (Miami)   Fee     97.2 % Built 1984     100.0 %   943,886   Macy's (9), JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's
22.   Cordova Mall   FL   Pensacola   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     96.2%     918,079   Dillard's, Belk, Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond, Cost Plus World Market, Ross Dress for Less, Dick's Sporting Goods
23.   Crystal Mall   CT   Waterford   Fee     78.2 % (4) Acquired 1998     92.3%     783,116   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Bed Bath & Beyond, Christmas Tree Shops
24.   Dadeland Mall   FL   Miami   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 1997     98.6%     1,498,402   Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Macy's (9), JCPenney
25.   Del Amo Fashion Center (13)   CA   Torrance (Los Angeles)   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2007     92.8%     2,094,060   Macy's Womens, Macy's Mens & Home & Furniture, Nordstrom (6), JCPenney, Sears, Marshalls, T.J. Maxx, Barnes & Noble, JoAnn Fabrics, Crate & Barrel, L.A. Fitness, AMC Theatres, (8)
26.   Domain, The   TX   Austin   Fee     100.0 % Built 2006     95.1%     1,232,899   Neiman Marcus, Macy's, Dick's Sporting Goods, iPic Theaters, Dillard's, Arhaus Furniture, Punch Bowl Social
27.    Dover Mall   DE   Dover   Fee and Ground Lease (2041) (7)     68.1 % (4) Acquired 2007     92.5%     928,189   Macy's, JCPenney, Boscov's, Sears, Carmike Cinemas, Dick's Sporting Goods

14


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal Ownership   Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
28.    Emerald Square   MA   North Attleboro (Providence, RI)   Fee     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     94.3%     1,022,661   Macy's (9), JCPenney, Sears
29.   Empire Mall   SD   Sioux Falls   Fee and Ground Lease (2033) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 1998     95.7%     1,125,295   Macy's, Younkers, JCPenney, Sears, Gordmans, Hy-Vee, Dick's Sporting Goods
30.   Falls, The   FL   Miami   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2007     96.9%     837,626   Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Regal Cinema, The Fresh Market
31.   Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The   VA   Arlington (Washington, DC)   Fee     42.5 % (4) Built 1989     98.0%     990,432   Nordstrom, Macy's
32.   Fashion Mall at Keystone, The   IN   Indianapolis   Fee and Ground Lease (2067) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 1997     94.3%     710,663   Saks Fifth Avenue, Crate & Barrel, Nordstrom, Keystone Art Cinema
33.   Fashion Valley   CA   San Diego   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2001     97.7%     1,721,237   Forever 21, Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, AMC Theatres, The Container Store
34.   Firewheel Town Center   TX   Garland (Dallas)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2005     93.0%     999,502   Dillard's, Macy's, Barnes & Noble, DSW, Cost Plus World Market, AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ethan Allen, Toys 'R Us/Babies 'R Us
35.   Florida Mall, The   FL   Orlando   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 1986     98.9%     1,676,299   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, H&M, Forever 21, Zara, American Girl, Dick's Sporting Goods (6), Crayola Experience (6)
36.   Forum Shops at Caesars, The   NV   Las Vegas   Ground Lease (2050)     100.0 % Built 1992     97.8%     674,730    
37.   Galleria, The   TX   Houston   Fee     50.4 % (4) Acquired 2002     98.3%     1,902,091   Saks Fifth Avenue (11), Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's, Galleria Tennis/Athletic Club
38.   Greendale Mall   MA   Worcester (Boston)   Fee and Ground Lease (2019) (7)     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     91.8%     428,818   T.J. Maxx 'N More, Best Buy, DSW, Big Lots
39.   Greenwood Park Mall   IN   Greenwood (Indianapolis)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1979     96.6%     1,287,991   Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinema
40.   Haywood Mall   SC   Greenville   Fee and Ground Lease (2067) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 1998     97.9%     1,228,948   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Belk
41.   Independence Center   MO   Independence (Kansas City)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1994     98.2%     865,948   Dillard's, Macy's, Sears
42.   Ingram Park Mall   TX   San Antonio   Fee     100.0 % Built 1979     96.7%     1,120,874   Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Bealls, (8)
43.   King of Prussia Mall   PA   King of Prussia (Philadelphia)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2003     97.2%     2,450,177   Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, Macy's, JCPenney, Crate & Barrel, Arhaus Furniture, The Container Store, Dick's Sporting Goods, Primark (6)
44.   La Plaza Mall   TX   McAllen   Fee and Ground Lease (2040) (7)     100.0 % Built 1976     100.0 %   1,220,878   Macy's (9), Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Joe Brand
45.   Lakeline Mall   TX   Cedar Park (Austin)   Fee     100.0 % Built 1995     95.7%     1,097,510   Dillard's (9), Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
46.   Lehigh Valley Mall   PA   Whitehall   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2003     99.2%     1,180,862   Macy's, JCPenney, Boscov's, Barnes & Noble, hhgregg, Babies 'R Us
47.   Lenox Square   GA   Atlanta   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     99.4%     1,560,091   Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Macy's
48.   Liberty Tree Mall   MA   Danvers (Boston)   Fee     49.1 % (4) Acquired 1999     92.1%     856,039   Marshalls, Sports Authority, Target, Kohl's, Best Buy, Staples, AC Moore, AMC Theatres, Nordstrom Rack, Off Broadway Shoes, Sky Zone
49.   Livingston Mall   NJ   Livingston (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     90.4%     969,348   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Barnes & Noble
50.   Mall at Chestnut Hill, The   MA   Chestnut Hill (Boston)   Fee     94.4 % Acquired 2002     94.3%     469,006   Bloomingdale's (9)
51.   Mall at Rockingham Park, The   NH   Salem (Boston)   Fee     28.2 % (4) Acquired 1999     97.2%     1,025,214   JCPenney, Sears, Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Dick's Sporting Goods (6)
52.   Mall at Tuttle Crossing, The   OH   Dublin (Columbus)   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2007     94.7%     1,125,123   Macy's (9), JCPenney, Sears
53.   Mall of Georgia   GA   Buford (Atlanta)   Fee     100.0 % Built 1999     98.8%     1,817,941   Nordstrom (15), Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, Haverty's Furniture, Regal Cinema, Von Maur (6)
54.    Mall of New Hampshire, The   NH   Manchester   Fee     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     96.8%     812,357   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Best Buy, A.C. Moore

15


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal Ownership   Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
55.    McCain Mall   AR   N. Little Rock   Fee     100.0 % Built 1973     93.4%     788,155   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
56.   Meadowood Mall   NV   Reno   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2007     95.3%     883,751   Macy's (9), Sears, JCPenney, (8)
57.   Menlo Park Mall   NJ   Edison (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1997     99.1%     1,332,363   Nordstrom, Macy's, Barnes & Noble, AMC Dine-In Theatre, WOW! Work Out World, Fortunoff Backyard Store
58.   Miami International Mall   FL   Miami   Fee     47.8 % (4) Built 1982     99.7%     1,081,955   Macy's (9), JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's
59.   Midland Park Mall   TX   Midland   Fee     100.0 % Built 1980     98.3%     622,190   Dillard's (9), JCPenney, Sears, Bealls, Ross Dress for Less
60.   Miller Hill Mall   MN   Duluth   Fee     100.0 % Built 1973     96.1%     832,803   JCPenney, Sears, Younkers, Barnes & Noble, DSW, Dick's Sporting Goods
61.   Montgomery Mall   PA   North Wales (Philadelphia)   Fee     79.4 % Acquired 2003     80.6%     1,107,025   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Wegmans
62.   North East Mall   TX   Hurst (Dallas)   Fee     100.0 % Built 1971     98.0%     1,669,001   Nordstrom, Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Rave Theatre
63.   Northgate Mall   WA   Seattle   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1987     99.5%     1,048,104   Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW, Nordstrom Rack
64.   Northshore Mall   MA   Peabody (Boston)   Fee     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     95.2%     1,591,973   JCPenney, Sears, Nordstrom, Macy's Men's & Furniture, Macy's, Barnes & Noble, Toys 'R Us, Shaw's Grocery, The Container Store, DSW
65.   Ocean County Mall   NJ   Toms River (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     96.4%     898,359   Macy's, Boscov's, JCPenney, Sears
66.   Orland Square   IL   Orland Park (Chicago)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1997     97.6%     1,231,958   Macy's, Carson's, JCPenney, Sears, Dave & Buster's
67.   Oxford Valley Mall   PA   Langhorne (Philadelphia)   Fee     85.5 % Acquired 2003     88.8%     1,332,378   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, United Artists Theatre, (8)
68.   Penn Square Mall   OK   Oklahoma City   Ground Lease (2060)     94.5 % Acquired 2002     98.7%     1,063,809   Macy's, Dillard's (9), JCPenney, AMC Theatres
69.   Pheasant Lane Mall   NH   Nashua       0.0 % (14) Acquired 2002     96.6%     979,338   JCPenney, Sears, Target, Macy's, Dick's Sporting Goods
70.   Phipps Plaza   GA   Atlanta   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     94.5%     830,318   Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Belk, AMC Theatres, Arhaus Furniture, Legoland Discovery Center
71.   Plaza Carolina   PR   Carolina (San Juan)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     97.7%     1,157,721   JCPenney, Sears, Tiendas Capri, Econo, Best Buy, T.J. Maxx, DSW, Sports Authority
72.   Prien Lake Mall   LA   Lake Charles   Fee and Ground Lease (2040) (7)     100.0 % Built 1972     98.5%     848,040   Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods
73.   Quaker Bridge Mall   NJ   Lawrenceville   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2003     91.9%     1,083,298   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears
74.   Rockaway Townsquare   NJ   Rockaway (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     96.2%     1,245,658   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears
75.   Roosevelt Field   NY   Garden City (New York)   Fee and Ground Lease (2090) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 1998     95.2%     2,209,817   Bloomingdale's, Bloomingdale's Furniture Gallery, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Loews Theatre, XSport Fitness, Neiman Marcus (6)
76.   Ross Park Mall   PA   Pittsburgh   Fee     100.0 % Built 1986     98.8%     1,245,629   JCPenney, Sears, Nordstrom, L.L. Bean, Macy's, Crate & Barrel
77.   Santa Rosa Plaza   CA   Santa Rosa   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     91.5%     692,820   Macy's, Sears, Forever 21
78.   Shops at Nanuet, The   NY   Nanuet   Fee     100.0 % Redeveloped 2013     99.7%     752,872   Macy's, Sears, Fairway Market, Regal Cinema, 24 Hour Fitness
79.   Shops at Mission Viejo, The   CA   Mission Viejo (Los Angeles)   Fee     51.0 % (4) Built 1979     97.6%     1,151,131   Nordstrom, Macy's Women's, Macy's Men's and Furniture, Forever 21
80.   Shops at Riverside, The   NJ   Hackensack (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     94.2%     770,764   Bloomingdale's, Barnes & Noble, Arhaus Furniture, (8)
81.   Smith Haven Mall   NY   Lake Grove (New York)   Fee     25.0 % (4)(2) Acquired 1995     96.7%     1,300,240   Macy's, Macy's Furniture Gallery, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble
82.   Solomon Pond Mall   MA   Marlborough (Boston)   Fee     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     96.0%     885,178   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
83.   South Hills Village   PA   Pittsburgh   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1997     99.6%     1,118,429   Macy's, Macy's Furniture Gallery, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Carmike Cinemas, Dick's Sporting Goods, Target, DSW, Ulta

16


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal Ownership   Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
84.    South Shore Plaza   MA   Braintree (Boston)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     96.8%     1,588,885   Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Nordstrom, Target, DSW
85.   Southdale Center   MN   Edina (Minneapolis)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     86.8%     1,258,482   Macy's, JCPenney, AMC Theatres, Herberger's, Gordmans (6), Dave & Buster's (6)
86.   SouthPark   NC   Charlotte   Fee and Ground Lease (2040) (10)     100.0 % Acquired 2002     98.6%     1,680,545   Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Crate & Barrel, The Container Store
87.   Southridge Mall   WI   Greendale (Milwaukee)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     98.2%     1,176,807   JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Boston Store, Macy's
88.   Springfield Mall (1)   PA   Springfield (Philadelphia)   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2005     86.5%     611,200   Macy's, Target
89.   Square One Mall   MA   Saugus (Boston)   Fee     56.4 % (4) Acquired 1999     98.5%     929,779   Macy's, Sears, Best Buy, T.J. Maxx N More, Dick's Sporting Goods, Work Out World
90.   St. Charles Towne Center   MD   Waldorf (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     100.0 % Built 1990     98.0%     980,765   Macy's (9), JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Dick Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres
91.   St. Johns Town Center   FL   Jacksonville   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 2005     100.0 %   1,390,913   Dillard's, Target, Ashley Furniture Home Store, Barnes & Noble, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, DSW, JoAnn Fabrics, PetsMart, Nordstrom, Arhaus Furniture
92.   Stanford Shopping Center   CA   Palo Alto (San Jose)   Ground Lease (2054)     94.4 % (12) Acquired 2003     98.1%     1,233,578   Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's (9), Crate and Barrel, The Container Store
93.   Stoneridge Shopping Center   CA   Pleasanton (San Francisco)   Fee     49.9 % (4) Acquired 2007     98.6%     1,301,214   Macy's (9), Nordstrom, Sears, JCPenney
94.   Summit Mall   OH   Akron   Fee     100.0 % Built 1965     96.7%     769,431   Dillard's (9), Macy's
95.   Tacoma Mall   WA   Tacoma (Seattle)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1987     94.3%     1,335,516   Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, David's Bridal, Forever 21
96.   Tippecanoe Mall   IN   Lafayette   Fee     100.0 % Built 1973     98.4%     864,039   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods, hhgregg
97.   Town Center at Boca Raton   FL   Boca Raton (Miami)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     100.0 %   1,779,596   Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Sears, Crate & Barrel, The Container Store
98.   Town Center at Cobb   GA   Kennesaw (Atlanta)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 1998     94.8%     1,280,798   Belk, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Macy's Men's & Furniture
99.   Towne East Square   KS   Wichita   Fee     100.0 % Built 1975     98.8%     1,134,396   Dillard's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears
100.   Treasure Coast Square   FL   Jensen Beach   Fee     100.0 % Built 1987     96.3%     876,437   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, hhgregg, Regal Cinema
101.   Tyrone Square   FL   St. Petersburg (Tampa)   Fee     100.0 % Built 1972     98.0%     1,094,153   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, DSW, Cobb 10 Luxury Theatres (6)
102.   University Park Mall   IN   Mishawaka   Fee     100.0 % Built 1979     98.0%     920,985   Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble
103.   Walt Whitman Shops   NY   Huntington Station (New York)   Fee and Ground Lease (2032) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 1998     99.0%     1,087,715   Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale's, Lord & Taylor, Macy's, Zara (6)
104.   West Town Mall   TN   Knoxville   Ground Lease (2042)     50.0 % (4) Acquired 1991     98.0%     1,334,851   Belk (9), Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
105.   Westchester, The   NY   White Plains (New York)   Fee     40.0 % (4) Acquired 1997     97.4%     826,292   Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom
106.   White Oaks Mall   IL   Springfield   Fee     80.7 % Built 1977     89.8%     924,615   Macy's, Bergner's, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, hhgregg, LA Fitness
107.   Wolfchase Galleria   TN   Memphis   Fee     94.5 % Acquired 2002     98.7%     1,151,233   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Malco Theatres
108.   Woodfield Mall   IL   Schaumburg (Chicago)   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2012     96.9%     2,172,855   Nordstrom, Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears, Arhaus Furniture, Level 257 (6)
109.   Woodland Hills Mall   OK   Tulsa   Fee     94.5 % Acquired 2002     98.6%     1,087,032   Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
    Total Mall GLA                                 122,673,199 (16)  

17


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
    Premium Outlets                                      
1.    Albertville Premium Outlets   MN   Albertville (Minneapolis)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     96.3%     429,555   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, Kenneth Cole, Loft Outlet, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
2.   Allen Premium Outlets   TX   Allen (Dallas)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     100.0 %   441,762   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Lacoste, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
3.   Aurora Farms Premium Outlets   OH   Aurora (Cleveland)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     97.2%     285,307   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
4.   Birch Run Premium Outlets   MI   Birch Run (Detroit)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     92.0%     678,703   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Guess, J.Crew, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Tommy Hilfiger, The North Face
5.   Calhoun Premium Outlets   GA   Calhoun   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     96.8%     254,053   Ann Taylor, Carter's, Coach, Gap Outlet, Gymboree, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
6.   Camarillo Premium Outlets   CA   Camarillo (Los Angeles)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     99.3%     674,834   Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Diesel, Hugo Boss, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch
7.   Carlsbad Premium Outlets   CA   Carlsbad (San Diego)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     100.0%     289,461   Adidas, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Theory, Vince
8.   Carolina Premium Outlets   NC   Smithfield (Raleigh)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     97.9%     438,870   Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Levi's, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
9.   Charlotte Premium Outlets   NC   Charlotte   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 2014     99.1%     398,690   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, Kate Spade, Michael Kors, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Under Armour
10.   Chicago Premium Outlets (13)   IL   Aurora (Chicago)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2004     98.0%     437,483   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Diesel, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Max Mara, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th (6), Salvatore Ferragamo, Tag Heuer, Theory, Under Armour, Vera Bradley
11.   Cincinnati Premium Outlets   OH   Monroe (Cincinnati)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2009     100.0%     398,835   Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, The North Face
12.   Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets   CT   Clinton   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     100.0%     276,188   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Tumi, Under Armour, Vera Bradley
13.   Columbia Gorge Premium Outlets   OR   Troutdale (Portland)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     89.0%     163,736   Adidas, Carter's, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Gymboree, Levi's, Tommy Hilfiger
14.   Desert Hills Premium Outlets (13)   CA   Cabazon (Palm Springs)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     93.6%     650,941   Alexander McQueen, Armani Outlet, Burberry, Coach, Gucci, Lacoste, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Marc Jocobs, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, Tory Burch, True Religion, Yves Saint Laurent, Zegna
15.   Edinburgh Premium Outlets   IN   Edinburgh (Indianapolis)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     97.8%     377,839   Abercrombie & Fitch (6), Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Express (6), Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, White House Black Market
16.   Ellenton Premium Outlets   FL   Ellenton (Tampa)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     99.4%     476,467   Ann Taylor, Adidas, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Kenneth Cole, Lacoste, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Movado, Nike, Puma, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th

18


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
17.    Folsom Premium Outlets   CA   Folsom (Sacramento)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     97.4%     297,701   Adidas, BCBG Max Azria, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Kenneth Cole, Loft Outlet, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
18.   Gaffney Premium Outlets   SC   Gaffney (Greenville/Charlotte)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     93.6%     359,825   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren
19.   Gilroy Premium Outlets   CA   Gilroy (San Jose)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     99.1%     577,872   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Elie Tahari, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Lululemon, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sony, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion
20.   Grand Prairie Premium Outlets   TX   Grand Prairie (Dallas)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2012     98.9%     417,211   Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Hugo Boss, Kate Spade New York, J.Crew, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
21.   Grove City Premium Outlets   PA   Grove City (Pittsburgh)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     100.0%     531,459   American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Under Armour, Vera Bradley
22.   Gulfport Premium Outlets   MS   Gulfport   Ground Lease (2059)     100.0 % Acquired 2010     98.5%     300,233   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
23.   Hagerstown Premium Outlets   MD   Hagerstown (Baltimore/Washington D.C.   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     96.7%     485,132   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Loft Outlet, Nike, The North Face, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
24.   Houston Premium Outlets   TX   Cypress (Houston)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2008     100.0%     541,760   Ann Taylor, A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, Vera Bradley
25.   Jackson Premium Outlets   NJ   Jackson (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     98.3%     285,617   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Loft Outlet, Lucky Brand, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Talbots, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
26.   Jersey Shore Premium Outlets   NJ   Tinton Falls (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2008     99.0%     434,363   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Burberry, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, Diesel, DKNY, Eddie Bauer, Elie Tahari, Guess, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Lacoste, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, Talbots, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour, Ugg
27.   Johnson Creek Premium Outlets   WI   Johnson Creek   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     95.8%     276,373   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Columbia Sportswear, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
28.   Kittery Premium Outlets   ME   Kittery   Fee and Ground Lease (2049) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 2004     98.5%     259,403   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Chico's, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
29.   Las Americas Premium Outlets   CA   San Diego   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     95.9%     555,261   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour
30.   Las Vegas North Premium Outlets (13)   NV   Las Vegas   Fee     100.0 % Built 2003     97.5%     527,779   Armani Outlet, A/X Armani Exchange, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Coach, David Yurman, Diesel, Dolce & Gabbana, Elie Tahari, Etro, Hugo Boss, Lacoste, Last Call by Neiman Marcus (6), Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th (6), Salvatore Ferragamo, St. John, TAG Heuer, Ted Baker, True Religion

19


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
31.    Las Vegas South Premium Outlets   NV   Las Vegas   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     98.7%     535,772   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Bose, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Gap Outlet, Kenneth Cole, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, Vera Bradley
32.   Lebanon Premium Outlets   TN   Lebanon (Nashville)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     90.7%     227,271   Ann Taylor, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Loft Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Samsonite
33.   Lee Premium Outlets   MA   Lee   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     99.8%     224,850   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Chico's, Coach, Cole Haan, J.Crew, Lacoste, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
34.   Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets   VA   Leesburg (Washington D.C.)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     99.3%     517,992   Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Diesel, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Hugo Boss, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Under Armour, Vera Bradley, Williams-Sonoma
35.   Liberty Village Premium Outlets   NJ   Flemington (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     88.9%     162,217   American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, G.H. Bass & Co., J.Crew, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Timberland
36.   Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets   IN   Michigan City (Chicago, IL)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     100.0%     454,730   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, DKNY, Gap Outlet, Guess, Hollister, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
37.    Merrimack Premium Outlets   NH   Merrimack   Fee     100.0 % Built 2012     99.2%     408,996   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, White House Black Market
38.   Napa Premium Outlets   CA   Napa   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     99.3%     179,168   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
39.   North Bend Premium Outlets   WA   North Bend (Seattle)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     97.7%     223,552   Banana Republic, Carter's, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Nike, PacSun, Under Armour, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
40.   North Georgia Premium Outlets   GA   Dawsonville (Atlanta)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     100.0 %   540,312   Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Elie Tahari, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Kate Spade, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Williams-Sonoma
41.   Orlando International Premium Outlets   FL   Orlando   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     98.5%     773,644   7 For All Mankind, Adidas, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, J.Crew, Kate Spade, Kenneth Cole, Lacoste, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Victoria's Secret
42.   Orlando Vineland Premium Outlets   FL   Orlando   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     100.0%     655,004   Adidas, Armani Outlet, A/X Armani Exchange, Brunello Cucinelli, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Carolina Herrera, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, Fendi, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Prada, Polo Ralph Lauren, Roberto Cavalli, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, TAG Heuer, The North Face, Tod's, Tory Burch, Vera Bradley, Zegna
43.    Osage Beach Premium Outlets   MO   Osage Beach   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     94.3%     392,450   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Levi's, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour

20


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
44.   Petaluma Village Premium Outlets   CA   Petaluma (San Francisco)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     96.7%     195,566   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, Nike, Puma, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
45.   Philadelphia Premium Outlets   PA   Limerick (Philadelphia)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2007     99.6%     549,137   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Restoration Hardware, Theory, Under Armour, Vera Bradley, Ugg
46.   Phoenix Premium Outlets   AZ   Chandler (Phoenix)   Ground Lease (2077)     100.0 % Built 2013     98.7%     356,496   Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Elie Tahari, Gap Factory Store, Hugo Boss, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
47.   Pismo Beach Premium Outlets   CA   Pismo Beach   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     100.0%     147,416   Calvin Klein, Carter's, Coach, Guess, Levi's, Nike, Nine West, Quiksilver, Skechers, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen
48.   Pleasant Prairie Premium Outlets   WI   Pleasant Prairie (Chicago/Milwaukee)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     97.0%     402,540   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, Hugo Boss, Kate Spade, J.Crew, Lacoste, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, St. John, The North Face, Under Armour, Ugg
49.   Puerto Rico Premium Outlets   PR   Barceloneta   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     97.5%     341,951   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Calvin Klein, Coach, Disney Store Outlet, Gap Outlet, Guess, Kenneth Cole, Lacoste, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Tommy Hilfiger
50.   Queenstown Premium Outlets   MD   Queenstown (Baltimore)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     97.7%     289,472   Adidas, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia sportswear, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Loft Outlet, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, St. John, Talbots, Tommy Bahama
51.   Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets   TX   Mercedes (McAllen)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2006     100.0%     604,105   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Express, Gap Outlet, Guess, Hugo Boss, Loft Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, VF Outlet
52.   Round Rock Premium Outlets   TX   Round Rock (Austin)   Fee     100.0 % Built 2006     99.3%     488,672   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
53.   San Francisco Premium Outlets (13)   CA   Livermore (San Francisco)   Fee and Ground Lease (2021) (10)     100.0 % Built 2012     98.2%     511,926   Barneys New York, Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Coach, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Kate Spade New York, J.Crew, Lacoste, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, MaxMara, Michael Kors, Prada, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
54.   San Marcos Premium Outlets   TX   San Marcos (Austin/San Antonio   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     98.5%     731,991   Banana Republic, Cole Haan, Diane Von Furstenberg, Gucci, Hugo Boss, J. Crew, Kate Spade, Lacoste, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Michael Kors, Pottery Barn, Prada, Restoration Hardware, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, The North Face, Tommy Bahama, Ugg, Victoria's Secret
55.   Seattle Premium Outlets   WA   Tulalip (Seattle)   Ground Lease (2079)     100.0 % Built 2005     99.3%     554,766   Abercrombie, Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Elie Tahari, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, The North Face, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger

21


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
56.    Silver Sands Premium Outlets   FL   Destin   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2012     98.0%     451,087   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, DKNY, Dooney & Bourke, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Movado, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
57.   St. Augustine Premium Outlets   FL   St. Augustine (Jacksonsville)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     96.5%     328,539   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma (6), Reebok, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
58.   St. Louis Premium Outlets   MO   St. Louis (Chesterfield)   Fee     60.0 % (4) Built 2013     99.1%     351,462   Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, BCBG Max Azria, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Crabtree & Evelyn, Elie Tahari, J. Crew, Kate Spade New York, Michael Kors, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, St. John, Tommy Hilfiger, Ugg, Under Armour, Vera Bradley
59.   Tanger Outlets — Galveston/Houston (1)   TX   Texas City   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 2012     98.4%     352,705   Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, J. Crew, Kenneth Cole, Michael Kors, Nike, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger, White House Black Market
60.   The Crossings Premium Outlets   PA   Tannersville   Fee and Ground Lease (2019) (7)     100.0 % Acquired 2004     96.8%     411,520   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Guess, J.Crew, Kate Spade, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, The North Face, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
61.   Twin Cities Premium Outlets   MN   Eagan   Fee     35.0 % (4) Built 2014     97.3%     408,944   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J. Crew, Michael Kors, Movado, Nike, Robert Graham, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, True Religion, Under Armour, Vera Bradley
62.   Vacaville Premium Outlets   CA   Vacaville   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     99.5%     440,040   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, DKNY, Gucci, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger
63.   Waikele Premium Outlets (13)   HI   Waipahu (Honolulu)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     95.4%     215,546   A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Guess, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion
64.   Waterloo Premium Outlets   NY   Waterloo   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     96.6%     417,752   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Chico's, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Levi's, Loft Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Talbots, Timerberland, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, VF Outlet
65.   Williamsburg Premium Outlets   VA   Williamsburg   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     97.5%     521,931   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, Dooney & Bourke, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Kate Spade New York, Loft Outlet, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Talbots, The North Face, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour
66.   Woodburn Premium Outlets   OR   Woodburn (Portland)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2013     99.2%     389,773   Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Cole Haan, Eddie Bauer, Fossil, Gap Outlet, J. Crew, Max Studio, Nike, The North Face, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Tommy Hilfiger

22


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal
Ownership
  Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
67.    Woodbury Common Premium Outlets (13)   NY   Central Valley (New York)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     99.0%     854,448   Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Burberry, Chloe, Coach, Dior, Dolce & Gabbana, Fendi, Gucci, Lacoste, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Nike, Oscar de la Renta, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Reed Krakoff, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, Tom Ford, Tory Burch, Valentino, Versace, Yves St. Laurent
68.   Wrentham Village Premium Outlets   MA   Wrentham (Boston)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2004     99.1%     660,101   All Saints, Ann Taylor, Armani Outlet, Banana Republic, Barneys New York, Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Kate Spade, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Robert Graham, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Ted Baker, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger, Tory Burch, True Religion, Under Armour
    Total U.S. Premium Outlets GLA                         28,796,557    

23


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal Ownership   Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
    The Mills                                      
1.   Arizona Mills   AZ   Tempe (Phoenix)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     98.5%     1,239,804   Marshalls, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th (15), Burlington Coat Factory, Sears Appliance Outlet, Gameworks, Sports Authority (11), Ross Dress for Less, At Home, Group USA, Harkins Cinemas & IMAX, Sea Life Center, Conn's
2.   Arundel Mills   MD   Hanover (Baltimore)   Fee     59.3 % (4) Acquired 2007     100.0%     1,662,640   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, The Children's Place, Dave & Buster's, F.Y.E., H&M, Medieval Times, Modell's, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, T.J. Maxx, Cinemark Egyptian 24 Theatres, Maryland Live! Casino, Forever 21
3.   Colorado Mills   CO   Lakewood (Denver)   Fee     37.5 % (4) Acquired 2007     96.3%     1,410,205   Forever 21, Jumpstreet, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sports Authority, Super Target, United Artists Theatre, Burlington Coat Factory, H&M
4.   Concord Mills   NC   Concord (Charlotte)   Fee     59.3 % (4) Acquired 2007     99.5%     1,343,551   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, The Children's Place Outlet, Dave & Buster's, Nike Factory Store, T.J. Maxx, Group USA, Sun & Ski, VF Outlet, Off Broadway Shoes, Bed Bath & Beyond, AMC Theatres, Best Buy, Forever 21, Sea Life Center
5.   Grapevine Mills   TX   Grapevine (Dallas)   Fee     59.3 % (4) Acquired 2007     93.3%     1,778,483   Bed Bath & Beyond, Burlington Coat Factory, The Children's Place, Group USA, Marshalls, Nike Factory Store, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, AMC Theatres, Sun & Ski Sports, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Sears Appliance Outlet, Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Off Broadway Shoes, VF Outlet, Legoland Discovery Center, Sea Life Center, Ross Dress for Less, H&M
6.   Great Mall   CA   Milpitas (San Jose)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     98.9%     1,366,245   Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Sports Authority, Group USA, Kohl's, Dave & Busters, Sears Appliance Outlet, Burlington Coat Factory, Marshalls, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Nike Factory Store, Century Theatres, Bed Bath & Beyond, Off Broadway Shoes, Uniqlo
7.   Gurnee Mills   IL   Gurnee (Chicago)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     98.9%     1,918,263   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath & Beyond/Buy Buy Baby, Burlington Coat Factory, Kohl's, Marshalls Home Goods, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Rinkside, Sears Grand, Sports Authority, T.J. Maxx, VF Outlet, Marcus Cinemas, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Value City Furniture, Shoppers World, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Macy's
8.   Katy Mills   TX   Katy (Houston)   Fee     62.5 % (4) (2) Acquired 2007     98.9%     1,747,461   Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath and Beyond, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Jumpstreet, Marshalls, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Nike Factory Store, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sun & Ski Sports, AMC Theatres, Off Broadway Shoes, Tilt, Ross Dress for Less, H&M
9.   Ontario Mills   CA   Ontario (Riverside)   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2007     99.7%     1,471,353   Burlington Coat Factory, Nike Factory Store, Gameworks, The Children's Place Outlet, Marshalls, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nordstrom Rack, Dave & Busters, Group USA, Sam Ash Music, Off Broadway Shoes, AMC Theatres, Sports Authority, Forever 21, Last Call by Neiman Marcus
10.   Opry Mills   TN   Nashville   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     96.9%     1,153,536   Regal Cinema & IMAX, Dave & Busters, VF Outlet, Sun & Ski, Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Forever 21, Bed Bath & Beyond, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Off Broadway Shoes, H&M

24


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
U.S. Properties

 
 
Property Name
  State   City (CBSA)   Ownership
Interest
(Expiration if
Lease) (3)
  Legal Ownership   Year Built
or
Acquired
  Occupancy (5)   Total GLA   Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
11.    Outlets at Orange, The   CA   Orange (Los Angeles)   Fee     50.0 % (4) Acquired 2007     99.2%     805,311   Dave & Buster's, Vans Skatepark, Lucky Strike Lanes, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, AMC Theatres, Nike Factory Store, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shoes, Nordstrom Rack, Sports Authority, H&M, Forever 21
12.   Potomac Mills   VA   Woodbridge (Washington, D.C.)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     99.6%     1,525,636   Group USA, Marshalls, T.J. Maxx, Sears Appliance Outlet, JCPenney, Burlington Coat Factory, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th Outlet, Costco Warehouse, The Children's Place, AMC Theatres, Modell's Sporting Goods, Books-A-Million, H&M, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, XXI Forever, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Buy Buy Baby/and That!
13.   Sawgrass Mills   FL   Sunrise (Miami)   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2007     99.1%     2,197,314   American Signature Home, Bed Bath & Beyond, Brandsmart USA, Burlington Coat Factory, Gameworks, Marshalls, Last Call by Neiman Marcus, Nike Factory Store, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Ron Jon Surf Shop, Sports Authority, Super Target, T.J. Maxx, Urban Planet, VF Factory Outlet, F.Y.E., Off Broadway Shoes, Regal Cinema, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Forever 21
    Total Mills Properties                         19,619,802    
    Community Centers                                  

1.

 

ABQ Uptown

 

NM

 

Albuquerque

 

Fee

 

 

100.0

%

Acquired 2011

 

 

99.3%

 

 

230,036

 

 
2.   Hamilton Town Center   IN   Noblesville (Indianapolis)   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 2008     91.3%     672,896   JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Stein Mart, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW, Hamilton 16 IMAX, Earth Fare
3.   Pier Park   FL   Panama City Beach   Fee     65.6 % (4) Built 2008     96.6%     882,654   Dillard's, JCPenney, Target, Grand Theatres, Ron Jon Surf Shop, Margaritaville, Marshalls, Dave & Buster's
    Total Community Centers GLA                         1,785,586    
    Other Properties                                  
1.   Circle Centre   IN   Indianapolis   Property Lease (2097)     14.7 % (4) (2) Built 1995     94.9%     751,652   Carson's, United Artists Theatre, Indianapolis Star
2.   Florida Keys Outlet Center   FL   Florida City   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     88.6%     206,349   American Eagle, Carter's, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Nike, Nine West, OshKosh B'gosh, Skechers, Tommy Hilfiger
3.   Huntley Outlet Center   IL   Huntley   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     53.5%     278,845   Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Bose, Calvin Klein, Carter's, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Guess, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
4.   Indian River Commons   FL   Vero Beach   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 1997     100.0%     255,942   Lowe's Home Improvement, Best Buy, Ross Dress for Less, Bed Bath & Beyond, Michaels
5.   Indian River Mall   FL   Vero Beach   Fee     50.0 % (4) Built 1996     84.3%     736,262   Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatres
6.   Lincoln Plaza   PA   King of Prussia (Philadelphia)   Fee     85.5 % Acquired 2003     100.0%     268,086   AC Moore, Michaels, T.J. Maxx, Home Goods, hhgregg, American Signature Furniture, DSW, (8)
7.   Naples Outlet Center   FL   Naples   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     68.7%     146,033   Ann Taylor, Bass, Coach, L'eggs/Hanes/Bali/Playtex, Loft Outlet, Samsonite, Van Heusen
8.   Outlet Marketplace   FL   Orlando   Fee     100.0 % Acquired 2010     79.4%     199,316   American Eagle, Calvin Klein, Nike (6), Nine West, Reebok, Skechers
9.   Shops at Sunset Place, The   FL   S. Miami   Fee     37.5 % (4) (2) Built 1999     83.4%     517,964   Barnes & Noble, Gametime, Z Gallerie, LA Fitness, AMC Theatres, Splitsville, (8)
10 - 14.   The Mills Limited Partnership (TMLP)                     Acquired 2007           5,787,887    
    Total Other GLA                         9,148,336    
    Total U.S. Properties GLA                         182,023,480    

25


Table of Contents

FOOTNOTES:

(1)
This property is managed by a third party.

(2)
Our direct and indirect interests in some of the properties held as joint venture interests are subject to preferences on distributions in favor of other partners or us.

(3)
The date listed is the expiration date of the last renewal option available to the operating entity under the ground lease. In a majority of the ground leases, we have a right to purchase the lessor's interest under an option, right of first refusal or other provision. Unless otherwise indicated, each ground lease listed in this column covers at least 50% of its respective property.

(4)
Joint venture properties accounted for under the equity method.

(5)
Malls — Executed leases for all company-owned GLA in mall stores, excluding majors and anchors. Premium Outlets and The Mills — Executed leases for all company-owned GLA (or total center GLA).

(6)
Indicates anchor or major that is currently under development or has announced plans for development.

(7)
Indicates ground lease covers less than 50% of the acreage of this property.

(8)
Indicates vacant anchor space(s).

(9)
Tenant has multiple locations at this center.

(10)
Indicates ground lease covers outparcel only.

(11)
Tenant has an existing store at this center but will move to a new location.

(12)
We receive substantially all the economic benefit of the property due to a preference or advance.

(13)
Property is undergoing an expansion.

(14)
We own a mortgage note that encumbers Pheasant Lane Mall that entitles us to 100% of the economics of this property.

(15)
Indicates anchor has announced its intent to close this location.

(16)
Mall & Freestanding GLA includes office space. Centers with more than 20,000 square feet of office space are listed below:

Circle Centre — 129,944 sq. ft.   Greendale Mall — 119,860 sq. ft.
Copley Place — 869,018 sq. ft.   Menlo Park Mall — 49,481 sq. ft.
Domain, The — 156,240 sq. ft.   Oxford Valley Mall — 111,038 sq. ft.
Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The — 169,550 sq. ft.   Plaza Carolina — 27,343 sq. ft.
Firewheel Town Center — 75,303 sq. ft.   Southdale Center — 20,393 sq. ft.

26


Table of Contents

            The following table summarizes lease expiration data for our malls and Premium Outlets located in the United States, including Puerto Rico, as of December 31, 2014. The data presented does not consider the impact of renewal options that may be contained in leases.

U.S. MALLS AND PREMIUM OUTLETS LEASE EXPIRATIONS (1)

Year
  Number of
Leases Expiring
  Square Feet   Avg. Base
Minimum Rent
PSF at 12/31/14
  Percentage of Gross
Annual Rental
Revenues (2)
 

Inline Stores and Freestanding

                         

Month to Month Leases

   
434
   
1,242,185
 
$

44.68
   
1.2

%

2015

    2,085     6,506,235   $ 44.74     6.4 %

2016

    2,444     8,274,653   $ 42.38     7.7 %

2017

    2,402     8,186,466   $ 44.84     8.3 %

2018

    2,218     8,259,805   $ 47.00     8.6 %

2019

    1,834     7,070,956   $ 46.48     7.4 %

2020

    1,342     5,239,299   $ 46.74     5.5 %

2021

    1,209     4,867,902   $ 49.87     5.5 %

2022

    1,447     5,589,313   $ 48.97     6.1 %

2023

    1,757     6,653,525   $ 51.16     7.7 %

2024

    1,551     5,897,684   $ 53.19     6.9 %

2025 and Thereafter

    572     3,126,265   $ 45.09     3.2 %

Specialty Leasing Agreements w/ terms in excess of 12 months

    766     1,795,916   $ 21.95     0.9 %

Anchor Tenants

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

2015

   
7
   
736,118
 
$

4.38
   
0.1

%

2016

    9     1,192,928   $ 2.43     0.1 %

2017

    18     2,546,584   $ 2.59     0.1 %

2018

    17     2,130,629   $ 4.99     0.2 %

2019

    21     2,231,012   $ 5.16     0.3 %

2020

    22     2,502,850   $ 5.35     0.3 %

2021

    9     732,696   $ 9.26     0.1 %

2022

    8     957,917   $ 9.59     0.2 %

2023

    9     1,223,016   $ 10.54     0.3 %

2024

    12     703,770   $ 11.67     0.2 %

2025 and Thereafter

    27     2,978,780   $ 5.71     0.4 %

(1)
Does not consider the impact of renewal options that may be contained in leases. Excludes WPG properties.

(2)
Annual rental revenues represent domestic 2014 consolidated and joint venture combined base rental revenue excluding WPG properties.

27


Table of Contents

International Properties

            Our ownership interests in properties outside the United States are primarily owned through joint venture arrangements.

            On March 14, 2012, we acquired a 28.7% interest in Klépierre for approximately $2.0 billion. At December 31, 2014 we owned 57,634,148 shares, or approximately 28.9%, of Klépierre, which had a quoted market price of $43.45 per share. Klépierre is a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in shopping centers located in 13 countries in Europe. On July 29, 2014 Klépierre announced that it had entered into a conditional agreement to acquire Corio N.V., or Corio, pursuant to which Corio shareholders would receive 1.14 Klépierre ordinary shares for each Corio ordinary share. On January 15, 2015 the tender offer transaction closed, and it is anticipated that Klépierre will own all of the equity of Corio on March 31, 2015 through a merger transaction, after which our percentage ownership will be diluted to approximately 18.3%.

            During the second quarter of 2013, we signed a definitive agreement with McArthurGlen, an owner, developer, and manager of designer outlets, to form one or more joint ventures to invest in certain of its existing designer outlets, development projects, and its property management and development companies. In conjunction with that agreement, we purchased a noncontrolling interest in the property management and development companies of McArthurGlen, and a noncontrolling interest in a development property located in Vancouver, British Columbia. On August 2, 2013 we acquired a noncontrolling interest in Ashford Designer Outlet in Kent, UK. On October 16, 2013 we completed transactions with McArthurGlen acquiring noncontrolling interests in portions of four existing McArthurGlen Designer Outlets — Parndorf (Vienna, Austria), La Reggia (Naples, Italy), Noventa di Piave (Venice, Italy), and Roermond (Roermond, Netherlands). During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we purchased an additional 22.5% noncontrolling interest in Ashford Designer Outlet, increasing our percentage ownership of this entity to 45%. At December 31, 2014 our legal ownership interests in these entities range from 45% to 90%.

            We own a 13.3% interest in Value Retail PLC and affiliated entities, which own or have interests in and operate nine luxury outlets throughout Europe. We also have a minority direct ownership in three of those outlets.

            We also hold a 40% interest in nine operating joint venture properties in Japan, a 50% interest in three operating joint venture properties in South Korea, a 50% interest in one operating joint venture property in Mexico, a 50% interest in one operating joint venture property in Malaysia, and a 50% interest in two operating joint venture properties in Canada. The nine Japanese Premium Outlets operate in various cities throughout Japan and comprise over 3.1 million square feet of GLA and were 99.1% leased as of December 31, 2014.

            The following property tables summarize certain data for our properties located in Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, Canada and the various European countries related to the McArthurGlen joint venture property locations at December 31, 2014:

28


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
International Properties

 
 
COUNTRY/Property Name
  City
(Metropolitan area)
  Ownership
Interest
  SPG Effective
Ownership
  Year Built   Total Gross
Leasable Area
  Retail Anchors and Major Tenants
INTERNATIONAL PREMIUM OUTLETS                        
    JAPAN                            
1.   Ami Premium Outlets   Ami (Tokyo)   Fee     40.0 % 2009     315,000   Adidas, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Beams, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, McGregor, MK Michel Klein, Nike, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren
2.   Gotemba Premium Outlets   Gotemba City (Tokyo)   Fee     40.0 % 2000     481,500   Armani, Balenciaga, Bally, Banana Republic, Bottega Veneta, Burberry, Coach, Diesel, Dolce & Gabbana, Dunhill, Gap Outlet, Gucci, Jill Stuart, Loro Piana, Miu Miu, Moschino, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tod's
3.   Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets   Hyougo-ken (Osaka)   Ground Lease (2026)     40.0 % 2007     441,000   Adidas, Armani, Bally, Banana Republic, Beams, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, Etro, Gap Outlet, Gucci, Harrod's, Hugo Boss, Loro Piana, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger, Valentino
4.   Rinku Premium Outlets   Izumisano (Osaka)   Ground Lease (2031)     40.0 % 2000     416,500   Adidas, Armani, Bally, BCBG Max Azria, Beams, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, Dolce & Gabbana, Dunhill, Eddie Bauer, Etro, Furla, Gap Outlet, Hugo Boss, Kate Spade, Lacoste, Lanvin Collection, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren
5.   Sano Premium Outlets   Sano (Tokyo)   Ground Lease (2022)     40.0 % 2003     390,800   Adidas, Armani, Beams, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Diesel, Dunhill, Eddie Bauer, Etro, Furla, Gap Outlet, Gucci, Harrod's, Kate Spade, Miu Miu, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada
6.   Sendai-Izumi Premium Outlets   Izumi Park Town (Sendai)   Ground Lease (2027)     40.0 % 2008     164,200   Adidas. Beams, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Forever21, Jill Stuart, Levi's, Pleats Please Issey Miyake, Tasaki, TaylorMade, United Arrows
7.   Shisui Premium Outlets   Shisui (Chiba), Japan   Ground Lease (2032)     40.0 % 2013     234,800   Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Citizen, Coach, Gap, Marmot, Michael Kors, Samsonite, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows
8.   Toki Premium Outlets   Toki (Nagoya)   Ground Lease (2024)     40.0 % 2005     367,700   Adidas, BCBG Max Azria, Beams, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Diesel, Eddie Bauer, Furla, Gap Outlet, MK Michel Klein, Nike, Olive des Olive, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, United Arrows
9.   Tosu Premium Outlets   Fukuoka (Kyushu)   Ground Lease (2023)     40.0 % 2004     290,400   Adidas, Armani, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Beams, Bose, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Coach, Cole Haan, Courreges, Dolce & Gabbana, Furla, Gap Outlet, Miki House, Nike, Puma, Reebok, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger
   

Subtotal Japan

                      3,101,900    

29


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
International Properties

 
 
COUNTRY/Property Name
  City
(Metropolitan area)
  Ownership
Interest
  SPG Effective
Ownership
  Year Built   Total Gross
Leasable Area
  Retail Anchors and Major Tenants
    MEXICO                            
10.   Punta Norte Premium Outlets   Mexico City   Fee     50.0 % 2004     333,000   Adidas, Calvin Klein, CH Carolina Herrera, Coach, Kenneth Cole, Diesel, Lacoste, Levi's, MaxMara, Nautica, Nike, Palacio Outlet, Reebok, Rockport, Salvatore Ferragamo, Swarovski, Zegna
   

Subtotal Mexico

                      333,000    

 

 

SOUTH KOREA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
11.   Yeoju Premium Outlets   Yeoju (Seoul)   Fee     50.0 % 2007     286,200   Adidas, Giorgio Armani, Burberry, Chloe, Coach, Diesel, Dolce & Gabbana, Escada, Fendi, Gucci, Lacoste, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, Tod's, Valentino, Vivienne Westwood
12.   Paju Premium Outlets   Paju (Seoul)   Fee     50.0 % 2011     442,900   Armani, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Escada, Jill Stuart, Lacoste, Lanvin Collection, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Theory, Tory Burch, Vivienne Westwood
13.   Busan Premium Outlets   Busan   Fee     50.0 % 2013     360,200   Adidas, Armani, Banana Republic, Bean Pole, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Gap, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Theory, The North Face, Tommy Hilfiger
   

Subtotal South Korea

                      1,089,300    

 

 

MALAYSIA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
14.   Johor Premium Outlets   Johor (Singapore)   Fee     50.0 % 2011     264,400   Adidas, Armani, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Canali, Coach, DKNY, Gap, Guess, Lacoste, Levi's, Michael Kors, Nike, Salvatore Ferragamo, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, Zegna
   

Subtotal Malaysia

                      264,400    

 

 

CANADA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
15.   Toronto Premium Outlets   Toronto (Ontario)   Fee     50.0 % 2013     358,400   Adidas, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
16.   Premium Outlets Montreal   Montreal (Quebec)   Fee     50.0 % 2014     365,500   Adidas, American Eagle Outfitters, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Gap, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Old Navy, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
   

Subtotal Canada

                      723,900    
    TOTAL INTERNATIONAL PREMIUM OUTLETS                   5,512,500    

30


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Property Table
International Properties

 
 
COUNTRY/Property Name
  City
(Metropolitan area)
  Ownership
Interest
  SPG Effective
Ownership
  Year Built   Total Gross
Leasable Area
  Retail Anchors and Major Tenants
INTERNATIONAL DESIGNER OUTLETS
    AUSTRIA                            
1.   Parndorf Designer Outlet   Vienna   Fee     90.0 % Phase 3 — 2005     118,000   Armani, Bally, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Diesel, Furla, Geox,
    Phases 3 & 4                 Phase 4 — 2011         Gucci, Hugo Boss, Joop! Windsor Strellson, Michael Kors, Porsche Design, Prada, Swarovski, Zegna
   

Subtotal Austria

                      118,000    

 

 

ITALY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2.   La Reggia Designer Outlet   Marcianise (Naples)   Fee     60.0 % Phase 1 — 2010     288,000   Adidas, Armani, Calvin Klein, Hugo Boss, Lacoste, Lui Jo,
    Phases 1 & 2                 Phase 2a — 2010         Michael Kors, Nike, Pinko, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada,
                      Phase 2b — 2011         Roberto Cavalli, Timberland, Tommy Hilfiger, Valentino, Versace
3.   Noventa Di Piave Designer   Venice   Fee     60.0 % Phase 1 — 2008     280,000   Armani, Bally, Bottega Veneta, Brioni,
    Outlet Phases 1, 2, & 3                 Phase 2 — 2010         Burberry, Calvin Klein, Fendi, Gucci, Hugo Boss, Loro Piana,
                      Phase 3 — 2012         Michael Kors, Nike, Pinko, Paul Smith, Prada, Salvatore
                                Ferragamo, Sergio Rossi, Tommy Hilfiger, Valentino, Versace
   

Subtotal Italy

                      568,000    

 

 

NETHERLANDS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
4.   Roermond Designer Outlet   Roermond   Fee     90.0 % Phase 2 — 2005     173,000   Armani, Bally, Burberry, Calvin Klein Jeans, Escada, Furla,
    Phases 2 & 3                 Phase 3 — 2011         Gucci, Hugo Boss, Joop! Windsor Strellson, Loro Piana,
                                Michael Kors, Moncler, Mulberry, Prada,
                                Ralph Lauren Luxury, Swarovski,
                                Tod's, Tommy Hilfiger, UGG
   

Subtotal Netherlands

                      173,000    

 

 

UNITED KINGDOM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
5.   Ashford Designer Outlet   Kent   Fee     45.0 % 2000     183,000   Abercrombie and Fitch, Adidas, CK Underwear, Clarks, Fossil, French Connection, Gap, Guess, Lacoste, Levis, Marks & Spencer, Next, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reiss, Superdry, Swarovski, Tommy Hilfiger
   

Subtotal United Kingdom

                      183,000    
    Total International Designer Outlets                   1,042,000    

FOOTNOTES:

(1)
All gross leasable area listed in square feet.

31


Table of Contents

            We have direct or indirect ownership interests in approximately 350 acres of land held in the United States and Canada for future development.

            We incorporate sustainable thinking into all areas of our business from property development and operations, to doing business with customers, to engaging with the communities we serve as well as our employees.

            One main focus of our sustainability strategy is on energy conservation and energy efficiency. Through the continued use of energy conservation practices, energy efficiency projects, and continuous monitoring and reporting, we have reduced our energy consumption at comparable properties every year since 2003. As a result, excluding new developments and expansions, we reduced the electricity usage over which we have direct control by 280 million kWhs since 2003. This represents a 30% reduction in electricity usage across a portfolio of comparable properties and reflects an annual value of over $28 million in avoided operating costs. Our documented reduction in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from our energy management efforts is 481,500 metric tons of CO2e.

            We have been globally recognized for our energy efficiency programs and transparency in disclosure practices. In 2014, we were listed on CDP's Climate Disclosure Leadership Index for the sixth time and included in the Climate Performance Leadership Index — identifying us as a leader in our sector for driving significant reduction in emissions due to implementation of energy efficient initiatives. Additionally, in 2014 we received the highest designation of a Green Star rating from the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark.

            The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages and unsecured indebtedness encumbering our properties, and the properties held by our domestic and international joint venture arrangements, and also our unsecured corporate debt. Substantially all of the mortgage and property related debt is nonrecourse to us.

32


Table of Contents


Mortgage and Unsecured Debt on Portfolio Properties
As of December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name
  Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service (1)
  Maturity
Date
 

Consolidated Indebtedness:

                         

Secured Indebtedness:

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Arizona Mills

    5.76 % $ 164,566   $ 12,268     07/01/20  

Bangor Mall

    6.15 %   80,000     4,918    (2)   10/01/17  

Battlefield Mall

    3.95 %   125,000     4,938    (2)   09/01/22  

Birch Run Premium Outlets

    5.95 %   102,362    (10)   8,078     04/11/16  

Calhoun Premium Outlets

    5.79 %   19,683    (22)   1,519     09/01/16  

Carolina Premium Outlets

    3.36 %   48,448     2,675     12/01/22  

Domain, The

    5.44 %   198,454     14,085     08/01/21  

Ellenton Premium Outlets

    5.51 %   100,466    (21)   7,649     01/11/16  

Empire Mall

    5.79 %   176,300     10,215    (2)   06/01/16  

Florida Keys Outlet Center

    5.51 %   10,253    (21)   781     01/11/16  

Gaffney Premium Outlets

    5.79 %   35,721    (22)   2,757     09/01/16  

Grand Prairie Premium Outlets

    3.66 %   120,000     4,392    (2)   04/01/23  

Greenwood Park Mall

    8.00 %   75,733    (19)   7,044     08/01/16  

Grove City Premium Outlets

    5.51 %   108,453    (21)   8,258     01/11/16  

Gulfport Premium Outlets

    5.51 %   24,198    (21)   1,842     01/11/16  

Gurnee Mills

    5.77 %   321,000     18,512    (2)   07/01/17  

Hagerstown Premium Outlets

    5.95 %   86,045    (10)   6,787     04/11/16  

Huntley Outlet Center

    5.51 %   28,679    (21)   2,183     01/11/16  

Independence Center

    5.94 %   200,000     11,886    (2)   07/10/17  

Ingram Park Mall

    5.38 %   137,783     9,746     06/01/21  

Jersey Shore Premium Outlets

    5.51 %   67,306    (21)   5,124     01/11/16  

King of Prussia — The Court & The Plaza — 1

    7.49 %   44,457     23,183     01/01/17  

King of Prussia — The Court & The Plaza — 2

    8.53 %   3,204     1,685     01/01/17  

King of Prussia — The Court & The Plaza — 3

    4.50 %   50,000     2,250    (2)   01/01/17  

Las Americas Premium Outlets

    5.84 %   176,605     12,728     06/11/16  

Lebanon Premium Outlets

    5.51 %   14,877    (21)   1,133     01/11/16  

Lee Premium Outlets

    5.79 %   49,134    (22)   3,792     09/01/16  

Mall at Chestnut Hill, The

    4.69 %   120,000     5,624    (2)   11/01/23  

Merrimack Premium Outlets

    3.78 %   130,000     4,908    (2)   07/01/23  

Midland Park Mall

    4.35 %   81,860     5,078     09/06/22  

Montgomery Mall

    4.57 %   100,000     5,885     05/01/24  

Naples Outlet Center

    5.51 %   15,415    (21)   1,174     01/11/16  

Opry Mills — 1

    2.67 %   (1)   280,000     7,480    (2)   10/10/16  

Opry Mills — 2

    5.00 %   91,427     4,571    (2)   10/10/16  

Oxford Valley Mall

    4.77 %   66,516     4,456     12/07/20  

Penn Square Mall

    7.75 %   93,998     8,597     04/01/16  

Pismo Beach Premium Outlets

    5.84 %   33,850    (20)   1,978    (2)   11/06/16  

Plaza Carolina

    1.52 %   (1)   225,000     3,423    (2)   09/30/17    (3)

Pleasant Prairie Premium Outlets — 1

    5.51 %   57,806    (21)   4,401     01/11/16  

Pleasant Prairie Premium Outlets — 2

    6.01 %   35,192     2,758     12/01/16  

Potomac Mills

    5.83 %   410,000     23,901    (2)   07/11/17  

Puerto Rico Premium Outlets

    1.52 %   (1)   125,000     1,902    (2)   09/30/17    (3)

Queenstown Premium Outlets

    5.84 %   66,150    (20)   3,864    (2)   11/06/16  

San Marcos Premium Outlets

    5.51 %   137,569    (21)   10,474     01/11/16  

Shops at Riverside, The

    3.37 %   130,000     4,382    (2)   02/01/23  

Southdale Center

    3.84 %   155,000     5,958    (2)   04/01/23  

SouthPark

    8.00 %   187,439    (19)   17,434     08/01/16  

Southridge Mall

    3.85 %   125,000     4,818    (2)   06/06/23  

Summit Mall

    5.42 %   65,000     3,526    (2)   06/10/17  

33


Table of Contents


Mortgage and Unsecured Debt on Portfolio Properties
As of December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name
  Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service (1)
  Maturity
Date
 

The Crossings Premium Outlets

    3.41 %   115,000     3,926    (2)   12/01/22  

Town Center at Cobb

    4.76 %   198,095     12,530     05/01/22  

Walt Whitman Shops

    8.00 %   115,492    (19)   10,742     08/01/16  

White Oaks Mall

    5.54 %   50,000     2,768    (2)   11/01/16  

Williamsburg Premium Outlets

    5.95 %   99,406    (10)   7,841     04/11/16  

Wolfchase Galleria

    5.64 %   225,000     12,700    (2)   04/01/17  

Woodland Hills Mall

    7.79 %   91,686     8,414     04/05/19  

Total Consolidated Secured Indebtedness

        $ 6,195,628              

Unsecured Indebtedness:

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Simon Property Group, LP:

                         

Global Commercial Paper — USD Currency

    0.19 % $ 200,000   $ 380    (2)   02/11/15  

Global Commercial Paper — Euro Currency

    0.13 %   209,185    (18)   356    (2)   03/18/15  

Revolving Credit Facility — Euro Currency

    0.81 %   (15)   372,154    (16)   3,004    (2)   06/30/19    (3)

Revolving Credit Facility — Yen Currency

    0.88 %   (15)   186,383    (23)   1,640    (2)   06/30/19    (3)

Unsecured Notes — 4C

    7.38 %   200,000     14,750    (14)   06/15/18  

Unsecured Notes — 12A

    5.10 %   326,816     16,668    (14)   06/15/15  

Unsecured Notes — 13B

    5.75 %   366,635     21,082    (14)   12/01/15  

Unsecured Notes — 14B

    6.10 %   163,298     9,961    (14)   05/01/16  

Unsecured Notes — 15B

    5.88 %   207,453     12,188    (14)   03/01/17  

Unsecured Notes — 16B

    5.25 %   364,276     19,124    (14)   12/01/16  

Unsecured Notes — 19B

    6.13 %   800,000     49,000    (14)   05/30/18  

Unsecured Notes — 20A

    10.35 %   650,000     67,275    (14)   04/01/19  

Unsecured Notes — 22B

    5.65 %   1,250,000     70,625    (14)   02/01/20  

Unsecured Notes — 22C

    6.75 %   600,000     40,500    (14)   02/01/40  

Unsecured Notes — 23A

    4.38 %   900,000     39,375    (14)   03/01/21  

Unsecured Notes — 24A

    2.80 %   500,000     14,000    (14)   01/30/17  

Unsecured Notes — 24B

    4.13 %   700,000     28,875    (14)   12/01/21  

Unsecured Notes — 25A

    2.15 %   600,000     12,900    (14)   09/15/17  

Unsecured Notes — 25B

    3.38 %   600,000     20,250    (14)   03/15/22  

Unsecured Notes — 25C

    4.75 %   550,000     26,125    (14)   03/15/42  

Unsecured Notes — 26A

    1.50 %   750,000     11,250    (14)   02/01/18  

Unsecured Notes — 26B

    2.75 %   500,000     13,750    (14)   02/01/23  

Unsecured Notes — Euro 1

    2.38 %   912,143    (34)   21,663    (6)   10/02/20  

Unsecured Notes — 27A

    2.20 %   600,000     13,200    (14)   02/01/19  

Unsecured Notes — 27B

    3.75 %   600,000     22,500    (14)   02/01/24  

Unsecured Notes — 28A

    3.38 %   900,000     30,375    (14)   10/01/24  

Unsecured Notes — 28B

    4.25 %   400,000     17,000    (14)   10/01/44  

Unsecured Term Loan

    1.26 %   (1)   240,000     3,024    (2)   02/28/18    (3)

Total Consolidated Unsecured Indebtedness

        $ 14,648,343              

Total Consolidated Indebtedness at Face Amounts

        $ 20,843,971              

Net Premium on Indebtedness

          50,133              

Net Discount on Indebtedness

          (41,111 )            

Total Consolidated Indebtedness

        $ 20,852,993              

Our Share of Consolidated Indebtedness

        $ 20,773,850              

Joint Venture Indebtedness:

                         

Secured Indebtedness:

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Ami Premium Outlets

    1.82 %   (12)   76,881    (26)   11,573     09/25/23  

Ashford Designer Outlets — Fixed

    4.27 %   (11)   56,048    (32)   2,390    (2)   07/31/16  

34


Table of Contents


Mortgage and Unsecured Debt on Portfolio Properties
As of December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name
  Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service (1)
  Maturity
Date
 

Ashford Designer Outlets — Variable

    2.42 %   (1)   6,228    (32)   151    (2)   07/31/16  

Arundel Mills

    4.29 %   375,500    (35)   28,116     02/06/24  

Arundel Mills Marketplace

    4.29 %   9,500    (35)   884     02/06/24  

Auburn Mall

    6.02 %   39,755     3,027     09/01/20  

Aventura Mall

    3.75 %   1,200,000     45,002    (2)   12/01/20  

Avenues, The

    3.60 %   110,000     3,960    (2)   02/06/23  

Briarwood Mall

    7.50 %   109,680    (33)   10,641     11/30/16  

Busan Premium Outlets — Fixed

    5.44 %   73,678    (17)   4,009    (2)   06/20/22  

Busan Premium Outlets — Variable

    4.42 %   (27)   51,584    (17)   2,278    (2)   02/13/17  

California Department Stores

    6.53 %   31,300     2,044    (2)   11/01/17  

Cape Cod Mall

    5.75 %   95,139     7,003     03/06/21  

Charlotte Premium Outlets

    1.62 %   (1)   90,000     1,459    (2)   11/24/19    (3)

Circle Centre

    3.07 %   (24)   67,000     2,055    (2)   01/28/20    (3)

Coconut Point

    5.83 %   230,000     13,409    (2)   12/10/16  

Coddingtown Mall

    1.92 %   (1)   11,850     839     03/01/17    (3)

Colorado Mills — 1

    4.28 %   136,000     5,824    (2)   11/01/24  

Colorado Mills — 2

    5.04 %   27,843     1,811     07/01/21  

Concord Mills

    3.84 %   235,000     9,015    (2)   11/01/22  

Crystal Mall

    4.46 %   94,272     5,749     06/06/22  

Dadeland Mall

    4.50 %   442,740     27,361     12/05/21  

Del Amo Fashion Center

    2.17 %   (1)   310,000     6,731    (2)   01/17/18    (3)

Domain Westin

    1.92 %   (1)   45,000     865    (2)   08/30/18    (3)

Dover Mall

    5.57 %   89,831     6,455     08/06/21  

Emerald Square Mall

    4.71 %   110,883     7,165     08/11/22  

Falls, The

    7.50 %   106,024    (33)   10,287     11/30/16  

Fashion Centre Pentagon Office

    5.11 %   40,000     2,043    (2)   07/01/21  

Fashion Centre Pentagon Retail

    4.87 %   410,000     19,957    (2)   07/01/21  

Fashion Valley

    4.30 %   466,385     28,208     01/04/21  

Firewheel Residential

    5.91 %   21,756     1,635     12/01/16    (3)

Firewheel Residential II

    2.17 %   (1)   24,000     521    (2)   11/14/18    (3)

Florida Mall, The

    5.25 %   350,483     24,849     09/05/20  

Gloucester Premium Outlets

    1.67 %   (1)   1,608     27    (2)   06/19/19    (3)

Grapevine Mills

    3.83 %   268,000     15,157    (2)   10/01/24  

Greendale Mall

    6.00 %   45,000     2,699    (2)   10/01/16  

Gotemba Premium Outlets

    0.39 %   (12)   15,382    (26)   6,207     02/28/18  

Hamilton Town Center

    4.81 %   84,000     4,038    (2)   04/01/22  

Houston Galleria — 1

    5.44 %   643,583     34,985    (2)   12/01/15  

Houston Galleria — 2

    5.44 %   177,417     9,644    (2)   12/01/15  

Indian River Commons

    5.21 %   8,924    (13)   637     (8 )

Indian River Mall

    5.21 %   60,463    (13)   4,313     (8 )

Johor Premium Outlets

    5.06 %   (7)   21,443    (9)   6,678     10/14/20  

Katy Mills

    3.49 %   140,000     4,886    (2)   12/06/22  

Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets — Variable

    0.47 %   (12)   33,100    (26)   6,272     01/31/20  

Lehigh Valley Mall

    5.88 %   131,394     9,943     07/05/20  

La Reggia Designer Outlets Phases 1 & 2

    1.52 %   (25)   75,411    (30)   6,602     03/31/27  

Liberty Tree Mall

    3.41 %   33,940     1,866     05/06/23  

Mall at Rockingham Park, The

    5.61 %   260,000     14,586    (2)   03/10/17  

Mall at Tuttle Crossing, The

    3.56 %   125,000     4,455    (2)   05/01/23  

Mall of New Hampshire, The

    6.23 %   124,989     10,079     10/05/15  

Meadowood Mall

    5.82 %   120,139     8,818     11/06/21  

Miami International Mall

    4.42 %   160,000     7,072    (2)   02/06/24  

Northshore Mall

    3.30 %   267,212     14,453     07/05/23  

35


Table of Contents


Mortgage and Unsecured Debt on Portfolio Properties
As of December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name
  Interest
Rate
  Face
Amount
  Annual Debt
Service (1)
  Maturity
Date
 

Noventa Di Piave Designer Outlets Phase 1

    1.12 %   (25)   40,098    (30)   3,753     08/29/26  

Noventa Di Piave Designer Outlets Phase 2 & 3

    2.58 %   (28)   42,911    (30)   3,608     06/30/27  

Ontario Mills

    4.25 %   333,152     20,661     03/05/22  

Outlets at Orange, The

    4.22 %   215,000     12,936    (2)   04/01/24  

Paju Premium Outlets

    4.08 %   98,968    (17)   4,040    (2)   11/28/19  

Parndorf Designer Outlets Phases 3 & 4

    2.21 %   (28)   42,160    (30)   5,013     06/30/16  

Phipps Plaza Residential

    1.92 %   (1)   101     2    (2)   10/16/19    (3)

Premium Outlets Montréal

    2.60 %   (4)   80,570    (5)   2,095    (2)   09/10/17    (3)

Quaker Bridge Mall — 1

    7.03 %   12,273     2,407     04/01/16  

Quaker Bridge Mall — 2

    2.95 %   62,000     1,829    (2)   04/01/16  

Rinku Premium Outlets — Variable

    0.42 %   (12)   13,394    (26)   1,962     07/31/17  

Roermond Designer Outlets Phases 2 & 3 — Fixed

    1.86 %   218,914    (30)   4,070    (2)   12/01/21  

Sano Premium Outlets

    0.48 %   (12)   6,990    (26)   4,665     05/31/18  

Sendai-Izumi Premium Outlets

    0.44 %   (12)   12,724    (26)   3,677     10/31/18  

Shisui Premium Outlets

    0.39 %   (12)   39,847    (26)   5,494     05/31/18  

Shops at Mission Viejo, The

    3.61 %   295,000     10,650    (2)   02/01/23  

Shops at Sunset Place, The

    5.62 %   72,355     5,892     09/01/20  

Silver Sands Premium Outlets

    3.93 %   100,000     3,930    (2)   06/01/22  

Smith Haven Mall

    5.16 %   180,000     9,283    (2)   03/01/16  

Solomon Pond Mall

    4.01 %   105,847     6,309     11/01/22  

Southdale Residential

    1.82 %   (1)   33,880     617    (2)   07/01/18    (3)

SouthPark Residential

    4.80 %   22,000     1,056    (2)   05/01/21  

Springfield Mall

    4.77 %   (11)   62,611     3,492     11/30/15  

Square One Mall

    5.47 %   96,077     6,793     01/06/22  

Stoneridge Shopping Center

    7.50 %   216,178    (33)   19,214     11/30/16  

St. Johns Town Center

    3.82 %   350,000     9,528    (2)   09/11/24  

St. Louis Premium Outlets

    4.06 %   95,000     3,858    (2)   10/06/24  

Tanger Outlets — Galveston/Houston

    1.67 %   (1)   65,000     1,086    (2)   07/01/18    (3)

Toki Premium Outlets

    0.94 %   (12)   30,974    (26)   1,773     11/30/19  

Toronto Premium Outlets

    2.45 %   (4)   83,069    (5)   2,035    (2)   07/09/15  

Tosu Premium Outlets

    0.45 %   (12)   17,496    (26)   2,270     12/31/18  

Twin Cities Premium Outlets

    4.32 %   115,000     4,968    (2)   11/06/24  

West Town Mall

    6.34 %   210,000     13,309    (2)   12/01/17  

Westchester, The

    6.00 %   351,434     26,980     05/05/20  

Woodfield Mall

    4.50 %   425,000     19,125    (2)   03/05/24  

Yeoju Premium Outlets

    4.68 %   51,404    (17)   2,408    (2)   09/06/20  

Total Joint Venture Secured Indebtedness at Face Value

        $ 12,538,792              

The Mills Limited Partnership Indebtedness at Face Value

       
$

726,474

   (29)
           

Total Joint Venture and The Mills Limited Partnership Indebtedness at Face Value

        $ 13,265,266              

Net Premium on Indebtedness

          7,291              

Total Joint Venture Indebtedness

        $ 13,272,557              

Our Share of Joint Venture Indebtedness

        $ 6,359,882    (31)            

36


Table of Contents


Mortgage and Unsecured Debt on Portfolio Properties
As of December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

(1)
Variable rate loans based on 1M LIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 80 bps to 250 bps. 1M LIBOR as of December 31, 2014 was 0.17%.

(2)
Requires monthly payment of interest only.

(3)
Includes applicable extension available at the Applicable Borrower's option.

(4)
Variable rate loans based on 1M CDOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 115 bps to 130 bps. 1M CDOR at December 31, 2014 was 1.30%.

(5)
Amount shown in USD equivalent. CAD Equivalent is 189.9 million.

(6)
Requires annual payment of interest only.

(7)
Variable rate loans based on Cost of Fund plus interest rates spreads ranging from 150 bps to 175 bps. Cost of Fund as of December 31, 2014 was 3.54%.

(8)
Expected sale or transfer of the property during the first quarter of 2015.

(9)
Amount shown in USD Equivalent. Ringgit equivalent is 75.0 million.

(10)
Loans secured by these three properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(11)
Associated with these loans are interest rate swap agreements that effectively fix the interest rate of the loans at the all-in rate presented.

(12)
Variable rate loans based on 1M YEN LIBOR or 6M YEN LIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 25.0 bps to 79.3 bps. As of December 31, 2014, 1M YEN LIBOR and 6M YEN LIBOR were 0.08% and 0.14%, respectively.

(13)
Loans secured by these two properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(14)
Requires semi-annual payments of interest only.

(15)
$4.0 Billion Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2014, the Credit Facility — Yen Currency bears interest at Yen LIBOR + 80 bps and the Credit Facility — Euro Currency bears interest at 1M EURO LIBOR + 80 bps. The facilities provide for different pricing based upon our investment grade rating. As of December 31, 2014, $5.0 billion was available after outstanding borrowings and letters of credit under our credit facilities.

(16)
Amount shown in USD Equivalent. Balances include borrowings on multi-currency tranche of Euro 306.0 million.

(17)
Amount shown in USD equivalent. Won Equivalent is 301.9 billion.

(18)
Amount shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 172.0 million.

(19)
Loans secured by these three properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(20)
Loans secured by these two properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(21)
Loans secured by these ten properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(22)
Loans secured by these three properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(23)
Amount shown in USD Equivalent. Balances include borrowings on multi-currency tranche of Yen 22.3 billion.

(24)
Variable rate loan based on 1M LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of 290 bps. In addition, 1M LIBOR is capped at 5.00%.

(25)
Variable rate loan based on 6M EURIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 95 bps to 135 bps. 6M EURIBOR at December 31, 2014 was 0.17%.

(26)
Amount shown in USD Equivalent. Yen equivalent is 29.5 billion.

(27)
Variable rate loans based on 91 Day Korean CD rate plus interest rate spreads ranging from 200 bps to 290 bps. The 91 Day Korean CD rate as of December 31, 2014 was 2.13%.

(28)
Variable rate loan based on 3M EURIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 200 bps to 250 bps. 3M EURIBOR at December 31, 2014 was 0.08%.

(29)
Consists of five properties with interest rates ranging from 4.50% to 7.32% and maturities between 2015 and 2023.

(30)
Amount shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 344.9 million.

37


Table of Contents


Mortgage and Unsecured Debt on Portfolio Properties
As of December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

(31)
Our share of total indebtedness includes a pro rata share of the mortgage debt on joint venture properties, including The Mills Limited Partnership. To the extent total indebtedness is secured by a property, it is non-recourse to us, with the exception of approximately $223.5 million of payment guarantees provided by the Operating Partnership (of which $78.7 million is recoverable from our venture partner under the partnership agreement).

(32)
Amount shown in USD equivalent. GBP equivalent is 40.0 million.

(33)
Loans secured by these three properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

(34)
Amount shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 750.0 million.

(35)
Loans secured by these two properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

            The changes in consolidated mortgages and unsecured indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 are as follows:

 
  2014   2013   2012  

Balance, Beginning of Year

  $ 22,669,917   $ 22,186,848   $ 17,431,588  

Additions during period:

                   

New Loan Originations (a)

    2,273,014     1,988,710     4,815,345  

Loans assumed in acquisitions and consolidation

    166,950         2,576,407  

Net Premium

    8,747     (3,273 )   70,495  

Deductions during period:

                   

Loan Retirements

    (4,164,574 )   (1,400,562 )   (2,610,878 )

Amortization of Net Premiums

    (24,092 )   (33,026 )   (32,143 )

Scheduled Principal Amortization

    (76,969 )   (68,780 )   (63,966 )

Balance, Close of Year

  $ 20,852,993   $ 22,669,917   $ 22,186,848  
(a)
Includes net activity on the credit facilities and commercial paper

38


Table of Contents

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

            We are involved from time-to-time in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions including acquisitions and divestitures. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

            Not applicable.

39


Table of Contents


Part II

Item 5.    Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

            There is no established trading market for our units or preferred units. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the distributions declared on our units:

 
  Declared
Distributions
 

2013

       

1st Quarter

  $ 1.15  

2nd Quarter

    1.15  

3rd Quarter

    1.15  

4th Quarter

    1.20  

2014

       

1st Quarter

  $ 1.25  

2nd Quarter

    1.30  

3rd Quarter

    1.30  

4th Quarter

    1.30  

            The number of holders of record of units was 258 as of February 13, 2015.

            We make distributions on our units in amounts sufficient to maintain Simon's qualification as a REIT. Simon is required each year to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its taxable income after certain adjustments. Future distributions will be determined at the discretion of Simon's Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for distribution, and what may be required to maintain Simon's status as a REIT.

            Distributions during 2014 aggregated $5.15 per unit. Distributions during 2013 aggregated $4.65 per unit. In January 2015, Simon's Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend for the first quarter of 2015 of $1.40 per share. The distribution rate on our units is equal to the dividend rate on Simon's common stock.

40


Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

            The following tables set forth selected financial data. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Other data we believe is important in understanding trends in our business is also included in the tables.

 
  As of or for the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2014 (1)   2013   2012   2011   2010 (2)  
 
  (in thousands, except per unit data)
 

OPERATING DATA:

                               

Total consolidated revenue

  $ 4,870,818   $ 4,543,849   $ 4,256,157   $ 3,728,454   $ 3,378,624  

Consolidated income from continuing operations

    1,622,165     1,366,793     1,563,242     1,086,040     599,766  

Consolidated net income

    1,651,526     1,551,590     1,719,632     1,245,900     753,514  

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 1,643,783   $ 1,537,348   $ 1,705,860   $ 1,232,089   $ 733,945  

BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT:

                               

Income from continuing operations

  $ 4.44   $ 3.73   $ 4.29   $ 3.03   $ 1.66  

Discontinued operations

    0.08     0.51     0.43     0.45     0.44  

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 4.52   $ 4.24   $ 4.72   $ 3.48   $ 2.10  

Basic weighted average units outstanding

    363,476     362,356     361,323     354,026     349,976  

Diluted weighted average units outstanding

    363,476     362,356     361,324     354,095     350,250  

Distributions per unit (3)

  $ 5.15   $ 4.65   $ 4.10   $ 3.50   $ 2.60  

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

                               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 612,282   $ 1,691,006   $ 1,153,532   $ 776,039   $ 777,020  

Total assets

    29,532,330     33,324,574     32,586,606     26,216,925     24,857,429  

Mortgages and other indebtedness

    20,852,993     22,669,917     22,186,848     17,431,588     16,465,685  

Total equity

    5,951,505   $ 6,822,632   $ 6,893,089   $ 5,544,288   $ 5,633,752  

OTHER DATA:

                               

Cash flow provided by (used in):

                               

Operating activities

  $ 2,730,420   $ 2,700,996   $ 2,513,072   $ 2,005,887   $ 1,755,210  

Investing activities

    (897,266 )   (948,088 )   (3,580,671 )   (994,042 )   (1,246,695 )

Financing activities

    (2,937,735 )   (1,220,563 )   1,453,467     (1,009,913 )   (3,669,515 )

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (4)

    2.40 x   2.23 x   2.44 x   2.00 x   1.47 x

Funds from Operations (FFO) (5)

    3,235,298   $ 3,205,693   $ 2,884,915   $ 2,438,765   $ 1,770,491  
(1)
During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded a $127.6 million loss on extinguishment of debt associated with five unsecured note tender offers and one early unsecured note redemption. We also recorded transaction expenses related to the spin-off of Washington Prime of $38.2 million. 2014 FFO includes results for five months of Washington Prime of $146.2 million.

(2)
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded a $350.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt associated with two unsecured note tender offers and we recorded transaction expenses of $69.0 million.

(3)
Represents distributions on units declared per period.

(4)
Ratio calculations for years prior to the year ended December 31, 2014 have been revised to conform to the most recent presentation.

(5)
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe provides useful information to investors. Please refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a definition and reconciliation of FFO to consolidated net income.

41


Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

            The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

            Simon Property Group, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership and the majority-owned partnership subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. In this discussion, the terms "Operating Partnership", "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, L.P. and its subsidiaries and the term "Simon" refers specifically to Simon Property Group, Inc. Simon is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. REITs will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as they continue to distribute not less than 100% of their taxable income. According to our partnership agreement, we are required to pay all expenses of Simon.

            We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of malls, Premium Outlets® and The Mills®. As of December 31, 2014, we owned or held an interest in 207 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 109 malls, 68 Premium Outlets, 13 Mills, three community centers, and 14 other retail properties in 37 states and Puerto Rico. We have four outlets under development and have redevelopment and expansion projects, including the addition of anchors and big box tenants, underway at more than 25 properties in the U.S. and Asia. Internationally, as of December 31, 2014, we had ownership interests in nine Premium Outlets in Japan, three Premium Outlets in South Korea, two Premium Outlets in Canada, one Premium Outlet in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet in Malaysia. As of December 31, 2014, we had noncontrolling ownership interests in five outlet properties in Europe through our joint venture with McArthurGlen. Of the five properties, two are located in Italy and one each is located in Austria, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Additionally, as of December 31, 2014, we owned a 28.9% equity stake in Klépierre SA, or Klépierre, a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in, shopping centers located in 13 countries in Europe. On July 29, 2014 Klépierre announced that it had entered into a conditional agreement to acquire Corio N.V., or Corio, pursuant to which Corio shareholders would receive 1.14 Klépierre ordinary shares for each Corio ordinary share. On January 15, 2015 the tender offer transaction closed, and it is anticipated that Klépierre will own all of the equity of Corio on March 31, 2015 through a merger transaction, after which our percentage ownership will be diluted to approximately 18.3%.

            On May 28, 2014, as further discussed in Note 3 to the notes to the consolidated financial statements, we completed the spin-off of our interests in 98 properties comprised of substantially all of our strip center business and our smaller enclosed malls to Washington Prime Group Inc., or Washington Prime, an independent, publicly traded REIT (now doing business as WP GLIMCHER). The historical results of operations of the Washington Prime properties as well as the related assets and liabilities are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

            We generate the majority of our revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

            Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

            We invest in real estate properties to maximize total financial return which includes both operating cash flows and capital appreciation. We seek growth in earnings, funds from operations, or FFO, and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our properties and investments. We seek to accomplish this growth through the following:

42


Table of Contents

            We also grow by generating supplemental revenue from the following activities:

            We focus on high quality real estate across the retail real estate spectrum. We expand or redevelop properties to enhance profitability and market share of existing assets when we believe the investment of our capital meets our risk-reward criteria. We selectively develop new properties in markets we believe are not adequately served by existing retail outlets.

            We routinely review and evaluate acquisition opportunities based on their ability to enhance our portfolio. Our international strategy includes partnering with established real estate companies and financing international investments with local currency to minimize foreign exchange risk.

            To support our growth, we employ a three-fold capital strategy:

            We consider FFO, net operating income, or NOI, and comparable property NOI (NOI for properties owned and operating in both periods under comparison) to be key measures of operating performance that are not specifically defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. We use these measures internally to evaluate the operating performance of our portfolio and provide a basis for comparison with other real estate companies. Reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measure are included below in this discussion.

Results Overview

            Diluted earnings per unit of partnership interest, or unit, increased $0.28 during 2014 to $4.52 as compared to $4.24 in 2013. The increase in diluted earnings per unit was primarily attributable to:

            Core business fundamentals improved during 2014 primarily driven by higher tenant sales and strong leasing activity. Our share of portfolio NOI grew by 6.7% in 2014 as compared to 2013. Comparable property NOI also grew 5.1% for our portfolio of U.S. Malls, Premium Outlets and The Mills. Total sales per square foot, or psf, increased 0.2% from $618 psf at December 31, 2013, to $619 psf at December 31, 2014, for our U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets. Average base minimum rent for U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets increased 4.4% to $47.01 psf as of December 31, 2014, from $45.01 psf as of December 31, 2013. Releasing spreads remained positive in our U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets as we were able to lease

43


Table of Contents

available square feet at higher rents than the expiring rental rates on the same space, resulting in a releasing spread (based on total tenant payments — base minimum rent plus common area maintenance) of $9.59 psf ($67.51 openings compared to $57.92 closings) as of December 31, 2014, representing a 16.6% increase over expiring payments. Ending occupancy for our U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets was 97.1% as of December 31, 2014, as compared to 96.9% as of December 31, 2013, an increase of 20 basis points.

            Our effective overall borrowing rate at December 31, 2014 on our consolidated indebtedness decreased 39 basis points to 4.41% as compared to 4.80% at December 31, 2013. This reduction was primarily due to a decrease in the effective overall borrowing rate on fixed rate debt of 38 basis points (4.72% at December 31, 2014 as compared to 5.10% at December 31, 2013) combined with a decrease in the effective overall borrowing rate on variable rate debt of 6 basis points (1.16% at December 31, 2014 as compared to 1.22% at December 31, 2013). At December 31, 2014, the weighted average years to maturity of our consolidated indebtedness was 6.2 years as compared to 4.2 years at December 31, 2013.

            Our financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014, included:

United States Portfolio Data

            The portfolio data discussed in this overview includes the following key operating statistics: ending occupancy, average base minimum rent per square foot, and total sales per square foot for our domestic assets. We include acquired properties in this data beginning in the year of acquisition and remove disposed properties in the year of disposition. The Washington Prime properties have been removed from the portfolio data for all periods presented. For comparative purposes, we separate the information related to The Mills from our other U.S. operations. We also do not include any properties located outside of the United States.

            The following table sets forth these key operating statistics for:

44


Table of Contents

 
  2014   %/Basis Points
Change (1)
  2013   %/Basis Points
Change (1)
  2012

U.S. Malls and Premium Outlets:

                   

Ending Occupancy

                   

Consolidated

  97.3%   –20 bps   97.5%   +100 bps   96.5%

Unconsolidated

  96.4%   +100 bps   95.4%     95.4%

Total Portfolio

  97.1%   +20 bps   96.9%   +70 bps   96.2%

Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot

                   

Consolidated

  $45.34   4.6%   $43.33   4.8%   $41.33

Unconsolidated

  $51.89   3.8%   $50.00   2.2%   $48.92

Total Portfolio

  $47.01   4.4%   $45.01   4.2%   $43.19

Total Sales per Square Foot

                   

Consolidated

  $603     $603   2.6%   $588

Unconsolidated

  $679   1.3%   $670   2.0%   $657

Total Portfolio

  $619   0.2%   $618   2.5%   $603

The Mills®:

                   

Ending Occupancy

  98.4%   –10 bps   98.5%   +130 bps   97.2%

Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot

  $25.43   6.9%   $23.79   5.4%   $22.58

Total Sales per Square Foot

  $541   2.3%   $529   3.7%   $510
(1)
Percentages may not recalculate due to rounding. Percentage and basis point changes are representative of the change from the comparable prior period.

            Ending Occupancy Levels and Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot.    Ending occupancy is the percentage of gross leasable area, or GLA, which is leased as of the last day of the reporting period. We include all company owned space except for mall anchors, mall majors, mall freestanding and mall outlots in the calculation. Base minimum rent per square foot is the average base minimum rent charge in effect for the reporting period for all tenants that would qualify to be included in ending occupancy.

            Total Sales per Square Foot.    Total sales include total reported retail tenant sales on a trailing 12-month basis at owned GLA (for mall stores with less than 10,000 square feet) in the malls and The Mills and all reporting tenants at the Premium Outlets. Retail sales at owned GLA affect revenue and profitability levels because sales determine the amount of minimum rent that can be charged, the percentage rent realized, and the recoverable expenses (common area maintenance, real estate taxes, etc.) that tenants can afford to pay.

            During 2014, we signed 773 new leases and 1,581 renewal leases (excluding mall anchors and majors, new development, redevelopment, expansion, downsizing, and relocation) with a fixed minimum rent across our U.S. malls and Premium Outlets portfolio, comprising approximately 7.4 million square feet of which 5.5 million square feet related to consolidated properties. During 2013, we signed 950 new leases and 1,391 renewal leases with a fixed minimum rent, comprising approximately 10.3 million square feet of which 7.7 million square feet related to consolidated properties. The average annual initial base minimum rent for new leases was $58.57 per square foot in 2014 and $49.85 per square foot in 2013 with an average tenant allowance on new leases of $38.83 per square foot and $34.69 per square foot, respectively.

            The following are selected key operating statistics for our Premium Outlets in Japan. The information used to prepare these statistics has been supplied by the managing venture partner.

 
  December 31,
2014
  %/basis point
Change
  December 31,
2013
  %/basis point
Change
  December 31,
2012

Ending Occupancy

  99.1%   –30 bps   99.4%   –10 bps   99.5%

Total Sales per Square Foot

  ¥94,933   4.37%   ¥90,959   3.69%   ¥87,720

Average Base Minimum Rent per Square Foot

  ¥4,910   0.45%   ¥4,888   2.05%   ¥4,790

45


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

            The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we reevaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, see Note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

46


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

            In addition to the activity discussed above in the "Results Overview" section, the following acquisitions, openings, and dispositions of consolidated properties affected our consolidated results from continuing operations in the comparative periods:

            In addition to the activities discussed above and in "Results Overview", the following acquisitions, dispositions, and openings of joint venture properties affected our income from unconsolidated entities in the comparative periods:

47


Table of Contents

            For the purposes of the following comparisons between the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the above transactions are referred to as the property transactions. In the following discussions of our results of operations, "comparable" refers to properties we owned and operated in both years in the year-to-year comparisons.

Year Ended December 31, 2014 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2013

            Minimum rents increased $186.4 million during 2014, of which the property transactions accounted for $32.0 million of the increase. Comparable rents increased $154.4 million, or 5.8%, primarily attributable to an increase in base minimum rents.

            Tenant reimbursements increased $104.2 million, due to a $14.8 million increase attributable to the property transactions and a $89.4 million, or 7.6%, increase in the comparable properties primarily due to utility reimbursements, annual fixed contractual increases related to common area maintenance, real estate tax recoveries and additional marketing recoveries related to costs incurred during our property rebranding initiative and increased digital and social media advertising costs.

48


Table of Contents

            Total other income increased $32.7 million, principally as a result of a $16.1 million increase in lease settlement income, $8.3 million increase attributable to dividend income and a $7.6 million increase in land sale activity.

            Property operating expense increased $27.6 million due to a $6.5 million increase related to the property transactions, and a $21.1 million increase related to the comparable properties primarily as a result of increased utility expenses partially due to the harsh winter.

            Depreciation and amortization expense increased $36.1 million primarily due to the additional depreciable assets related to the property transactions and our continued redevelopment and expansion activities.

            Advertising and promotion increased $18.8 million primarily related to costs incurred during our property rebranding initiative and increased digital and social media advertising costs.

            Provision for credit losses increased $4.8 million as a result of increased reserves due to an increase in tenant bankruptcies and a decrease in recoveries as compared to 2013. The 2014 expense is in line with longer term historical levels.

            Home and regional office costs increased $17.6 million primarily related to higher personnel costs including incentive compensation and one-time expenses related to the spin-off of Washington Prime.

            Other expenses increased $7.9 million primarily due to the net foreign currency impact of the change in foreign currency rates from 2013 to 2014.

            Interest expense decreased $89.5 million primarily due to the net impact of our financing activities during 2014 and the reduction in the effective overall borrowing rate as previously discussed.

            During 2014, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $127.6 million as a result of the debt tender offers and redemption during the third quarter of 2014.

            Income and other taxes decreased $11.5 million primarily due to a decrease in state income taxes and taxes related to certain of our international investments.

            Income from unconsolidated entities increased $20.4 million primarily due to favorable results of operations from the development and redevelopment of joint venture properties and 2013 results including an extinguishment charge related to the refinancing of Aventura Mall.

            During 2014, we recorded a gain related to Klépierre's sale of a portfolio of 126 properties and our disposal of three retail properties. Additionally, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in Arizona Mills from our joint venture partner. The property was previously accounted for under the equity method and we recognized a non-cash gain upon consolidation of this property. The aggregate gain recognized on these transactions was $158.3 million. During 2013, we disposed of our interest in two malls, four community centers, and five retail properties and recorded a gain on the acquisition of an outlet center. The aggregate gain recognized on these transactions was approximately $93.4 million.

            Discontinued operations decreased $117.3 million due to 2014 including approximately five months ownership of the Washington Prime properties, whereas 2013 included twelve full months of ownership of those properties. The 2013 results also include a $14.2 million gain on the disposal of three strip centers held within a joint venture portfolio of Washington Prime properties. Additionally, on February 28, 2014 one strip center was sold by that same joint venture for a gain of $0.2 million. In 2014, we also incurred $38.2 million in transaction costs related to the Washington Prime spin-off.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2012

            Minimum rents increased $182.0 million during 2013, of which the property transactions accounted for $99.7 million of the increase. Comparable rents increased $82.3 million, or 3.7%, primarily attributable to an $78.2 million increase in base minimum rents. Overage rents increased $27.1 million, or 14.5%, as a result of an increase in tenant sales at the comparable properties in 2013 compared to 2012 of $20.1 million as well as an increase related to the property transactions of $7.0 million.

            Tenant reimbursements increased $100.8 million, due to a $40.4 million increase attributable to the property transactions and a $60.4 million, or 6.1%, increase in the comparable properties primarily due to annual fixed contractual increases related to common area maintenance and higher reimbursements for the tenants' pro rata share of real estate taxes.

49


Table of Contents

            Total other income decreased $20.9 million, principally as a result of the following:

            Depreciation and amortization expense increased $39.3 million primarily due to the additional depreciable assets related to the property transactions and our continued redevelopment and expansion activities.

            Real estate tax expense increased $25.8 million primarily due to an $14.9 million increase related to the property transactions.

            Repairs and maintenance expense increased $4.3 million primarily as a result of increased snow removal costs compared to the prior year period.

            During 2013, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $7.2 million whereas in the prior year the provision was $10.9 million. Both amounts reflect the overall strong economic health of our tenants.

            Home and regional office costs increased $17.0 million primarily related to higher personnel costs.

            Interest expense increased $13.9 million primarily due to an increase of $21.9 million related to the property transactions partially offset by the net impact of the financing activities and reduction in the effective overall borrowing rate.

            Income and other taxes increased $23.8 million due to taxes related to certain of our international investments and an increase in state income taxes.

            Income from unconsolidated entities increased $75.5 million primarily due to the increase in ownership in the joint venture properties acquired as part of the Mills transaction, the 2012 acquisition of an equity stake in Klépierre, our acquisition and expansion activity and favorable results of operations from joint venture properties partially offset by an extinguishment charge related to the refinancing of Aventura Mall.

            During 2013, we disposed of our interests in two malls, four community centers and five retail properties, and recorded a gain on the acquisition of an outlet center. The aggregate gain recognized on these transactions was approximately $93.4 million. During 2012, we disposed of our interest in GCI, four unconsolidated properties, and eight consolidated retail properties for a net gain of $43.7 million and acquired a controlling interest in nine properties previously accounted for under the equity method in the Mills transaction which resulted in the recognition of a non-cash gain of $488.7 million. In addition, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $22.4 million on our remaining investment in SPG-FCM Ventures, LLC, which holds our investment in TMLP, representing the excess of carrying value over the estimated fair value.

            Discontinued operations increased $28.4 million as a result of favorable results of operations. The 2013 results also include a $14.2 million gain on the disposal of three strip centers held within a joint venture portfolio of Washington Prime properties.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

            Because we own long-lived income-producing assets, our financing strategy relies primarily on long-term fixed rate debt. Floating rate debt currently comprises only 8.8% of our total consolidated debt at December 31, 2014. We also enter into interest rate protection agreements to manage our interest rate risk. We derive most of our liquidity from positive net cash flow from operations and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities that totaled $3.2 billion during 2014. In addition, the Credit Facility, the $2.0 billion supplemental unsecured revolving credit facility, or Supplemental Facility, and the Commercial Paper program provide alternative sources of liquidity as our cash needs vary from time to time. Borrowing capacity under these credit facilities may be increased as discussed further below.

50


Table of Contents

            Our balance of cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations decreased $1.1 billion during 2014 to $612.3 million as of December 31, 2014 as further discussed in "Cash Flows" below.

            On December 31, 2014, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of approximately $5.0 billion under the two credit facilities, net of outstanding borrowings of $558.5 million and letters of credit of $38.9 million. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the maximum amount outstanding under the two credit facilities was $1.2 billion and the weighted average amount outstanding was $855.4 million. The weighted average interest rate was 0.99% for the year ended December 31, 2014. Further, on October 6, 2014, we entered into a global Commercial Paper program as further discussed below.

            We also have historically had access to private and public long and short-term unsecured debt markets and access to secured debt and private equity from institutional investors at the property level. Simon also has historically had access to public equity markets.

            Our business model requires us to regularly access the debt markets to raise funds for acquisition, development and redevelopment activity, and to refinance maturing debt. We may also, from time to time, access the equity capital markets to accomplish our business objectives. We believe we have sufficient cash on hand and availability under the Credit Facility, the Supplemental Facility, and the Commercial Paper program to address our debt maturities and capital needs through 2015.

            Our net cash flow from operating activities and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities totaled $3.2 billion during 2014. In addition, we had net repayments from our debt financing and repayment activities, including the $127.6 million debt extinguishment charge, of $1.8 billion in 2014 and net proceeds from debt financings related to the Washington Prime spin-off of $1.0 billion. These activities are further discussed below under "Financing and Debt" or Note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. During 2014, we also:

            In general, we anticipate that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet operating expenses, monthly debt service, recurring capital expenditures, and distributions to partners necessary to maintain Simon's REIT qualification on a long-term basis. In addition, we expect to be able to generate or obtain capital for nonrecurring capital expenditures, such as acquisitions, major building redevelopments and expansions, as well as for scheduled principal maturities on outstanding indebtedness, from:

            We expect to generate positive cash flow from operations in 2015, and we consider these projected cash flows in our sources and uses of cash. These cash flows are principally derived from rents paid by our retail tenants. A significant deterioration in projected cash flows from operations could cause us to increase our reliance on available funds from our credit facilities, curtail planned capital expenditures, or seek other additional sources of financing as discussed above.

51


Table of Contents

            At December 31, 2014, our unsecured debt consisted of $13.4 billion of our senior unsecured notes, net of discounts, $558.5 million outstanding under our Credit Facility, $240.0 million outstanding under an unsecured term loan, and $409.2 million outstanding under our Commercial Paper program. The December 31, 2014 balance on the Credit Facility included $372.2 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Euro-denominated borrowings and $186.4 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Yen-denominated borrowings. At December 31, 2014 the outstanding amount under the Commercial Paper program was $409.2 million, of which $209.2 million was related to U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro-denominated notes. Foreign currency denominated borrowings under both the Credit Facility and Commercial Paper program are designated as net investment hedges of a portion of our international investments.

            On December 31, 2014, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of approximately $5.0 billion under the Credit Facility and the Supplemental Facility. The maximum outstanding balance of the credit facilities during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.2 billion and the weighted average outstanding balance was $855.4 million. Letters of credit of $38.9 million were outstanding under the facilities as of December 31, 2014.

            On April 7, 2014, we amended and extended the Credit Facility. The initial borrowing capacity of $4.0 billion may be increased to $5.0 billion during its term and provides for borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollars, Euros, Yen, Sterling, Canadian Dollars and Australian Dollars. Borrowings in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar are limited to 75% of the maximum revolving credit amount, as defined. The initial maturity date of the Credit Facility was extended to June 30, 2018 and can be extended for an additional year to June 30, 2019 at our sole option. The base interest rate on the amended Credit Facility was reduced to LIBOR plus 80 basis points and the additional facility fee was reduced to 10 basis points.

            The Supplemental Facility's borrowing capacity of $2.0 billion may be increased to $2.5 billion during its term. The Supplemental Facility will initially mature on June 30, 2016 and can be extended for an additional year at our sole option. As of December 31, 2014, the base interest rate on the Supplemental Facility was LIBOR plus 95 basis points with an additional facility fee of 15 basis points. Like the Credit Facility, the Supplemental Facility provides for a money market competitive bid option program and allows for multi-currency borrowings. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we moved $184.9 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Yen-denominated borrowings from the Supplemental Facility to the Credit Facility.

            On October 6, 2014, we entered into a global Commercial Paper program. Under the terms of this program, we may issue unsecured Commercial Paper notes, denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros and other currencies, up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $500.0 million, or the non-U.S. dollar equivalent thereof. Notes issued in non-U.S. currencies may be issued by one or more of our subsidiaries and are guaranteed by us. Notes will be sold under customary terms in the U.S and Euro commercial paper note markets and will rank (either by themselves or as a result of the guarantee described above) pari passu with all of our other unsecured senior indebtedness. Our Commercial Paper program is supported by our credit facilities and if necessary or appropriate, we may make one or more draws under the credit facilities to pay amounts outstanding from time to time on the Commercial Paper program. At December 31, 2014, we had $409.2 million outstanding comprised of $200.0 million outstanding in U.S. dollar denominated notes and $209.2 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Euro denominated notes with weighted average interest rates of 0.19% and 0.13%, respectively. The borrowings mature on various dates from January 7, 2015 to March 18, 2015.

            On September 3, 2014, we commenced cash tender offers for any and all of five series of our outstanding senior unsecured notes with maturity dates ranging from 2015 to 2017. The total principal amount of notes tendered and accepted for purchase was approximately $1.322 billion, with a weighted average remaining duration of 1.7 years and a weighted average coupon rate of 5.60%. We purchased the tendered notes using cash on hand and the proceeds from an offering of $1.3 billion of senior unsecured notes that closed on September 10, 2014. The senior notes offering was comprised of $900.0 million of 3.375% notes due 2024 and $400.0 million of 4.25% notes due 2044. Combined, the new issues of senior notes have a weighted average duration of 16.1 years and a weighted average coupon rate of 3.64%. A portion of the proceeds from the senior notes offering was also used to fund the redemption on September 30, 2014 of all $250.0 million outstanding principal amount of the 7.875% notes due 2016 issued by one of our subsidiaries. We recorded a $127.6 million loss of extinguishment of debt in the third quarter of 2014 as a result of the tender offers and redemption.

            On January 21, 2014, we issued $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 2.20% with a maturity date of February 1, 2019 and $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 3.75% with a maturity date of February 1, 2024. Proceeds from the unsecured notes offering were used to repay debt and for general corporate purposes.

            In addition to the debt tender offers and redemption described above, during 2014 we used cash on hand to redeem at par or repay at maturity $1.3 billion of senior unsecured notes with fixed rates ranging from 4.20% to 6.75%.

52


Table of Contents

            Total mortgage indebtedness was $6.2 billion and $7.3 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

            On January 2, 2014, we repaid the $820.0 million outstanding mortgage at Sawgrass Mills originally maturing July 1, 2014 and on February 28, 2014, we repaid the $269.0 million outstanding mortgage at Great Mall originally maturing August 28, 2015. During 2014, we disposed of our interests in three retail properties and their related mortgage debt of $90.0 million.

            Our unsecured debt agreements contain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants. If we were to fail to comply with these covenants, after the expiration of the applicable cure periods, the debt maturity could be accelerated or other remedies could be sought by the lender including adjustments to the applicable interest rate. As of December 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all covenants of our unsecured debt.

            At December 31, 2014, we or our subsidiaries were the borrowers under 38 non-recourse mortgage notes secured by mortgages on 52 properties, including five separate pools of cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized mortgages encumbering a total of 21 properties. Under these cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage included in the cross-defaulted pool may constitute a default under all mortgages within that pool and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the pool. Certain of our secured debt instruments contain financial and other non-financial covenants which are specific to the properties which serve as collateral for that debt. If the borrower fails to comply with these covenants, the lender could accelerate the debt and enforce its right against their collateral. At December 31, 2014, the applicable borrowers under these non-recourse mortgage notes were in compliance with all covenants where non-compliance could individually, or giving effect to applicable cross-default provisions in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

            Our consolidated debt, adjusted to reflect outstanding derivative instruments, and the effective weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

Debt Subject to
  Adjusted Balance
as of
December 31, 2014
  Effective
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
  Adjusted Balance
as of
December 31, 2013
  Effective
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
 

Fixed Rate

  $ 19,015,271     4.72 % $ 20,907,618     5.10 %

Variable Rate

    1,837,722     1.16 %   1,762,299     1.22 %

  $ 20,852,993     4.41 % $ 22,669,917     4.80 %

            In regards to long-term debt arrangements, the following table summarizes the material aspects of these future obligations on our consolidated indebtedness as of December 31, 2014, and subsequent years thereafter (dollars in thousands) assuming the obligations remain outstanding through initial maturities including applicable exercise of available extension options:

 
  2015   2016 and 2017   2018 and 2019   After 2019   Total  

Long Term Debt (1)

  $ 1,174,796   $ 5,935,795   $ 3,952,670   $ 9,780,710   $ 20,843,971  

Interest Payments (2)

    907,771     1,430,850     972,343     2,462,576     5,773,540  

Consolidated Capital Expenditure Commitments (3)

    366,113                   366,113  

Lease Commitments (4)

    29,775     70,657     63,679     907,110     1,071,221  
(1)
Represents principal maturities only and therefore, excludes net premiums of $9,022.

(2)
Variable rate interest payments are estimated based on the LIBOR rate at December 31, 2014.

(3)
Represents contractual commitments for capital projects and services at December 31, 2014. Our share of estimated 2015 development, redevelopment and expansion activity is further discussed below in the "Development Activity" section.

(4)
Represents only the minimum non-cancellable lease period, excluding applicable lease extension and renewal options.

53


Table of Contents

            Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of our investments in joint ventures which are common in the real estate industry and are described in Note 7 to the notes to consolidated financial statements. Our joint ventures typically fund their cash needs through secured debt financings obtained by and in the name of the joint venture entity. The joint venture debt is secured by a first mortgage, is without recourse to the joint venture partners, and does not represent a liability of the partners, except to the extent the partners or their affiliates expressly guarantee the joint venture debt. As of December 31, 2014, we guaranteed joint venture related mortgage indebtedness of $223.5 million (of which we have a right of recovery from our venture partners of $78.7 million). Mortgages guaranteed by us are secured by the property of the joint venture which could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation and which has an estimated fair value in excess of the guaranteed amount. We may elect to fund cash needs of a joint venture through equity contributions (generally on a basis proportionate to our ownership interests), advances or partner loans, although such fundings are not required contractually or otherwise.

            Buy-sell, marketing rights, and other exit mechanisms are common in real estate partnership agreements. Most of our partners are institutional investors who have a history of direct investment in retail real estate. We and our partners in our joint venture properties may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions). If we determine it is in our unitholders' best interests for us to purchase the joint venture interest and we believe we have adequate liquidity to execute the purchase without hindering our cash flows, then we may initiate these provisions or elect to buy our partner's interest. If we decide to sell any of our joint venture interests, we expect to use the net proceeds to reduce outstanding indebtedness or to reinvest in development, redevelopment, or expansion opportunities.

            Acquisitions.    On January 15, 2015, we acquired a 100% interest in Jersey Gardens (renamed The Mills at Jersey Gardens) in Elizabeth, New Jersey and University Park Village in Fort Worth, Texas, properties previously owned by Glimcher Realty Trust for $677.9 million of cash and the assumption of existing mortgage debt of $405.0 million.

            On April 10, 2014, through our joint venture with McArthurGlen, we acquired an additional 22.5% noncontrolling interest in Ashford Designer Outlet, increasing our percentage ownership of this property to 45%.

            On January 30, 2014, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in Arizona Mills from our joint venture partner, as well as approximately 39 acres of land in Oyster Bay, New York, for approximately $145.8 million, consisting of cash consideration and 555,150 units. Arizona Mills is subject to a mortgage which was $166.9 million at the time of the acquisition. The consolidation of this previously unconsolidated property resulted in a remeasurement of our previously held interest to fair value and a corresponding non-cash gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2014. We now own 100% of this property.

            On January 10, 2014, we acquired one of our partner's redeemable interests in a portfolio of ten properties for approximately $114.4 million subject to a pre-existing contractual arrangement. The amount paid to acquire the interests in the seven properties which were previously consolidated was included in preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties at December 31, 2013.

            Dispositions.    We continue to pursue the disposition of properties that no longer meet our strategic criteria or that are not a primary retail venue within their trade area.

            As discussed in Note 3 to the notes to the consolidated financial statements, on May 28, 2014, we completed the spin-off of our interests in 98 properties comprised of substantially all of our strip center business and our smaller enclosed malls to Washington Prime.

            During 2014, we disposed of our interests in three consolidated retail properties. The aggregate gain recognized on these transactions was approximately $21.8 million.

            On September 26, 2014, we sold our investment in a hotel located at Coconut Point in Estero, Florida. The gain from this sale was $4.5 million, which is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

54


Table of Contents

            New Domestic Developments, Redevelopments and Expansions.    During 2014, construction began on the following Premium Outlets:

            During 2014, the following Premium Outlets opened:

            We recently announced plans to develop The Shops at Clearfork, a new 500,000 square foot project located in Fort Worth, Texas, which is scheduled to open in February 2017. We own a 45% noncontrolling interest in this project.

            We routinely incur costs related to construction for significant redevelopment and expansion projects at our properties. Redevelopment and expansion projects, including the addition of anchors and big box tenants, are underway at 25 properties in the U.S.

            Summary of Capital Expenditures.    The following table summarizes total capital expenditures on consolidated properties on a cash basis (in millions):

 
  2014   2013   2012  

New Developments

  $ 52   $ 40   $ 216  

Redevelopments and Expansions

    500     509     332  

Tenant Allowances

    143     124     112  

Operational Capital Expenditures

    79     75     74  

Capital Expenditures on Washington Prime properties

    23     93     68  

Total

  $ 797   $ 841   $ 802  

            Our share of the costs of all development and redevelopment projects currently under construction is approximately $2.1 billion. We expect to fund these capital projects with cash flows from operations. Our estimated stabilized return on invested capital typically ranges between 8-12% for all of our new development, expansion and redevelopment projects.

            International Development Activity.    We typically reinvest net cash flow from our international joint ventures to fund future international development activity. We believe this strategy mitigates some of the risk of our initial investment and our exposure to changes in foreign currencies. We have also funded most of our foreign investments with local currency-denominated borrowings that act as a natural hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates. We expect our share of international development costs for 2015 will be approximately $118.0 million, primarily funded through reinvested joint venture cash flow and construction loans.

55


Table of Contents

            The following table describes these new development and expansion projects as well as our share of the estimated total cost as of December 31, 2014 (in millions):

Property
  Location   Gross
Leasable
Area (sqft)
  Our
Ownership
Percentage
  Our Share
of
Projected
Net Cost
(in Local
Currency)
  Our
Share of
Projected
Net Cost
(in USD)
  Projected Opening
Date

New Development Projects:

                               

Montreal Premium Outlets

  Montreal (Quebec), Canada     360,000     50 %   CAD 74.2   $ 63.9   Opened Oct. - 2014

Vancouver Designer Outlet

  Vancouver (British Columbia), Canada     242,000     45 %   CAD 68.7   $ 59.3   Summer - 2015

Expansions:

 

 

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

 

Premium Outlets Punta Norte Phase 3

  Mexico City, Mexico     55,000     50 %   MXN 43.8   $ 3.0   Opened Nov. - 2014

Toki Premium Outlets Phase 4

  Gifu (Osaka), Japan     77,000     40 %   JPY 1,805   $ 15.1   Opened Nov. - 2014

Yeoju Premium Outlets Phase 2

  Gyeonggi Province, South Korea     259,000     50 %   KRW 79,361   $ 72.5   March - 2015

Shisui Premium Outlets Phase 2

  Shisui (Chiba), Japan     130,000     40 %   JPY 2,895   $ 24.2   May - 2015

Distributions

            Distributions during 2014 aggregated $5.15 per unit. Distributions during 2013 aggregated $4.65 per unit. In January 2015, Simon's Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $1.40 per share of common stock payable on February 27, 2015 to stockholders of record on February 13, 2015. The distribution rate on our units is equal to the dividend rate on Simon's common stock. We pay a sufficient amount of distributions to maintain Simon's status as a REIT. Our future distributions will be determined by the Simon Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for distributions, cash reserves as deemed necessary for capital and operating expenditures, and the amount required to maintain Simon's status as a REIT.

Forward-Looking Statements

            Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be deemed "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to: our ability to meet debt service requirements, the availability and terms of financing, changes in our credit rating, changes in market rates of interest and foreign exchange rates for foreign currencies, changes in value of investments in foreign entities, the ability to hedge interest rate and currency risk, risks associated with the acquisition, development, expansion, leasing and management of properties, general risks related to retail real estate, the liquidity of real estate investments, environmental liabilities, international, national, regional and local economic conditions, changes in market rental rates, security breaches that could compromise our information technology or infrastructure or personally identifiable data of customers of our retail properties, trends in the retail industry, relationships with anchor tenants, the inability to collect rent due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise, risks relating to joint venture properties, the intensely competitive market environment in the retail industry, costs of common area maintenance, risks related to international activities, insurance costs and coverage, the loss of key management personnel, terrorist activities, changes in economic and market conditions and maintenance of Simon's status as a real estate investment trust. We discussed these and other risks and uncertainties under the heading "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We may update that discussion in subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, but otherwise we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

            Industry practice is to evaluate real estate properties in part based on performance measures such as FFO, NOI and comparable property NOI. We believe that these non-GAAP measures are helpful to investors because they are widely recognized measures of the performance of REITs and provide a relevant basis for comparison among REITs. We also use these measures internally to measure the operating performance of our portfolio.

56


Table of Contents

            We determine FFO based on the definition set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as consolidated net income computed in accordance with GAAP:

            We have adopted NAREIT's clarification of the definition of FFO that requires us to include the effects of nonrecurring items not classified as extraordinary, cumulative effect of accounting changes, or a gain or loss resulting from the sale or disposal of, or any impairment charges related to, previously depreciated operating properties.

            We include in FFO gains and losses realized from the sale of land, outlot buildings, marketable and non-marketable securities, and investment holdings of non-retail real estate. We also include in FFO the impact of foreign currency exchange gains and losses, legal expenses, transaction expenses and other items required by GAAP.

            You should understand that our computation of these non-GAAP measures might not be comparable to similar measures reported by other REITs and that these non-GAAP measures:

            The following schedule reconciles total FFO to consolidated net income.

 
  2014   2013   2012  
 
  (in thousands)
 

Funds from Operations

  $ 3,235,298   $ 3,205,693   $ 2,884,915  

Increase in FFO from prior period

    0.9%     11.1%     18.3%  

Consolidated Net Income

  $ 1,651,526   $ 1,551,590   $ 1,719,632  

Adjustments to Arrive at FFO:

                   

Depreciation and amortization from consolidated properties          

    1,204,624     1,273,646     1,242,741  

Our share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated entities, including Klépierre

    549,138     511,200     456,011  

Gain upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment charge on investment in unconsolidated entities, net

    (158,550 )   (107,515 )   (510,030 )

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest holders in properties

    (2,491 )   (8,990 )   (8,520 )

Noncontrolling interests portion of depreciation and amortization

    (3,697 )   (8,986 )   (9,667 )

Preferred distributions and dividends

    (5,252 )   (5,252 )   (5,252 )

FFO from Operations (A) (B)

  $ 3,235,298   $ 3,205,693   $ 2,884,915  

(A)
Includes FFO related to the Washington Prime properties, net of transaction expenses, of $108.0 million, $360.3 million and $350.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

(B)
Includes a loss on extinguishment of debt of $127.6 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2014.

57


Table of Contents

The following schedule reconciles consolidated net income to NOI and sets forth the computations of comparable property NOI.

 
  For the Year
Ended December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013  
 
  (in thousands)
 

Reconciliation of NOI of consolidated properties:

             

Consolidated Net Income

  $ 1,651,526   $ 1,551,590  

Discontinued operations

    (67,524 )   (184,797 )

Discontinued operations transaction expenses

    38,163      

Income and other taxes

    28,085     39,538  

Interest expense

    992,601     1,082,081  

Income from unconsolidated entities

    (226,774 )   (206,380 )

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    127,573      

Gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, net

    (158,308 )   (93,363 )

Operating Income

    2,385,342     2,188,669  

Depreciation and amortization

    1,143,827     1,107,700  

NOI of consolidated properties

  $ 3,529,169   $ 3,296,369  

Reconciliation of NOI of unconsolidated entities:

             

Net Income

  $ 677,371   $ 641,099  

Interest expense

    598,900     680,321  

Income from operations of discontinued joint venture interests

    (5,079 )   (14,200 )

Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net

        (51,164 )

Operating Income

    1,271,192     1,256,056  

Depreciation and amortization

    604,199     512,702  

NOI of unconsolidated entities

  $ 1,875,391   $ 1,768,758  

Total consolidated and unconsolidated NOI from continuing operations

  $ 5,404,560   $ 5,065,127  

Change in total NOI from continuing operations from prior period

    6.7%        

Adjustments to NOI:

   
 
   
 
 

NOI of discontinued consolidated properties

    169,828     409,848  

NOI of discontinued unconsolidated properties

    17,445     44,352  

Total NOI of our portfolio

  $ 5,591,833   $ 5,519,327  

Add: Our share of NOI from Klépierre

    223,013     276,391  

Less: Joint venture partners' share of NOI from continuing operations

    966,154     949,841  

Less: Joint venture partners' share of NOI from discontinued operations

    12,998     33,620  

Our share of NOI

  $ 4,835,694   $ 4,812,257  

Total NOI of our portfolio

 
$

5,591,833
 
$

5,519,327
 

NOI from non comparable properties (1)

    961,053     1,112,166  

Total NOI of comparable properties (2)

  $ 4,630,780   $ 4,407,161  

Increase in NOI of U.S. Malls, Premium Outlets, and The Mills that are comparable properties

    5.1%        

(1)
NOI excluded from comparable property NOI relates to Washington Prime properties, international properties, other retail properties, TMLP properties, any of our non-retail holdings and results of our corporate and management company operations, NOI of U.S. Malls, Premium Outlets and The Mills not owned and operated in both periods under comparison and excluded income noted in footnote 2 below.

(2)
Excludes lease termination income, interest income, land sale gains, straight line rent, above/below market rent adjustments, and the impact of significant redevelopment activities.

58


Table of Contents

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

            We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, Simon's Board of Directors, principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by Simon's Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

            Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

            We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).

            Based on that assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Item 7A.    Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk

            Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates primarily relates to our long-term debt obligations. We manage exposure to interest rate market risk through our risk management strategy by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of variable rate debt. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on financings of certain foreign operations. Our intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposures. We do not enter into either interest rate protection or foreign currency rate protection agreements for speculative purposes.

            We may enter into treasury lock agreements as part of anticipated issuances of senior notes. Upon completion of the debt issuance, the cost of these instruments is recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt agreement.

            Our future earnings, cash flows and fair values relating to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market rates of interest, primarily LIBOR, which was at historically low levels during 2014. Based upon consolidated indebtedness and interest rates at December 31, 2014, a 50 basis point increase in the market rates of interest would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $9.2 million, and would decrease the fair value of debt by approximately $474.0 million.

59


Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.
and the Partners of Simon Property Group, L.P.:

            We have audited Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

            We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

            A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

            Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

            In our opinion, Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.

            We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries, and our report dated March 2, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 2, 2015

60


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Simon Property Group, Inc.
and the Partners of Simon Property Group, L.P.:

            We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

            We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

            In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

            We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated March 2, 2015, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 2, 2015

61


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except unit amounts)

 
  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 

ASSETS:

             

Investment properties at cost

  $ 31,318,532   $ 30,336,639  

Less — accumulated depreciation

    8,950,747     8,092,794  

    22,367,785     22,243,845  

Cash and cash equivalents

    612,282     1,691,006  

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

    580,197     520,361  

Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity

    2,378,800     2,429,845  

Investment in Klepierre, at equity

    1,786,477     2,014,415  

Deferred costs and other assets

    1,806,789     1,422,788  

Total assets of discontinued operations

        3,002,314  

Total assets

  $ 29,532,330   $ 33,324,574  

LIABILITIES:

             

Mortgages and unsecured indebtedness

  $ 20,852,993   $ 22,669,917  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues                 

    1,259,681     1,223,102  

Cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity                 

    1,167,163     1,050,278  

Other liabilities

    275,451     250,371  

Total liabilities of discontinued operations

        1,117,789  

Total liabilities

    23,555,288     26,311,457  

Commitments and contingencies

   
 
   
 
 

Preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties

   
25,537
   
190,485
 

EQUITY:

   
 
   
 
 

Partners' Equity

             

Preferred units, 796,948 units outstanding. Liquidation value of $39,847                 

    44,062     44,390  

General Partner, 310,787,910 and 310,608,565 units outstanding, respectively                 

    5,049,115     5,805,016  

Limited Partners, 52,846,682 and 51,846,157 units outstanding, respectively

    858,557     968,962  

Total partners' equity

    5,951,734     6,818,368  

Noncontrolling nonredeemable (deficit) interests in properties, net

    (229 )   4,264  

Total equity

    5,951,505     6,822,632  

Total liabilities and equity

  $ 29,532,330   $ 33,324,574  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

62


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

 
  For the Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

REVENUE:

                   

Minimum rent

  $ 2,962,295   $ 2,775,919   $ 2,593,909  

Overage rent

    207,104     214,758     187,613  

Tenant reimbursements

    1,362,412     1,258,165     1,157,333  

Management fees and other revenues

    138,226     126,972     128,366  

Other income

    200,781     168,035     188,936  

Total revenue

    4,870,818     4,543,849     4,256,157  

EXPENSES:

                   

Property operating

    398,598     371,044     363,514  

Depreciation and amortization

    1,143,827     1,107,700     1,068,382  

Real estate taxes

    384,189     368,683     342,906  

Repairs and maintenance

    100,016     98,219     93,960  

Advertising and promotion

    136,656     117,894     109,809  

Provision for credit losses

    12,001     7,165     10,905  

Home and regional office costs

    158,576     140,931     123,926  

General and administrative

    59,958     59,803     57,144  

Marketable and non-marketable securities charges and realized gains, net

            (6,426 )

Other

    91,655     83,741     85,808  

Total operating expenses

    2,485,476     2,355,180     2,249,928  

OPERATING INCOME

    2,385,342     2,188,669     2,006,229  

Interest expense

   
(992,601

)
 
(1,082,081

)
 
(1,068,181

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    (127,573 )        

Income and other taxes

    (28,085 )   (39,538 )   (15,715 )

Income from unconsolidated entities

    226,774     206,380     130,879  

Gain upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment charge on investment in unconsolidated entities, net

    158,308     93,363     510,030  

Consolidated income from continuing operations

    1,622,165     1,366,793     1,563,242  

Discontinued operations

    67,524     184,797     156,390  

Discontinued operations transaction expenses

    (38,163 )        

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME

    1,651,526     1,551,590     1,719,632  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   
2,491
   
8,990
   
8,520
 

Preferred unit requirements

    5,252     5,252     5,252  

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS

  $ 1,643,783   $ 1,537,348   $ 1,705,860  

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS ATTRIBUTABLE TO:

                   

General Partner

  $ 1,405,251     1,316,304   $ 1,431,159  

Limited Partners

    238,532     221,044     274,701  

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 1,643,783   $ 1,537,348   $ 1,705,860  

BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT

                   

Income from continuing operations

  $ 4.44   $ 3.73   $ 4.29  

Discontinued operations

    0.08     0.51     0.43  

Net income attributable to unitholders

  $ 4.52   $ 4.24   $ 4.72  

Consolidated net income

  $ 1,651,526   $ 1,551,590   $ 1,719,632  

Unrealized gain on derivative hedge agreements

    5,220     7,101     16,652  

Net loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings

    10,789     9,205     21,042  

Currency translation adjustments

    (101,799 )   2,865     9,200  

Changes in available-for-sale securities and other

    102,816     (1,479 )   (39,248 )

Comprehensive income

    1,668,552     1,569,282     1,727,278  

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    2,491     8,990     8,520  

Comprehensive income attributable to unitholders

  $ 1,666,061   $ 1,560,292   $ 1,718,758  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

63


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

 
  For the Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

                   

Consolidated Net Income

  $ 1,651,526   $ 1,551,590   $ 1,719,632  

Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities —

                   

Depreciation and amortization

    1,285,784     1,332,950     1,301,304  

Loss on debt extinguishment

    127,573          

Gain upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment charge on investment in unconsolidated entities, net                  

    (158,550 )   (107,515 )   (510,030 )

Marketable and non-marketable securities charges and realized gains, net                  

            (6,426 )

Straight-line rent

    (48,880 )   (48,264 )   (37,998 )

Equity in income of unconsolidated entities

    (227,426 )   (205,259 )   (131,907 )

Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities

    202,269     179,054     151,398  

Changes in assets and liabilities —

                   

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

    (6,730 )   (13,938 )   (4,815 )

Deferred costs and other assets

    (65,569 )   (30,013 )   (133,765 )

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, deferred revenues and other liabilities

    (29,577 )   42,391     165,679  

Net cash provided by operating activities

    2,730,420     2,700,996     2,513,072  

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

                   

Acquisitions

    (85,459 )   (866,541 )   (3,735,718 )

Funding of loans to related parties

    (50,892 )   (99,079 )   (25,364 )

Repayments of loans to related parties

    170,953         92,600  

Capital expenditures, net

    (796,736 )   (841,209 )   (802,427 )

Cash from acquisitions and cash impact from the consolidation and deconsolidation of properties

    5,402         91,163  

Net proceeds from sale of assets

        274,058     383,804  

Investments in unconsolidated entities

    (239,826 )   (143,149 )   (201,330 )

Purchase of marketable and non-marketable securities

    (391,188 )   (44,117 )   (184,804 )

Proceeds from sale of marketable and non-marketable securities

        47,495     415,848  

Repayments of loans held for investment

            163,908  

Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities

    490,480     724,454     221,649  

Net cash used in investing activities

    (897,266 )   (948,088 )   (3,580,671 )

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

                   

Issuance of units

    277     99     1,213,840  

Cash impact of Washington Prime spin-off

    (33,776 )        

Redemption of limited partner units

    (14,435 )       (248,000 )

Purchase of noncontrolling interest in consolidated properties and other            

    (172,652 )       (229,595 )

Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties

    (21,259 )   (9,335 )   (13,623 )

Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in properties

    1,738     6,053     4,204  

Partnership distributions

    (1,877,158 )   (1,690,553 )   (1,485,240 )

Loss on debt extinguishment

    (127,573 )        

Mortgage and unsecured indebtedness proceeds, net of transaction costs                  

    3,627,154     2,919,364     6,772,443  

Mortgage and unsecured indebtedness principal payments

    (5,323,186 )   (2,446,191 )   (4,560,562 )

Net proceeds from issuance of debt related to Washington Prime properties, net

    1,003,135          

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

    (2,937,735 )   (1,220,563 )   1,453,467  

(DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (NOTE 3)

    (1,104,581 )   532,345     385,868  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period

    1,716,863     1,184,518     798,650  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period

  $ 612,282   $ 1,716,863   $ 1,184,518  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

64


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in Thousands)

 
  Preferred
Units
  Simon Property
(Managing General
Partner)
  Limited
Partners
  Noncontrolling
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $ 45,047   $ 4,604,619   $ 953,622   $ (59,000 ) $ 5,544,288  

General partner contributions (712 units)

          41                 41  

Issuance of limited partner units (205,335 units)

                31,324           31,324  

Issuance of units related to Simon's public offering of its common stock (9,137,500 units)

          1,213,741                 1,213,741  

Series J preferred stock premium and amortization

    (328 )                     (328 )

Limited partner units exchanged to units (7,447,921 units for 6,795,296 common shares)

          144,197     (144,197 )          

Redemption of limited partner units (2,000,000 units)

          (209,096 )   (38,904 )         (248,000 )

Stock incentive program (114,066 units, net)

                           

Amortization of stock incentive

          14,001                 14,001  

Purchase of noncontrolling interests

          25,917           58,559     84,476  

Issuance of unit equivalents and other (337,006 units)

          (36,157 )   56,621     (1 )   20,463  

Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased ownership in the Operating Partnership

          (84,685 )   84,685            

Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity

    (3,337 )   (1,241,216 )   (238,772 )   (435 )   (1,483,760 )

Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $1,915 and $8,520 attributable to noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties in temporary equity

    3,337     1,431,159     274,701         1,709,197  

Other comprehensive income

          3,363     4,283           7,646  

Balance at December 31, 2012

  $ 44,719   $ 5,865,884   $ 983,363   $ (877 ) $ 6,893,089  

General partner contributions (1,567 units)

          90                 90  

Series J preferred stock premium and amortization

    (329 )                     (329 )

Limited partner units exchanged to common units (596,051 units)

          11,161     (11,161 )          

Stock incentive program (107,123 units, net)

                           

Amortization of stock incentive

          18,311                 18,311  

Issuance of unit equivalents and other (489,654 units)

          (7,516 )   44,107     5,294     41,885  

Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership

          28,382     (28,382 )          

Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity

    (3,337 )   (1,442,705 )   (242,596 )   (285 )   (1,688,923 )

Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $1,915 and $8,858 attributable to noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties in temporary equity

    3,337     1,316,304     221,044     132     1,540,817  

Other comprehensive income

          15,105     2,587           17,692  

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $ 44,390   $ 5,805,016   $ 968,962   $ 4,264   $ 6,822,632  

65


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in Thousands)

 
  Preferred
Units
  Simon Property
(Managing General
Partner)
  Limited
Partners
  Noncontrolling
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Issuance of limited partner units (555,150)

                84,910           84,910  

Series J preferred stock premium and amortization

    (328 )                     (328 )

Limited partner units exchanged to common units (70,291 units)

          1,297     (1,297 )          

Stock incentive program (83,509 units, net)

                           

Redemption of limited partner units (87,621 units)

          (12,972 )   (1,463 )         (14,435 )

Amortization of stock incentive

          18,256                 18,256  

Spin-off of Washington Prime

          (694,457 )   (118,306 )         (812,763 )

Long-term incentive performance units

                49,938           49,938  

Issuance of unit equivalents and other (603,287 units and 25,545 common units)

          18,885         12,081     30,966  

Adjustment to limited partners' interest from change in ownership in the Operating Partnership

          93,351     (93,351 )          

Distributions, excluding distributions on preferred interests classified as temporary equity

    (3,337 )   (1,600,266 )   (271,640 )   (19,065 )   (1,894,308 )

Net income, excluding preferred distributions on temporary equity preferred units of $1,915

    3,337     1,405,251     238,532     2,491     1,649,611  

Other comprehensive income

          14,754     2,272           17,026  

Balance at December 31, 2014

  $ 44,062   $ 5,049,115   $ 858,557   $ (229 ) $ 5,951,505  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

66


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

1. Organization

            Simon Property Group, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership and the majority-owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. In these notes to consolidated financial statements, the terms "Operating Partnership", "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, L.P. and its subsidiaries and the term "Simon" refers specifically to Simon Property Group, Inc. (NYSE: SPG). Simon is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. REITs will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as they continue to distribute not less than 100% of their taxable income. According to our partnership agreement, we are required to pay all expenses of Simon.

            We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of malls, Premium Outlets® and The Mills®. As of December 31, 2014, we owned or held an interest in 207 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 109 malls, 68 Premium Outlets, 13 Mills, three community centers, and 14 other retail properties in 37 states and Puerto Rico. Internationally, as of December 31, 2014, we had ownership interests in nine Premium Outlets in Japan, three Premium Outlets in South Korea, two Premium Outlets in Canada, one Premium Outlet in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet in Malaysia. As of December 31, 2014, we had noncontrolling ownership interests in five outlet properties in Europe through our joint venture with McArthurGlen. Of the five properties, two are located in Italy and one each is located in Austria, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Additionally, as of December 31, 2014, we owned a 28.9% equity stake in Klépierre SA, or Klépierre, a publicly traded, Paris-based real estate company, which owns, or has an interest in, shopping centers located in 13 countries in Europe.

            On May 28, 2014, as further discussed in Note 3, we completed the spin-off of our interests in 98 properties comprised of substantially all of our strip center business and our smaller enclosed malls to Washington Prime Group Inc., or Washington Prime, an independent, publicly traded REIT (now doing business as WP GLIMCHER). The historical results of operations of the Washington Prime properties as well as the related assets and liabilities are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

            We generate the majority of our revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

            Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

            We also grow by generating supplemental revenues from the following activities:

67


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

2. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

            The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all controlled subsidiaries, and all significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.

            We consolidate properties that are wholly owned or properties where we own less than 100% but we control. Control of a property is demonstrated by, among other factors, our ability to refinance debt and sell the property without the consent of any other partner or owner and the inability of any other partner or owner to replace us.

            We also consolidate a variable interest entity, or VIE, when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether an entity has (1) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE considers all relationships between us and the VIE, including management agreements and other contractual arrangements. As described in Note 4, on December 4, 2012, we acquired the remaining 50% noncontrolling interest in two previously consolidated outlet properties. Prior to the acquisition, we had determined these properties were VIEs and we were the primary beneficiary. There have been no changes during 2014 and 2013 in previous conclusions about whether an entity qualifies as a VIE or whether we are the primary beneficiary of any previously identified VIE. During 2014 and 2013, we did not provide financial or other support to a previously identified VIE that we were not previously contractually obligated to provide.

            Investments in partnerships and joint ventures represent our noncontrolling ownership interests in properties. We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting. We initially record these investments at cost and we subsequently adjust for net equity in income or loss, which we allocate in accordance with the provisions of the applicable partnership or joint venture agreement, cash contributions and distributions, and foreign currency fluctuations, if applicable. The allocation provisions in the partnership or joint venture agreements are not always consistent with the legal ownership interests held by each general or limited partner or joint venture investee primarily due to partner preferences. We separately report investments in joint ventures for which accumulated distributions have exceeded investments in and our share of net income of the joint ventures within cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The net equity of certain joint ventures is less than zero because of financing or operating distributions that are usually greater than net income, as net income includes non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.

            As of December 31, 2014, we consolidated 133 wholly-owned properties and 13 additional properties that are less than wholly-owned, but which we control or for which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for the remaining 82 properties, or the joint venture properties, as well as our investment in Klépierre, using the equity method of accounting, as we have determined we have significant influence over their operations. We manage the day-to-day operations of 60 of the 82 joint venture properties, but have determined that our partner or partners have substantive participating rights with respect to the assets and operations of these joint venture properties. Our investments in joint ventures in Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, and the five properties through our joint venture with McArthurGlen comprise 19 of the remaining 22 properties. These international properties are managed locally by joint ventures in which we share control.

            We allocate our net operating results after preferred distributions based on our partners' respective weighted average ownership. Simon owns a majority of our units of partnership interest, or units, and certain series of our preferred units of partnership interest, or preferred units, which have terms comparable to outstanding shares of Simon preferred stock. Simon's weighted average ownership interest in us was as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Weighted average ownership interest

    85.5 %   85.6 %   83.9 %

            As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, Simon's ownership interest in us was 85.5% and 85.7%, respectively. We adjust the noncontrolling limited partners' interests at the end of each period to reflect their respective interests in us.

68


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            Preferred unit requirements in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income represent distributions on outstanding preferred units held by limited partners and are recorded when declared.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

            We record investment properties at cost. Investment properties include costs of acquisitions; development, predevelopment, and construction (including allocable salaries and related benefits); tenant allowances and improvements; and interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction. We capitalize improvements and replacements from repair and maintenance when the repair and maintenance extends the useful life, increases capacity, or improves the efficiency of the asset. All other repair and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. We capitalize interest on projects during periods of construction until the projects are ready for their intended purpose based on interest rates in place during the construction period. The amount of interest capitalized during each year is as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Capitalized interest

  $ 16,500   $ 15,585   $ 20,703  

            We record depreciation on buildings and improvements utilizing the straight-line method over an estimated original useful life, which is generally 10 to 35 years. We review depreciable lives of investment properties periodically and we make adjustments when necessary to reflect a shorter economic life. We amortize tenant allowances and tenant improvements utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter. We record depreciation on equipment and fixtures utilizing the straight-line method over seven to ten years.

            We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, declines in a property's cash flows, ending occupancy or total sales per square foot. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization plus its residual value is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to income the excess of carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. We estimate fair value using unobservable data such as operating income, estimated capitalization rates, or multiples, leasing prospects and local market information. We may decide to sell properties that are held for use and the sale prices of these properties may differ from their carrying values. We also review our investments, including investments in unconsolidated entities, if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the fair value of the investments is other-than-temporary. Changes in economic and operating conditions that occur subsequent to our review of recoverability of investment property and other investments could impact the assumptions used in that assessment and could result in future charges to earnings if assumptions regarding those investments differ from actual results.

            We allocate the purchase price of acquisitions and any excess investment in unconsolidated entities to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component which may be derived from various observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions. Also, we may utilize third party valuation specialists. These components typically include buildings, land and intangibles related to in-place leases and we estimate:

69


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            Amounts allocated to building are depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the acquired building or related improvements. We amortize amounts allocated to tenant improvements, in-place lease assets and other lease-related intangibles over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We also estimate the value of other acquired intangible assets, if any, which are amortized over the remaining life of the underlying related intangibles.

            On May 28, 2014, we completed the spin-off of our interests in 98 properties comprised of substantially all of our strip center business and our smaller enclosed malls to Washington Prime, an independent, publicly traded REIT. The spin-off was effectuated through a distribution of the common shares of Washington Prime to holders of Simon common stock as of the distribution record date, and qualified as a tax-free distribution for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For every two shares of Simon common stock held as of the record date of May 16, 2014, Simon stockholders received one Washington Prime common share on May 28, 2014. At the time of the separation and distribution, Washington Prime owned a percentage of the outstanding units of partnership interest of Washington Prime Group, L.P. that was approximately equal to the percentage of our outstanding units owned by Simon. The remaining units of Washington Prime Group, L.P. were owned by our limited partners who received one Washington Prime Group, L.P. unit for every two units they owned of us. Subsequent to the spin-off, we retained a nominal interest in Washington Prime Group, L.P. We also retained approximately $1.0 billion of proceeds from recently completed unsecured debt and mortgage debt as part of the spin-off.

            The historical results of operations of the Washington Prime properties have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Discontinued operations also include transaction costs of $38.2 million we incurred to spin-off Washington Prime. In addition, the assets and liabilities of Washington Prime are presented separately from assets and liabilities from continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows include within operating, investing and financing cash flows those activities which related to our period of ownership of the Washington Prime properties.

            The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities transferred to Washington Prime as part of the spin-off (dollars in thousands):

 
  May 28, 2014   December 31, 2013  

ASSETS:

             

Investment properties at cost

  $ 4,802,975   $ 4,789,705  

Less — accumulated depreciation

    2,034,615     1,974,949  

    2,768,360     2,814,756  

Cash and cash equivalents

    33,776     25,857  

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

    53,662     61,121  

Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity

    5,189     3,554  

Deferred costs and other assets

    110,365     97,026  

Total assets

  $ 2,971,352   $ 3,002,314  

LIABILITIES:

             

Mortgages and unsecured indebtedness

  $ 1,929,019   $ 918,614  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues                

    112,390     151,011  

Cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity           

    41,623     41,313  

Other liabilities

    36,927     6,851  

Total liabilities

    2,119,959     1,117,789  

Net Assets Transferred to Washington Prime

  $ 851,393   $ 1,884,525  

70


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            The results of the discontinued operations through the May 28, 2014 date of the spin-off are included in the consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2014. Summarized financial information for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands).

 
  For the Year Ended  
 
  2014   2013   2012  

TOTAL REVENUE

  $ 262,652   $ 626,289   $ 623,927  

Property operating

   
43,175
   
104,089
   
106,241
 

Depreciation and amortization

    76,992     182,828     189,187  

Real estate taxes

    32,474     76,216     76,361  

Repairs and maintenance

    10,331     22,584     22,208  

Advertising and promotion

    3,340     8,316     8,981  

Provision for credit losses

    1,494     572     1,904  

Other

    2,028     4,664     4,674  

Total operating expenses

    169,834     399,269     409,556  

OPERATING INCOME

   
92,818
   
227,020
   
214,371
 

Interest expense

   
(26,076

)
 
(55,058

)
 
(58,844

)

Income and other taxes

    (112 )   (196 )   (165 )

Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities

    652     (1,121 )   1,028  

Gain upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment charge on investment in unconsolidated entities, net

    242     14,152      

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME

    67,524     184,797     156,390  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   
9,781
   
26,571
   
25,184
 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO UNITHOLDERS

  $ 57,743   $ 158,226   $ 131,206  

            Capital expenditures on a cash basis for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 were $31.9 million, $93.3 million, and $67.8 million, respectively, related to the discontinued operations.

            We and Washington Prime entered into property management and transitional services agreements in connection with the spin-off whereby we will provide certain services to Washington Prime and its properties. Pursuant to the terms of the property management agreements, we manage, lease, and maintain Washington Prime's mall properties under the direction of Washington Prime. In exchange, Washington Prime pays us annual fixed rate property management fees ranging from 2.5% to 4.0% of base minimum and percentage rents, reimburses us for direct out-of-pocket costs and expenses and also pays us separate fees for any leasing and development services we provide. The property management agreements have an initial term of two years with automatic one year renewals unless terminated. Either party may terminate the property management agreements on or after the two-year anniversary of the spin-off upon 180 days prior written notice.

            We also provide certain support services to the Washington Prime strip centers and certain of its central functions to assist Washington Prime as it establishes its stand-alone processes for various activities that were previously provided by us and does not constitute significant continuing support of Washington Prime's operations. These services include assistance in the areas of information technology, treasury and financial management, payroll, lease administration, taxation and procurement. The charges for such services are intended to allow us to recover costs of providing these services. The transition services agreement will terminate no later than two years following the date of the spin-off subject to a minimum notice period equal to the shorter of 180 days or one-half of the original service period.

            Transitional services fees earned for the portion of 2014 subsequent to the spin-off were approximately $3.2 million.

71


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents generally consist of commercial paper, bankers acceptances, Eurodollars, repurchase agreements, and money market deposits or securities. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk include our cash and cash equivalents and our trade accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents with institutions with high credit quality. However, at certain times, such cash and cash equivalents may be in excess of FDIC and SIPC insurance limits. See Notes 4 and 10 for disclosures about non-cash investing and financing transactions.

            Marketable securities consist primarily of the investments of our captive insurance subsidiaries, available-for-sale securities, our deferred compensation plan investments, and certain investments held to fund the debt service requirements of debt previously secured by investment properties. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had marketable securities of $643.0 million and $148.3 million, respectively, generally accounted for as available-for-sale, which are adjusted to their quoted market price with a corresponding adjustment in other comprehensive income (loss). Net unrealized gains recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $103.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and represent the valuation adjustments for our marketable securities.

            The types of securities included in the investment portfolio of our captive insurance subsidiaries typically include U.S. Treasury or other U.S. government securities as well as corporate debt securities with maturities ranging from less than 1 to 10 years. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are valued based upon quoted market prices or other observable inputs when quoted market prices are not available. The amortized cost of debt securities, which approximates fair value, held by our captive insurance subsidiaries is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Changes in the values of these securities are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the gain or loss is realized or until any unrealized loss is deemed to be other-than-temporary. We review any declines in value of these securities for other-than-temporary impairment and consider the severity and duration of any decline in value. To the extent an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis is established.

            Our insurance subsidiaries are required to maintain statutory minimum capital and surplus as well as maintain a minimum liquidity ratio. Therefore, our access to these securities may be limited. Our deferred compensation plan investments are classified as trading securities and are valued based upon quoted market prices. The investments have a matching liability as the amounts are fully payable to the employees that earned the compensation. Changes in value of these securities and changes to the matching liability to employees are both recognized in earnings and, as a result, there is no impact to consolidated net income.

            We hold an investment in a publicly traded REIT, which is accounted for as an available-for-sale security. At December 31, 2014, we owned 5.71 million shares, representing a market value of $476.4 million with an aggregate net unrealized gain of $102.5 million.

            At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had investments of $167.1 million and $120.3 million, respectively, in non-marketable securities that we account for under the cost method. We regularly evaluate these investments for any other-than-temporary impairment in their estimated fair value and determined that no adjustment in the carrying value was required. During the fourth quarter of 2012, as a result of the significance and duration of the impairment, represented by the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value of certain cost method investments, we recognized other-than-temporary non-cash charges of $71.0 million, which is included in marketable and non-marketable securities charges and realized gains, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The fair value of the remaining investment for the securities that were impaired is not material and was based on Level 2 fair value inputs.

            On October 23, 2012 we completed the sale of all of our investments in Capital Shopping Centres Group PLC, or CSCG, and Capital & Counties Properties PLC, or CAPC. These investments were accounted for as available-for-sale securities and their value was adjusted to their quoted market price, including a related foreign exchange component,

72


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

through other comprehensive income (loss). At the date of sale, we owned 35.4 million shares of CSCG and 38.9 million shares of CAPC. The aggregate proceeds received from the sale were $327.1 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of $82.7 million, which is included in marketable and non-marketable securities charges and realized gains, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The gain includes $79.4 million that was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

            Level 1 fair value inputs are quoted prices for identical items in active, liquid and visible markets such as stock exchanges. Level 2 fair value inputs are observable information for similar items in active or inactive markets, and appropriately consider counterparty creditworthiness in the valuations. Level 3 fair value inputs reflect our best estimate of inputs and assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation estimate. We have no investments for which fair value is measured on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs.

            The marketable securities we held at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were primarily classified as having Level 1 fair value inputs. In addition, we had derivative instruments which were classified as having Level 2 inputs which consist primarily of interest rate swap agreements and foreign currency forward contracts with a gross liability balance of $2.1 million and $1.2 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and a gross asset value of $20.1 million and $8.4 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

            Note 8 includes a discussion of the fair value of debt measured using Level 2 inputs. Notes 3 and 4 include a discussion of the fair values recorded in purchase accounting and impairment, using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs to our purchase accounting and impairment analyses include our estimations of net operating results of the property, capitalization rates and discount rates.

            We prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

            Our primary business is the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate. We have aggregated our retail operations, including malls, Premium Outlets, The Mills, and our international investments into one reportable segment because they have similar economic characteristics and we provide similar products and services to similar types of, and in many cases, the same tenants.

73


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            Deferred costs and other assets include the following as of December 31:

 
  2014   2013  

Deferred financing and lease costs, net

  $ 312,569   $ 296,359  

In-place lease intangibles, net

    216,330     265,097  

Acquired above market lease intangibles, net

    75,366     91,170  

Marketable securities of our captive insurance companies

    111,844     94,720  

Goodwill

    20,098     20,098  

Other marketable and non-marketable securities

    698,265     173,887  

Prepaids, notes receivable and other assets, net

    372,317     481,457  

  $ 1,806,789   $ 1,422,788  

            Our deferred costs consist primarily of financing fees we incurred in order to obtain long-term financing and internal and external leasing commissions and related costs. We record amortization of deferred financing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective loans or agreements. Our deferred leasing costs consist primarily of capitalized salaries and related benefits in connection with lease originations. We record amortization of deferred leasing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Details of these deferred costs as of December 31 are as follows:

 
  2014   2013  

Deferred financing and lease costs

  $ 533,050   $ 525,413  

Accumulated amortization

    (220,481 )   (229,054 )

Deferred financing and lease costs, net

  $ 312,569   $ 296,359  

            We report amortization of deferred financing costs, amortization of premiums, and accretion of discounts as part of interest expense. Amortization of deferred leasing costs is a component of depreciation and amortization expense. We amortize debt premiums and discounts, which are included in mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, over the remaining terms of the related debt instruments. These debt premiums or discounts arise either at the time of the debt issuance or as part of the purchase price allocation of the fair value of debt assumed in acquisitions. The accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income include amortization from continuing operations as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

  $ 21,392   $ 25,159   $ 25,932  

Amortization of debt premiums, net of discounts

    (24,092 )   (33,026 )   (32,143 )

Amortization of deferred leasing costs

    39,488     34,891     32,977  

            From time to time, we may make investments in mortgage loans or mezzanine loans of third parties that own and operate commercial real estate assets located in the United States. Mortgage loans are secured, in part, by mortgages recorded against the underlying properties which are not owned by us. Mezzanine loans are secured, in part, by pledges of ownership interests of the entities that own the underlying real estate. Loans held for investment are carried at cost, net of any premiums or discounts which are accreted or amortized over the life of the related loan receivable utilizing the effective interest method. We evaluate the collectability of both interest and principal of each of these loans quarterly to determine whether the value has been impaired. A loan is deemed to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a loan is

74


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

impaired, the amount of the loss accrual is calculated by comparing the carrying amount of the loan held for investment to its estimated realizable value.

            We had investments in mortgage and mezzanine loans which were repaid during 2012. We recorded $6.8 million during 2012 in interest income earned from these loans.

            The average remaining life of in-place lease intangibles is approximately 3.3 years and is being amortized on a straight-line basis and is included with depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The fair market value of above and below market leases is amortized into revenue over the remaining lease life as a component of reported minimum rents. The weighted average remaining life of these intangibles is approximately 4.7 years. The unamortized amount of below market leases is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues in the consolidated balance sheets and was $103.1 million and $135.1 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The amount of amortization from continuing operations of above and below market leases, net for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $11.3 million, $22.8 million, and $15.9 million, respectively. If a lease is terminated prior to the original lease termination, any remaining unamortized intangible is written off to earnings.

            Details of intangible assets as of December 31 are as follows:

 
  2014   2013  

In-place lease intangibles

  $ 416,623   $ 443,127  

Accumulated depreciation

    (200,293 )   (178,030 )

In-place lease intangibles, net

  $ 216,330   $ 265,097  

 
  2014   2013  

Acquired above market lease intangibles

  $ 225,335   $ 239,000  

Accumulated amortization

    (149,969 )   (147,830 )

Acquired above market lease intangibles, net

  $ 75,366   $ 91,170  

            Estimated future amortization and the increasing (decreasing) effect on minimum rents for our above and below market leases as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 
  Below
Market
Leases
  Above
Market
Leases
  Impact to
Minimum
Rent,
Net
 

2015

  $ 29,062   $ (19,697 ) $ 9,365  

2016

    23,829     (17,524 )   6,305  

2017

    17,255     (14,169 )   3,086  

2018

    13,146     (10,810 )   2,336  

2019

    10,602     (7,384 )   3,218  

Thereafter

    9,218     (5,782 )   3,436  

  $ 103,112   $ (75,366 ) $ 27,746  

            We record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have designated a derivative as a hedge and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. We may use a variety of derivative

75


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

financial instruments in the normal course of business to selectively manage or hedge a portion of the risks associated with our indebtedness and interest payments. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps. We require that hedging derivative instruments be highly effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. As a result, there is no significant ineffectiveness from any of our derivative activities. We formally designate any instrument that meets these hedging criteria as a hedge at the inception of the derivative contract. We have no credit-risk-related hedging or derivative activities. As of December 31, 2014, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives related to managing our interest rate risk:

Interest Rate Derivative
  Number of
Instruments
  Notional Amount

Interest Rate Swaps

  2   $375.0 million

            The carrying value of our interest rate swap agreements, at fair value, as of December 31, 2014, was a net liability balance of $1.2 million, of which $2.1 million was included in other liabilities and $0.9 million was included in deferred costs and other assets. The carrying value of our interest rate swap agreements, at fair value, at December 31, 2013 was a net asset balance of $3.0 million, of which $0.4 million was included in other liabilities and $3.4 million was included in deferred costs and other assets. The interest rate cap agreements were of nominal value at December 31, 2013 and we generally do not apply hedge accounting to these arrangements.

            We are also exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on financial instruments which are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in Japan and Europe. We use currency forward contracts and foreign currency denominated debt to manage our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates on certain Yen and Euro-denominated receivables and net investments. Currency forward contracts involve fixing the Yen:USD or Euro:USD exchange rate for delivery of a specified amount of foreign currency on a specified date.

            The currency forward contracts are typically cash settled in US dollars for their fair value at or close to their settlement date. Approximately ¥14.7 million remained as of December 31, 2014 for all Yen forward contracts which matured through January 5, 2015. The December 31, 2014 asset balance related to these forward contracts was $0.1 million and was included in deferred costs and other assets. The December 31, 2013 asset balance related to these forward contracts was $5.0 million and was included in deferred costs and other assets. We have reported the changes in fair value for these forward contracts in earnings. The underlying currency adjustments on the foreign currency denominated receivables are also reported in income and generally offset the amounts in earnings for these forward contracts.

            In the third quarter of 2014, we entered into Euro:USD forward contracts, which were designated as net investment hedges, with an aggregate €150.0 million notional value which mature through August 11, 2017. The December 31, 2014 asset balance related to these forward contracts was $19.1 million and is included in deferred costs and other assets. In the fourth quarter of 2013, we entered into a Euro:USD forward contract with a €74.0 million notional value, which we designated as a net investment hedge, that matured on May 30, 2014. The liability balance related to this forward contract was $0.8 million and included in other liabilities as of December 31, 2013. We apply hedge accounting to these forward contracts and report the changes in fair value in other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in the value of these forward contracts are offset by changes in the underlying hedged Euro-denominated joint venture investment.

            The total gross accumulated other comprehensive loss related to our derivative activities, including our share of the other comprehensive loss from joint venture properties, approximated $45.8 million and $61.8 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

            In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-08, "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity." ASU 2014-08 changes the definition of a discontinued operation to include only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. ASU 2014-08 became effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, but could be early-adopted. We early adopted ASU 2014-08 in the first quarter of 2014 and are applying the revised definition to all disposals on a prospective basis,

76


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

including the spin-off of Washington Prime. ASU 2014-08 also requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation.

            In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers." ASU 2014-09 amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition and is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for us beginning in its first quarter of 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. We are currently evaluating the methods and impact of adopting the new revenue standard on our consolidated financial statements.

            In addition to noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties, we classify our 7.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, or 7.5% preferred units, in temporary equity. Although we may redeem the 7.5% preferred units for cash or shares of Simon common stock, we could be required to redeem the securities for cash because the non-cash redemption alternative requires us to deliver fully registered shares of Simon common stock which we may not be able to deliver depending upon the circumstances that exist at the time of redemption. The previous and current carrying amounts are equal to the liquidation value, which is the amount payable upon the occurrence of any event that could potentially result in cash settlement.

            Our evaluation of the appropriateness of classifying the units held by Simon and limited partners within permanent equity considered several significant factors. First, as a limited partnership, all decisions relating to our operations and distributions are made by Simon, acting as our sole general partner. The decisions of the general partner are made by Simon's Board of Directors or management. We have no other governance structure. Secondly, the sole asset of Simon is its interest in us. As a result, a share of Simon common stock (if owned by us) is best characterized as being similar to a treasury share and thus not an asset of the Operating Partnership.

            Limited partners have the right under our partnership agreement to exchange their units for shares of Simon common stock or cash as selected by the general partner. Accordingly, we classify units held by limited partners in permanent equity because Simon has the ability to issue shares of its common stock to limited partners exercising their exchange rights rather than using cash or other assets. Under our partnership agreement, we are required to redeem units held by Simon only when Simon has redeemed shares of its common stock. We classify units held by Simon in permanent equity because the decision to redeem those units would be made by Simon.

            Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (which includes nonredeemable and redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties) is a component of consolidated net income. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, no individual components of other comprehensive income (loss) were attributable to noncontrolling interests.

            A rollforward of noncontrolling interests for the years ending December 31 is as follows:

 
  2014   2013   2012  

Noncontrolling nonredeemable (deficit) interests in properties, net — beginning of period

  $ 4,264   $ (877 ) $ (59,000 )

Net income attributable to noncontrolling nonredeemable interests

    2,491     132      

Distributions to noncontrolling nonredeemable interestholders

    (19,065 )   (285 )   (435 )

Purchase and disposition of noncontrolling interests, net, and other

    12,081     5,294     58,558  

Noncontrolling nonredeemable (deficit) interests in properties, net — end of period

  $ (229 ) $ 4,264   $ (877 )

77


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            The changes in components of our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following net of noncontrolling interest as of December 31, 2014:

 
  Currency
translation
adjustments
  Accumulated
derivative
losses, net
  Net unrealized
gains on
marketable
securities
  Total  

Beginning balance

  $ (27,755 ) $ (61,833 ) $ 1,134   $ (88,454 )

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

    (101,799 )   5,220     102,816     6,237  

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

        10,789         10,789  

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

    (101,799 )   16,009     102,816     17,026  

Ending balance

  $ (129,554 ) $ (45,824 ) $ 103,950   $ (71,428 )

            The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 
  December 31, 2014   December 31, 2013    
Details about accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
components:
  Amount reclassified
from accumulated
other comprehensive
income (loss)
  Amount reclassified
from accumulated
other comprehensive
income (loss)
  Affected line item
in the statement
where net income
is presented

Accumulated derivative losses, net

  $ (10,789 ) $ (9,205 ) Interest expense

  $ (10,789 ) $ (9,205 )  

            We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We accrue minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the terms of their respective leases. Substantially all of our retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. We recognize overage rents only when each tenant's sales exceed the applicable sales threshold. We amortize any tenant inducements as a reduction of revenue utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter.

            We structure our leases to allow us to recover a significant portion of our property operating, real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotion expenses from our tenants. A substantial portion of our leases, other than those for anchor stores, require the tenant to reimburse us for a substantial portion of our operating expenses, including common area maintenance, or CAM, real estate taxes and insurance. This significantly reduces our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. Such property operating expenses typically include utility, insurance, security, janitorial, landscaping, food court and other administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2014 for substantially all of our leases in the U.S. mall portfolio, we receive a fixed payment from the tenant for the CAM component which is recognized as revenue when earned. When not reimbursed by the fixed-CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses and CAM capital expenditures for the property. We also receive escrow payments for these reimbursements from substantially all our non-fixed CAM tenants and monthly fixed CAM payments throughout the year. We accrue reimbursements from tenants for recoverable portions of all these expenses as revenue in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. We recognize differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year. These differences were not material in any period presented. Our advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred.

78


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            Management fees and other revenues are generally received from our unconsolidated joint venture properties as well as third parties. Management fee revenue is earned based on a contractual percentage of joint venture property revenue. Development fee revenue is earned on a contractual percentage of hard costs to develop a property. Leasing fee revenue is earned on a contractual per square foot charge based on the square footage of current year leasing activity. We recognize revenue for these services provided when earned based on the underlying activity.

            Revenues from insurance premiums charged to unconsolidated properties are recognized on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies. Insurance losses on these policies and our self-insurance for our consolidated properties are reflected in property operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and include estimates for losses incurred but not reported as well as losses pending settlement. Estimates for losses are based on evaluations by third-party actuaries and management's estimates. Total insurance reserves for our insurance subsidiaries and other self-insurance programs as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 approximated $93.5 million and $103.4 million, respectively, and are included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Information related to the securities included in the investment portfolio of our captive insurance subsidiaries is included within the "Marketable and Non-Marketable Securities" section above.

            We record a provision for credit losses based on our judgment of a tenant's creditworthiness, ability to pay and probability of collection. In addition, we also consider the retail sector in which the tenant operates and our historical collection experience in cases of bankruptcy, if applicable. Accounts are written off when they are deemed to be no longer collectible. Presented below is the activity in the allowance for credit losses during the following years:

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Balance, beginning of period

  $ 32,681   $ 29,263   $ 24,170  

Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties

    117         2,061  

Provision for credit losses

    12,001     7,165     10,905  

Accounts written off, net of recoveries

    (11,517 )   (3,747 )   (7,873 )

Balance, end of period

  $ 33,282   $ 32,681   $ 29,263  

            As a partnership, the allocated share of our income or loss for each year is included in the income tax returns of the partners; accordingly, no accounting for income taxes is required in the accompanying consolidated financial statements other than as discussed below for our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

            Simon and certain of our subsidiaries are taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations relating to REIT qualification. In order to maintain this REIT status, the regulations require the entity to distribute at least 90% of taxable income to its owners and meet certain other asset and income tests as well as other requirements. We intend to continue to make distributions to Simon in amounts sufficient to assist Simon in adhering to REIT requirements and maintaining its REIT status. Our subsidiary REIT entities will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as they continue to distribute in excess of 100% of their taxable income. Thus, we made no provision for federal income taxes for these entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. If Simon or any of our REIT subsidiaries fail to qualify as a REIT, Simon or that entity will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates for the years in which it failed to qualify. If Simon or any of our REIT subsidiaries lost their REIT status, they could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost unless their failure to qualify was due to reasonable cause and certain other conditions were satisfied.

79


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            We have also elected taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, status for some of our subsidiaries. This enables us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs and participate in activities that do not qualify as "rents from real property". For these entities, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if we believe all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from the change in circumstances that causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset is included in income.

            As of December 31, 2014, we had a net deferred tax liability of $1.1 million and as of December 31, 2013, we had a net deferred tax asset of $1.1 million related to our TRS subsidiaries. The net deferred tax liability is included in other liabilities and the net deferred tax asset is included in deferred costs and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The net deferred tax asset/liability consists primarily of operating losses and other carryforwards for federal income tax purposes as well as the timing of the deductibility of losses or reserves from insurance subsidiaries. No valuation allowance has been recorded as we believe these amounts will be realized.

            We are also subject to certain other taxes, including state and local taxes, franchise taxes, as well as income-based and withholding taxes on dividends from certain of our international investments, which are included in income and other taxes in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            Home and regional office costs primarily include compensation and personnel related costs, travel, building and office costs, and other expenses for our corporate home office and regional offices. General and administrative expense primarily includes executive compensation, benefits and travel expenses as well as costs of being a public company including certain legal costs, audit fees, regulatory fees, and certain other professional fees.

4. Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions

            We acquire interests in properties to generate both current income and long-term appreciation in value. We acquire interests in individual properties or portfolios of retail real estate companies that meet our investment criteria and sell properties which no longer meet our strategic criteria. Unless otherwise noted below, gains and losses on these transactions are included in gain upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment charge on investment in unconsolidated entities, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. We expense acquisition, potential acquisition and disposition related costs as they are incurred. We incurred $38.2 million in transaction costs during the first six months of 2014 related to the spin-off of Washington Prime. Other than these transaction costs, we incurred a minimal amount of transaction expenses during 2014, 2013, and 2012.

            Our consolidated and unconsolidated acquisition and disposition activity for the periods presented are highlighted as follows:

            On January 15, 2015, we acquired a 100% interest in Jersey Gardens (renamed The Mills at Jersey Gardens) in Elizabeth, New Jersey and University Park Village in Fort Worth, Texas, properties previously owned by Glimcher Realty Trust for $677.9 million of cash and the assumption of existing mortgage debt of $405.0 million.

            On April 10, 2014, as discussed further in Note 7, through our joint venture with McArthurGlen, we acquired an additional noncontrolling interest in Ashford Designer Outlet.

            On January 30, 2014, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in Arizona Mills from our joint venture partner, as well as approximately 39 acres of land in Oyster Bay, New York, for approximately $145.8 million, consisting of cash consideration and 555,150 units. Arizona Mills is subject to a mortgage which was $166.9 million at the time of the acquisition. The consolidation of this previously unconsolidated property resulted in a remeasurement of our previously held

80


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

interest to fair value and a corresponding non-cash gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2014. We now own 100% of this property.

            On January 10, 2014, we acquired one of our partner's redeemable interests in a portfolio of ten properties for approximately $114.4 million subject to a pre-existing contractual arrangement. The amount paid to acquire the interests in the seven properties which were previously consolidated was included in preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013.

            During 2013, as further discussed in Note 7, we acquired noncontrolling interests in the property management and development companies of McArthurGlen as well as interests in five designer outlet properties.

            On May 30, 2013, we acquired a 100% interest in a 390,000 square foot outlet center located near Portland, Oregon for cash consideration of $146.7 million. The fair value of the acquisition was recorded primarily as investment property and lease related intangibles. As a result of the excess of fair value over amounts paid, we recognized a gain of approximately $27.3 million.

            On December 31, 2012, as discussed in Note 7, we contributed a wholly-owned property to a newly formed joint venture in exchange for an interest in a property contributed to the same joint venture by our joint venture partner.

            On December 4, 2012, we acquired the remaining 50% noncontrolling equity interest in two previously consolidated outlet properties located in Grand Prairie, Texas, and Livermore, California, and, accordingly, we now own 100% of these properties. We paid consideration of $260.9 million for the additional interests in the properties, 90% of which was paid in cash and 10% of which was satisfied through the issuance of our units. In addition, the construction loans we had provided to the properties totaling $162.5 million were extinguished on a non-cash basis. The transaction was accounted for as an equity transaction, as the properties had been previously consolidated.

            On June 4, 2012, we acquired a 50% interest in a 465,000 square foot outlet center located in Destin, Florida for $70.5 million.

            On March 22, 2012, as discussed in Note 7, we acquired additional interests in 26 of our joint venture properties from SPG-FCM Ventures, LLC, or SPG-FCM, in a transaction valued at approximately $1.5 billion, or the Mills transaction.

            On March 14, 2012, as discussed in Note 7, we acquired a 28.7% equity stake in Klépierre for approximately $2.0 billion.

            On January 6, 2012, we paid $50.0 million to acquire an additional 25% interest in Del Amo Fashion Center, thereby increasing our interest to 50%.

            During 2014, we disposed of our interests in three consolidated retail properties. The aggregate gain recognized on these transactions was approximately $21.8 million.

            On September 26, 2014, we sold our investment in a hotel located at Coconut Point in Estero, Florida. The gain from this sale was $4.5 million, which is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            During 2013, we increased our economic interest in three unconsolidated community centers and subsequently disposed of our interests in those properties. Additionally, we disposed of our interests in eight consolidated retail properties and three unconsolidated retail properties. The aggregate gain recognized on these transactions was approximately $80.2 million.

81


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            On August 8, 2013, we disposed of our interest in an office property located in the Boston, Massachusetts area. The gain on the sale was $7.9 million and is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            During 2012, we disposed of our interests in nine consolidated retail properties and four unconsolidated retail properties. The aggregate net gain on these disposals was $15.5 million.

            On May 3, 2012, we sold our interests in two residential apartment buildings located at The Domain in Austin, Texas. The gain from the sale was $12.4 million, which is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            On January 9, 2012, as discussed in Note 7, we sold our entire ownership interest in Gallerie Commerciali Italia, S.p.A, or GCI.

5. Per Unit Data

            We determine basic earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of units outstanding during the period and we consider any participating securities for purposes of applying the two-class method. We determine diluted earnings per unit based on the weighted average number of units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average units that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into units at the earliest date possible. The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per unit.

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Net Income attributable to Unitholders — Basic and Diluted

  $ 1,643,783   $ 1,537,348   $ 1,705,860  

Weighted Average Units Outstanding — Basic

    363,475,504     362,355,581     361,322,520  

Effect of stock options of Simon

        50     1,072  

Weighted Average Units Outstanding — Diluted

    363,475,504     362,355,631     361,323,592  

            For the year ended December 31, 2014, potentially dilutive securities include long-term incentive performance units, or LTIP units. The only securities that had a dilutive effect for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were stock options of Simon.

            We accrue distributions when they are declared. The taxable nature of the distributions declared for each of the years ended as indicated is summarized as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Total distributions paid per unit

  $ 5.15   $ 4.65   $ 4.10  

Percent taxable as ordinary income

    100.0 %   97.50 %   99.50 %

Percent taxable as long-term capital gains

        2.50 %   0.50 %

    100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %

            In January 2015, Simon's Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend for the first quarter of 2015 of $1.40 per share. The distribution rate on our units is equal to the dividend rate on Simon's common stock.

82


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

6. Investment Properties

            Investment properties consist of the following as of December 31:

 
  2014   2013  

Land

  $ 3,185,624   $ 3,086,183  

Buildings and improvements

    27,828,509     26,962,049  

Total land, buildings and improvements

    31,014,133     30,048,232  

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

    304,399     288,407  

Investment properties at cost

    31,318,532     30,336,639  

Less — accumulated depreciation

    8,950,747     8,092,794  

Investment properties at cost, net

  $ 22,367,785   $ 22,243,845  

Construction in progress included above

  $ 640,081   $ 328,705  

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

            Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties, and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio of properties. As discussed in Note 2, we held joint venture interests in 82 properties as of December 31, 2014 and 93 properties as of December 31, 2013. As discussed below, on January 9, 2012, we sold our interest in GCI which at the time owned 45 properties in Italy. Additionally, on March 14, 2012, we purchased a 28.7% equity stake in Klépierre. On May 21, 2012, Klépierre paid a dividend, which we elected to receive in additional shares, resulting in an increase in our ownership to approximately 28.9%.

            Certain of our joint venture properties are subject to various rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, put and call rights, or other sale or marketing rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. We and our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which may result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash, borrowings or our units to acquire the joint venture interest from our partner.

            We may provide financing to joint ventures primarily in the form of interest bearing construction loans. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had construction loans and other advances to related parties totaling $14.9 million and $140.3 million, respectively, which are included in deferred costs and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

            On January 30, 2014, as discussed in Note 4, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in Arizona Mills from our joint venture partner. The consolidation of this previously unconsolidated property resulted in a remeasurement of our previously held interest to fair value and a corresponding non-cash gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2014. As a result of this acquisition, we now own 100% of this property.

            On December 31, 2012, we formed a joint venture with Institutional Mall Investors, or IMI, to own and operate The Shops at Mission Viejo in the Los Angeles suburb of Mission Viejo, California, and Woodfield Mall in the Chicago suburb of Schaumburg, Illinois. We and IMI each own a noncontrolling 50% interest in Woodfield Mall and we own a noncontrolling 51% interest in The Shops at Mission Viejo and IMI owns the remaining 49%. Prior to the formation of the joint venture, we owned 100% of The Shops at Mission Viejo and IMI owned 100% of Woodfield Mall. No gain was recorded as the transaction was recorded based on the carryover basis of our previous investment. Woodfield Mall is encumbered by a $425.0 million mortgage loan which matures in March of 2024 and bears interest at 4.5%. In January 2013, the joint venture closed a $295.0 million mortgage on the Shops at Mission Viejo which bears interest at 3.61% and matures in February of 2023. The proceeds from the financing were distributed to the venture partners and, as a result, we received a distribution of $149.7 million.

            On March 22, 2012, we acquired, through an acquisition of substantially all of the assets of TMLP, additional interests in 26 properties. The transaction resulted in additional interests in 16 of the properties which remain unconsolidated, the consolidation of nine previously unconsolidated properties and the purchase of the remaining noncontrolling interest in a

83


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

previously consolidated property. The transaction was valued at $1.5 billion, which included repayment of the remaining $562.1 million balance on TMLP's senior loan facility, and retirement of $100.0 million of TMLP's trust preferred securities. In connection with the transaction, our $558.4 million loan to SPG-FCM was extinguished on a non-cash basis. We consolidated $2.6 billion in additional property-level mortgage debt in connection with this transaction. This property-level mortgage debt was previously presented as debt of our unconsolidated entities. We and our joint venture partner had equal ownership in these properties prior to the transaction.

            The consolidation of the previously unconsolidated properties resulted in a remeasurement of our previously held interest in each of these nine newly consolidated properties to fair value and recognition of a corresponding non-cash gain of $488.7 million. In addition, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $22.4 million for the excess of carrying value of our remaining investment in SPG-FCM over its estimated fair value. The gain on the transaction and impairment charge are included in gain upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, and impairment charge on investment in unconsolidated entities, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The assets and liabilities of the newly consolidated properties acquired in the Mills transaction have been reflected at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date.

            We recorded our acquisition of the interest in these nine newly consolidated properties using the acquisition method of accounting. Tangible and intangible assets and liabilities were established based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. The results of operations of the newly consolidated properties have been included in our consolidated results from the date of acquisition. The purchase price allocations were finalized during the first quarter of 2013. No significant adjustments were made to the previously reported purchase price allocations.

            On January 6, 2012, we paid $50.0 million to acquire an additional 25% interest in Del Amo Fashion Center, increasing our interest to 50%.

International Investments

            We conduct our international operations through joint venture arrangements and account for all of our international joint venture investments using the equity method of accounting

            European Investments.    At December 31, 2014, we owned 57,634,148 shares, or approximately 28.9%, of Klépierre, which had a quoted market price of $43.45 per share. Our share of net income, net of amortization of our excess investment, was $131.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $20.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Based on applicable Euro:USD exchange rates and after our conversion of Klépierre's results to GAAP, Klépierre's total assets, total liabilities, and noncontrolling interests were $12.7 billion, $8.2 billion, and $1.4 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2014 and $17.1 billion, $12.3 billion, and $1.7 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. Klépierre's total revenues, operating income and consolidated net income were approximately $1.2 billion, $432.1 million and $1.3 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $1.5 billion, $989.6 million and $317.3 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013. On April 16, 2014, Klépierre completed the disposal of a portfolio of 126 retail galleries located in France, Spain and Italy. Total gross consideration for the transaction, including transfer duties, was €1.98 billion (€1.65 billion Klépierre's group share). The net cash proceeds were used by Klépierre to reduce its overall indebtedness. In connection with this transaction, we recorded a gain of $133.9 million, net of the write-off of a portion of our excess investment, which is included in "Gain upon acquisition of controlling interests and sale or disposal of assets and interest in unconsolidated entities, net" in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. On January 12, 2015 Klépierre' paid an interim dividend, which reduced our carrying amount by approximately $62.0 million. On July 29, 2014 Klépierre announced that it had entered into a conditional agreement to acquire Corio N.V., or Corio, pursuant to which Corio shareholders would receive 1.14 Klépierre ordinary shares for each Corio ordinary share. On January 15, 2015 the tender offer transaction closed, and it is anticipated that Klépierre will own all of the equity of Corio on March 31, 2015 through a merger transaction, after which our percentage ownership will be diluted to approximately 18.3%.

            During the second quarter of 2013, we signed a definitive agreement with McArthurGlen, an owner, developer, and manager of designer outlets, to form one or more joint ventures to invest in certain of its existing designer outlets, development projects, and its property management and development companies. In conjunction with that agreement, we purchased a noncontrolling interest in the property management and development companies of McArthurGlen, and a noncontrolling interest in a development property located in Vancouver, British Columbia. On August 2, 2013, through our

84


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

joint venture with McArthurGlen we acquired a noncontrolling interest in Ashford Designer Outlet in Kent, UK. On October 16, 2013, through our joint venture with McArthurGlen we completed the remaining transactions contemplated by our previously announced definitive agreement with McArthurGlen by acquiring noncontrolling interests in portions of four existing McArthurGlen Designer Outlets — Parndorf (Vienna, Austria), La Reggia (Naples, Italy), Noventa di Piave (Venice, Italy), and Roermond (Roermond, Netherlands). During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, through our joint venture with McArthurGlen we purchased an additional 22.5% noncontrolling interest in Ashford Designer Outlet, increasing our percentage ownership to 45%. At December 31, 2014 our legal percentage ownership interests in these entities range from 45% to 90%. The aggregate consideration for the 2013 transactions was $496.7 million and is subject to further adjustment based upon contractual obligations and customary purchase price adjustments. The carrying amount of our investment in these joint ventures, including all related components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as well as subsequent capital contributions for development, was $677.1 million and $510.7 million as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The change in the carrying amount of the investment in 2014 was driven primarily by the additional investment discussed above and adjustments to our purchase accounting during the one-year measurement period, including our estimate of the aggregate consideration that will ultimately be paid to the seller. Substantially all of our investment has been determined to be excess investment and has been allocated to the underlying investment property based on estimated fair values. In December 2014, Roermond Designer Outlet phases 2 and 3, in which we own a 90% interest, refinanced its $85.1 million mortgage maturing in 2017 with a $218.9 million mortgage that matures in 2021. The fixed interest rate was reduced from 5.12% to 1.86% as a result. Excess proceeds from the financing were distributed to the venture partners in January 2015.

            We also have a minority interest in Value Retail PLC and affiliated entities which own or have interests in and operate nine luxury outlets throughout Europe and a direct minority ownership in three of those outlets. Our investment in these centers is accounted for under the cost method. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the carrying value of these non-marketable investments was $115.4 million and is included in deferred costs and other assets.

            On January 9, 2012, we sold our entire ownership interest in GCI to our venture partner, Auchan S.A. The aggregate cash we received was $375.8 million and we recognized a gain on the sale of $28.8 million. Our investment carrying value included $39.5 million of accumulated losses related to currency translation and net investment hedge accumulated balances which had been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

            Asian Joint Ventures.    We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in Japan through a joint venture with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. We have a 40% ownership interest in this joint venture. The carrying amount of our investment in this joint venture was $229.8 million and $261.1 million as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, including all related components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in South Korea through a joint venture with Shinsegae International Co. We have a 50% ownership interest in this joint venture. The carrying amount of our investment in this joint venture was $104.5 million and $76.4 million as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, including all related components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Summary Financial Information

            A summary of our equity method investments and share of income from such investments, excluding Klépierre, follows. In addition, we acquired a controlling interest in nine properties in the Mills transaction on March 22, 2012. These previously unconsolidated properties became consolidated properties as of their respective acquisition dates. During 2012, we disposed of our interests in one mall and three retail properties as well as our investment in GCI. During 2013, we disposed of three retail properties. Finally, as discussed in Note 3, on May 28, 2014, we completed the spin-off of Washington Prime, which included ten unconsolidated properties. The net income of these ten properties is included in income from operations of discontinued joint venture interests and the net assets and liabilities of these properties are included in the total assets and total liabilities of discontinued operations, respectively, in the accompanying summary financial information. The above transactions are reported within discontinued operations in the following joint venture statements of operations.

85


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

BALANCE SHEETS

 
  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 

Assets:

             

Investment properties, at cost

  $ 16,087,282   $ 15,355,700  

Less - accumulated depreciation

    5,457,899     5,080,832  

    10,629,383     10,274,868  

Cash and cash equivalents

    993,178     781,554  

Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net

    362,201     302,902  

Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity

    11,386     38,352  

Deferred costs and other assets

    536,600     579,480  

Total assets of discontinued operations

        281,000  

Total assets

  $ 12,532,748   $ 12,258,156  

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit:

             

Mortgages

  $ 13,272,557   $ 12,753,139  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue

    1,015,334     834,898  

Other liabilities

    493,718     513,897  

Total liabilities of discontinued operations

        286,252  

Total liabilities

    14,781,609     14,388,186  

Preferred units

   
67,450
   
67,450
 

Partners' deficit

    (2,316,311 )   (2,197,480 )

Total liabilities and partners' deficit

  $ 12,532,748   $ 12,258,156  

Our Share of:

             

Partners' deficit

  $ (663,700 ) $ (717,776 )

Add: Excess investment

    1,875,337     2,059,584  

Add: Our share of investment in discontinued unconsolidated entities, at equity

        37,759  

Our net investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity

  $ 1,211,637   $ 1,379,567  

            "Excess Investment" represents the unamortized difference of our investment over our share of the equity in the underlying net assets of the joint ventures or other investments acquired and is allocated on a fair value basis primarily to investment property, lease related intangibles, and debt premiums and discounts. We amortize excess investment over the life of the related depreciable components of investment property, typically no greater than 40 years, the terms of the applicable leases and the applicable debt maturity, respectively. The amortization is included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

            As of December 31, 2014, scheduled principal repayments on joint venture properties' mortgage indebtedness are as follows:

2015

  $ 1,567,248  

2016

    1,217,673  

2017

    823,948  

2018

    770,447  

2019

    526,296  

Thereafter

    8,359,654  

Total principal maturities

    13,265,266  

Net unamortized debt premium

    7,291  

Total mortgages and unsecured indebtedness

  $ 13,272,557  

86


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            This debt becomes due in installments over various terms extending through 2027 with interest rates ranging from 0.39% to 9.35% and a weighted average rate of 4.44% at December 31, 2014.

            In November 2013, Aventura Mall in which we own a 33% interest refinanced its $430.0 million mortgage maturing December 11, 2017 with a $1.2 billion mortgage that matures December 1, 2020. The fixed interest rate was reduced from 5.91% to 3.75% as a result of this transaction and an extinguishment charge of $82.8 million was incurred which is included in interest expense in the accompanying joint venture statements of operations. Excess proceeds from the financing were distributed to the venture partners.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Revenue:

                   

Minimum rent

  $ 1,746,549   $ 1,618,802   $ 1,435,586  

Overage rent

    183,478     180,435     176,255  

Tenant reimbursements

    786,351     747,447     672,935  

Other income

    293,419     199,197     170,263  

Total revenue

    3,009,797     2,745,881     2,455,039  

Operating Expenses:

   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Property operating

    574,706     487,144     465,333  

Depreciation and amortization

    604,199     512,702     492,073  

Real estate taxes

    221,745     204,894     170,292  

Repairs and maintenance

    71,203     66,612     62,659  

Advertising and promotion

    72,496     61,664     54,404  

Provision for credit losses

    6,527     1,388     1,814  

Other

    187,729     155,421     169,558  

Total operating expenses

    1,738,605     1,489,825     1,416,133  

Operating Income

    1,271,192     1,256,056     1,038,906  

Interest expense

   
(598,900

)
 
(680,321

)
 
(584,143

)

Income from Continuing Operations

    672,292     575,735     454,763  

Income from operations of discontinued joint venture interests

   
5,079
   
14,200
   
(3,881

)

Gain(Loss) on disposal of discontinued operations, net

        51,164     (5,354 )

Net Income

  $ 677,371   $ 641,099   $ 445,528  

Third-Party Investors' Share of Net Income

  $ 348,127   $ 353,708   $ 239,931  

Our Share of Net Income

    329,244     287,391     205,597  

Amortization of Excess Investment

    (99,463 )   (102,875 )   (83,400 )

Our Share of (Loss) Income from Unconsolidated Discontinued Operations

    (652 )   1,121     (1,028 )

Our Share of Loss on Sale or Disposal of Assets and Interests in Unconsolidated Entities, net

            9,245  

Income from Unconsolidated Entities

  $ 229,129   $ 185,637   $ 130,414  

            Our share of income from unconsolidated entities in the above table, aggregated with our share of results of Klépierre, is presented in income from unconsolidated entities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Our share of the loss on sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities, net is reflected within gain upon acquisition of controlling interests, sale or disposal of assets and interests in unconsolidated

87


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

entities, and impairment charge on investment in unconsolidated entities, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            In 2013, we disposed of our interest in three retail properties. We recognized no gain or loss on the disposal of these properties.

            In July 2012, we disposed of our interest in a mall, and in August 2012 we disposed of our interest in three retail properties. Our share of the net loss on disposition was $9.2 million.

8. Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments

            Our mortgages and unsecured indebtedness, excluding the impact of derivative instruments, consist of the following as of December 31:

 
  2014   2013  

Fixed-Rate Debt:

             

Mortgage notes, including $49,723 and $62,886 net premiums, respectively. Weighted average interest and maturity of 5.48% and 3.9 years at December 31, 2014. 

  $ 5,615,351   $ 6,975,913  

Unsecured notes, including $40,701 and $38,519 net discounts, respectively. Weighted average interest and maturity of 4.41% and 7.6 years at December 31, 2014. 

    13,399,920     13,931,705  

Total Fixed-Rate Debt

    19,015,271     20,907,618  

Variable-Rate Debt:

             

Mortgages notes, at face value. Weighted average interest and maturity of 2.03% and 2.3 years at December 31, 2014. 

    630,000     350,000  

Unsecured Term Loan (see below)

    240,000     240,000  

Credit Facility (see below)

    558,537     1,172,299  

Commercial Paper (see below)

    409,185      

Total Variable-Rate Debt

    1,837,722     1,762,299  

Total Mortgages and Unsecured Indebtedness

  $ 20,852,993   $ 22,669,917  

            General.    Our unsecured debt agreements contain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants. If we were to fail to comply with these covenants, after the expiration of the applicable cure periods, the debt maturity could be accelerated or other remedies could be sought by the lender including adjustments to the applicable interest rate. As of December 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all covenants of our unsecured debt.

            At December 31, 2014, we or our subsidiaries were the borrowers under 38 non-recourse mortgage notes secured by mortgages on 52 properties, including five separate pools of cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized mortgages encumbering a total of 21 properties. Under these cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage included in the cross-defaulted pool may constitute a default under all mortgages within that pool and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the pool. Certain of our secured debt instruments contain financial and other non-financial covenants which are specific to the properties which serve as collateral for that debt. If the borrower fails to comply with these covenants, the lender could accelerate the debt and enforce its right against their collateral. At December 31, 2014, the applicable borrowers under these non-recourse mortgage notes were in compliance with all covenants where non-compliance could individually, or giving effect to applicable cross-default provisions in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

88


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

Unsecured Debt

            At December 31, 2014, our unsecured debt consisted of $13.4 billion of our senior unsecured notes, net of discounts, $558.5 million outstanding under our $4.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, or Credit Facility, $240.0 million outstanding under an unsecured term loan, and $409.2 million outstanding under our global unsecured commercial paper note program, or the Commercial Paper program. The December 31, 2014 balance on the Credit Facility included $372.2 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Euro-denominated borrowings and $186.4 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Yen-denominated borrowings. At December 31, 2014 the outstanding amount under the Commercial Paper program was $409.2 million, of which $209.2 million was related to the U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro-denominated notes. Foreign currency denominated borrowings under both the Credit Facility and Commercial Paper program are designated as net investment hedges of a portion of our international investments.

            On December 31, 2014, we had an aggregate available borrowing capacity of approximately $5.0 billion under both the Credit Facility and our $2.0 billion supplemental unsecured revolving credit facility, or Supplemental Facility. The maximum outstanding balance of the credit facilities during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.2 billion and the weighted average outstanding balance was $855.4 million. Letters of credit of $38.9 million were outstanding under the facilities as of December 31, 2014.

            On April 7, 2014, we amended and extended the Credit Facility. The initial borrowing capacity of $4.0 billion may be increased to $5.0 billion during its term and provides for borrowings denominated in U.S. Dollars, Euros, Yen, Sterling, Canadian Dollars and Australian Dollars. Borrowings in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar are limited to 75% of the maximum revolving credit amount, as defined. The initial maturity date of the Credit Facility was extended to June 30, 2018 and can be extended for an additional year to June 30, 2019 at our sole option. The base interest rate on the amended Credit Facility was reduced to LIBOR plus 80 basis points and the additional facility fee was reduced to 10 basis points.

            The Supplemental Facility's borrowing capacity of $2.0 billion may be increased to $2.5 billion during its term. The Supplemental Facility will initially mature on June 30, 2016 and can be extended for an additional year at our sole option. As of December 31, 2014, the base interest rate on the Supplemental Facility was LIBOR plus 95 basis points with an additional facility fee of 15 basis points. Like the Credit Facility, the Supplemental Facility provides for a money market competitive bid option program and allows for multi-currency borrowings. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we moved $184.9 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Yen-denominated borrowings from the Supplemental Facility to the Credit Facility.

            On October 6, 2014, we entered into a global Commercial Paper program. Under the terms of this program, we may issue unsecured Commercial Paper notes, denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros and other currencies, up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $500.0 million, or the non-U.S. dollar equivalent thereof. Notes issued in non-U.S. currencies may be issued by one or more of our subsidiaries and are guaranteed by us. Notes will be sold under customary terms in the U.S and Euro commercial paper note markets and will rank (either by themselves or as a result of the guarantee described above) pari passu with all of our other unsecured senior indebtedness. Our Commercial Paper program is supported by our credit facilities and if necessary or appropriate, we may make one or more draws under the credit facilities to pay amounts outstanding from time to time on the Commercial Paper program. At December 31, 2014, we had $409.2 million outstanding comprised of $200.0 million of U.S. dollar denominated notes and $209.2 million (U.S. dollar equivalent) of Euro denominated notes with weighted average interest rates of 0.19% and 0.13%, respectively. The borrowings mature on various dates from January 7, 2015 to March 18, 2015.

            On September 3, 2014, we commenced cash tender offers for any and all of five series of our outstanding senior unsecured notes with maturity dates ranging from 2015 to 2017. The total principal amount of notes tendered and accepted for purchase was approximately $1.322 billion, with a weighted average remaining duration of 1.7 years and a weighted average coupon rate of 5.60%. We purchased the tendered notes using cash on hand and the proceeds from an offering of $1.3 billion of senior unsecured notes that closed on September 10, 2014. The senior notes offering was comprised of $900.0 million of 3.375% notes due 2024 and $400.0 million of 4.25% notes due 2044. Combined, the new issues of senior notes have a weighted average duration of 16.1 years and a weighted average coupon rate of 3.64%. A portion of the proceeds from the senior notes offering was used to fund the redemption on September 30, 2014 of all $250.0 million outstanding principal amount of the 7.875% notes due 2016 issued by one of our subsidiaries. We recorded a $127.6 million loss on extinguishment of debt in the third quarter of 2014 as a result of the tender offers and redemption.

89


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            On January 21, 2014, we issued $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 2.20% with a maturity date of February 1, 2019 and $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 3.75% with a maturity date of February 1, 2024. Proceeds from the unsecured notes offering were used to repay debt and for general corporate purposes.

            In addition to the debt tender offers and redemption described above, during the year ended December 31, 2014, we used cash on hand to redeem at par or repay at maturity $1.3 billion of senior unsecured notes with fixed rates ranging from 4.20% to 6.75%.

Mortgage Debt

            Total mortgage indebtedness was $6.2 billion and $7.3 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

            On January 2, 2014, we repaid the $820.0 million outstanding mortgage at Sawgrass Mills originally maturing July 1, 2014 and on February 28, 2014, we repaid the $269.0 million outstanding mortgage at Great Mall originally maturing August 28, 2015. During 2014, we disposed of our interests in three retail properties and their related mortgage debt of $90.0 million.

Debt Maturity and Other

            Our scheduled principal repayments on indebtedness as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

2015

  $ 1,174,796  

2016

    2,892,728  

2017

    3,043,067  

2018

    2,024,275  

2019

    1,928,394  

Thereafter

    9,780,711  

Total principal maturities

    20,843,971  

Net unamortized debt premium

    9,022  

Total mortgages and unsecured indebtedness

  $ 20,852,993  

            Our cash paid for interest in each period, net of any amounts capitalized, was as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Cash paid for interest

  $ 1,018,911   $ 1,086,128   $ 1,063,470  

Derivative Financial Instruments

            Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates primarily relates to our long-term debt obligations. We manage exposure to interest rate market risk through our risk management strategy by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of variable rate debt. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on financings of certain foreign operations. Our intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposures. We do not enter into either interest rate protection or foreign currency rate protection agreements for speculative purposes.

            We may enter into treasury lock agreements as part of an anticipated debt issuance. Upon completion of the debt issuance, the fair value of these instruments is recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt agreement.

            The unamortized loss on our treasury locks and terminated hedges recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was $65.7 million and $67.5 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014,

90


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

our outstanding LIBOR based derivative contracts consisted of fixed rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $375.0 million.

            Within the next year, we expect to reclassify to earnings approximately $10.9 million of losses related to active and terminated interest rate swaps from the current balance held in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Fair Value of Debt

            The carrying value of our variable-rate mortgages and other loans approximates their fair values. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate mortgages using cash flows discounted at current borrowing rates and other indebtedness using cash flows discounted at current market rates. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate unsecured notes using quoted market prices, or, if no quoted market prices are available, we use quoted market prices for securities with similar terms and maturities. The book value of our consolidated fixed-rate mortgages and unsecured indebtedness was $19.0 billion and $20.9 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The fair values of these financial instruments and the related discount rate assumptions as of December 31 are summarized as follows:

 
  2014   2013

Fair value of fixed-rate mortgages and unsecured indebtedness

  $20,558   $22,316

Weighted average discount rates assumed in calculation of fair value for fixed-rate mortgages

  3.02%   3.07%

9. Rentals under Operating Leases

            Future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable tenant operating leases for each of the next five years and thereafter, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses and percentage rent based on tenant sales volume as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

2015

  $ 2,548,265  

2016

    2,335,798  

2017

    2,099,583  

2018

    1,820,246  

2019

    1,540,869  

Thereafter

    4,440,204  

  $ 14,784,965  

10. Equity

Temporary Equity

            We classify as temporary equity those securities for which there is the possibility that we could be required to redeem the security for cash, irrespective of the probability of such a possibility. As a result, we classify one series of preferred units and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties in temporary equity. The carrying values for those securities classified in temporary equity are discussed below and summarized as follows as of December 31:

 
  2014   2013  

7.50% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 260,000 units authorized, 255,373 issued and outstanding

  $ 25,537   $ 25,537  

Other noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties

        164,948  

Total preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties

  $ 25,537   $ 190,485  

91


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            Noncontrolling Redeemable Interests in Properties    Redeemable instruments, which typically represent the remaining interest in a property or portfolio of properties, and which are redeemable at the option of the holder or in circumstances that may be outside our control, are accounted for as temporary equity within preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is adjusted to the redemption amount assuming the instrument is redeemable at the balance sheet date. Changes in the redemption value of the underlying noncontrolling interest are recorded within equity. There are no noncontrolling interests redeemable at amounts in excess of fair value.

            On January 10, 2014, we acquired one of our partner's remaining redeemable interests in a portfolio of ten properties for approximately $114.4 million subject to a pre-existing contractual arrangement. The amount paid to acquire the interests in the seven properties which were previously consolidated was included in preferred units, at liquidation value, and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013. During the second quarter of 2014, in connection with the resolution of all partnership disputes with related party limited partners in one of our partnerships, we contributed $83.0 million into the partnership in exchange for a new series of preferred partnership units that carry a 2.5% preferred return. Amounts due upon a future exercise of the limited partners' right to cause us to redeem their noncontrolling interests would be net of this preferred investment. Accordingly, this preferred investment contractually offsets the mezzanine liability previously recognized on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

            7.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units    The 7.5% preferred units accrue cumulative quarterly distributions at a rate of $7.50 annually. We may redeem the preferred units upon the death of the survivor of the original holders, or the transfer of any units to any person or entity other than the persons or entities entitled to the benefits of the original holder. The redemption price is the liquidation value ($100.00 per preferred unit) plus accrued and unpaid distributions, payable either in cash or fully registered shares of common stock of Simon. In the event of the death of a holder of the 7.5% preferred units, the occurrence of certain tax triggering events applicable to the holder, or on or after November 10, 2006, the holder may require us to redeem the preferred units at the same redemption price payable at our option in either cash or fully registered shares of common stock of Simon.

Permanent Equity

            Series J 83/8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units.    Distributions accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 83/8% per unit on the Series J 83/8% preferred units, or Series J preferred units. Simon owns all of the Series J preferred units which have the same economic rights and preferences of an outstanding series of Simon preferred stock. We can redeem this series, in whole or in part, when Simon can redeem the related preferred stock, on and after October 15, 2027 at a redemption price of $50.00 per unit, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions. The Series J preferred units were issued at a premium of $7.5 million. The unamortized premium included in the carrying value of the preferred units at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $4.2 million and $4.5 million, respectively. There are 1,000,000 Series J preferred units authorized and 796,948 issued and outstanding.

Unit Issuances and Repurchases

            In 2014, seven limited partners exchanged 70,291 units for an equal number of shares of common stock of Simon pursuant to our partnership agreement. These transactions increased Simon's ownership interest in us.

            On January 30, 2014, we issued 555,150 units in connection with the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Arizona Mills and approximately 39 acres of land in Oyster Bay, New York, as discussed in Note 4.

            On July 22, 2014, we redeemed 87,621 units from a limited partner for $14.4 million in cash.

Other Equity Activity

            Notes Receivable from Former CPI Stockholders.    Notes receivable of $14.8 million from stockholders of an entity we acquired in 1998 are reflected as a deduction from capital in excess of par value in the consolidated statements of equity in the accompanying financial statements. The notes do not bear interest and become due at the time the underlying shares are sold.

92


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.    We, along with Simon, have a stock incentive plan, or the 1998 plan, which provides for the grant of awards with respect to the equity of Simon, in the form of options to purchase shares of Simon common stock, or Options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock grants and performance unit awards, collectively, Awards. Options may be granted which are qualified as "incentive stock options" within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and options which are not so qualified. An aggregate of 16,300,000 shares of Simon common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1998 plan. Additionally, the partnership agreement requires Simon to purchase units for cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares issued on the exercise of stock options.

            Administration.    The 1998 plan is administered by Simon's Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determines which eligible individuals may participate and the type, extent and terms of the awards to be granted to them. In addition, the Compensation Committee interprets the 1998 plan and makes all other determinations deemed advisable for its administration. Options granted to employees become exercisable over the period determined by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price of an employee option may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Employee options generally vest over a three-year period and expire ten years from the date of grant.

            Awards for Eligible Directors.    Directors of Simon who are not employees or employees of affiliates of Simon, or eligible directors, receive awards under the 1998 plan. Currently, each eligible director receives on the first day of the first calendar month following his or her initial election an award of restricted stock with a value of $82,500 (pro-rated for partial years of service). Thereafter, as of the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, eligible directors who are re-elected receive an award of restricted stock having a value of $82,500. In addition, eligible directors who serve as chairpersons of the standing committees receive an additional annual award of restricted stock having a value of $10,000 (in the case of the Audit and Compensation Committees) or $7,500 (in the case of the Governance and Nominating Committees). The Lead Independent Director also receives an annual restricted stock award having a value of $12,500. The restricted stock vests in full after one year.

            Once vested, the delivery of the shares of restricted stock (including reinvested dividends) is deferred under our Director Deferred Compensation Plan until the director retires, dies or becomes disabled or otherwise no longer serves as a director. The directors may vote and are entitled to receive dividends on the underlying shares; however, any dividends on the shares of restricted stock must be reinvested in shares of Simon common stock and held in the deferred compensation plan until the shares of restricted stock are delivered to the former director.

Stock Based Compensation

            Awards under our stock based compensation plans primarily take the form of LTIP units and restricted stock grants of Simon. Restricted stock and awards under the LTIP programs are all performance based and are based on various corporate and business unit performance measures as further described below. The expense related to these programs, net of amounts capitalized, is included within home and regional office costs and general and administrative costs in the accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive income.

            LTIP Programs.    Every year since 2010, the Compensation Committee has approved long-term, performance based incentive compensation programs, or the LTIP programs, for certain senior executive officers. Awards under the LTIP programs take the form of LTIP units, a form of limited partnership interest issued by us, and will be considered earned if, and only to the extent to which, applicable total shareholder return, or TSR, performance measures are achieved during the performance period. Once earned, LTIP units are subject to a two year vesting period. One-half of the earned LTIP units will vest on January 1 of each of the 2nd and 3rd years following the end of the applicable performance period, subject to the participant maintaining employment with us through those dates and certain other conditions as described in those agreements. Awarded LTIP units not earned are forfeited. Earned and fully vested LTIP units are the equivalent of units. During the performance period, participants are entitled to receive distributions on the LTIP units awarded to them equal to 10% of the regular quarterly distributions paid on a unit. As a result, we account for these LTIP units as participating securities under the two-class method of computing earnings per unit.

93


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            From 2010 to 2014, the Compensation Committee approved LTIP grants as shown in the table below. Grant date fair values of the LTIP units are estimated using a Monte Carlo model, and the resulting expense is recorded regardless of whether the TSR performance measures are achieved if the required service is delivered. The grant date fair values are being amortized into expense over the period from the grant date to the date at which the awards, if any, would become vested. The extent to which LTIP units were earned, and the aggregate grant date fair values adjusted for estimated forfeitures, are as follows:

LTIP Program   LTIP Units Earned   Grant Date Fair Value

2010 LTIP Program

       

1-year 2010 LTIP Program

  133,673   1-year program — $7.2 million

2-year 2010 LTIP Program

  337,006   2-year program — $14.8 million

3-year 2010 LTIP Program

  489,654   3-year program — $23.0 million

2011-2013 LTIP Program

  469,848   $35.0 million

2012-2014 LTIP Program

  401,203   $35.0 million

2013-2015 LTIP Program

  To be determined in 2016   $33.5 million

2014-2016 LTIP Program

  To be determined in 2017   $30.0 million

            We recorded compensation expense, net of capitalization, related to these LTIP programs of approximately $27.6 million, $25.7 million, and $22.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

            Restricted Stock.    The 1998 plan also provides for shares of restricted common stock of Simon to be granted to certain employees at no cost to those employees, subject to achievement of individual performance and certain financial and return-based performance measures established by the Compensation Committee related to the most recent year's performance. Once granted, the shares of restricted stock then vest annually over a three-year or a four-year period (as defined in the award). The cost of restricted stock grants, which is based upon the stock's fair market value on the grant date, is recognized as expense ratably over the vesting period. Through December 31, 2014 a total of 5,530,945 shares of restricted stock, net of forfeitures, have been awarded under the plan. Information regarding restricted stock awards is summarized in the following table for each of the years presented:

 
  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Shares of restricted stock awarded during the year, net of forfeitures

    83,509     107,123     114,066  

Weighted average fair value of shares granted during the year

  $ 166.36   $ 160.22   $ 146.70  

Amortization expense

  $ 18,256   $ 18,311   $ 14,001  

            We recorded compensation expense, net of capitalization, related to restricted stock of approximately $12.3 million, $13.4 million, and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

            Other Compensation Arrangements.    On July 6, 2011, in connection with the execution of an employment agreement, the Compensation Committee granted David Simon, our Chairman and CEO, a retention award in the form of 1,000,000 LTIP units, or the Award, for his continued service as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer through July 5, 2019. Effective December 31, 2013, the Award was modified, or the Current Award, and as a result the LTIP units will now become earned and eligible to vest based on the attainment of Company-based performance goals, in addition to the service-based vesting requirement included in the original Award. If the relevant performance criteria are not achieved, all or a portion of the Current Award will be forfeited. The Current Award does not contain an opportunity for Mr. Simon to receive additional LTIP Units above and beyond the original Award should our performance exceed the higher end of the performance criteria. The performance criteria of the Current Award are based on the attainment of specific funds from operations, or FFO, per share. If the performance criteria have been met, a maximum of 360,000 LTIP units, or the A Units, 360,000 LTIP units, or the B Units, and 280,000 LTIP units, or the C Units, may become earned December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The earned A Units will vest on January 1, 2018, earned B Units will vest on January 1, 2019 and earned C Units will vest on June 30, 2019, subject to Mr. Simon's continued employment through such applicable date. The

94


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

grant date fair value of the retention award of $120.3 million is being recognized as expense over the eight-year term of his employment agreement on a straight-line basis based through the applicable vesting periods of the A Units, B Units and C Units.

            Since 2001, we have not granted any options to officers, directors or employees, except for a series of reload options we assumed as part of a prior business combination. As of December 31, 2014, there were no remaining options outstanding.

            We also maintain a tax-qualified retirement 401(k) savings plan and offer no other post-retirement or post-employment benefits to our employees.

Exchange Rights

            Limited partners have the right under our partnership agreement to exchange all or any portion of their units for shares of Simon common stock on a one-for-one basis or cash, as determined by Simon in its sole discretion. If Simon selects cash, Simon cannot cause us to redeem the exchanged units for cash without contributing cash to us as partners' equity sufficient to effect the redemption. If sufficient cash is not contributed, Simon will be deemed to have elected to exchange the units for shares of Simon common stock. The amount of cash to be paid if the exchange right is exercised and the cash option is selected will be based on the trading price of Simon's common stock at that time. The number of shares of Simon's common stock issued pursuant to the exercise of the exchange right will be the same as the number of units exchanged.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

            We are involved from time-to-time in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions including acquisitions and divestitures. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

            In May 2010, Opry Mills sustained significant flood damage. Insurance proceeds of $50 million have been funded by the insurers and remediation work has been completed. The property was re-opened March 29, 2012. The excess insurance carriers (those providing coverage above $50 million) have denied the claim under the policy for additional proceeds (of up to $150 million) to pay further amounts for restoration costs and business interruption losses. We and our lenders are continuing our efforts through pending litigation to recover our losses under the excess insurance policies for Opry Mills and we believe recovery is probable, but no assurances can be made that our efforts to recover these funds will be successful.

Lease Commitments

            As of December 31, 2014, a total of 22 of the consolidated properties are subject to ground leases. The termination dates of these ground leases range from 2017 to 2090. These ground leases generally require us to make fixed annual rental payments, or a fixed annual rental plus a percentage rent component based upon the revenues or total sales of the property. In addition, we have several regional office locations that are subject to leases with termination dates ranging from 2016 to 2028. These office leases generally require us to make fixed annual rental payments plus pay our share of common area, real estate and utility expenses. Some of our ground and office leases include escalation clauses and renewal options. We incurred ground lease expense and office lease expense, which are included in other expense and home office and regional expense, respectively, as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended,
December 31,
 
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Ground lease expense

  $ 39,898   $ 37,150   $ 40,518  

Office lease expense

    4,577     4,057     2,004  

95


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

            Future minimum lease payments due under these leases for years ending December 31, excluding applicable extension options and any sublease income, are as follows:

2015

  $ 29,775  

2016

    35,221  

2017

    35,436  

2018

    35,413  

2019

    28,266  

Thereafter

    907,110  

  $ 1,071,221  

Insurance

            We maintain insurance coverage with third party carriers who provide a portion of the coverage for specific layers of potential losses including commercial general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties in the United States. The initial portion of coverage not provided by third party carriers is either insured through our wholly-owned captive insurance companies, Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd. and Bridgewood Insurance Company, Ltd., or other financial arrangements controlled by us. The third party carrier has, in turn, agreed to provide evidence of coverage for this layer of losses under the terms and conditions of the carrier's policy. A similar policy written through our captive insurance entities also provides initial coverage for property insurance and certain windstorm risks at the properties located in coastal windstorm locations.

            We currently maintain insurance coverage against acts of terrorism on all of our properties in the United States on an "all risk" basis in the amount of up to $1 billion. The current federal laws which provide this coverage are expected to operate through 2015. Despite the existence of this insurance coverage, any threatened or actual terrorist attacks where we operate could adversely affect our property values, revenues, consumer traffic and tenant sales.

Guarantees of Indebtedness

            Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by the joint venture property, which is non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we guaranteed joint venture related mortgage indebtedness of $223.5 million and $190.8 million, respectively (of which we have a right of recovery from our venture partners of $78.7 million and $83.0 million, respectively). Mortgages guaranteed by us are secured by the property of the joint venture which could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation and which has an estimated fair value in excess of the guaranteed amount.

Concentration of Credit Risk

            Our malls, Premium Outlets and Mills rely heavily upon anchor tenants to attract customers; however, anchor retailers do not contribute materially to our financial results as many anchor retailers own their spaces. All material operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant accounts for 5% or more of our consolidated revenues.

Limited Life Partnerships

            We are the controlling partner in several consolidated partnerships that have a limited life. We estimated the settlement values of these noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 as approximately $101.0 million and $125.0 million, respectively. The settlement values are based on the estimated fair values upon a hypothetical liquidation of the partnership interests and estimated yield maintenance or prepayment penalties associated with the payment to settle any underlying secured mortgage debt.

96


Table of Contents


Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts
and where indicated as in millions or billions)

12. Related Party Transactions

            Our management company provides management, insurance, and other services to Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc., a related party, unconsolidated joint ventures, and other non-owned related party properties. Amounts for services provided by our management company and its affiliates to our unconsolidated joint ventures and other related parties were as follows:

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2014   2013   2012  

Amounts charged to unconsolidated joint ventures and Washington Prime properties

  $ 133,730   $ 121,996   $ 119,534  

Amounts charged to properties owned by related parties

    4,393     4,510     4,416  

            During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recorded development, royalty and other fee income, net of elimination, related to our international investments of $13.7 million, $14.0 million and $15.5 million, respectively. Also during 2014, 2013 and 2012, we received fees related to financing activities, net of elimination, provided to unconsolidated joint ventures of $4.2 million, $15.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The fees related to our international investments and financing activities are included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

13. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

            Quarterly 2014 and 2013 data is summarized in the table below. Quarterly amounts may not sum to annual amounts due to rounding.

 
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

2014

                         

Total revenue

  $ 1,157,022   $ 1,181,982   $ 1,234,694   $ 1,297,120  

Operating income

    560,965     561,531     607,557     655,288  

Consolidated income from continuing operations

    359,601     489,609     296,963     475,992  

Consolidated net income

    401,103     477,468     296,963     475,992  

Net income attributable to unitholders

    399,267     475,708     294,900     473,907  

Net income per unit from continuing operations — Basic and Diluted

  $ 0.99   $ 1.34   $ 0.81   $ 1.30  

Net income per unit — Basic and Diluted

  $ 1.10   $ 1.31   $ 0.81   $ 1.30  

Weighted average units outstanding — Basic and Diluted

    363,008,959     363,604,376     363,645,178     363,634,759  

2013

                         

Total revenue

  $ 1,060,823   $ 1,084,993   $ 1,146,877   $ 1,251,155  

Operating income

    502,484     509,939     548,478     627,769  

Consolidated income from continuing operations

    278,615     359,129     328,712     400,337  

Consolidated net income

    334,468     400,525     367,293     449,304  

Net income attributable to unitholders

    330,694     397,115     364,022     445,517  

Net income per unit from continuing operations — Basic and Diluted

  $ 0.76   $ 0.99   $ 0.89   $ 1.09  

Net income per unit — Basic and Diluted

  $ 0.91   $ 1.10   $ 1.00   $ 1.23  

Weighted average units outstanding

    362,051,682     362,455,413     362,454,880     362,454,828  

Diluted weighted average units outstanding

    362,051,885     362,455,413     362,454,880     362,454,828  

97


Table of Contents

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

            None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

            Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.    We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Simon's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.

            Simon's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at a reasonable assurance level.

            Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    Management's report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth within Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

            Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.    The audit report of Ernst & Young LLP on their assessment of our internal control over financial reporting is set forth within Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

            Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.    Other Information

            During the fourth quarter of the year covered by this report, the Audit Committee of Simon's Board of Directors approved certain audit, audit-related and non-audit tax compliance and tax consulting services to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Exchange Act as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

98


Table of Contents


Part III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

            We are a limited partnership and Simon is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 11.    Executive Compensation

            We are a limited partnership and Simon is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

            We are a limited partnership and Simon is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

            We are a limited partnership and Simon is our sole general partner. We do not have any directors or executive officers or any equity securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comparable information for Simon can be found in its periodic reports and proxy statements it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

            The Audit Committee of Simon's Board of Directors pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP, or Ernst & Young, Simon's and our independent registered public accounting firm, prior to commencement of services. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve specific services up to specified individual and aggregate fee amounts. These pre-approval decisions are presented to the full Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting after such approvals are made. We have incurred fees as shown below for services from Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young has advised us that it has billed or will bill these indicated amounts for the following categories of services for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:

 
  2014   2013  

Audit Fees (1)

  $ 3,753,000   $ 3,692,000  

Audit-Related Fees (2)

    4,269,000     5,435,000  

Tax Fees (3)

    428,000     305,000  

All Other Fees

        26,000  
(1)
Audit Fees include fees for the audit of the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for us, Simon, and certain of our subsidiaries and services associated with Securities and Exchange Commission registration statements, periodic reports, and other documents issued in connection with securities offerings.

(2)
Audit-Related Fees include audits of individual or portfolios of properties and schedules of recoverable common area maintenance costs to comply with lender, joint venture partner or tenant requirements and accounting consultation and due diligence services. In addition, these fees include services related to the audits of Washington Prime Group Inc., which Simon spun off to its stockholders in May 2014, and which accounted for the higher fees in 2013. Our share of these Audit-Related Fees for the years ended 2014 and 2013 was approximately 58% and 64%, respectively.

(3)
Tax Fees include fees for international and other tax consulting services and tax return compliance services associates with the tax returns for certain joint ventures as well as other miscellaneous tax compliance services. Our share of these Tax Fees for 2014 and 2013 was approximately 85% and 75%, respectively.

99


Table of Contents


Part IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 
   
   
  Page No.  

(a)

  (1)  

Financial Statements

       

     

The following consolidated financial statements of Simon Property Group, L.P. and subsidiaries are set forth in the Part II, item 8.

       

     

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   
60
 

     

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

    62  

     

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

    63  

     

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

    64  

     

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

    65  

     

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

    67  

 

(2)

 

Financial Statement Schedule

   
 
 

     

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries Schedule III — Schedule of Real Estate and Accumulated FDepreciation

   
103
 

     

Notes to Schedule III

    108  

     

Other financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

       

 

(3)

 

Exhibits

   
 
 

     

The Exhibit Index attached hereto is hereby incorporated by reference to this Item. 

   
109
 

100


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

    SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.

 

 

By

 

/s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner

March 2, 2015

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature   Capacity   Date

 

 

 

 

 
/s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner (Principal Executive Officer)   March 2, 2015

/s/ HERBERT SIMON

Herbert Simon

 

Chairman Emeritus and Director

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ RICHARD S. SOKOLOV

Richard S. Sokolov

 

President, Chief Operating Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner and Director

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ MELVYN E. BERGSTEIN

Melvyn E. Bergstein

 

Director

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ LARRY C. GLASSCOCK

Larry C. Glasscock

 

Director

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ REUBEN S. LEIBOWITZ

Reuben S. Leibowitz

 

Director

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ J. ALBERT SMITH, JR.

J. Albert Smith, Jr.

 

Director

 

March 2, 2015

101


Table of Contents

Signature   Capacity   Date

 

 

 

 

 
/s/ KAREN N. HORN

Karen N. Horn
  Director   March 2, 2015

/s/ ALLAN HUBBARD

Allan Hubbard

 

Director

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ DANIEL C. SMITH

Daniel C. Smith

 

Director

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ ANDREW JUSTER

Andrew Juster

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner (Principal Financial Officer)

 

March 2, 2015

/s/ STEVEN K. BROADWATER

Steven K. Broadwater

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

March 2, 2015

102


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
   
   
   
  Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (3)
  Gross Amounts
At Which Carried
At Close of Period
   
   
 
   
   
  Initial Cost (3)    
   
 
   
   
   
  Date of
Construction
or
Acquisition
Name
  Location   Encumbrances (6)   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)

Malls

                                                             

Bangor Mall

  Bangor, ME     80,000     5,478     59,740         12,690   $ 5,478   $ 72,430   $ 77,908   $ 32,708   2004 (5)

Barton Creek Square

  Austin, TX         2,903     20,929     7,983     63,632     10,886     84,561     95,447     54,300   1981

Battlefield Mall

  Springfield, MO     125,000     3,919     27,231     3,000     64,575     6,919     91,806     98,725     62,825   1970

Bay Park Square

  Green Bay, WI         6,358     25,623     4,106     26,725     10,464     52,348     62,812     28,608   1980

Brea Mall

  Brea (Los Angeles), CA         39,500     209,202         45,199     39,500     254,401     293,901     112,583   1998 (4)

Broadway Square

  Tyler, TX         11,306     32,431         24,612     11,306     57,043     68,349     31,339   1994 (4)

Burlington Mall

  Burlington (Boston), MA         46,600     303,618     19,600     98,850     66,200     402,468     468,668     173,559   1998 (4)

Castleton Square

  Indianapolis, IN         26,250     98,287     7,434     75,531     33,684     173,818     207,502     87,897   1972

Cielo Vista Mall

  El Paso, TX         1,005     15,262     608     56,279     1,613     71,541     73,154     41,384   1974

College Mall

  Bloomington, IN         1,003     16,245     720     45,487     1,723     61,732     63,455     35,938   1965

Columbia Center

  Kennewick, WA         17,441     66,580         26,575     17,441     93,155     110,596     46,545   1987

Copley Place

  Boston, MA             378,045         134,988         513,033     513,033     186,391   2002 (4)

Coral Square

  Coral Springs (Miami), FL         13,556     93,630         21,772     13,556     115,402     128,958     73,716   1984

Cordova Mall

  Pensacola, FL         18,626     73,091     7,321     62,190     25,947     135,281     161,228     54,859   1998 (4)

Domain, The

  Austin, TX     198,454     40,436     197,010         140,748     40,436     337,758     378,194     95,746   2005

Empire Mall

  Sioux Falls, SD     176,300     35,998     192,186         23,023     35,998     215,209     251,207     22,834   1998 (5)

Fashion Mall at Keystone, The

  Indianapolis, IN             120,579     29,145     86,836     29,145     207,415     236,560     87,335   1997 (4)

Firewheel Town Center

  Garland (Dallas), TX         8,485     82,716         28,391     8,485     111,107     119,592     43,708   2004

Forum Shops at Caesars, The

  Las Vegas, NV             276,567         236,894         513,461     513,461     205,871   1992

Greenwood Park Mall

  Greenwood (Indianapolis), IN     75,733     2,423     23,445     5,253     116,642     7,676     140,087     147,763     69,569   1979

Haywood Mall

  Greenville, SC         11,585     133,893     6     28,434     11,591     162,327     173,918     89,144   1998 (4)

Independence Center

  Independence (Kansas City), MO     200,000     5,042     45,798         35,209     5,042     81,007     86,049     43,934   1994 (4)

Ingram Park Mall

  San Antonio, TX     137,783     733     17,163     37     23,977     770     41,140     41,910     27,454   1979

King of Prussia Mall

  King of Prussia (Philadelphia), PA     97,661     175,063     1,128,200         102,386     175,063     1,230,586     1,405,649     149,322   2003 (5)

La Plaza Mall

  McAllen, TX         1,375     9,828     6,569     51,454     7,944     61,282     69,226     31,414   1976

Lakeline Mall

  Cedar Park (Austin), TX         10,088     81,568     14     18,189     10,102     99,757     109,859     51,916   1995

Lenox Square

  Atlanta, GA         38,058     492,411         112,373     38,058     604,784     642,842     259,596   1998 (4)

Livingston Mall

  Livingston (New York), NJ         22,214     105,250         45,782     22,214     151,032     173,246     64,746   1998 (4)

Mall at Chestnut Hill, The

  Chestnut Hill (Boston), MA     120,000     449     25,102     43,257     98,336     43,706     123,438     167,144     12,617   2002 (5)

Mall of Georgia

  Buford (Atlanta), GA         47,492     326,633         12,634     47,492     339,267     386,759     141,018   1999 (5)

McCain Mall

  N. Little Rock, AR             9,515     10,530     27,441     10,530     36,956     47,486     10,081   1973

Menlo Park Mall

  Edison (New York), NJ         65,684     223,252         47,372     65,684     270,624     336,308     137,796   1997 (4)

Midland Park Mall

  Midland, TX     81,860     687     9,213         24,747     687     33,960     34,647     20,380   1980

Miller Hill Mall

  Duluth, MN         2,965     18,092     1,811     40,307     4,776     58,399     63,175     36,560   1973

Montgomery Mall

  North Wales (Philadelphia), PA     100,000     27,105     86,915         56,661     27,105     143,576     170,681     48,698   2004 (5)

North East Mall

  Hurst (Dallas), TX         128     12,966     19,010     151,139     19,138     164,105     183,243     93,959   1971

Northgate Mall

  Seattle, WA         24,369     115,992         100,121     24,369     216,113     240,482     97,943   1987

103


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
   
   
   
  Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (3)
  Gross Amounts
At Which Carried
At Close of Period
   
   
 
   
   
  Initial Cost (3)    
   
 
   
   
   
  Date of
Construction
or
Acquisition
Name
  Location   Encumbrances (6)   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)

Ocean County Mall

  Toms River (New York), NJ         20,404     124,945         30,639     20,404     155,584     175,988     71,395   1998 (4)

Orland Square

  Orland Park (Chicago), IL         35,514     129,906         50,512     35,514     180,418     215,932     83,769   1997 (4)

Oxford Valley Mall

  Langhorne (Philadelphia), PA     66,514     24,544     100,287         18,607     24,544     118,894     143,438     69,426   2003 (4)

Penn Square Mall

  Oklahoma City, OK     93,998     2,043     155,958         48,096     2,043     204,054     206,097     96,100   2002 (4)

Pheasant Lane Mall

  Nashua, NH         3,902     155,068     550     46,155     4,452     201,223     205,675     80,931   2004 (5)

Phipps Plaza

  Atlanta, GA         16,185     210,610         41,356     16,185     251,966     268,151     114,662   1998 (4)

Plaza Carolina

  Carolina (San Juan), PR     225,000     15,493     279,560         62,061     15,493     341,621     357,114     111,495   2004 (4)

Prien Lake Mall

  Lake Charles, LA         1,842     2,813     3,053     49,383     4,895     52,196     57,091     23,065   1972

Rockaway Townsquare

  Rockaway (New York), NJ         41,918     212,257         43,188     41,918     255,445     297,363     112,753   1998 (4)

Roosevelt Field

  Garden City (New York), NY         163,160     702,008     93     251,214     163,253     953,222     1,116,475     346,583   1998 (4)

Ross Park Mall

  Pittsburgh, PA         23,541     90,203         89,769     23,541     179,972     203,513     95,786   1986

Santa Rosa Plaza

  Santa Rosa, CA         10,400     87,864         25,222     10,400     113,086     123,486     49,437   1998 (4)

Shops at Nanuet, The

  Nanuet, NY         28,125     143,120         8,019     28,125     151,139     179,264     7,630   2013

Shops at Riverside, The

  Hackensack (New York), NJ     130,000     13,521     238,746         5,137     13,521     243,883     257,404     25,217   2007 (4) (5)

South Hills Village

  Pittsburgh, PA         23,445     125,840     1,472     56,299     24,917     182,139     207,056     75,009   1997 (4)

South Shore Plaza

  Braintree (Boston), MA         101,200     301,495         158,767     101,200     460,262     561,462     179,736   1998 (4)

Southdale Center

  Edina (Minneapolis), MN     155,000     40,172     184,967         38,599     40,172     223,566     263,738     22,300   2007 (4) (5)

SouthPark

  Charlotte, NC     187,439     42,092     188,055     100     181,111     42,192     369,166     411,358     155,981   2002 (4)

Southridge Mall

  Greendale (Milwaukee), WI     125,000     12,359     130,111     2,389     18,410     14,748     148,521     163,269     19,389   2007 (4) (5)

St. Charles Towne Center

  Waldorf (Washington, D.C.), MD         7,710     52,934     1,180     31,061     8,890     83,995     92,885     49,586   1990

Stanford Shopping Center

  Palo Alto (San Jose), CA             339,537         66,277         405,814     405,814     121,500   2003 (4)

Summit Mall

  Akron , OH     65,000     15,374     51,137         47,534     15,374     98,671     114,045     47,796   1965

Tacoma Mall

  Tacoma (Seattle), WA         37,803     125,826         87,784     37,803     213,610     251,413     99,336   1987

Tippecanoe Mall

  Lafayette, IN         2,897     8,439     5,517     48,508     8,414     56,947     65,361     39,480   1973

Town Center at Boca Raton

  Boca Raton (Miami), FL         64,200     307,317         168,055     64,200     475,372     539,572     213,868   1998 (4)

Town Center at Cobb

  Kennesaw (Atlanta), GA     198,095     32,355     158,225         18,514     32,355     176,739     209,094     86,734   1998 (5)

Towne East Square

  Wichita, KS         8,525     18,479     4,108     44,870     12,633     63,349     75,982     41,034   1975

Treasure Coast Square

  Jensen Beach, FL         11,124     72,990     3,067     38,226     14,191     111,216     125,407     58,459   1987

Tyrone Square

  St. Petersburg (Tampa), FL         15,638     120,962     1,459     35,695     17,097     156,657     173,754     79,999   1972

University Park Mall

  Mishawaka, IN         16,768     112,158     7,000     58,511     23,768     170,669     194,437     135,520   1996 (4)

Walt Whitman Shops

  Huntington Station (New York), NY     115,492     51,700     111,258     3,789     124,069     55,489     235,327     290,816     87,286   1998 (4)

White Oaks Mall

  Springfield, IL     50,000     3,024     35,692     2,102     62,388     5,126     98,080     103,206     41,085   1977

Wolfchase Galleria

  Memphis, TN     225,000     15,881     128,276         12,677     15,881     140,953     156,834     72,914   2002 (4)

Woodland Hills Mall

  Tulsa, OK     91,688     34,211     187,123         26,957     34,211     214,080     248,291     99,583   2004 (5)

104


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
   
   
   
  Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (3)
  Gross Amounts
At Which Carried
At Close of Period
   
   
 
   
   
  Initial Cost (3)    
   
 
   
   
   
  Date of
Construction
or
Acquisition
Name
  Location   Encumbrances (6)   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)

Premium Outlets

                                                             

Albertville Premium Outlets

  Albertville (Minneapolis), MN         3,900     97,059         6,217     3,900     103,276     107,176     38,433   2004 (4)

Allen Premium Outlets

  Allen (Dallas), TX         13,855     43,687     97     14,418     13,952     58,105     72,057     24,704   2004 (4)

Aurora Farms Premium Outlets

  Aurora (Cleveland), OH         2,370     24,326         4,466     2,370     28,792     31,162     18,722   2004 (4)

Birch Run Premium Outlets

  Birch Run (Detroit), MI     102,362     11,477     77,856         3,926     11,477     81,782     93,259     17,898   2010 (4)

Calhoun Premium Outlets

  Calhoun, GA     19,683     1,745     12,529         887     1,745     13,416     15,161     5,788   2010 (4)

Camarillo Premium Outlets

  Camarillo (Los Angeles), CA         16,670     224,721     395     64,570     17,065     289,291     306,356     95,495   2004 (4)

Carlsbad Premium Outlets

  Carlsbad (San Diego), CA         12,890     184,990     96     4,469     12,986     189,459     202,445     59,242   2004 (4)

Carolina Premium Outlets

  Smithfield (Raleigh), NC     48,448     3,175     59,863     5,311     5,438     8,486     65,301     73,787     28,294   2004 (4)

Chicago Premium Outlets

  Aurora (Chicago), IL         659     118,005     13,050     31,524     13,709     149,529     163,238     50,063   2004 (4)

Cincinnati Premium Outlets

  Monroe (Cincinnati), OH         14,117     71,520         4,589     14,117     76,109     90,226     21,254   2008

Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets

  Clinton, CT         2,060     107,556     1,532     3,065     3,592     110,621     114,213     41,027   2004 (4)

Columbia Gorge Premium Outlets

  Troutdale (Portland), OR         7,900     16,492         2,735     7,900     19,227     27,127     10,171   2004 (4)

Desert Hills Premium Outlets

  Cabazon (Palm Springs), CA         3,440     338,679         94,260     3,440     432,939     436,379     108,736   2004 (4)

Edinburgh Premium Outlets

  Edinburgh (Indianapolis), IN         2,857     47,309         13,791     2,857     61,100     63,957     25,458   2004 (4)

Ellenton Premium Outlets

  Ellenton (Tampa), FL     100,466     15,807     182,412         4,102     15,807     186,514     202,321     46,572   2010 (4)

Folsom Premium Outlets

  Folsom (Sacramento), CA         9,060     50,281         4,235     9,060     54,516     63,576     24,502   2004 (4)

Gaffney Premium Outlets

  Gaffney (Greenville/Charlotte), SC     35,721     4,056     32,371         2,203     4,056     34,574     38,630     9,268   2010 (4)

Gilroy Premium Outlets

  Gilroy (San Jose), CA         9,630     194,122         10,060     9,630     204,182     213,812     73,554   2004 (4)

Grand Prairie Premium Outlets

  Grand Prairie (Dallas), TX     120,000     9,497     197,242             9,497     197,242     206,739     15,463   2012

Grove City Premium Outlets

  Grove City (Pittsburgh), PA     108,453     6,421     121,880         3,101     6,421     124,981     131,402     32,630   2010 (4)

Gulfport Premium Outlets

  Gulfport, MS     24,198         27,949         2,198         30,147     30,147     8,209   2010 (4)

Hagerstown Premium Outlets

  Hagerstown (Baltimore/Washington DC), MD     86,045     3,576     85,883         900     3,576     86,783     90,359     19,215   2010 (4)

Houston Premium Outlets

  Cypress (Houston), TX         8,695     69,350         46,294     8,695     115,644     124,339     31,069   2007

Jackson Premium Outlets

  Jackson (New York), NJ         6,413     104,013     3     5,458     6,416     109,471     115,887     34,827   2004 (4)

Jersey Shore Premium Outlets

  Tinton Falls (New York), NJ     67,306     15,390     50,979         75,614     15,390     126,593     141,983     36,202   2007

Johnson Creek Premium Outlets

  Johnson Creek, WI         2,800     39,546         6,778     2,800     46,324     49,124     16,685   2004 (4)

Kittery Premium Outlets

  Kittery , ME         11,832     94,994         7,515     11,832     102,509     114,341     30,769   2004 (4)

Las Americas Premium Outlets

  San Diego, CA     176,605     45,168     251,878         6,561     45,168     258,439     303,607     55,965   2007 (4)

Las Vegas North Premium Outlets

  Las Vegas, NV         25,435     134,973     16,536     132,127     41,971     267,100     309,071     72,952   2004 (4)

Las Vegas South Premium Outlets

  Las Vegas, NV         13,085     160,777         23,993     13,085     184,770     197,855     52,538   2004 (4)

Lebanon Premium Outlets

  Lebanon (Nashville), TN     14,877     1,758     10,189         896     1,758     11,085     12,843     3,509   2010 (4)

Lee Premium Outlets

  Lee, MA     49,134     9,167     52,212         1,209     9,167     53,421     62,588     14,077   2010 (4)

Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets

  Leesburg (Washington D.C.), VA         7,190     162,023         4,689     7,190     166,712     173,902     63,162   2004 (4)

105


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
   
   
   
  Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
 
   
   
  Initial Cost (3)    
   
 
   
   
   
  Date of
Construction
or
Acquisition
Name
  Location   Encumbrances (6)   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)

Liberty Village Premium Outlets

  Flemington (New York), NJ         5,670     28,904         1,606     5,670     30,510     36,180     15,494   2004 (4)

Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets

  Michigan City (Chicago, IL), IN         6,630     94,138         8,542     6,630     102,680     109,310     42,698   2004 (4)

Merrimack Premium Outlets

  Merrimack, NH     130,000     17,028     118,428         813     17,028     119,241     136,269     14,076   2012

Napa Premium Outlets

  Napa, CA         11,400     45,023         4,498     11,400     49,521     60,921     18,889   2004 (4)

North Bend Premium Outlets

  North Bend (Seattle), WA         2,143     36,197         3,499     2,143     39,696     41,839     12,705   2004 (4)

North Georgia Premium Outlets

  Dawsonville (Atlanta), GA         4,300     132,325         2,883     4,300     135,208     139,508     48,183   2004 (4)

Orlando International Premium Outlets

  Orlando, FL         31,998     472,815         3,108     31,998     475,923     507,921     81,925   2010 (4)

Orlando Vineland Premium Outlets

  Orlando, FL         14,040     304,410     38,656     78,186     52,696     382,596     435,292     109,502   2004 (4)

Osage Beach Premium Outlets

  Osage Beach, MO         9,460     85,804         6,661     9,460     92,465     101,925     35,800   2004 (4)

Petaluma Village Premium Outlets

  Petaluma (San Francisco), CA         13,322     13,710         1,774     13,322     15,484     28,806     9,106   2004 (4)

Philadelphia Premium Outlets

  Limerick (Philadelphia), PA         16,676     105,249         16,604     16,676     121,853     138,529     42,832   2006

Phoenix Premium Outlets

  Chandler (Phoenix), AZ             63,751         51         63,802     63,802     6,337   2013

Pismo Beach Premium Outlets

  Pismo Beach, CA     33,850     4,317     19,044         1,667     4,317     20,711     25,028     6,394   2010 (4)

Pleasant Prairie Premium Outlets

  Pleasant Prairie (Chicago, IL/Milwaukee), WI     92,998     16,823     126,686         3,346     16,823     130,032     146,855     25,459   2010 (4)

Puerto Rico Premium Outlets

  Barceloneta, PR     125,000     20,586     114,021         3,003     20,586     117,024     137,610     23,285   2010 (4)

Queenstown Premium Outlets

  Queenstown (Baltimore), MD     66,150     8,129     61,950         2,979     8,129     64,929     73,058     13,832   2010 (4)

Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets

  Mercedes (McAllen), TX         12,229     41,547         32,929     12,229     74,476     86,705     29,930   2005

Round Rock Premium Outlets

  Round Rock (Austin), TX         14,706     82,252         1,686     14,706     83,938     98,644     35,433   2005

San Francisco Premium Outlets

  Livermore (San Francisco), CA         21,925     308,694     40,046     16,991     61,971     325,685     387,656     22,827   2012

San Marcos Premium Outlets

  San Marcos (Austin/San Antonio), TX     137,569     13,180     287,179         6,897     13,180     294,076     307,256     50,624   2010 (4)

Seattle Premium Outlets

  Tulalip (Seattle), WA             103,722         53,354         157,076     157,076     47,499   2004 (4)

St. Augustine Premium Outlets

  St. Augustine (Jacksonville), FL         6,090     57,670     2     9,480     6,092     67,150     73,242     27,592   2004 (4)

The Crossings Premium Outlets

  Tannersville , PA     115,000     7,720     172,931         12,969     7,720     185,900     193,620     59,249   2004 (4)

Vacaville Premium Outlets

  Vacaville , CA         9,420     84,850         12,825     9,420     97,675     107,095     40,848   2004 (4)

Waikele Premium Outlets

  Waipahu (Honolulu), HI         22,630     77,316         10,033     22,630     87,349     109,979     30,727   2004 (4)

Waterloo Premium Outlets

  Waterloo , NY         3,230     75,277         8,382     3,230     83,659     86,889     34,507   2004 (4)

Williamsburg Premium Outlets

  Williamsburg, VA     99,406     10,323     223,789         2,969     10,323     226,758     237,081     39,553   2010 (4)

Woodburn Premium Outlets

  Woodburn (Portland), OR         9,414     150,414         281     9,414     150,695     160,109     10,953   2013 (4)

Woodbury Common Premium Outlets

  Central Valley (New York), NY         11,110     862,559     1,658     116,994     12,768     979,553     992,321     276,603   2004 (4)

Wrentham Village Premium Outlets

  Wrentham (Boston), MA         4,900     282,031         8,858     4,900     290,889     295,789     98,278   2004 (4)

The Mills

 

 

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

 

Arizona Mills

  Tempe (Phoenix), AZ     164,566     41,936     297,289         3,290     41,936     300,579     342,515     9,976   2007 (4)(5)

Great Mall

  Milpitas (San Jose), CA         70,496     463,101         11,751     70,496     474,852     545,348     47,214   2007 (4)(5)

Gurnee Mills

  Gurnee (Chicago), IL     321,000     41,133     297,911         7,914     41,133     305,825     346,958     31,813   2007 (4)(5)

Opry Mills

  Nashville, TN     371,427     51,000     327,503         9,765     51,000     337,268     388,268     34,648   2007 (4)(5)

Potomac Mills

  Woodbridge (Washington, D.C.), VA     410,000     61,755     425,370         27,701     61,755     453,071     514,826     46,933   2007 (4)(5)

Sawgrass Mills

  Sunrise (Miami), FL         194,002     1,641,153         38,809     194,002     1,679,962     1,873,964     161,050   2007 (4)(5)

106


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)

 
   
   
   
   
  Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition (3)
  Gross Amounts At Which
Carried At Close of Period
   
   
 
   
   
  Initial Cost (3)    
   
 
   
   
   
  Date of
Construction
or
Acquisition
Name
  Location   Encumbrances (6)   Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Land   Buildings and
Improvements
  Total (1)   Accumulated
Depreciation (2)

Community Centers

                                                             

ABQ Uptown

  Albuquerque, NM         6,374     75,333     4,054     4,360     10,428     79,693     90,121     10,949   2011 (4)

Other Properties

 

 

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

 

Florida Keys Outlet Center

  Florida City, FL     10,253     1,560     1,748         2,462     1,560     4,210     5,770     1,351   2010 (4)

Huntley Outlet Center

  Huntley, IL     28,679     3,477     2,027         345     3,477     2,372     5,849     922   2010 (4)

Lincoln Plaza

  King of Prussia (Philadelphia), PA             21,299         2,858         24,157     24,157     13,311   2003 (4)

Naples Outlet Center

  Naples, FL     15,415     1,514     519         79     1,514     598     2,112     424   2010 (4)

Outlet Marketplace

  Orlando , FL         3,367     1,557         380     3,367     1,937     5,304     961   2010 (4)

Development Projects

 

 

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

 

Tampa Premium Outlets

  Tampa, FL         14,298     14,996             14,298     14,996     29,294        

Tucson Premium Outlets

  Marana (Tucson), AZ         12,507     12,561             12,507     12,561     25,068        

Other pre-development costs

            72,983     9,630             72,983     9,630     82,613     78    

Other

            2,615     10,045             2,615     10,045     12,660     4,568    

      $ 6,195,628   $ 2,861,905   $ 22,230,768   $ 323,719   $ 5,597,741   $ 3,185,624   $ 27,828,509   $ 31,014,133   $ 8,740,928    

107


Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Schedule III as of December 31, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)

            All periods presented exclude properties which were spun-off to Washington Prime Group Inc. as further discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

(1)
Reconciliation of Real Estate Properties:

            The changes in real estate assets for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 are as follows:

 
  2014   2013   2012  

Balance, beginning of year

  $ 30,048,230   $ 29,263,463   $ 24,736,546  

Acquisitions and consolidations (5)

    393,351     288,835     4,408,870  

Improvements

    791,453     874,240     746,161  

Disposals and deconsolidations

    (218,901 )   (378,308 )   (628,114 )

Balance, close of year

  $ 31,014,133   $ 30,048,230   $ 29,263,463  

            The unaudited aggregate cost of real estate assets for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2014 was $23,893,426.

(2)
Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation:

            The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 are as follows:

 
  2014   2013   2012  

Balance, beginning of year

  $ 7,896,614   $ 7,055,622   $ 6,483,917  

Depreciation expense

    997,482     948,811     908,029  

Disposals and deconsolidations

    (153,168 )   (107,819 )   (336,324 )

Balance, close of year

  $ 8,740,928   $ 7,896,614   $ 7,055,622  

            Depreciation of our investment in buildings and improvements reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income is calculated over the estimated original lives of the assets as noted below.

(3)
Initial cost generally represents net book value at December 20, 1993, except for acquired properties and new developments after December 20, 1993. Initial cost also includes any new developments that are opened during the current year. Costs of disposals and impairments of property are first reflected as a reduction to cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition.

(4)
Not developed/constructed by us or our predecessors. The date of construction represents the initial acquisition date for assets in which we have acquired multiple interests.

(5)
Initial cost for these properties is the cost at the date of consolidation for properties previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

(6)
Encumbrances represent face amount of mortgage debt and exclude any premiums or discounts.

108


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibits

   
  2.1   Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among Simon Property Group, Inc., Simon Property Group, L.P., Washington Prime Group Inc. and Washington Prime Group, L.P., dated as of May 27, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 29, 2014).

 

3.1

 

Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003, SEC File No. 333-11491).

 

3.2

 

Eighth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9, 2008, SEC File No. 001-14469).

 

3.3

 

Certificate of Designation of Series B Junior Participating Redeemable Preferred Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2014).

 

3.4

 

Agreement between Simon Property Group, Inc. and Simon Property Group, L.P. dated March 7, 2007, but effective as of August 27, 1999, regarding a prior agreement filed under an exhibit 99.1 to Form S-3/A of Simon Property Group, L.P. on November 20, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2007, SEC File No. 333-11491).

 

3.5

 

Agreement between Simon Property Group, Inc. and Simon Property Group, L.P. dated April 29, 2009, but effective as of October 14, 2004, regarding redemption of the Registrant's Series I Preferred Units (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2009, SEC File No. 333-11491).

 

4.1

 (a)

Indenture, dated as of November 26, 1996, by and among Simon Property Group, L.P. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed October 21, 1996 (Reg. No. 333-11491)).

 

10.1

*

Simon Property Group, L.P. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 10, 2014).

 

10.2

*

Certificate of Designation of Series 2010 LTIP Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 19, 2010).

 

10.3

*

Form of Simon Property Group Series 2010 LTIP Unit (Three Year Program) Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 19, 2010).

 

10.4

*

Form of Simon Property Group Series 2010 LTIP Unit (Two Year Program) Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 19, 2010).

 

10.5

*

Form of Simon Property Group Series 2010 LTIP Unit (One Year Program) Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 19, 2010).

 

10.6

*

Certificate of Designation of Series CEO LTIP Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 7, 2011).

 

10.7

*

Simon Property Group Series CEO LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 7, 2011).

109


Table of Contents

Exhibits

   
  10.8 * First Amendment to Simon Property Group Series CEO LTIP Unit Award Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 28, 2012).

 

10.9

*

Second Amendment to Simon Property Group Series CEO LTIP Unit Award Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 4, 2013).

 

10.10

*

Simon Property Group Amended and Restated Series CEO LTIP Unit Award Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2014).

 

10.11

*

Certificate of Designation of Series 2011 LTIP Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 7, 2011).

 

10.12

*

Form of Simon Property Group Series 2011 LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 7, 2011).

 

10.13

*

Certificate of Designation of Series 2012 LTIP Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 11, 2012)

 

10.14

*

Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series 2012 LTIP Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2014).

 

10.15

*

Form of Simon Property Group Series 2012 LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2012).

 

10.16

*

Simon Property Group Amended and Restated Series 2012 LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 2014).

 

10.17

*

Option Agreement to acquire the Excluded Retail Property (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993 filed by a predecessor of Simon Property Group, L.P.).

 

10.18

 

Voting Agreement dated as of June 20, 2004 among Simon Property Group, Inc., Simon Property Group, L.P., and certain holders of shares of common stock of Chelsea Property Group, Inc. and/or common units of CPG Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 22, 2004, SEC File No. 001-14469).

 

10.19

 

Amended and Restated $4,000,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of April 7, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 8, 2014).

 

10.20

 

$2,000,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 4, 2012).

 

10.21

*

Certificate of Designation of Series 2013 LTIP Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2013).

 

10.22

*

Form of Simon Property Group Series 2013 LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 4, 2013).

 

10.23

*

Simon Property Group CEO LTIP Unit Adjustment Waiver, dated April 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Simon Property Group Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 2014).

110


Table of Contents

Exhibits

   
  10.24 * Form of Simon Property Group Series 2014 LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2014).

 

10.25

*

Certificate of Designation of Series 2014 LTIP Units of Simon Property Group, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2014).

 

10.26

*

Form of Simon Property Group Executive Officer LTIP Waiver, dated April 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Simon Property Group, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 2014).

 

10.27

 

Form of Global Dealer Agreement, dated October 6, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 7, 2014).

 

12.1

 

Statement regarding computation of ratios.

 

21.1

 

List of Subsidiaries of the Company.

 

23.1

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

31.1

 

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.2

 

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32

 

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

(a)
Does not include supplemental indentures that authorize the issuance of debt securities series, none of which exceeds 10% of the total assets of Simon Property Group, L.P. on a consolidated basis. Simon Property Group, L.P. agrees to file copies of any such supplemental indentures upon the request of the Commission.

*
Represents a management contract, or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Regulation S-K.

111




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 12.1

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Unaudited, (in thousands)

 
  For the year ended December 31,  
 
  2014   2013   2012   2011   2010  

Earnings:

                               

Pre-tax income from continuing operations

    1,650,250     1,406,331   $ 1,578,957   $ 1,097,478   $ 603,978  

Add:

                               

Distributions from unconsolidated entities

    201,614     177,354     148,927     112,611     108,346  

Amortization of capitalized interest

    3,925     3,900     999     2,830     1,990  

Fixed Charges

    1,150,251     1,110,893     1,102,184     946,500     1,330,457  

Less:

                               

Income from unconsolidated entities

    (226,774 )   (206,380 )   (121,634 )   (255,201 )   (88,581 )

Minority interest in pre-tax (income) loss of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges

    (347 )   (1,063 )   (1,286 )   (1,249 )   (1,066 )

Interest capitalization

    (16,500 )   (15,585 )   (20,703 )   (5,700 )   (3,707 )

Earnings

  $ 2,762,419   $ 2,475,450   $ 2,687,444   $ 1,897,269   $ 1,951,417  

Fixed Charges:

                               

Portion of rents representative of the interest factor

    13,577     13,227     13,300     12,600     12,573  

Interest on indebtedness (including amortization of debt expense)

    992,601     1,082,081     1,068,181     928,200     963,489  

Interest capitalized

    16,500     15,585     20,703     5,700     3,707  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    127,573                 350,688  

Fixed Charges

  $ 1,150,251   $ 1,110,893   $ 1,102,184   $ 946,500   $ 1,330,457  

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

    2.40x     2.23x     2.44x     2.00x     1.47x  

            For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, the term "earnings" is the amount resulting from adding (a) pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustment for noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries or income or loss from equity investees, (b) fixed charges, (c) amortization of capitalized interest and (d) distributed income of equity investees, reduced by (a) interest capitalized and (b) the noncontrolling interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges. "Fixed charges" consist of (a) interest expensed and capitalized, (b) amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness and (c) an estimate of the interest within rental expense.

            There are generally no restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from our joint ventures where no preference in favor of the other owners of the joint venture exists.

            Ratios have been revised for all years presented to reflect the spin-off of Washington Prime Group Inc.




QuickLinks

Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Unaudited, (in thousands)

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of Simon Property Group, L.P.

Subsidiary
  Jurisdiction
The Retail Property Trust   Massachusetts
Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.    Illinois
Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.    Texas
M.S. Management Associates, Inc.    Delaware
Bridgewood Insurance Company, Ltd.    Bermuda
Simon Global Limited   United Kingdom
Simon Property Group Administrative Services Partnership, L.P.    Delaware
Kravco Simon Investments, L.P.    Pennsylvania
Simon Management Associates II, LLC   Delaware
Simon Management Associates, LLC   Delaware
CPG Partners, L.P.    Delaware
Prime Retail, L.P.    Delaware
SPG Mayflower, LLC   Delaware
Simon KP I S.a.r.l.    Luxembourg
Simon KP II S.a.r.l.    Luxembourg
Simon-Mills I, LLC   Delaware

Omits names of subsidiaries that as of December 31, 2014 were not, in the aggregate, a "significant subsidiary."




QuickLinks

List of Subsidiaries of Simon Property Group, L.P.

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

            We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-157794-01) of Simon Property Group, L.P. and in the related prospectus of our reports dated March 2, 2015 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Simon Property Group, L.P. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2014.

    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
MARCH 2, 2015

 

 



QuickLinks

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David Simon, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

    a.
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b.
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

    c.
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    d.
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a.
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b.
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 2, 2015

    /s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner



QuickLinks

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 31.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Andrew Juster, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

    a.
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b.
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

    c.
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    d.
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a.
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b.
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 2, 2015

    /s/ ANDREW JUSTER

Andrew Juster
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner



QuickLinks

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document


Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of Simon Property Group, L.P., on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ DAVID SIMON

David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
   

March 2, 2015

 

 

/s/ ANDREW JUSTER

Andrew Juster
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner

 

 

March 2, 2015

 

 



QuickLinks

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002